LEESBURG, Va., April 8, 2005

Convicted Spammer Prevails In Va. Court

State Supreme Court Strikes Down Anti-Spam Law, Calling It Unconstitutional

  • In this photo provided by the Loudoun County Sheriff's Office, Jeremy Jaynes is shown in Leesburg, Va., in October 2004.

    In this photo provided by the Loudoun County Sheriff's Office, Jeremy Jaynes is shown in Leesburg, Va., in October 2004.  (Loudoun County Sheriffs office)

  • Interactive Spam: Inbox Invasion

    Tips to stamp out spam, state-by-state laws and a look at the 10 most common unwanted e-mails.

  • Interactive PC Perils

    Facts on viruses and other computer menaces, security tips and a timeline of virus attacks.

  • Special Report PC Answer

    Tips and tricks from Larry Magid on PCs, software, gadgets and more.

(AP)  The Virginia Supreme Court declared the state's anti-spam law unconstitutional Friday and reversed the conviction of a man once considered one of the world's most prolific spammers.

The court unanimously agreed with Jeremy Jaynes' argument that the law violates the free-speech protections of the First Amendment because it does not just restrict commercial e-mails. Most other states also have anti-spam laws, and there is a federal CAN-SPAM Act as well.

The Virginia law "is unconstitutionally overbroad on its face because it prohibits the anonymous transmission of all unsolicited bulk e-mails, including those containing political, religious or other speech protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution," Justice G. Steven Agee wrote.

In 2004, Jaynes became the first person in the country to be convicted of a felony for sending unsolicited bulk e-mail. Authorities claimed Jaynes sent up to 10 million e-mails a day from his home in Raleigh, N.C. He was sentenced to nine years in prison.

Jaynes was charged in Virginia because the e-mails went through an AOL server there.

The state Supreme Court last February affirmed Jaynes' conviction on several grounds but later agreed, without explanation, to reconsider the First Amendment issue. Jaynes was allowed to argue that the law unconstitutionally infringed on political and religious speech even though all his spam was commercial.

Jaynes' attorney, Thomas Wolf, has said sending commercial spam would still be illegal under the federal CAN-SPAM Act even if Virginia's law is invalidated. However, he said the federal law would not apply to Jaynes because it was adopted after he sent the e-mails that were the basis for the state charges.




©MMV, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: