Sept. 10th, 2008
Obama, Biden And The Bridge To Nowhere
National Review Online: Sarah Palin Is Taking Hits Over The Bridge, But Obama And Biden Have Their Own Questions To Answer
-
Play CBS Video Video Palin's Bridge Claim Sinks Sarah Palin has come under fire by claiming that she turned down federal earmark spending for the "bridge to nowhere" in her native Alaska. But, as Wyatt Andrews reports, Palin did accept the funds.
-
Video Alaska's Bridge To Nowhere A controversial bridge project in Alaska may run into more problems because it could threaten the habitat of an endangered species. Jerry Bowen reports from Anchorage.
-
Republican vice presidential candidate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin addresses supporters before introducing Republican presidential candidate Sen., John McCain, R-Ariz. during a campaign rally at Franklin & Marshall College in Lancaster, Pa., on Tuesday, Sept. 9, 2008. (AP Photo/Vinny Tennis)
-
60 Minutes The New Team Barack Obama and Joe Biden give their first joint interview to CBS' Steve Kroft.
-
Timeline Palin's Path A look at Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's life and career
The far-away, now-abandoned Bridge to Nowhere lately has taken center stage in the race for the White House. For an unbuilt span that never actually connected two cold spots, it certainly is generating plenty of heat.
“The McCain campaign continues to repeat the lie that Sarah Palin stopped the Bridge to Nowhere,” Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton told the Associated Press Monday.
“The only people ‘lying’ about spending are the Obama campaign,” McCain-Palin spokesman Brian Rogers shot back. “The only explanation for their hysterical attacks is that they’re afraid that when John McCain and Sarah Palin are in the White House, Barack Obama’s nearly $1 billion in earmark spending will stop dead in its tracks,” he added, referring to the 330 federally funded projects worth $931.3 million that Obama has requested since joining the Senate in January 2005.
Crossfire aside, who is right here? And are Barack Obama and Joe Biden fighting this issue with clean hands?
The GOP ticket’s detractors cite a statement Gov. Palin made on September 21, 2007: “Despite the work of our congressional delegation, we are about $329-million short of full funding for the bridge project, and it’s clear that Congress has little interest in spending any more money on a bridge between Ketchikan and Gravina Island.”
As TalkingPointMemo.com adds: “She shut it down after it became clear that Congress would no longer fund it.”
While noting her early support for the Bridge while a gubernatorial candidate, the Republican vice-presidential nominee’s critics seem to forget statements she made against it while governor long before “Palin officially killed the project” as PolitiFact.com puts it.
While running for chief executive, Palin backed the bridge, although with little evident enthusiasm. “The money that’s been appropriated for the project,” she told Ketchikan voters in September 2006, “it should remain available for a link, an access process as we continue to evaluate the scope and just how best to just get this done.”
Palin could have fought for the bridge as governor, as did her spendthrift GOP predecessor, Frank Murkowski (whom she jettisoned in a primary). Murkowski recommended dedicating $195 million in the state budget for the bridge. Instead, Palin gave it $0.
“Palin’s budget doesn’t include money for mega projects that she supported as a candidate, such as the controversial Gravina Island bridge in Ketchikan,” Kyle Hopkins wrote in the December 16, 2006 Anchorage Daily News. “Palin said she will hash out where the bridge fits on the state’s list of priorities with the help of the Legislature and public. ‘We have a limited pot of money, of course, and we need to make wise, sensible choices,’ she said.”
In a February 2007 report on infrastructure priorities, Palin’s transition team opposed the Bridge, plus a road in Juneau. “Statewide, these two projects are seen as a severe drain on resources that would otherwise be assigned to heavily used commercial and passenger routes,” the study concluded.
Alaska’s Senate approved $1.6 billion in capital items on May 11, 2007. True to Palin’s wishes, the spending plan provided no money for the Bridge to Nowhere.
On September 21, 2007, Palin finally stated, “‘Ketchikan desires a better way to reach the airport, but the $398 million bridge is not the answer.”
Palin’s early, tepid support for the bridge, followed by her open hostility to it as governor did not please the state’s GOP political establishment.
As Amy Goldstein and Michael D. Shear observed in the August 30 Washington Post, Palin “has angered two of Alaska’s leading Republicans - Sen. Ted Stevens and Rep. Don Young - by refusing to support their decades-long practice of securing federal money for the state, including Young’s effort to obtain $233 million for a structure dubbed the ‘Bridge to Nowhere’ by critics because it would have connected a small town with an island populated with 50 people. In her short time in state office, she has repeatedly thwarted Stevens’s and Young’s interests and, at times, challenged their candidates - including their children.”
While it may be unfair to say that Sarah Palin always treated the Bridge as Milton Friedman might have, she quickly grasped the project’s folly and ultimately put it out of the nation’s misery. In a country where politicians endlessly make demands until weary taxpayers capitulate, Palin scrapped the bridge soon after she was empowered to do so.
Obama and Biden’s moaning about all of this would be far easier to stomach if they, too, opposed the Bridge to Nowhere. Not so.
Obama and Biden had an excellent opportunity to do the right thing. Just seven weeks after Hurricane Katrina, Senator Tom Coburn (R., Okla.) proposed to transfer $125 million from the notorious Bridge’s budget and instead devote it to rebuilding the Interstate 10 Twin Spans Bridge between New Orleans and St. Tammany’s Parish. The storm chopped up the bridge.
“We have the largest natural catastrophe we have ever seen in our history,” Coburn said on the Senate floor on October 20, 2005. “It is time we reassess the priorities we utilize in this body as we think about our obligations at home.”
Coburn’s amendment failed 15-82. Obama and Biden were among the “nays.” They and 80 other senators preferred to protect the earmarking tradition than to assist Katrina’s tempest-tossed citizens.
Obama and Biden put pork first and people second. While the residents of New Orleans and southern Louisiana endured perhaps their greatest challenge since the Civil War, Obama and Biden both turned their backs on these embattled Americans.
Katrina demolished much of the city of Slidell, home to Nan Eitel, a formerly New Orleans-based attorney who relocated with her family to Washington, D.C. after the storm. The Twin Spans Bridge was “the route I used to take to work every day,” she recalls by phone. When Eitel learned Monday that Obama and Biden helped junk Coburn’s plan to rebuild the bridge she traveled every weekday morning and evening for 14 years, she says, “I was stunned. That bridge is critical to the economy of the greater New Orleans region.” She explains that it connected Slidell’s bedroom community with downtown New Orleans. She says it served “many people who worked in the oil and gas industry and the Michoud, Louisiana facility where the Space Shuttle’s rockets are built.”
Eitel says that Obama and Biden’s votes “showed a tremendous lack of understanding for that community and the bridge’s importance to the reconstruction effort.” While other routes connected New Orleans to the north and west, the ruined Twin Spans Bridge left it isolated from points east. “Without the bridge, you couldn’t get the city rebuilt,” Eitel says. “Without it, you could not bring in building supplies. Without it you could not truck in the water and food that people needed.”
The Twin Spans Bridge is being rebuilt, though without the help that Coburn tried to provide and Obama and Biden helped block.
“Sarah Palin stood up to the biggest porkers in her state when she refused to spend taxpayer dollars on the Bridge to Nowhere,” the Club for Growth said in a statement yesterday. “Some in the media have claimed that Congress killed the Bridge first. This is not true. Congress removed the requirement to fund the bridge, leaving the choice up to the state. Once given the choice, Palin refused to spend taxpayer dollars on the wasteful Bridge to Nowhere. Standing up to Ted Stevens and Don Young in Alaska is nothing to sneeze at. Clearly, Barack Obama didn’t have the same courage in 2005.”
