Elizabeth Edwards: Trust Is Biggest Hurdle
Wife of Ex-Candidate Says She Is Focused On Children, Health Reform Since News Of Husband's Affair Became Public
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Edwards' First Appearance
Returning to the public spotlight, Elizabeth Edwards spoke about U.S. health care issues at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia. Bianca Solorzano reports.
-
Video
Elizabeth's Untold Story
The people closest to Elizabeth Edwards are speaking out. Maggie Rodriguez talks with People magazine correspondent Sandra Westfall about Elizabeth's untold story.
-
Photo
Elizabeth Edwards (shown here in Philadelphia on Tuesday) said she wants her children to carry an image of their father, former Sen. John Edwards, as an advocate for the impoverished. (AP Photo/Tom Mihalek)
-
Timeline
The Edwards Affair
Events leading to former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards' admission of an extramarital affair.
"There's a lot of adjustment to make," Elizabeth Edwards told the Detroit Free Press. "When you mention trust, that's probably the most difficult hurdle."
The interview came she returned to the public stage this week to speak about health care, more than a month after her husband acknowledged that he repeatedly lied about being unfaithful in 2006.
Elizabeth Edwards, 59, had been quiet about the affair, only discussing it in a brief statement last month in which she pleaded for privacy and said her husband confessed the affair to her in 2006.
The two-time Democratic presidential candidate and former North Carolina Senator publicly admitted last month to an extramarital affair with campaign videographer Rielle Hunter.
"I made a very serious mistake. A mistake that I am responsible for and no one else," John Edwards said when news of his affair became public. "In 2006, I told Elizabeth about the mistake, asked for her forgiveness, asked God for His forgiveness."
Elizabeth Edwards has remained quiet about her husband's infidelity - issuing only a brief statement last month saying "I am proud of the courage John showed by his honesty in the face of shame."
She spoke with the paper ahead of a visit to Detroit next month to talk about coping with life's setbacks, including the loss of her teenage son in an auto accident and her 2004 cancer diagnosis.
She said she wants her children - Cate, 26, Emma Claire, 10, and Jack, 8 - to have an image of their father as "an advocate for poverty, not for this current picture of him to be the only one they carry with them, as young people and as adults."
"I have to prepare for the possibility if I die before they are grown," she said, of helping them "function without an involved, engaged and admiring parent. So I need to create the picture for them that I want them to have."
On Tuesday - her first public appearance since word of the affair became public - Edwards spoke to a Philadelphia audience, keeping her remarks limited to health care policy.
After being diagnosed with cancer herself, she has become a respected speaker on the subject.
As CBS News correspondent Bianca Solorzano reported, Edwards said she was "more discouraged than I was before" that the nation's economic problems might draw attention and money that might have been spent on fixing the health care system.
Audience members asked no questions about her private life, and Edwards did not mention the affair.
Meanwhile, John Edwards has canceled all of his public events until after the election, saying in a statement through his publicist he doesn't want to be a distraction to his party's ticket.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 59 CommentsOf course the most corrupt institution in America today, our mostly liberal MSM wolfpack press didn''t have time to investigate the claims by the National Enquirer concerning John$400. Yeah they didn''t want to spread any rumors about John$400
.........But the same group of corrupt liberals have plenty of time to write "rumors" "lies" "smears" and "distortions" with Sarah Palin.........don''t they?
Of course the contaminated liberals in our country simply just don''t see that "corrupt bias"........sad.
I can''t feel sorry for her even considering her medical condition. She knew for two years that her husband''s infidelity would destroy his chances of becoming president and her chances of becoming first lady. She and her husband both made a conscious effort to perpetuate this coverup.
Her acceptance speech has been debunked and discredited from liberal and conservatives source alike.
She is a hypocritical religious bigot who has conducted an amoral, unethical life and raised amoral, unethical children. She has relentlessly used public money and trust for personal gain. Her family life and marriage is a mess. Her only "skill" is self-aggrandizement and political hackery.
No of this is even remotely and "opinion" - it''s all a matter of public record.
She is the perfect example of what it wrong with the Republican Party, and
Posted by jumkey
What does your diatribe about Palin have to do with Elizabeth Edwards and her difficulties regarding health and her marriage?
Posted by Iagtot
Really? Then why are the Democrats in favor of same gender marriage while Republicans are against it?
