February 11, 2009 2:21 PM

States Urged To Raise The Driving Age

(CBS/AP)  Taking aim at a longstanding rite of passage for 16-year-olds, an influential auto safety group is calling on states to raise the age for getting a driver's license to 17 or even 18.

Adrian Lund, president of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, a research group funded by the auto insurance industry, acknowledged the idea is "a tough sell," but noted that car crashes are the leading cause of death among teenagers.

"The bottom line is that when we look at the research, raising the driving age saves lives," Lund said. He plans to present the proposal Tuesday at the annual conference of the Governors Highway Safety Association in Scottsdale, Ariz.

Not surprisingly, a lot of teens hate the idea.

"I would really be upset because I've waited so long to drive," said Diamante White, a 16-year-old in Reading, Pa., who got her permit in July. She said learning to drive is a "growing-up experience."

Many parents agree. They also like not having to chauffeur their teens to school, sporting events and any number of other places.

"Do we really want our kids dependent upon parents for virtually everything until they go to college, can vote and serve their country?" asked Margaret Menotti, a mother in Uxbridge, Mass.

She argued that keeping teens from driving would only make them less responsible. Some parents also find it ironic that this conversation is happening just as a group of college presidents have proposed lowering the drinking age to 18.

Among other things, institute researchers have compiled decades worth of data from New Jersey, the only state that issues licenses at 17. Various studies have shown that the overall rate of teens killed in crashes in New Jersey has been consistently lower than in some nearby states.

One study from the 1990s found that the rate of crash-related deaths among 16- and 17-year olds were 18 per 100,000 in New Jersey, compared with 26 per 100,000 in Connecticut. Those rates, researchers said, have dropped even further since both states instituted graduated driver's license programs.

Graduated licensing, which has become the standard across the country in the past 15 years, requires teens to spend more time driving with a parent or other responsible adult before they go solo. Though these rules are sometimes difficult to enforce, many states tie these more stringent standards to declining teen crash rates.

Illinois now has one of the toughest graduated licensing programs, reports CBS News correspondent Cynthia Bowers. Brent Johnson, who's been teaching kids to drive at suburban Chicago Hinsdale High School for 34 years, helped push through the restrictions, which require 100 hours of supervised driving and only one passenger for new drivers.

"We got tired of seeing our kids die on our highways," Johnson told Bowers. "Up through July, the end of this July this year, we've seen a 47 percent drop in fatal crashes>"

More than 5,000 U.S. teens die each year in car crashes. The rate of crashes, fatal and nonfatal, per mile driven for 16-year-old drivers is almost 10 times the rate for drivers ages 30 to 59, according to the National Highway Safety Administration. Many industrialized countries in Europe and elsewhere have a driving age of 17 or 18.

Barbara Harsha, executive director of the Governors Highway Safety Association, said she welcomes a debate on raising the driving age - as do many who deal with public health.

"Getting the highest of the high-risk drivers away from the wheel probably isn't a bad idea," said Dr. Barbara Gaines, trauma director at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC.

But she and others - even the Insurance Institute officials who propose raising the driving age - agreed it is not the only option.

Gaines noted that teen drivers in the Pittsburgh area who have committed moving violations must attend a "reality education" program at her hospital. They tour the intensive care unit and talk with young drivers who have been in serious crashes.

Andrea Summers, coordinator of the teen driving program for the Delaware Office of Highway Safety, said her state and others have chosen to toughen laws without raising the driving age - by banning teens from using cell phones while driving, imposing stricter driving curfews and expanding supervised driving time. Even New Jersey is considering lengthening the time a young driver has a permit, from six months to 12.

Still others say we are worrying too much about teen drivers, and not enough about others who cause serious problems on the road.

Karen Sternheimer, a University of Southern California sociologist who studies accident statistics, cited federal data from 2007 showing that drivers ages 25 to 34, as well as those ages 45 to 64, were nearly twice as likely to be involved in alcohol-related fatalities as 16- to 20-year-old drivers.

