Dow
     +45.11
12994.98
+0.35%
|
     +5.47
1366.70
+0.40%
|
     +48.06
14256.29
+0.34%
|
     +11.29
2963.07
+0.38%
|
     +0.36
54.88
+0.66%
|
     +0.60
119.20
+0.51%
|
     +0.00
2.01
+0.00
February 11, 2009 2:19 PM

Couric's Palin Interview Levels The Field

By
Tucker Reals
(MarketWatch)  This column was written by MarketWatch's Jon Friedman.
With no disrespect to any of the other television networks or anchors, I can't wait to see Katie Couric's interview with Sarah Palin. It will feature two accomplished women talking to each other on national television.

It will also allow Palin and Couric the opportunity to present different images to America.

Couric, who has anchored the "CBS Evening News" for two years, will spend a few days talking with Palin on Sept. 28 and 29 and the interview will air on the 29th.

After a rocky introduction, Couric has done solid work on the evening news program. She is launching an intriguing spot called "Presidential Questions." On Sept. 17, she raised the points of how the two presidential candidates would prevent another terrorist attack and what personal flaw might hinder the ability of either man to be President of the U.S.

If Couric could get Palin to offer thought-provoking answers to her questions, she'd go a long way toward finally erasing the media's ever-present "perky" characterization of her. The quality of her work should speak for itself.

Palin, lampooned brilliantly by Tina Fey on "Saturday Night Live," will have an agenda, too. Palin will hope to show viewers that she has the gravitas to run the country someday.

CBS presents an ideal opportunity for Palin. She has already made a strong impression on many conservative "hockey moms." Many see a connection with Palin's struggles to "have it all" as both a working mother and an accomplished professional.

CBS will allow Palin to address an audience that has had a reputation for appealing to a greater number of liberal Americans than its network competitors.

To its chagrin, many Americans continue to identify CBS as the TV network that had to apologize publicly for its unsubstantiated report on President George W. Bush's National Guard service during the Vietnam War.

Wowing viewers and voters

Palin may have wowed the nation since Sen. John McCain tapped the obscure governor of Alaska to be his running mate. And, if you believe the Republican Party's hype machine, she may even be able to kill a moose from fifty paces, but she had better watch her back, nonetheless.

Couric is starting to hit her stride after two years in the anchor seat the "CBS Evening News" and she won't take any guff or double talk. We're starting to see media writers (including this one) writing favorable pieces about Couric after a relentless stream of criticism. Either Couric is getting more comfortable and self-assured in the job (I think so) or critics are finally warming up to her. Maybe the viewers will follow.

Palin pretty much skated by in her first network interview, with ABC's Charlie Gibson except for a few awkward moments when she digressed about the White House's foreign policy.

Gibson tried hard to keep Palin honest with focused questions. But he was destined to come up short in his interview. (Click here to read Friedman's analysis of the Gibson interview.) If he put Palin's back against the wall, he would have been blasted as a big-city, elitist sexist. But if Gibson had given Palin what amounted to a free pass (I knew he wouldn't do that), he would have been castigated as a wimp.

Now, CBS will level the playing field for viewers by matching its Unsinkable Molly Brown versus McCain's version of Marge, the fearless sheriff in the Coen Brothers' classic 1996 movie "Fargo."

Nobody will be able to accuse the media of sexism when it's Couric who will be firing fastballs at Palin's head.

Tough questions

If I had Couric's ear before the interview, I'd suggest she hammer on two issues: national defense and the economy.

I'd want to hear Palin discuss the crisis on Wall Street and in the housing market. Maybe we shouldn't expect her to have a solution right away, but I would like to hear her talk about wha it means to her.

With this interview, Palin is trying to show she represents more than just her home state, she's looking to be the voice for small town America.

And how will Palin propose to solve the messes involving Social Security and health care?

It's going to be up to Katie Couric to tell us all what it means.

What do you want Couric to ask Palin?

Join the online community of Media Web readers by posting comments directly to the MarketWatch.com site.


By Jon Friedman

MarketWatch
  • Tucker Reals

    Tucker Reals is a senior news editor and overnight site editor for CBSNews.com, based at CBS News' London bureau.

Add a Comment See all 234 Comments
by freedog008 September 22, 2008 2:44 AM EDT
I don''t care if she tanks. I''m voting for McCain not Palin. AND, if God forbids, McCain tanks, Palin will bring in someone like Condi Rice or Colin Powell as VP and all wil be hunky dory. I''ve worked with lot of people like Palin. There are those who talk a good game, and those who make good decisions. Palin has got to where she is, so quickly because she''s a good decision maker. She, like Truman, would be a great President if the situation met her head on. She''s the type that will rise to the occasion.
Reply to this comment
by im4honesty September 20, 2008 8:55 PM EDT
JOHN McCAIN: "I believe the fundamentals of the economy are strong."

