September 17, 2008 5:00 PM
- Text
Pregnant Mom's Flu Shot Protects Baby
- Adele's Grammy Comeback After Vocal Cord Surgery
- Treating Sleep Apnea in Kids Improves Behavior, Quality of Life
- Chemo May Not Harm Unborn Baby
- C-Sections Not Always Best for Small Babies
- CDC: Doctors Increasingly Prescribe Exercise
- Osteoporosis Medication Linked to Unusual Thigh Fractures
- More from WebMD »
Nurse prepares syringe and bottle of flu vaccine (AP)
(WebMD)
Pregnant women who get flu shots protect their infants up to age 6 months, a clinical trial shows.
The study, conducted in Bangladesh and led by Mark C. Steinhoff, MD, at Baltimore's Johns Hopkins University, is the first definitive proof that flu vaccines benefit both mother and infant.
"Our study shows that a newborn's risk of infection can be greatly reduced by vaccinating mom during pregnancy. It's a two-for-one benefit," Steinhoff says in a news release. "Infants under six months have the highest rates of hospitalization from influenza among children in the U.S."
U.S. guidelines advise pregnant women to get flu shots, but only 12 to 13 percent do. Obstetricians have been slow to pass the recommendation on to women, even though most agree that getting the flu during pregnancy is dangerous.
The study enrolled 340 mothers who had not received a flu shot for at least three years. The study showed that vaccinating pregnant women:
Cut infants' risk of getting lab-confirmed flu by at least 63 percent
Cut both infants' and mothers' risk of respiratory disease with fever by one-third
Prevented respiratory disease with fever in 14 infants and seven mothers for every 100 women vaccinated
Prevented one case of lab-confirmed flu for every 16 women vaccinated
A number of factors affected the study, including a shortage of flu tests. But analysis of these factors suggested that, if anything, they led to an underestimation of the true benefit of flu shots for pregnant women.
Infants under age 6 months cannot get a flu shot. And since it takes two shots for full protection, there's a gap during which a child might be vulnerable to the flu.
"Pregnant women should be encouraged to be vaccinated for the flu to protect their infants and themselves," Steinhoff says.
Researchers from the International Center for Diarrheal Disease Research in Dhaka, Bangladesh, and from Emory University in Atlanta also contributed to the study. The study appears in the Sept. 17 Online First issue of TheNew England Journal of Medicine.
By Daniel DeNoon
Reviewed by Louise Chang
©2005-2008 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved
The study, conducted in Bangladesh and led by Mark C. Steinhoff, MD, at Baltimore's Johns Hopkins University, is the first definitive proof that flu vaccines benefit both mother and infant.
"Our study shows that a newborn's risk of infection can be greatly reduced by vaccinating mom during pregnancy. It's a two-for-one benefit," Steinhoff says in a news release. "Infants under six months have the highest rates of hospitalization from influenza among children in the U.S."
U.S. guidelines advise pregnant women to get flu shots, but only 12 to 13 percent do. Obstetricians have been slow to pass the recommendation on to women, even though most agree that getting the flu during pregnancy is dangerous.
The study enrolled 340 mothers who had not received a flu shot for at least three years. The study showed that vaccinating pregnant women:
A number of factors affected the study, including a shortage of flu tests. But analysis of these factors suggested that, if anything, they led to an underestimation of the true benefit of flu shots for pregnant women.
Infants under age 6 months cannot get a flu shot. And since it takes two shots for full protection, there's a gap during which a child might be vulnerable to the flu.
"Pregnant women should be encouraged to be vaccinated for the flu to protect their infants and themselves," Steinhoff says.
Researchers from the International Center for Diarrheal Disease Research in Dhaka, Bangladesh, and from Emory University in Atlanta also contributed to the study. The study appears in the Sept. 17 Online First issue of TheNew England Journal of Medicine.
By Daniel DeNoon
Reviewed by Louise Chang
©2005-2008 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved
Popular Now in Health
- Cancer drug reverses Alzheimer's in mice: Study
- Norovirus outbreak hits Rider University in N.J
- Marijuana-smoking motorists twice as likely to crash
- Electric shocks to brain may boost memory: Study
- Chinese mom gives birth to 15-pound baby
- America's sodium problem: Not from salty snacks?
- America's pets also have an obesity epidemic
- Measles patient at Super Bowl prompts health alert
- Caffeine inhalers - the next club drug?
- Skin cancer self-exam: What to look for (PHOTOS)
- 4.5 million Americans over 50 have artificial knees
- Things You Didn't Know About Your Penis
- PICTURES: 15 Shocking Sexual Fetishes
- Drinking soda raises risk for asthma, COPD: Study
- Let's Move! campaign turns 2 today: Is it working?
- Woman spotlights uterus didelphys on talk show
- Dr. Liar? Study finds dishonest docs common
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Censored Chinese artist's photos coming to NYC
- Censored Chinese artist's photos coming to NYC
- La Scala dancers deny anorexia is rampant
- Taiwan's 'Love' features Taiwan-China romance
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Josh Powell had "incestuous" images on his home computer, authorities say
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
on CBS News






