Diplomat: Moscow Stalling Over Monitors
International Efforts To Oversee Russian Presence In South Ossetia, Abkhazia Faltering
-
A Russian soldier looks on at a checkpoint at the village of Karaleti, 4 miles northwest of Gori, Georgia, Sept. 10, 2008. (AP Photo)
-
Who's Who Russia And Georgia At Odds Some of the faces and places involved in the tense dispute.
-
Interactive Russia Rolls Into Georgia Troops thrust deep into country after Georgia's attempt to reclaim South Ossetia.
The official, who has been intimately involved in three weeks of negotiations, accused Russia of stalling for time in an effort to keep observers from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe out of the two breakaway regions.
"It has become clear that Russia doesn't want any agreement. I think they're afraid of what the observers will see," the diplomat told The Associated Press, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to publicly discuss the talks.
"The talks have collapsed and there are no further discussions under way," he said.
The Vienna-based OSCE, Europe's largest security organization, now has a total of 28 monitors in Georgia. It has been trying to boost that presence to 100 in the aftermath of Russia's invasion last month, which came after Georgia attacked separatist South Ossetia.
But efforts to get Russia to agree on terms of the observers' deployment have bogged down over the central question of whether the unarmed military monitors would be allowed inside the two contested regions.
"For three weeks now, we have been fighting on how to deploy these extra 80 monitors without delay," the Western official said. "Everyone but Russia has said they should be able to get into all of Georgia, including South Ossetia."
Confidential OSCE documents obtained by the AP detail how Russian forces allegedly have restricted the monitors' movements.
"The freedom of movement of the OSCE military monitoring officers ... has been hindered and conditioned," said one document, issued as recently as Wednesday.
Another report, from Thursday, said all 28 observers "continue to encounter difficulties in their movement to most of the areas of their deployment."
"They are denied access to South Ossetia by the Russian Armed Forces deployed in the southern part of the area ... They are now also denied access to the Akhalgori district by South Ossetian armed personnel deployed along the administrative border of South Ossetia, where access had been previously granted," it said.
In addition to the OSCE monitors, the European Union has been racing to prepare 200 unarmed observers for Georgia by Oct. 1.
It has become clear that Russia doesn't want any agreement. I think they're afraid of what the observers will see.
Diplomat re: discussions over international observersRussia, however, has said it would keep 7,600 troops in the breakaway regions themselves for the foreseeable future, tightening its grip there.
The Kremlin's actions at the OSCE "throw into question the sincerity" of Moscow's pledge to pull back, the diplomat said Friday, after Russia rejected what he characterized as a "final compromise."
The official, along with another Western diplomat accredited to the 56-nation OSCE, told the AP that Russia introduced more than a dozen different proposals in the talks - only to withdraw them abruptly or reverse its position.
"Russia has gotten more and more hard-line in recent days," he said. "Our view is that they don't want the monitors there because they would report on how many troops are there, and where, and because they'll see villages burned" and evidence of other atrocities.
In Moscow, Foreign Ministry spokesman Igor Frolov insisted that Russia's position was based on the Sarkozy-Medvedev cease-fire agreement, which he said mentions nothing about increasing the number of OSCE observers in South Ossetia or Abkhazia.
However, the OSCE's permanent council - which includes Russia - agreed Aug. 19 to boost the number of monitors to 100 to implement a cease-fire agreement reached a week earlier.
Russia recognized South Ossetia and Abkhazia as independent nations after last month's war with Georgia over the regions. Both have had de-facto independence for more than a decade since breaking away from Georgian control in the early 1990s.
©MMVIII, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





Shareholders in the BTC pipeline are: British Petroleum, AzBTC, Chevron, Statoil, TPAO, ENI, Total, Itochu, INPEX, ConocoPhillips & Amerada Hess.
Russia is the second largest supplier of oil & gas on the planet.
After loosing Iraqi oil to Operation Iraqi Freedom, they negotiated supplies with Iran. The Russians were not happy with Cheneys BTC pipeline or the TAPI Caspian Sea Pipelines project going through Afghanistan. This threatens their economy based on oil & gas.
Again it s the Bush administrations lust for money in World markets for their BIG OIL buddies
Posted by tbweb at 03:47 PM : Sep 12, 2008
How true your words are, but I do have a question how come we normal people never have a problem with other normal people from other countries just the nut case politicians and religious leaders.
Says something about bother doesn''t it.
Posted by antoniof123 at 04:37 PM : Sep 12, 2008,,,
It`s more complicated than that, World Leaders have access to more inside information and facts than average citizens do and make decisions based on access to greater amounts of secret information. Our thoughts and comments are based on very limited information and speculation. The real issue is the trust citizens place in their Leaders to do the right thing and make the best decisions with the additional information and facts Leaders have access to. When citizens learn their Leaders abused their trust or told outright lies for hidden agendas it makes it hard for citizens to trust their Leaders in future endeavors and that`s where the World is now, very skeptical and not very trusting and several World Leaders have created this situation with past abuses!
Posted by tbweb at 03:47 PM : Sep 12, 2008
How true your words are, but I do have a question how come we normal people never have a problem with other normal people from other countries just the nut case politicians and religious leaders.
Says something about bother doesn''t it.
whenever you read the above, it''s propaganda.
-----------------------------------------
that''s absolutely true, of course. Anonymous sources are tricky, in some cases, you aren''t going to get a story without agreeing to anonymity...but of course, leaking out information meant to be propoganda that nobody has to take responsiblity for, is now standard operating procedure. And reporters don''t mind, cause all they ever wanted was another story for another day.
This story is pure dribble.
whenever you read the above, it''s propaganda.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by OlFishGut
With you leading the charge? Or are you just another Neocon scum who is brave with the lives of others, like your cowardly deserter hero George Bush, and Dik Cheney of the 5 draft deferments?
The U.S. already announced, its public knowledge available to anyone, that they moved their spy satellites out of the Iraq/Afghanastan region to a position to monitor Georgia. Ever seen Google earth? Used a computer? They have pictures of every single village in all of South Ossetia in great detail.
The very idea, that they need to keep the observers out for this reason, is, well its intentionally manipulative. This is the a real problem in the world today...words don''t mean any particular thing to politicians, they are just things that manipulate people.
But I digress.
To the topic at hand, did you ask South Ossetia if you could put monitors inside their sovereign borders?
No of course you didn''t, you are holding onto a fiction, some 17 years out of date, that Georgia controls South Ossetia. They don''t.
Ask the democratically elected government of South Ossetia for permission, and they may grant it, or they may reject it, their choice, not yours. Not even Russia''s for that matter.
- by olfishgut September 12, 2008 12:32 PM EDT
- We should tell them Russi''s we are sending in peace keeping observers, and then send in our Army Special Forces. That will teach them a lesson.
- Reply to this comment
See all 13 Comments