THEN THE NEXT DAY:

"Well... I... err... ummm, what I meant was the fundamentals of the economy are the working men and women, and anyone who disagrees with me is against the American worker."

The question is:

ARE YOU STUPID ENOUGH TO VOTE FOR McCAIN/PALIN???
Reply to this comment
by homespunlady September 20, 2008 12:26 PM EDT
LYING her way into the Whitehouse - like Cheney lied us into WAR - abusing her power then claiming "PRIVILEGE" because she has MORE POWER than ANYONE ELSE FACING A SUBPOENA then HIDING the TRUTH along the way....Good start to this "Cheney in a dress".

In the MEANTIME all those "spoiled brat" NEOCONS that have DESTROYED our ENTIRE ECONOMY are busy DUMPING THE BILL on the POOR and Middle Class!!

The NEODEPRESSION is STILL in the works - the DEBT DID NOT GO AWAY !

IT''S GOTTEN BIGGER with this GIGANTIC TRANSFER OF WEALTH TO THE UPPER ONE PERCENT!

Guess Who''s going To PAY for this NEOCON FRAT PARTY DAMAGE?? Certainly NOT THOSE WHO TOOK THE MONEY AND PARTIED AWAY what they did not HIDE IN FOREIGN "VACATION HOMES"!!

CHECK FOLKS- what POLITICAL PARTY are all those CEOS and financial scumbags that are STEALING YOUR pension and kid''s education SAVINGS!!

The "dirty little secret" is that McCain has gotten FAR MORE MONEY donated TO HIM through "LOOPHOLE" Party donations from these SCUMBAGS and is CONNING his way to "GET AROUND" his CAMPAIGN FINANCE RESTRICTIONS.

As usual the NEOCON "PARTY OPERATIVES" have gone into their "dirty trick" bags to FOOL the GULLIBLE "peasants" AGAIN.

FEUDALISM here we come and with Palin we can expect a "Holy Inquisition" as well if you disagree with her!
Reply to this comment
by wlmrtpatriot September 20, 2008 11:32 AM EDT
Oh and here goes.....Obama is a muslim.
Not that I care, nor that I know what I''m talking about, but as I read some of your comments I see some of you don''t either.
Reply to this comment
by wlmrtpatriot September 20, 2008 11:29 AM EDT
Barky voted for the extension of the FISA bill. Joe Biden was a loud supporter of the Iraq war.
That''s beside the point: liberals hate women, no matter what women do they are still hated.
Reply to this comment
by ralphcat1 September 20, 2008 8:45 AM EDT
They would be very happy to have the political discussion centered around "Obamas is Muslim" or "what they did to Hillary" or "lipstick on a pig". These people are set on cutting all government social programs and abolishing all government regulatory agencies so they can continue with their profitable, dangerous and radical influence on our government. It boils down to "Four More Years?"
Reply to this comment
by ralphcat1 September 20, 2008 8:28 AM EDT
Ask her if she favors Christian dominion - the ending of the separation of church and state, replacing U. S. democracy with a theocracy. Ask her if she knows that her candidacy was selected by the Council of National Policy, the secret right wing umbella group of the most powerful figures of the Christian right including James (SpungeBob is gay) Dobson and Erik Prince (Blackwater).
Reply to this comment
by kmar20009 September 20, 2008 3:42 AM EDT
Perhaps she can explain why she raised the tax on oil to 75% of its sales price, passing the cost along to US consumers. She then requested the largest federal grants per capita of any state from the federal government so that she could mail checks to each Alaskan. (who already paid no state taxes). Might that not explain part of her 80% popularity rating?
The total comes to something like $3600 per resident and it all comes from the pockets of the lower 48. Not bad for a family of 7... especially if you can charge the state rent for living in your own home.
Reply to this comment
by scorpio59er September 20, 2008 2:40 AM EDT
Retiring Republican Senator Chuck Hagel told the Omaha World Herald today that he does not think Sarah Palin is qualified to be president. %u201CI think it''s a stretch to, in any way, to say that she''s got the experience to be president of the United States,%u201D he said. %u201CShe doesn''t have any foreign policy credentials," Hagel added. %u201CYou get a passport for the first time in your life last year? I mean, I don''t know what you can say. You can''t say anything.%u201D

You pubs fight it out amongst yourselves. BWAHAHAHA!
Reply to this comment
by oldanalyst September 20, 2008 2:00 AM EDT
Please ask her if she has discussed with McCain what her duties would be. Since she has experience with energy companies, will she deal with energy issues for the president?

Ask her if the office of the Vice-president is part of the executive or legislative branch? Does she view the office as Cheney does? If so, is she going to be a secretive as Cheney is? She has claimed transparency as governor. Will she make the same claim if elected as Vice-president?
Reply to this comment
See all 234 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook