February 11, 2009 2:18 PM

Did The SEC Lose Sight Of Its Mission?

By
Sharyl Attkisson
(CBS)  As the nation's financial markets threatened to melt down, one agency taking the heat was the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The SEC was created in 1934, during the Great Depression, to protect investors. But in the current crisis, reports CBS News investigative correspondent Sharyl Attkisson, some say the SEC has lost sight of its mission.

A central figure in the economic firestorm is SEC chairman Christopher Cox, seen Friday morning in an appearance with President Bush.

It was less than two hours after Sen. John McCain repeated a call for Cox to resign.

"There needs to be accountability in Washington," McCain said.

President Bush appointed Cox in 2005 to head up the SEC, where 3,400 employees oversee disclosures of 13,000 public companies.

Before Cox, his predecessor at the SEC, William Donaldson, had drawn ire from some fellow Republicans by passing a host of new market regulations.

And during Donaldson's tenure, penalties against violators were on the rise, peaking at $1.5 billion in 2005.

But since Cox took over, penalties have plummeted by two-thirds, to $507 million last year.

Former SEC attorney Howard Schiffman says lax enforcement isn't the problem - it's that the SEC doesn't act quickly enough.

"Here it's not as important to find out who was responsible for the fire, but maybe should have stopped there ever being a fire," Shiffman.

Just two SEC chairmen have ever given up their office abruptly because of political turmoil.

In 1973, Bradford Cook stepped down during a Nixon campaign finance scandal. And in 2002, Harvey Pitt resigned after the Enron accounting fiasco.

Today, Pitt says the bulk of the problems that led to today's crisis are outside the SEC's purview, and that criticism heaped on Cox and the SEC is unfair.

"Christopher Cox has done, in my view, an outstanding job," Pitt said.

In a statement, Cox gives no sign of wavering, saying the SEC has "responded valiantly" and taken many "decisive actions" in the current market crisis.

Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
  • Sharyl Attkisson

    Sharyl Attkisson is a CBS News investigative correspondent based in Washington. All of her stories, videos and blogs are available here.

Add a Comment See all 146 Comments
by grandesign September 22, 2008 10:08 PM EDT
He was a very wise man, I learned to command by example, leadership was something I enjoyed fostered by the trust my men held in me. A simple doctrine completely absent in Washington, and ever present in the resulting absence of trust, confidence and harmony, so necessary to lead a government.
Posted by cav_03 at 10:02 PM : Sep 20, 2008

I see the down side of this example, so what can be done to turn this around? Where is leadership most valued--and seldom corrupted by the possibility of a cash windfall?
Reply to this comment
by jab232 September 22, 2008 7:16 PM EDT
Solve the problem. There will be time to do the blame game later. I support Senator Chris Dodd''s bailout proposal.
Reply to this comment
by jab232 September 22, 2008 7:16 PM EDT
Solve the problem. There will be time to do the blame game later. I support Senator Chris Dodd''s bailout proposal.
Reply to this comment
by theyank2 September 22, 2008 6:48 PM EDT
Who of the 3 major networks anchors is going to be gutsy enough to make a BIG DEAL of Section 8 of Bush''s
proposed bailout so the American people know the WHOLE truth. Maybe they don''t understand the ramifications of it!!
Reply to this comment
by missingamerica September 22, 2008 10:51 AM EDT
Oh, for pete''s sake....what is the point of blaming the various government agencies, when their charters were perverted and corrupted INTENTIONALLY by this Administration through their choices of leadership appointments?

What, has everybody forgotten that this Administration POINT-BLANK said that they expected that the various agencies'' interactions with the Public stay "on message"?

Is anybody REALLY stupid enough to think that staying "on message" was limited to press releases?

D@amn...tell me one more time that the media''s talking heads were not making so much money that they preferred to pretend that all was rosy in America!!

Who knows? Maybe if I hear it enough, I will put a HONKING big pair of blinders on, too!!!
Reply to this comment
by wogerwabbit September 21, 2008 1:48 AM EDT
Posted by cav_03 at 10:02 PM : Sep 20, 2008

Dude, as an ex-combat engineer squad leader I can totally relate (was 1st Cav (Air Mobile) once in another life, too). "Bring ''em home alive" was my prayer every morning and every night (although, they weren''t answered)... but 95% of the people I met, I felt honored to know as a fellow humaan being... the other 5% (could they be the top 5%?) were the cowards who''d say or do anything to save their own skins... their name be neocon.
Reply to this comment
by femaledem September 21, 2008 1:14 AM EDT
DID THE SEC LOSE SIGHT..NO HE LOST HIS MIND ALONG WITH BUSH!!!!!JUST SELL US TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER AND BE DONE WITH IT!!!HOW DARE ANYONE OF YOU SAY YOUR DOING THIS FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BULL****!!! YOU DON''T KNOW OR CARE ABOUT ME..I LOST MY HOME 4 MONTHS AGO..WHERE WERE YOU THEN!!YOUR ALL FULL OF IT..JUST LIKE MCPALIN!!!!!!YOU EXPECT US ALL TO JUST SIT BACK..YOU ALL HAVE RUINED THIS COUNTRY AND ARE BORROWING FROM FOREIGN COUNTRIES TO BAIL US OUT IMAGINE FOREIGN COUNTRIES HAVE TO BAIL OUT THE USA..PEOPLE WAKE UP..LET THEM KNOW THIS IS AWFUL..THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL BE PAYING FOR ALL OF THIS FOR THE NEXT 100 YEARS!!!!IT''S REAL AND IT''S SCARY!!!
Reply to this comment
by harp1963 September 21, 2008 1:03 AM EDT
Dear America,

Bribery and the love of money are all our "leadership" seem to know.

Reply to this comment
by txgrouch2006 September 20, 2008 10:33 PM EDT
In 1999 near the end of Bill Clinton''''s presidency, ... the President signed legislative backed laws that eliminated President Franklin Roosevelt''''s "common sense regulations" designed to block the financial catastrophe we see today.
Posted by White-Marsh at 03:48 PM : Sep 20, 2008

THANK YOU for telling THE TRUTH. This all started ON CLINTON''S WATCH, and it happened OVER HIS SIGNATURE.

He could have vetoed it, but he signed it instead.

STOP BLAMING BUSH ALONE. BOTH SIDES ARE TO BLAME.
Reply to this comment
by txgrouch2006 September 20, 2008 10:31 PM EDT
I just saw a program on TV and one of the guest said that the reason these bailouts were made and passed so quick by the politicians is because they have so much money invested in these firms. He said he would not give the name but one had over $20,000,000 (thats million) invested.
Posted by dmw1167 at 05:21 PM : Sep 20, 2008

What, you had to SEE IT ON TV to figure this out?????

Isn''t it OBVIOUS that the leading members of Congress ARE some of the FAT CATS getting bailed out?

Why else would there be such immediate and OVERWHELMING agreement from BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE in Congress?

Reply to this comment
See all 146 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook