Sept. 18, 2008
Study: Recent Obama Ads More Negative
Washington Post: Democrat Aired More Negative Advertising Than McCain In The Last Week
-
Play CBS Video Video Eye On Attack Ads As the campaign season enters its final stretch, negative attack ads and smear campaigns are dominating headlines. But not everything that makes it to air is true, as Wyatt Andrews reports.
-
Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., greets Republican presidential candidate, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., during the Service Nation Summit at Columbia University in New York, Thursday, Sept. 11, 2008. (AP)
-
Blog Campaign Ads From uplifting messages to nasty attacks, see the political TV spots meant to sway voters.
Despite perceptions that Sen. John McCain has spent more time on the attack, Sen. Barack Obama aired more negative advertising last week than did the Arizona Republican, says a study released yesterday.
Seventy-seven percent of the Illinois Democrat's commercials were negative during the week after the Republican National Convention, compared with 56 percent of the spots run by McCain.
See Recent Ads From Both Candidates
Ken Goldstein, who directed the study by the Wisconsin Advertising Project, based at the University of Wisconsin, says the pattern was a reversal from earlier months, in which McCain's advertising was consistently more negative than Obama's.
"It suggests that the Sarah Palin pick and the newfound aggressiveness by McCain got into Obama's head a little bit," Goldstein said. "He was under great pressure to show some spine, be aggressive, fire back."
The study found Obama limiting his television buys to 17 states and McCain airing spots in 15. For all the talk of an expanded electoral map, both campaigns are concentrating resources in traditional battlegrounds, with slightly more than half the total spent on advertising going to Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin, Indiana, Minnesota and Pennsylvania.
"Shockingly, this race is going to come down to swing voters in the same swing states that decided the last two elections," Goldstein said.
The study says the campaigns poured $15 million into the ad wars last week -- they were virtually even in total spending -- but the figures revealed an important distinction. Obama, who has rejected public financing in favor of private fundraising, paid for 97 percent of his spots. McCain, who is limited to an $84 million federal subsidy, financed 43 percent of his commercials, with the rest airing in conjunction with the Republican National Committee. These "hybrid" spots allow McCain to retain control while the party foots much of the bill.
Obama spent more on ads in Florida, $1.3 million, but that was nearly matched by McCain's $1 million. The most McCain spent was in traditionally Democratic Pennsylvania -- $1.6 million to Obama's $948.000.
Obama was on the air in Virginia, North Carolina, Indiana, North Dakota and Montana, all states won by President Bush in the last two elections.
Interest-group advertising was marginal at $187,000, although that is expected to ramp up in the coming weeks. Three pro-Obama groups aired commercials -- the Service Employees International Union, Defenders of Wildlife and Planned Parenthood -- while one, Vets for Freedom, ran spots on McCain's behalf.
By Howard Kurtz
© 2008 The Washington Post Company


Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 12
- next
See all 226 Commentsnow McCain the De-regulator wants regulation on wall street---Lies
McCain say Obama will have *** education for kindergarten children Lies
McCain say the pig thing was about the his vp pick --Lies
Pulin say never took earmarks %u2013Lies
Pulin says Iraq caused 9-11 --Lies
McCain pick Pulin because she best qualified ---LIES
McCain is a maverick and goes across the aisle %u2013 LIES
McCain is against Bush and his fellow Republicans - LIES
McCain blames Obama for the high gasoline prices %u2013 LIES
McCain doesn%u2019t know how many home he has --- Lies
McCain will help home owner that lose their homes ---LIES
McCain came up with the surge---LIES
McCain will give us a tax better break ---LIES
McCain vote for woman%u2019s rights---LIES
McCain support seniors ----LIES
McCain supports the Iraq vets with his vote ---LIES
Palin was always against the bridge to nowhere --LIES
About time.
Good
McDe-regulation
McSame
McLair
McJust-don''t get it
McBush
McI didn''t say that
McFlipFlop
McPulin
McStakes
McWar
McWrong
Mcloser
McDon''t vote for him
McLies
etc etc
nobama just took the money.
