February 11, 2009 2:21 PM

Court Slams Wis. Cops In Coma Sex Case

(AP)  Police who videotaped a man having sex with his comatose wife in her nursing home room violated his constitutional rights, an appeals court ruled Thursday.

David W. Johnson, 59, had an expectation to privacy when he visited his wife, a stroke victim, at Divine Savior Nursing Home in Portage, the District 4 Court of Appeals ruled. Therefore, police violated his Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches when they installed a hidden video camera in the room, the court said.

"We are satisfied that Johnson's expectation of privacy while visiting his wife in her nursing home room is one that society would recognize as reasonable," the unanimous three-judge panel wrote.

The ruling means prosecutors cannot introduce the videotapes as evidence in their case against Johnson, who is charged with felony sexual assault for having intercourse with his wife without her consent at least three times in 2005.

Johnson's attorney, Christopher Kelly, said his client would visit his now 54-year-old wife every day, reading her the Bible and moving her arms and legs so her muscles wouldn't atrophy.

The woman's sister is upset that prosecutors brought charges against him, Kelly said. "She believes her sister's husband was merely expressing his love for his wife and was trying everything he could to bring her back to consciousness," Kelly said.

The couple married in 1988 and had no children, Kelly said.

Kelly said he believed prosecutors would be forced to drop the charges without the evidence on the tapes and thought the appeals court made "a pretty obvious call."

Johnson's wife was admitted to the nursing home after suffering a stroke. Court records say she was unable to speak or sit up, and nursing home staff members fed, cleaned and turned her. Prosecutors say she was comatose.

Johnson visited her frequently and sometimes would close the door to her room so they could have privacy as allowed by the nursing home. But staff members tipped off police, fearing she was in danger because, they suspected, he was having sex with her.

Police obtained a search warrant to videotape the room and installed the camera, which ran for three weeks. Johnson, who is free on bail, was charged based on that evidence.

Columbia County Circuit Judge Patrick Taggart tossed out the evidence last year, ruling it stemmed from an illegal search. Prosecutors appealed, arguing Johnson had a right to privacy when he visited his wife to care for her but not when he used the room for what they contend was illegal intercourse.

The appeals court affirmed Taggart's ruling.

Department of Justice spokesman Bill Cosh said prosecutors are evaluating whether to ask the state Supreme Court to review the case.

Johnson's wife remains in a coma at the nursing home.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 105 Comments
by Lilysleeper May 20, 2011 2:58 AM EDT
Are you people kidding me? Being someones wife isn't automatic consent that they can have sex with you no matter what state you're in! This woman is still an autonomous human being, not this man's property, and as such she deserves the right to decide when and if she wants to have sex with him. That is certainly not a right being afforded to her if she is in a coma.
Reply to this comment
by wanetawr September 14, 2008 4:26 AM EDT
Listen To Me! They are married. Leave it the heck alone! We should be much more concerned that the police were recording in her room. Welcome to Nazi Germany everyone. THIS IS HOW IT STARTS! Every right they take away, every law the break, every breach of privacy is all FOR YOUR PROTECTION!
Reply to this comment
by tootall10142 September 13, 2008 11:18 AM EDT
The local judge that issued the warrant should be repramanded by the board of lawywers and judges.Local judges are always looking to kiss someones a@ss to either further his career or return a favor from a previous case that was a little shaky and he allowed it any way his *** should be sued along with the county proescuter and the officers that executed a illegal search and seizure.THESSE PRICKS ARE WHAT YOU ARE TELLING YOUR CHILDREN TO TRUST.PEOPLE LAUGH AT THE PEOPLE IN THE SOUTH BUT THIS KIND OF STUPID SH---IT DOESNT GO ON AROUND HERE. AND NEVER WILL.
Reply to this comment
by no2zeebas September 12, 2008 9:57 PM EDT
I recall a story a couple of years back, where a young girl was dead, and while in the mortuary, prior to being eviscerated and embalmed, a young man decided that the girl was too pretty to resist, and so had s3x with her, whereupon she awoke from a confirmed, clinical death.



Posted by brianbwb at 09:47 PM : Sep 11, 2008


You win the Darwin award of the century...A person that has been embalmed can not wake up or come back to life...

Posted by no2zeebas at 04:19 PM : Sep 12, 2008

I guess I''ll have to claim that Darwin award instead...I re-read your post and it clearly say''s "prior"...My bad...
Reply to this comment
by no2zeebas September 12, 2008 9:57 PM EDT
I recall a story a couple of years back, where a young girl was dead, and while in the mortuary, prior to being eviscerated and embalmed, a young man decided that the girl was too pretty to resist, and so had s3x with her, whereupon she awoke from a confirmed, clinical death.



Posted by brianbwb at 09:47 PM : Sep 11, 2008


You win the Darwin award of the century...A person that has been embalmed can not wake up or come back to life...

Posted by no2zeebas at 04:19 PM : Sep 12, 2008

I guess I''ll have to claim that Darwin award instead...I re-read your post and it clearly say''s "prior"...My bad...
Reply to this comment
by no2zeebas September 12, 2008 9:56 PM EDT
I recall a story a couple of years back, where a young girl was dead, and while in the mortuary, prior to being eviscerated and embalmed, a young man decided that the girl was too pretty to resist, and so had s3x with her, whereupon she awoke from a confirmed, clinical death.



Posted by brianbwb at 09:47 PM : Sep 11, 2008


You win the Darwin award of the century...A person that has been embalmed can not wake up or come back to life...

Posted by no2zeebas at 04:19 PM : Sep 12, 2008

I guess I''ll have to claim that Darwin award instead...I re-read your post and it clearly say''s "prior"...My bad...
Reply to this comment
by chimpyout September 12, 2008 9:00 PM EDT
Hope you file civil suits and win! Go get ''em Dave. Hope your endeavors eventually get a good response too!
Reply to this comment
by rickstas September 12, 2008 8:56 PM EDT
no2zeebas, LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by no2zeebas September 12, 2008 7:19 PM EDT
I recall a story a couple of years back, where a young girl was dead, and while in the mortuary, prior to being eviscerated and embalmed, a young man decided that the girl was too pretty to resist, and so had s3x with her, whereupon she awoke from a confirmed, clinical death.



Posted by brianbwb at 09:47 PM : Sep 11, 2008


You win the Darwin award of the century...A person that has been embalmed can not wake up or come back to life...
Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 September 12, 2008 4:10 PM EDT
"...but maybe he would like to make love to her a few more times before she dies." Posted by harp1963 at 09:09 AM : Sep 12, 2008

Oh sure, I just bet that''s it!!

Give your freakin'' head a shake!
Reply to this comment
See all 105 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook