Sept. 18, 2008
Officials Brace For Election Day Mess
Washington Post: High Turnout, New Procedures May Cause Problems At The Polls
-
Photo
In this March 4, 2008 file photo, a line of voters cast their ballots in the primary election in Columbus, Ohio. (AP Photo/Kiichiro Sato)
-
CBS Evening News
Where They Stand
The CBS Evening News provides an in-depth look at the issues facing the 44th president.
-
CBS Evening News
Reality Check
CBS News separates fact from fiction in what you're seeing and hearing about the presidential campaign.
Faced with a surge in voter registrations leading up to Nov. 4, election officials across the country are bracing for long lines, equipment failures and confusion over polling procedures that could cost thousands the chance to cast a ballot.
The crush of voters will strain a system already in the midst of transformation, with jurisdictions introducing new machines and rules to avoid the catastrophe of the deadlocked 2000 election and the lingering controversy over the 2004 outcome. Even within the past few months, cities and counties have revamped their processes: Nine million voters, including many in the battleground states of Ohio, Florida and Colorado, will use equipment that has changed since March.
But the widespread changes meant to reassure the public have also increased the potential for trouble.
"You change systems and throw in lots of new voters, and you can plan to be up the proverbial creek," said Kimball Brace, president of Election Data Services, a consulting firm that has tracked the voting changes.
Since Congress passed the Help America Vote Act six years ago, $3 billion in federal funds has been spent to overhaul voting operations, much of it for new equipment. With touchscreen machines falling out of favor, an increasing number of the nation's voters -- just over half -- will use paper ballots, which will be read by optical scanners. That will produce a paper trail that can serve as a backup if questions arise over tallies.
For more than half of the states, this will be the first presidential election using statewide databases required by the 2002 law to improve the accuracy of voter rolls. When voters arrive at the polls, their information must match the list in order for them to receive a regular ballot. That could trigger contentious questions in places with particularly rigid rules on what constitutes a match.
Both campaigns have lined up teams of lawyers to challenge any irregularities, from registrations to polling place problems to vote counts.
And experts say the problems ahead will be formidable, even if they don't rise to the level of the Supreme Court challenge over the 2000 results.
"The voting process is going to be tested in a way it has not been in recent history," said Tova Wang, vice president for research at Common Cause, a government watchdog group.
Recent local primaries have offered warning signs.
In the District last week, initial tallies were inflated by thousands of votes, causing chaos that night, and officials have yet to explain the problem.
In Palm Beach County, Fla., more than 3,500 ballots went missing in an August primary, forcing workers to hunt through bins and leaving a judicial election still undecided.
That same day, equipment problems in two other Florida jurisdictions delayed results for hours.
Premier Election Solutions, the company that makes many of the nation's voting machines, last month acknowledged that software used in 34 states, including Virginia and Maryland, could cause votes to be dropped. The company, formerly called Diebold, said it has no fix for the problem now, but election officials can catch the errors and recover the votes through a routine process of double-checking electronic memory cards.
Any weak spots in the process in November, whether poorly trained poll workers, a confusing ballot design or faulty equipment, will be further stressed by turnout, including many first-time voters.
During this year's presidential primaries, the number of voters hit an eight-year high in 36 states, according to Electionline.org, which monitors electoral reforms as part of the Pew Center on the States.
Maryland election officials said Tuesday that they expect 250,000 new voters to register by next month's deadline. More than 280,000 Virginians have registered to vote since the beginning of the year.
In the battleground state of Nevada, there are 400,000 more voters registered than four years ago. More than 500,000 have registered in Indiana since the beginning of the year, prompting Secretary of State Todd Rokita to say this could be "the biggest Election Day in our nation's history in terms of turnout."
Federal officials estimate that 2 million poll workers will be needed to handle the turnout, twice 2004's number and a goal states are scrambling to meet.
New York City had hoped to muster more than its usual 30,000 poll workers, particularly to help voters with disabilities, but extra funds were not available, said Marcus Cederqvist, executive director of the city's Board of Elections. "We will have waits -- I'd guess an hour or maybe two -- but we like to see high turnouts," he said. "It's what we are here for, and let's hope voters keep it in perspective. It won't be like waiting for an iPhone overnight."
Because elections are managed at the local level -- more than 10,000 jurisdictions run voting operations -- there is plenty of opportunity for foul-ups, which can resound nationally.
"Nobody wants to be that county," said Rosemary Rodriguez, chairwoman of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, created in 2002 to oversee and enforce nationwide election reform. But, she added, "the biggest fear I have is that elections officials don't heed what they saw in the primary and plan."
After a spate of Election Day problems in Ohio in 2004, when some voters waited in line more than five hours, Franklin County, which includes Columbus, has added poll workers, increased the number of voting machines by 50 percent and commissioned a study on where the machines should go.
Other jurisdictions, including elsewhere in Ohio and several counties in Virginia, are requiring more training of poll workers, from greeters who will walk lines to make sure voters are at the right site to supervisors who must be able to set up and test voting machines.
In Worcester, Mass., local election officials are trying to prepare for the bigger turnout by locating some polling places in four supermarkets, which have plenty of parking and are accessible to disabled voters.
But David Moon, program director for FairVote, a voting advocacy group that is surveying local operations, said that "very few county officials" in swing states "are creating rational plans" to put machines where they are most needed. As a result, he said, frustrated voters stuck in long lines could give up and go home without casting ballots -- the same thing that happened four years ago in many states.
The process could be complicated by the statewide registration databases, which have been coming online one by one since 2004. For 31 states, Nov. 4 will be the first test of the systems with the bigger turnout of a presidential election.
States have taken a variety of positions on what should be considered a match when it comes to nicknames, hyphenated names and married names. If the information doesn't match, voters can cast provisional ballots, but whether those will count in final tallies depends on local rules, which vary widely.
"If you have small glitches multiplied by thousands of voters, that means big problems that cost eligible voters their voice," said Daniel P. Tokaji, an election law specialist at Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law. The problems could be more acute with hyphenated Hispanic names or transposed Asian surnames, he said, "leaving certain groups disproportionately affected."
Registration rules have prompted bitter complaints and lawsuits in Missouri, New Mexico and other states, and could lead to challenges after the votes are counted. Voting rights advocates have protested an Arizona requirement that residents show proof of citizenship to register, which has been upheld by a federal judge.
Advocates also worry that the back-and-forth of legislative debates and court rulings on voter identification in numerous states could further confound poll workers, disenfranchising some voters.
As they approach November, some local officials say they have addressed problems that surfaced in this year's presidential primaries.
Touchscreen machines still will be in place in Horry County, S.C., which includes Myrtle Beach, but elections director Sandy Martin said she will avoid the programming error that forced the county to use backup paper ballots -- some votes were cast on yellow legal pads -- and delayed results for a day.
"Oh, my gosh, it was awful," Martin said.
In Contra Costa County, east of San Francisco, registrar Stephen Weir said he too learned from the primary. A fold in the absentee ballots forced him to spend nearly two weeks ironing, by hand, about 16,000 ballots to make them flat enough to feed into vote-counting machines.
"There were two lessons learned," he said. "Dump the fold. And the silk setting worked great."
By Mary Pat Flaherty
© 2008 The Washington Post Company





Diebold and corrupt Repug "election managers" have already programmed the computers for a McCain win.
There may also be squads of Repuglican Brownshirts at polling places to scare off any citizens who haven''t gotten the message that this election has already been decided by Bushit''s Billionaires in the international corporate financial elite.
Also known as Republicans'' Last Hope.
I guess one advantage of their racism is it''s easy to know where to put the working and the non-functional voting machines...
Except we''re on to them now. Sucks to be them!
Add a flat tax, cut governement and earmarks.
It is the rich that rule this country. Always was, always will be. Why do you think everyone wants to be in the first place?!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by john43218
IS THAT YOU, KEN LAY??? WHERE ARE YOU HIDING???
The FIX is in! We''re not going to have a fair election!
McCain/Palin have already got this locked up!
Obama could be ten percentage points ahead in the polls, it wouldn''t matter! The wealthy conservative elite of this country will see to it that he doesn''t win!
FEC officials better keep their eyes open in those counties using Premier Election Services---formerly Diebold---you can expect they''ll be up to no good!
The Only Mess on Election Day is going to the Republicans Loss and the Democrats Win.
Very misleading since Obama Supporters all over the state were arrested two months ago for forging signatures just to make some extra money. Another example of Democrat Voter Fraud.
We need some neutral party similar to the OSCE to come here to monitor American voting in these battleground states. Trusting either party is not going to work, and we cannot leave it to chance, or luck.
"Obama Supporters all over the state were arrested two months ago for forging signatures just to make some extra money. Another example of Democrat Voter Fraud."
BlameGovt why don''t you take your idiotic nonsense and go to Macomb County, Michigan, where the G.O.P. is attempting to disenfranchise people who have had their home foreclosed on. Man, without idiots like you, this country would be a much better place to live.
Posted by fenner at 12:26 PM : Sep 18, 2008
The standard logic is that polling is done through vetted respondents over land-line phones. The new generation, often younger voters, are not as vetted, and they commonly use cell phones. This may provide statisics like the Dewey and Truman election, where the polls suggested Dewey in a landslide.
Do you guys make this stuff up as you go along hoping that some moron will actually beleive it.
The number of voter fraud is nothing and I do mean nothing. The real numbers reported by convictions is like 2 period.
God neo cons are dumber than dirt they are so desperate that will say anything. Hey I here the space aliens are landing hide quick or they may probe you.
Memo to McSame from Diebold:
Thank$, the deposit was enough to carry the election.
FACT - Obama is deploying volunteers across Virginia to try to register 151,000 new voters by the Oct 6 deadline. Various non-profit organizations are also trying to register new voters, especially African-Americans. Three people in Hampton Roads have been charged with submitting false names on voter registration applications. The three canvassers worked for the Community Voters Project, a program of The Fund for the Public Interest.