He knew that, too, but still cheated on her and when she dies, he has his back-up family waiting for him.
Sadly, try as she might, this is what the children will remember, and hopefully they will never let him forget that he cheated on them, as well as their mother.
I am sorry that this going to be on her mind when the cancer does take her.
He is a pig, and I hope that someday he gets payback in spades.
This is about morals and that he has none.
Gee, I don''t know. Perhaps you should read the prior comments about Palin in this thread.
But please, don''t offer a defense of Palin. Just attack the messenger. The only thing you Republicans have left is your dishonesty so I guess I can''t fault you for using your last card. Me, I have self-respect, but I''m a liberal.
Funny that CBS News devotes such space to the martial problems of a prominent Democrat who is NOT RUNNING FOR ANY OFFICE but ignores the serial adultery and immoral behavior of the Republican Presidental team.
Why can''t you stick to the subject at hand?
Oh, maybe because you have nothing constructive to say about Mrs. Edwards?
This man made a mistake. Lets get down to reality here. This man was doomed to make this kind of error when his popularity shot through the roof back in 04 and with that snazzy hair cut, must have attracted all the woman he could ever dream about. These kinds of temptations are put in front of men of his power daily and by the truck loads. This is a recipe for disaster, but realistically, what man can resist this kind of temptation on a daily basis? I would say his marriage was missing something that he wasn%u2019t getting, *** excluded. He is a human man who made a human man mistake and allowed himself to be swepped off his feet by someone who captured his attention, not just once but probably for a long period of time. How many of you would like to be swepped off your feet or have someone take notice of you more often? If your not getting something you need form your spouse after man years, wouldn%u2019t you be more susceptible to this kind of relationship killer? I''ve not cheated but I can understand why it happens sometimes. Stop attacking the poor pig and understand the nature (cause and effect) of people.
Posted by demslie2u at 02:54 PM : Sep 18, 2008
errr I don''t see anything in that article where Elizabeth says its republicans fault or white people,though Mr.Edwards is white in case that little factoid evaded you. You must be reading a different article than this one .
This is about morals and that he has none.
Posted by MissSuZQ
Shorter MissSuZQ and every other Republican:
"If a Democrat does a bad thing it''s because Democrats are bad. If a Republican does a bad thing it''s because all politicians are bad"
I await your stinging rebuke of McCain''s adultery or Palin''s endless serial lying.
Well?
Posted by MissSuZQ
BINGO!!!
Thanks for playing the partisan non-blame game!
Wow.
Posted by twalk1122 at 03:13 PM : Sep 18, 2008
Go take you medicine I know you are on it.
He would lose to an goat this time around you moron.
earth if they cheat, but it''s okay for the republicans.
I can''t believe that adults can be so narrow minded.
No wonder our young people have no morals, look at the
examples they hae.
t
Posted by jumkey at 03:04 PM : Sep 18, 2008
Kinda invalidates the Rep''s theory that all the major news media are liberal Dem''s, don''t it?
Another Rethuglican propaganda message shredded for the lies they are.
Posted by minnick8 at 02:51 PM : Sep 18, 2008
Lets see while some democrats are gay, we prefer to let them live their lives out of the closet. Just because most democrats are straight it doesn''t mean we are narrow. There are also a lot of pro life democrats , I am not one of them but they are entitled to their opinion . Republicans have eaten their own moderates till there is Susan Collins and Christopher Shays left amongst moderates, and that''s it .Then wonder why they lost control of the congress ,sides doubling the deficit , the Iraq war, Katrina, torture as an American value , the deregulation of our financial markets with the ensuing crash,government corruption, Even knowing all that , gay marriage , abortion and Mr. Edwards infidelity are our most important issues?
Posted by twalk1122 at 03:13 PM : Sep 18, 2008
This poster is obviously paid to spew this junk as I see it over and over on lots of unrelated stories.
There is no debate - Bush is the worst and most corrupt president in history.
Posted by shaihalud at 03:15 PM : Sep 18, 2008
Yes and Obamahood was a cocaine addict. But, I guess that isn''t relevant is it?
She should be given her privacy to live her life to the fullest doing whatever she finds rewarding. His role will never be easy for he represents a diacotomy......rich person working for poor people''s benefit.....difficult to comprehend.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by baby54boomer at 04:03 PM : Sep 18, 2008
I don''t know about God but I sure as he11 am.