Posted by rookieat65
By the way CHARLIE GIBSON is a known Republican. Why do you think McCain gave him the Palin interview. Do some research before you start eating your own. And by the way they make more than a million dollars a year and will be taxed. The rest of us that make less than a million are looking forward to a tax cut under the Obama administration, and are glad there are patriots like Barbara Streisand and Matt Damon willing to take a tax increase to get us out of the the chaos Bush has produced. So much for small government Republicans. Their party is bigger government today than their worst Democratic nightmare. I''ll wave good riddance as the Republic-an party swirls down the toilet that they''ve flushed for themselves.
STOP POSTING THE SAME KRAP OVER AND OVER AGAIN. Typical Republican if you say it countless times people start to believe your krap.
Posted by littlebuddyd
WRONG. Liberals believe ordinary people can do extraordinary things. Like vote for a REAL change in Washington!
Watch out the Debates are going to be good and Sarah Palin is going to fall flat on her face and McSuperLame is going to stumble and make a fool of him self on National TV.
Posted by littlebuddyd
Wow. You do live in a cave. I was buying this post all the way to the end. Unless you really meant "licking McCain''s feet."
He has been consistent on only one point - that we should all see his strongly worded convictions as being just exactly the same as his strongly worded convictions expressing the completely opposite point of view the following day.
His economic ''policies'' are just the latest example of this disability. He deserves pity, but not my vote. We''ve already had two presidents for 16 of the last 28 years who''ve had mental disabilities. We can''t survive another one.
Obama = Blame all the Republicans for everything - Posted by cwazywabt
McCain, whose entire public career has been all about COMPLETELY eliminating ALL government regulation of ANYTHING in the business sector is suddenly - yesterday - the agent of "change" who is going to regulate the markets even though he has admitted very publicly that he doesn''t know much of anything about economics.
He''s going to do that even though his chief economic advisor says that America is not in a real recession; that it''s just a case of Americans being in a ''mental recession''.
Obama has been campaigning for government regulation of markets and companies which trade in the markets all along...so, suddenly, he''s just ''blaming republicans'' and, therefore, not the great change-monger that McCain is.
Obama has been calling for more regulation of the markets, of course, because there is no such thing as a ''free market'' unless there is a powerful entity FORCING the market to remain ''free''.
Markets are, by their very nature, easily subject to manipulation and monopoly. Those who are in the markets are there for one reason only - to make as much money as they possibly can in any way that they can. Those who are lucky in the markets soon understand that they can make much more money by CONTROLLING the markets and eliminating the competition - which is what invariably happens when there is no government policing effort to keep them honest.
Obama''s ads were judged by one very small group as ''more negative'' for one week because they were finally pointing out the mountain of outright lies and the in-your-face hypocrisy of the McCain campaign and its ads.
McCain and his sock-puppet-who-would-be-president seem to believe that they have the right to continuously lie and behave as hypocrites because Obama won''t do what McCain tells him to do - which also seems to be the arrogant point of view of most of his fellow members of the socialism-for-the-rich party. They don''t believe that their hateful lies and hypocrisy are behaviors for which they should be reprimanded. In fact, they seem to believe that they''re owed an apology for seemingly being unable to do anything else.
For the fascists, lies and hypocrisy are holy acts. In their view, Democrats have no right to say or do anything at all because, well, they aren''t rich and they don''t want to conquer the world - therefore they aren''t ''holy Americans''.
----------------
Posted by rafterman1
LOL. Contrary to the article. Denial is really not a viable tactic.
---------------------
Posted by demslie2u
Totally agree. The study proves the hatefulness of this candidate and this party. The hate is different in California than it is in Virginia. The only Change is the message based upon where Obama is campaigning. Now all the hate is on the lovely Governor of Alaska and not on the economy or more important issues. Shame on the Democrats. Now watch the hateful comments from Obama Supporters.
Talk about a guy who can''t make a decision?!?
He could easily be compared to Harry (We just don''t know what to do) Reid.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 12
- next
See all 226 Comments