"The intense focus on teens diverts our attention from the real threats to public safety: speeding and driving while intoxicated," she said.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 18 Comments
by cfh176 February 25, 2010 1:03 AM EST
If we were talking about any other subject, this would not be an issue. Lets say that 85% of slap shots are missed by 16 year olds. Your argument, as it stands, is that by banning all 16 year olds from performing a slap shot until they are 18, they will, without practice, significantly improve their ability to perform a slap shot. Inexperience is not corrected by prolonging the waiting period to try. Graduated licensing, when properly enforced, is a much better option and far less disruptive to the learning process and the country as a whole. If you want to make it better, make those who are supposed to be watching accountable. A 16 year old cant own a car. Someone has to supply it for them. Therefore, if you impose fines and sanctions on the registered owner of a vehicle as well as the driver until the age of 18, parents will start to pay attention to what their children are doing with their cars. If I am going to get a $200 ticket every time my son speeds or has too many people in the car, I am going to make every effort to ensure that these thing don't happen.
Reply to this comment
by j0xujahc September 12, 2008 6:21 PM EDT
Raising the age to 18 would not impose an undue hardship on our youth and would most definitely aid in ensuring safety on our highways.
I remember how I was at 16-17 and I would not say any of my pears were any different. We all drove fast, fast all the rime. I lost several of my classmates to automobiles accidents.
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica September 12, 2008 5:13 PM EDT
There will always be evangelists crusading to force others to conform to their beliefs. This a case and point.
Reply to this comment
by cepe10-2009 September 12, 2008 12:42 PM EDT
this insurance funded institute is a sham - they should go after elderly drivers and impeders (left lane lurkers) who are causing the reduced spacing and gridlock if there cared about safety.
Reply to this comment
by barbaram99 September 11, 2008 10:07 PM EDT
I have to say amen to that Vet. 21 years old to drive, 21 years old to drink. 21 years old to go in the military. 21 YEARS OLD TO BECOME AN ADULT. I am 53. Yep. I had to wait to my 21 birthday to be an adult. I was put in fostor care at 5. I was a foster child until 21. The law said 18. I could do very little. When I was in sp ed high school,there was an over 14 year boy who could legaally drive as his parents could not as they had health issues. I knew the boy. The only time he could drive was to take his parents to the Drs,them to where they needed to go. He could not take the car to drive alone. He eas the family driver and that meant a parent ibn the car with him. That was why he was granted to drive. It is a small town. I ''member the kids that were 18 could raise their paw but had to wait to be 21. They should be 21 and the only reason to legally drive at a younger age is if he/she is the family driver, amd a parent be in the car.I am sure ye and yers won''t like this. I am also legally blind from birth. Learn the white cane law and yes there is a law in all 50 states and fed as well. It is too easy to get a driver''s licnese.
Reply to this comment
by madhatter219 September 11, 2008 8:58 PM EDT
I think parents are to blame most parents just sign off driving permit hours for there kids that time is a crucial learning period that everybody needs i say make it longer drinking and driving is such a bigger issue though especially in cali.
Reply to this comment
by stupidrules3 September 11, 2008 9:39 AM EDT
STOP IT! It`s called "Natural Selection".


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Nancy_Naive at 10:42 AM : Sep 10, 2008


Be careful Nancy, you may be naturally selected. On the road, teens texting and talking on cell phones are a danger to everyone, not just themselves.
Reply to this comment
by blackyowe September 11, 2008 5:03 AM EDT
I agree with the last part of the piece lets push harder to stop speeding and driving while intoxicated!
Reply to this comment
by candy-apple September 10, 2008 8:23 PM EDT
In Louisiana the age is now 17. Teens also are now required to take drivers ed in order to get a permit.

It''s not always the age of the child that needs to be taken into consideration, it''s the child themselves. Are they ready to take on the responsibility of driving? Not all kids are the same, but changing the age requirements punishes all for the irresponsibility of the few.
Reply to this comment
by hwy71so September 10, 2008 5:26 PM EDT
I think leaving it at 16 is fine. Raising the age is an insult to the parents'' judgment.
Reply to this comment
See all 18 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook