Stocks Tank After Wall Street Shake-Up
Dow Drops 500 Points As Investors React To Demise Of Lehman Brothers, Buyout Of Merrill Lynch
-
-
Photo
Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on Monday, Sept. 15, 2008 in New York. (AP Photo/Jin Lee)
-
Photo
Investors will be watching to see whether the Dow moves below the 11,000 mark, a level it hasn't traded and closed under since mid-July. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)
-
Photo
Employees emerging Sunday night from Lehman's headquarters near the heart of Times Square carried boxes, tote bags and duffel bags, rolling suitcases, framed artwork and spare umbrellas. Many were emblazoned with the Lehman Brothers name. (AP Photo/David Karp)
-
Photo
The end of Lehman may not stop the financial crisis that has gripped Wall Street for months, analysts said. More investment banks could disappear soon. (AP Photo/David Karp)
-
Photo
President George W. Bush said he was pleased with work done so far by the Treasury Department, Federal Reserve and major financial institutions to "promote stability" in financial markets shaken by the developments involving Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
-
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Lehman's Collapse Creates Chaos
Global share prices sank on the news of Lehman's collapse, leaving the international financial markets in chaos. The world's central banks are pouring in funds to help calm the storm. Charlie D'Agata reports.
-
Video
No Bailout For Wall Street
Lehman Brothers has been forced to go into bankruptcy after the Fed announced it would not bailout the storied firm. Meanwhile, Merrill Lynch agreed to be bought by Bank of America. Jeff Glor reports.
-
Video
Weighing The Lehman Collapse
Investment bank Lehman Brothers announced its plan to file for bankruptcy after a plan to rescue it failed. Harry Smith talks with Liz Claman of Fox Business Network about its impact on Wall Street.
-
Timeline
Languishing Lehman
Key events at Lehman Brothers since the beginning of the credit crisis.
-
In-Depth
Bank Seizure Q&A
What if my bank fails? Some questions and answers in the wake of IndyMac Bank.
Stocks also posted big losses in markets across much of the globe as investors absorbed Lehman's bankruptcy filing and what was essentially a forced sale of Merrill Lynch to Bank of America for $50 billion in stock. While those companies' situations had reached some resolution, the market remained anxious about American International Group Inc., which is seeking emergency funding to shore up its balance sheet. A faltering of the world's largest insurance company likely would have financial implications far beyond that of Lehman, the largest U.S. bankruptcy.
The swift developments that took place Sunday are the biggest yet in the 14-month-old credit crises that stems from now toxic subprime mortgage debt. For the first part of Monday's trading, the market was falling, but in a largely orderly fashion as investors seemed to draw some relief from the resolution of Lehman's problems.
But as the session wore on, and there was no word about AIG, the market's suffered another bout of fear that the ongoing credit crisis will continue to devastate the financial sector, and selling accelerated in the final hour. Selling then took on more momentum as stock indexes broke through levels seen at the market's earlier lows in July, an ominous sign for some traders.
Veteran trader Art Cashin told CBS News correspondent Anthony Mason that he believes there could be more casualties:
"This is the fifth time we've seen this movie. And you sit on the edge of your seat and yell at whichever character it is: 'Don't go into that woodshed!' But they keep going in," Cashin said.
The stunning developments took place as voters, who rank the economy as their top concern, prepare to elect a new president in seven weeks. It likely will spur a much greater focus by presidential candidates - Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama - and members of Congress on the need for stricter financial regulation.
Earlier Monday, President Bush expressed confidence that the economy is strong enough to handle fluctuations in financial markets, adding though that in the short run these adjustments "can be painful."
Investors are worried that trouble at AIG and the bankruptcy filing by Lehman, felled by $60 billion in bad debt and a dearth of investor confidence, will touch off another series of troubles for banks and financial institutions that may be forced to further write down the value of their own debt assets. Wall Street had been hopeful six months ago that the collapse of Bear Stearns would mark the darkest day of the credit crisis.
AIG's troubles are worrisome for some investors because of the company's enormous balance sheet and the risks that troubles with that company's finances could spill over to the companies with which it does business. AIG, one of the 30 stocks that make up the Dow industrials, fell $7.38, or 61 percent, to $4.76 Monday as investors worried that it would be the subject of downgrades from credit ratings agencies.
"People sense that there is still a lot more pain to be felt," said Ryan Larson, senior equity trader at Voyageur Asset Management, a unit of RBC Dain Rauscher.
The market was expected to remain fractious when trading resumes Tuesday. Besides its continuing concerns about AIG, Wall Street will be waiting anxiously for the Federal Reserve's regular policy-making meeting. The central bank is widely expected to keep rates steady, but the market will be looking for signs from the Fed that it is willing to lower rates amid the nation's continuing economic problems and also because the price of oil has retreated sharply from its highs of $147 in mid-July. The drop in oil gives the inflation-wary Fed more room to maneuver.
According to preliminary calculations, the Dow fell 504.48, or 4.42 percent, to 10,917.51, moving below the 11,000 mark for the first time since mid-July. It was the worst point drop for the Dow since it lost 684.81 on Sept. 17, 2001, the first day of trading after the terror attacks. It was also the sixth-largest point drop in the Dow, just behind the 508.00 it suffered in the October 1987 crash.
Broader stock indicators also fell. The Standard & Poor's 500 index declined 58.74, or 4.69 percent, to 1,192.96 - also its biggest drop since 9/11 and the first time it closed below 1,200 in three years.
The Nasdaq composite index fell 81.36, or 3.60 percent, to 2,179.91; it was its worst percentage and point loss since Jan. 4.
Declining issues overwhelmed advancers on the New York Stock Exchange, where 164 stocks rose compared with 3,064 that fell. Volume came to a moderate 1.8 billion shares.
Oil closed below $100 for the first time in six months as investors worried that a slowing economy would hurt demand. Light, sweet crude fell $5.47 to settle at $95.71 on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Oil is down sharply from its mid-July highs when it hit a record over $147 a barrel.
Bond prices surged as investors fled to the security of government debt. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note, which moves opposite its price, plunged to 3.42 percent from 3.72 percent late Friday. The dollar was lower against other major currencies, while gold prices rose.
Mason reports that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson tried to reassure investors Monday.
"The American people can remain confident in the soundness and resilience of their financial system," Paulson said.
Investors likely also shrank from much bargain-hunting after Paulson said from the White House that he "never once" considered using taxpayer money to help prop up Lehman. That dashed some hopes that the federal government might come to the rescue of AIG.
But AIG pared some of its losses after New York Gov. David Paterson said in a press conference the company will be allowed to access $20 billion of assets held by its subsidiaries to stay in business. Paterson asked the state's insurance regulators to in essence allow AIG to provide a bridge loan to itself. Investors are worried that the company could need up to $40 billion to aid its balance sheet.
Other financial stocks fell as investors worried about the strength of banks' balance sheets. Washington Mutual Inc. fell 73 cents, or 27 percent, to $2, while Wachovia Corp. fell $3.56, or 25 percent, to $10.71.
Investors did have some more solid footing than they might have predicted at the end of last week, when Lehman's troubles and those of AIG weighed on the markets. A global consortium of banks, working alongside government officials in New York, announced a $70 billion pool of funds to lend to troubled financial companies.
And the deal for Merrill Lynch pays a 70 percent premium to the brokerage's closing price Friday. The stock has been squeezed in recent weeks, leading many Wall Street veterans to point to the company as the next behind Lehman as likely to run into trouble with bearish investors and get hit by intensified selling. The deal to pair the company with Bank of America, a huge bank with a big asset base, removes some of the worries about Merrill would be the next to fall.
Merrill rose 1 cent to $17.06, while Bank of America fell $7.19, or 21 percent, to $26.55.
Some investors said the market needed a cathartic sell-off to purge its worries over bad debt and the tight credit conditions that have hobbled the economy. They reason that a scare and subsequent sell-off in the markets could establish conditions for a market bottom to form.
"This is sort of groundbreaking type stuff," said Scott Fullman, director of derivatives investment strategy for WJB Capital Group in New York.
Fullman, who has worked on Wall Street for 29 years, noted that the Dow contains companies, such as retailers like Wal-Mart Stores Inc. that could help cushion some of the selling in the financial sector. Wal-Mart fell 78 cents to $61.63, while Coca-Cola Co. rose 25 cents to $54.75.
But even good news like a drop in oil and some resolution to fears about Merrill couldn't prevent widespread selling. Markets in Tokyo and several other Asian money centers were closed for holidays. Britain's FTSE 100 fell 3.92 percent, Germany's DAX index lost 2.74 percent, and France's CAC-40 fell 3.78 percent. The European Central Bank, the Bank of England, and the Swiss central bank stepped in an attempt to calm markets by making more short-term credit available to banks.
The reduced headcount of Wall Street firms Monday left Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley as the remaining big, independent firms. The two are slated to report quarterly results Tuesday and Wednesday, respectively.
Goldman Sachs fell $18.71, or 12 percent, to $135.50, while Morgan Stanley fell $5.04, or 14 percent, to $32.19.
The shake-up comes only a week after the government bailed out mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and ahead of sizable economic developments this week. The Fed is expected to make a decision on interest rates on Tuesday.
The Russell 2000 index of smaller companies fell 30.50, or 4.23 percent, to 689.76.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 12
- next
See all 592 CommentsDidn''t something like this happen on Regan''s watch? There seems to be a pattern here.
all those executives who collected multi-million dollar salaries and walk away with equity?
or the middle class who gets screwed once again?
follow the money...
yep, a crisis created that results in transfer of wealth to the wealthy. It is a pattern.
They are probably offering up the notes on half of America''s mortgages as collateral.
That will give Bush one last chance to eliminate the middle class before he leaves office by calling those notes and foreclosing.
lolll...I figure its either that, or Bush will cluster bomb suburbia.
Yes we are, and yes we do. It is past time we saw an arrogant and corrupt corporation get what they deserve for their malfeasance. It is also interesting to note that "Mr. Bailout the Rich" Bush won''t touch this, for fear of having his puppet McSame further confirmed as an advocate of welfare only for the rich.
It is also probable that someone in the tax bracket of the shouter has, on other occasions and in other conversations, derided assistance to the poor as "welfare", and if my suspicion is accurate, let us hope now that he will come to understand the position of walking in the other person''s shoes.
---
This "disaster" was a predictable result of GOP lessez faire banking policy. The housing bubble which sustained Bush, Jr''s Voodoo economy and its speculative frenzy of investments made the dot.com bubble look restrained and proper by any comparison.
Even Bush admits, "Wall Street got drunk." While Bernanke prefers a more elevated description of moral collapse, the lack of any federal oversight calls Bernanke, as an intelligent, moral entity, into serious dbout.
Speculative risk, per se, is not to blame, but the lack of any rules for the newer investment markets, any bounds by which to determine when an asset is truly valued, and when it is not. There is no other way to put it-- speculating banks took their customers and their assets on a wild ride, and knew they did. Now they blink their eyes soulfully and claim, "Dunno what happened, ossifer!"
The most galling aspect of Bernanke''s tenure is his insistence taxpayers are the ultiamte guarantee to make the world safe for bankers.
No, it will actually remove the false color, and let people see, in stark reality, that the financial system has no integrity, and their well-being, based on trust in a crooked corporation in a proven crooked industry, has always been nothing more than an illusion.
I wonder if you meant "morale" collapse, and I wonder because those of us who were denied business investment, and steered to unfair mortgages, even when we were more than qualified for standard treatment, have known for decades of the lack of "morals".
Those of us who have watched as CEOs and upper management ran companies into the ground, while taking their "golden parachutes", know full well of the lack of morals, but an arrogant abundance of morale.
There appears to be a plan afoot to destroy not only the middle-class but the entire platform of American economic well-being. There seems to be an attempt the equalize the level of American wages with that of the rest of the globe. I''d be okay with that if it wasn''t for the fact that big oil, big banks and big business still insist on making their record level of profits. RePugNaCOns and Bill Clinton DLCers have betrayed this country for over 28 years. Enough of the Reaganomic Tract-to-failure.
Nothing about bad business practices or enforement of the laws on the books or "reasonable" regulation? Just 9/11 and "blame" Bushisms abound for RePugNaCons? Two building fallins, et al, is not excuse to the bad-fiath practices the banks and investment houses have enbarked on since well before 9/11.
And claiming the business as "risky" and making on distinction between that and out-and-out banditry is either willful blindness or lobbying on your behalf. Risk are acceptable, but dishonest and treasonous economic activity by those banks and the political runway given them by Democrats and Republican alike will prove debilitating for years to come. Well beyond your 9/11 creed and Cheney/Bush protectionist stance.
The strong take for the weak
The Smart take from the stupid
And the weak become smart and rich and takes from everyone.
(I think Mojo Jojo said that)
Novemeber 22, John F. Kennedy assassination
Posted by maxify55 at 05:36 AM : Sep 15, 2008
You are one of those people who prefer socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor. The solution to the problem rests in compromise with everyone doing his fair share. Your approach is extremist and will only lead to worse problems.
Too bad they aren''''t all being sent to prison where the belong.
Posted by tuckerndfw at 02:05 AM : Sep 15, 2008
The Fed. Prison Camps are prison for the rich
Not a bad slap on the wrist for corporate representatives who know some of the best judges money can buy.
in with more largesse,,,"
"LARGESSE".!!!???"
"SAY IT!,,SAY "MONEY",,"M-O-N-E-Y",,"MONEY!"
"m-m-m-mon,,,mo,,mone,,,"
"NEVER MIND.!!",,SAY "LIQUIDITY"!"
"Liquidity.",,,I can say "liquidity" again
if you want!!
No no you proved the point, thank you,
share value $100 in 2007
share value $ 29 in 2008
71% loss in value, in 1 year
bush & co. want your social security in this "private" sector???? are they crazy?
One question, two answers, one common reason.
Answers:
Yes we think it funny as all get out.
No we do not think its funny at all.
Reason:
Your company and many others out of greed made a lot of wrong decisions along the way. Not that you had anything to say about it.
Well enjoy the ride as many of us got the boot several times over the last years thanks to free trade along with many other reasons. Sure they can make a bolt 5 cents cheaper but if it don%u2019t break right away in a few years it will. An American bolt has standards. Enjoy the ride as you have to sell for a loss your $750,000 condo in NYC. Enjoy the phone calls from the very people you worked for ask where this months checks are. Enjoy no health care and no retirement. If I was you I would get an answering machine and caller id. Your going to need it unless you have another trade like cutting lawns, splitting logs, pumping gas, flipping burgers, Etc. You could go work for Al Gore pretending to being green. I guess that means eating alot of grass.
Can anyone imagine the damages if social security & "asset-backed securities" (mortgages) were in the same pot ?? We''d probably be talking about Chapter 11 for the USA today.
everything these last 8 years has been reckless folly mixed with over inflated egos and arrogance.
Posted by maxify55 at 07:05 AM : Sep 15, 2008
I believe in honesty. Expecting to be paid for nothing is the opposite end of the coin from selfishly taking from others what you don''t deserve and driving them into servitude for unfair wages. We are all in this together. We are doing our best when everyone gets his share of prosperity. Fair and balanced is the centerground between all of the extremes. Compromise is esential for balanced solutions. We have seen precious little of it in Washington. We need honest politicians. Deceitful and self-serving politicians only make it worse.
Posted by neoconRcrazy at 07:26 AM
Excellent post ... spot on!!!
Posted by maxify55 at 07:10 AM : Sep 15, 2008
I have lived on this earth 60 years and at no time, under NO Democrat President has this nations suffered so much for the wealth of a few. You people are disgusting and worthless as far as I can see to this nation.
Posted by wdh3007 at 03:56 AM : Sep 15, 2008
----------------
----------------
You are a brain dead fool. You must work in politics? The loss of a few buildings in downtown New York and a few Thousand lives is terrible. However, in the larger scheme of things, it is a blip on the radar screen. What came after has been the disaster... That being politicians taking advantage of good American patriots out of greed and selfish desire. Democracy only works when the checks and balances are in place, ours is failed. There is always hope, but we need true change. I;m not sure our system is capable of it. Look at why Rome fell... Look familiar?
Posted by ontheleft at 07:37 AM : Sep 15, 2008"
This administration''s hands off approach with regard to sub prime lending and irresponsible borrowers, greedy appraisers lead us into this. The administration is in a state of denial. This war is financed by internal barrowing ( internal debt risen from 5.7 trillions to 10.16 trillions, capped at that) and no more money for war or for bailing out banks. Next president has to increase on top 5% of the income earners ( who makes 300,000 or more). That is rolling back taxes to rich.
Like when Bull O''Really was haranguing Barack Obama about capital gains tax rates--O''REally wants them at levels about half of other income--O''Really threatened to not put his money into investments if the tax rates are too high for his precious self.
Where else you gonna put all your money, Bull?
Into your mattress?
The "Gilded Age" is finally ending...
Lehman must not have made the necessary donations to the Repug party.
George Bush failed 9/11
George Bush failed to catch Bin Laden
George Bush failed the War in Afganistan
George Bush failed the War in Iraq
George Bush failed the "surge"
George Bush failed Katrina
George Bush failed the economy
How long can we endure failure by these stupid Republicans? How long?
Yes, we think that this is funny! Now, go find another $200,000 job flipping burgers instead of flipping people''s money.
Time to have a look at plan B?
Im sure many They are looking at a house that may have been set on fire in Texas because insurance only pays for wind and fire, not water. So burn it down and your in the club to collect. It%u2019s the American way now. Do you blame anybody anymore? Don%u2019t forget the next 165 billion will be needed in the spring to keep the war machine running. Would I deliberately default IN A MINUTE I should work in Washington. I would fit right in
How many "Reagan Democrats" have been hit, and hit hard by the ongoing financial collapse, of which this is but one small symptom?
If you''re one of them, don''t come crying to me!
And don''t expect me to bail you out!
Learn something new everyday, I thought it was a bunch of Ivy league liberals running Lehman
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 12
- next
See all 592 Comments