---------------------
Posted by caliguy55
lmao. This idiotic remark coming from a LIB who uses name calling as his defense. Incredible how fortunate you are to wave that fear without repurcussions.
DID OBAMA REALLY THINK HE COULD TELL THE DOUBTERS and they would just take his word for it? "go to smears and see the real thing." AS IN CAN SEE AN AUTHENTIC REMBRANDT posted on the interned? can you tell its genuine? because the keyboarder TOLD YOU SO?
now he''''s got a Court docket to look forward to. BOTH HIM AND THE DNC were served and must answer by September 29th, 2008.
Posted by fenner
God, you people never give up do you. Can''t win a fair fight - a fair fight in 2000 would have completely avoided the Bush embarrassment of the last 8 years - so ya gotta go dirty. Karl Rove would be so proud. I saw the CNN director of polls on TV the other day explaining the lack of new voters in the polls as because they haven''t been included in the random dialling programs they use yet, so you''re just pissing into the wind with your arguments. The whole birth certificate thing has been whipped up by Imarightwingnutcase.com and will be thrown out before anyone with a brain gets to read it. In the meantime your criminal-in-chief and his acolytes are still ignoring subpoenas, still getting US servicemen killed, and still using tax payers money to illegally bail out their buddies. So just go climb back under your rock and shaddup.
Posted by Element51
Element - twalk1222 has had that exact same message up on just about every political board for the last week. I believe it''s a joke, but I''m not quite sure - seems there may be some lunatics out there that might just agree - fenner and BlameGovt for example.
Posted by whatwhy001
A GOPig accusing liberals of cheating. How typical, how predictable how absolutely fvcking hypocritical.
Posted by singinrich at 01:21 PM : Sep 18, 2008
--------------------
Geez, I wish I shared your enthusiasm and optimism!
But, you never know! The men might wake up and realize they''re not going to get anything off of Palin, and the women might realize she''s going to take away all their hard fought for RIGHTS!
If that happens, then it would be a ''blow out''!
Posted by whatwhy001 at 01:57 PM : Sep 18, 2008
---------------------
Hey, buddy! NOBODY, no political party CHEATS as much as the GOP---not even the commies! YOU guys wrote the book when it comes to political FRAUD! So, save the poisonous monologue for a ''board where people want to hear B.S.---like FOX NEWS! You''re not impressing anyone here! LATER.
Let''s see, will we see the usual shenanigans? A 500 people to one voting machine ratio in the poor neighborhood that tend to vote Democratic, while we see a 3 person to 1 ratio in rich Republican neighborhoods?
The second a congressman gets sworn in, they start running for re-election. They start building a war chest of cash for the next election. They don''t regulate anyone who feeds them. They don''t regulate financial institutions, the FDA, the pharmaceutical companies, the food industry, the defense industry or the chemical industry. They are all potential sources of cash for re-election.
Unfortunately, they don''t stop there. Every year they increase farm subsidies. Agri-biz is a huge source of cash.
We need term limits for these greedy schmucks in Congress. Pelosi''s Congress is the worst Congress in history. The country is collapsing because they looked the other way after taking cash from contributors.
Don''t count your chickens before they hatch. It aint over till its over.
Posted by omega40
It''s good to be a rich republican
And this is related to voting...how????
And now...time to turn your negativity towards someone you have absolutely no knowledge of.........
Faced with a surge in voter registrations leading up to Nov. 4, Repugnantcan officials nationwide are working feverishly to figure out the best way to rip off the American public for a third time (it''s a charm!!) without raising the eyebrows of an increasingly stupid electorate. The ascent of Sarah Palin as V.P. candidate was a litmus test, proving that if the electorate did not have a stroke from incredulous laughter at the prospect of her being "one heartbeat away" then it was safe to take certain less secure precautions in the wake of the test''s proving the utter moose-like intelligence of the public.
http://www.blackboxvoting.org
They are WONDERFUL WATCHDOGS that those of us that simply want HONEST ELECTIONS have needed. I''m sure they can use all the HELP they can get.
Faced with a surge in voter registrations leading up to Nov. 4, Repugnantcan officials nationwide are working feverishly to figure out the best way to rip off the American public for a third time (it''''s a charm!!) without raising the eyebrows of an increasingly stupid electorate. The ascent of Sarah Palin as V.P. candidate was a litmus test, proving that if the electorate did not have a stroke from incredulous laughter at the prospect of her being "one heartbeat away" then it was safe to take certain less secure precautions in the wake of the test''''s proving the utter moose-like intelligence of the public.
Posted by rjs1955
Lets not forget Chicago where they count the votes of deceased people and constantly rig the voting. Speaking of Chicago, isn''t Chicago where Obama began his political career?
-
by luvienne
September 19, 2008 9:49 AM PDT
- Why is the company Premier formerly Diebold again in charge of supplying voting machines? Where is the common sense? Once a crook always a crook.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 44 Comments