“While Barack Obama attacks Sarah Palin, we still have not heard him disavow his 2005 vote in favor of the Bridge to Nowhere and admit his mistake,” said Club for Growth President Pat Toomey. “Sarah Palin deserves credit for recognizing how harmful and corrupt the pork process has become. Barack Obama has had three years to come to the same realization, and we’re still waiting. We call on Senator Obama to disavow his 2005 vote in favor of the Bridge to Nowhere.”
It may be too much to expect Obama and Biden to apologize for embracing an extravagance for 50 Alaskans over a necessity for some 500,000 New Orleanians. However, it would be nice if Democrats stopped attacking Palin who finally buried a boondoggle that Obama and Biden valued more than they did the victims of Hurricane Katrina.
By Deroy Murdock
Reprinted with permission from National Review Online
- Biden belongs on a bridge to nowhere. He fits the description of a stoneage politician. Also, he is not that bright and will bring disgrace to the U.S. if elected. He belongs in the same camp as Ted Kennedy.
- Reply to this comment
- Yes: You are a disgrace... and you know who you are. I hope you like OSAMA.
- Reply to this comment
- AaaBee, I am sure you can come up with lots of things you THINK are ture. I can not help it if you see a lie as the truth. Sorry I got you so work up abput you son OSAMA.
- Reply to this comment
- Obama, Biden And The Bridge To Nowhere, they should be on it, that is where they are going, NOWWHERE
- Reply to this comment
- The bridge to nowhere was slated to be built from Ketchikan to the island where the airport is. Presently, there is a ferry that goes back and forth all day- takes about 10 minutes. It serves the purpose. Maybe a bridge would be a bit quicker, but in my visit there, I thought the ferry was a great addition to the trip. I, too, would think that the money could be better spent elsewhere. (But a bridge would modernize that part of Alaska.) I vote for the ferry. (I still think we don''t have good candidates for President.)
- Reply to this comment
- It may be too much to expect Obama and Biden to apologize for embracing an extravagance for 50 Alaskans over a necessity for some 500,000 New Orleanians. However, it would be nice if Democrats stopped attacking Palin who finally buried a boondoggle that Obama and Biden valued more than they did the victims of Hurricane Katrina.
-Good article, I hope people actually read it before they post. It really shows what fakes Obama and Biden are and that Sarah Palin showed common sense from the beginning to end. - Reply to this comment
- Whether your a Republican or not?? The truth is that McCain is a man with health problems not in the "prime" of his youth.. Do you really want Palin as the President of the USA????????????
- Reply to this comment
- To the idiots who keep trying to play with Obama''s name demonstrate the ignorance of the Republican party as you continue to show your school kid mentality as you make fun of something that has nothing to do with anything.
You continue to try to perpetrate hate and fear by making a play on his name and heritage - against all of the American ideals...
Discrimination is DEAD!!! It has no place in our decisions to vote for a person and you clearly demonstrate a blatant resistance to EQUALITY for ALL...
You are a disgrace... and you know who you are... - Reply to this comment
- She finally granted an interview with Charlie Gibson on ABC which will be aired tonight @ 11:30pm on ABC.
I saw a clip where she mentioned that yes we will have to go to war for Georgia and the Ukraine as since we are a member of NATO then we must "honor our commitment to our NATO allies"...
What was the problem with that statement??? Well ... Gee ... Neither Georgia or the Ukraine are members of NATO...
Well ... her ignorance did have a chance to show very fast ... with her very first interview...
As we guessed... she is not doing any interviews and probably won''t grant anymore because she has no clue about the rest of the world and probably has no clue about the other 49 states... Well... I guess she knows a bit about Hawaii since her first 2 colleges were there...
I''m sure she can tell you about the rain in one area vs the best tanning spots and nightclubs...
And why are we questioning her ability to take over if John McCain''s arteries all of a sudden clog and he has a major heart attack or stroke or yet worse - dies...
How long as she been "preparing" to be the V.P.??? almost 2 weeks... As far as experience goes - the experience of preparing to be President and focusing on what is best for our country - not just an individual home state or town goes to Barack Obama... - Reply to this comment
- Cry baby Republicans. Oh boohoo. Go play footsie with the non christians in Idaho. They have plenty of public restrooms.
The sodom and Gomorrah of these times is the republicans. They only pay lip service to God and will suffer eternal damnation just as cain did. - Reply to this comment
- Sounds like you "Pinkos" are begining to worry....
Posted by ken1dall at 02:23 PM : Sep 11, 2008
Well, I know knowledgeable people have been worried about the diminishing quality of US life for these past 8 years. I worry about the continuation of our diminishing way of life under McCain/Palin No-Change Platform.
McCain can''t fight his own Bush-clone voting record, and Palin can''t be for cleaning up government using a team of lawyers to hide her own dirt. - Reply to this comment
- Osama, gets in the white house all we well hear are lies. He and his VP are no good. They do one thing good, LIE. Posted by Upto007 at 10:31 AM : Sep 11, 2008
Would you back your statement up with some links to Obama lies?
I imagine what you will link to is respective conservative sites stating Obama is a liar using personal opinions to back up their views, as you may have here.
In case you don''t realize it, Obama being a proven liar and the opposition SAYING he is a liar are two very different things.
I regret to say I am not sure if the Talk Radio listership grasps that distinction.
Lets Google and see what lies of Obama''s we come up with and who actually said them. LOL. - Reply to this comment
- Okay, so Ms Palin was marginally for the bridge before she was adamently against it. Its called changing your mind when you get more facts...something Republicans don''t allow outside their own circle. They call it flip-flopping when a non-Republican does it.
But back to pork, that other pork?
Alaska ranks first in pork-barrel spending
Published: March 22, 2008 at 6:24 PM
Alaska ranks top among all U.S. states in so-called pork-barrel spending, while Arizona is at the bottom...Data indicate Alaska received $506.34 per capita this fiscal year while Arizona only received $18.70 per capita.
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2008/03/22/Alaska_ranks_first_in_pork-barrel_spending/UPI-14101206224683/
Alaska, and Palin, are not pork-free by any means. She takes her share and then some:
"Earmarks have become a major concern in the political world after numerous reports linking corruption and over-spending to the funding process." - Reply to this comment
- I don''t think Obama or Biden have to explain why they falsely claimed they stopped a project that Congress pulled out of the budget before they got elected, which is what Palin has been doing on the Bridge to Nowhere. I hope they did not ask for half a million to study the mating habits of crabs, which Governor Palin''s state has.
- Reply to this comment
- ################
I have faith in the American people sanity will prevail.
Lets face it sarah palin pick was design to be a car crash , people will stop and take a look , but sooner or later they will keep on driving and head on home to some sanity.
the palin/ jerry springer cirus was a nice show now back to reality.
obama /biden 08 - Reply to this comment
- Sarah Palin kept the $229 million for other pork-barrel spending. She fleeced the taxpayers of the US.
- Reply to this comment
- REPUBLICANS WILL BE LUCKY TO CARRY 4 STATES IN NOVEMBER.
- Reply to this comment
- OK, here''s the deal- in language as simple and irrefutable as I can make it:
If you are happy with the way things are in America right now, vote for the people who made it that way.
If you think we are on a disastrous path and want things to improve, vote for the people who will honestly try to bring about those improvements.
It''s really very simple, but as we have proven in the past, so are we...
All the rest is noise. - Reply to this comment
- Sounds like you "Pinkos" are begining to worry....
- Reply to this comment
- The difference is that Barack and Biden are not on the stump lying day after day after day about their record. Sale of plane on EBay? Oops. Never happened. Sale of plane at a profit? Oops. Never happened. Did nothing as National Guard leader? Yes, until she promoted the general a rank so he would pimp for her. God sent us to Iraq? Who are you kidding? She makes John Birch look sane.
- Reply to this comment

The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.