Posted by BagdadsHere4 at 03:48 PM : Sep 18, 2008
*** I''d rather Edwards pay 400 bucks to a hairstylist for a haircut, rather than Amnesty MCcain wanting to give billions of our tax dollars to Oil Company Execs, and millions to help give amnesty to illegal latinos!
*** You are soo wrong! John and Elizabeth Edwards are eventhing that is RIGHT with America! They are a family coping with real problems that most americans face. Amnesty Mccain and Cindy Mcamnesty are the real problem of what is WRONG with America. Amnesty Mccain likes to take away our rights with the patriot act, but he WANTS TO GIVE AMNESTY to over 20 million latino law breakers. You tell me what is better for america. A rich guy that advocates helping the poor(just like the kennedys'') that just happened to make a few mistakes... or amnesty mccain that wants to give amnesty to over 20 million latino lawbreakers? I''ll take John Edwards over Amnesty Mccain every day of the week!
Posted by shaihalud at 03:15 PM : Sep 18, 2008
Yes and Obamahood was a cocaine addict. But, I guess that isn''''t relevant is it?
Posted by redbds at 03:38 PM : Sep 18, 2008
*** I don''t care about Obama being a crack addict, atleast he didn''t co-sponsor an amnesty bill to let over 20 million latino lawbreakers get amnesty!
I don''t define being human by the evil I do - that takes away from my humanity - in fact, it''s considered inhumane. There''s nothing wrong with marrying a person 20 years younger, especially later in life. And Palin''s daughter getting pregnant early by someone she loves isn''t good timing, it''s not responsible - but it''s not evil. Obama''s father DID abandon his son, but that''s not Obama''s fault. So if you want to compare wrongs here - I think your only legitimate comparison is Obama''s father & this charlatan known as Edwards. They abandoned & betrayed those they were supposed to love in their greatest time of need. That is not being ''human'' lady, that''s being an animal. Get it straight.
Your lack of compassion is sickening, but I firmly believe your petty little lives are in the minority. You have my sympathy.
Now while it''s true people can change their mindset over time, I have to wonder how John went from bashing Clinton''s cheating to wanting tolerance for his own. Where''s the impetus or catalyst to justify his own "Forgive me, waaaaaaaaah!" song and dance? Perhaps there is a slight reprieve in John''s favor, as he didn''t do anything in the Oval Office... he did it somewhere else like how all philandering jerks tend to do it.
I genuinely feel sorry for Ms Edwards. What her husband did behind her back was sick; while there are problems in life, infidelity of this sort just can''t ever be justified. Never mind a terminal illness (thankfully not a STD)... she is very brave indeed for talking.
BUT...
she lied to the American people by not saying
something when the news broke about the affair
last Oct. She will always be remembered
for not speaking up and forcing her husband
to speak the truth. This is not a quality of an honest woman. She was self-serving and power-hungry. She needs to apologize to all Democrats for the mess they created during the primaries.
We have no respect for liers like Elizabeth Edwards.
We don''t even think of John Edwards as still in politics, he needs to go away. This is what happens when you judge Bill Clinton for being a man, yes, thats right, men are dogs and any woman who believes that her man is the most faithful, dream on sweeties.
Life means NOTHING to the Democrat.
Too bad your mother did not abort you.
We could have saved you all of the pain.
It sucks to be immoral.
What IS "Immoral?" Ah... Well,,, it is when a Presidential candidate makes a huge sexual mistake, confesses to his wife, but then neither he OR his wife mention it to the general public while he is running and it becomes public through the media.
But it is NOT immoral when a candidate knows their own child has made a huge sexual mistake and the candidate does not tell anyone even when they are to be nominated for Vice President and it becomes public only through the media.
Of course the latter is not immoral. iT SHOULD not BE CONSIDERED IMMORAL AND NEITHER SHOULD THE FORMER.
Palin''s qualification for Vice President has nother to tdo with the private lives of her or her family. And Edwards value as a political leader has nothing to do with a mistake in private life either.
What is immoral about all this? It is OUR being so piously judgmental about either. Shame on We the people.
I can understand wanting your children to have a good memory of their dad, but guilting the media into not pushing the story because she has cancer and may not live is just manipulation. He made the choice, as a public figure, to commit adultery-he should have considered his family before the fact, not after. I feel very sorry his family is being drug through his dirt. They should him accountable.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 59 Comments