Bush: 8,000 U.S. Troops To Leave Iraq

U.S. Presence In Afghanistan To Be Upped To Handle Increased Violence There

(CBS)  Pointing to a reduction in violence in parts of Iraq as a sign of success for last year's increase in U.S. troop presence, President George W. Bush announced today a withdrawal of some forces from Iraq, some of which will be deployed to the war in Afghanistan.

Acting on recommendations made by Defense Secretary Robert Gates, the president announced the withdrawal of 8,000 troops from Iraq by next February: A battalion of 1,500 Marines out of western Iraq in November, and an Army combat brigade of 3,500 soldiers in February, along with 3,400 support troops.

That will bring overall troop strength in the country down to 136,000 - about what it was in 2006 before the "troop surge" was announced.

Mr. Bush also announced an increase in U.S. forces in Afghanistan: A Marine battalion that was scheduled to deploy to Iraq in November will instead be shipped to Afghanistan, and an Army combat brigade will follow in January.

CBS News national security correspondent David Martin said the troop withdrawal could well be Mr. Bush's last major decision on the Iraq War - an issue that has dominated and defined his presidency.

But even these modest withdrawals - less than six percent of U.S. troops - are more than the commander in Iraq, General David Pretraeus originally wanted; he recommended no further reductions until June of next year.

But he was overruled because of the pressing need to free up more troops for Afghanistan.

Still, Martin notes, the 5,000 additional forces headed for Afghanistan is only a fraction of what the commander there says he needs.

Speaking this morning to an audience at the National Defense University in Washington, D.C., Mr. Bush held up Iraq's Anbar province - the site of the 2006 Anbar Awakening - as evidence of the success of the U.S. troop surge that was instituted last year.
"Anbar was one of the most dangerous provinces in Iraq," he said. "Al Qaeda was in control of almost every major population center."

He said military intelligence had concluded the province was lost.

"Anbar was held up as proof of America's failure in Iraq," he said. "Yet something remarkable was happening. The tribes in Anbar were growing tired of al Qaeda's brutality. They wanted to live a normal life, and this presented us with an opportunity to defeat al Qaeda in Anbar."

He said the 4,000 additional Marines who went to Anbar last year showed America's commitment to security there. "It helped renew the confidence of local leaders, the tribal sheiks who led an uprising to take Anbar back from the terrorists. Together [the insurgents] were systematically controlled.

"Today Anbar is a province transformed."

Mr. Bush said the recent turnover of control to Iraqi authorities in Ramadi is evidence that Iraq is on the road to self-governance and self-defense.

Mr. Bush then turned his focus to Afghanistan, where U.S. casualties have been increasing, and where a "quiet surge" (his term) of U.S. Marines and NATO troops, and a doubling of trained Afghan security forces, has been taking place in recent months.

He also spoke of civilian losses - Afghanis who have lost their lives in the midst of U.S. and NATO operations.

"Regrettably there will be times when our pursuit of the enemy will result in accidental civilian deaths. This has been the case throughout the history of warfare. Our nation mourns the loss of every innocent life. Every grieving family has the sympathy of the American people. I've given President Karzai my word that America will work closely with the Afghan government to ensure security of Afghan people while protecting innocent lives."

Mr. Bush said the additional troops will be employed to provide security, protect the country's infrastructure and democratic institutions and help ensure access to services like education and health care.

"Afghanistan's success is critical to the security of America and our partners in the free world. For all the good work we've done in that country, it is clear we must do even more. As we learned in Iraq, the best way to restore the confidence of the people is to restore basic security, and that requires more troops."

He also announced an allied initiative to double the size of the Afghan
National Army over the next five years, and to increase the involvement of local tribes.

"In the period ahead we will once again encourage Afghan security forces and Afghan tribes to take a leading role in the building of a democratic Afghanistan. The Taliban and al Qaeda will not be allowed to return to power. The terrorists will suffer the same fate in Afghanistan that they are now suffering in Iraq, and they will be defeated."

[petro49l]

Sunnis and Shia control Al Qada Iraq. There is no need for a concentration of American Troops. The next President should order most U.S. soldiers home from Iraq. George W. Bush is offering a only a token reduction. His Saudi Friends want extensive fighting in Afghanistan to justify a high price on a barrel of oil.

[skyk-2009]

My Dear Old Mother told me once... The truth will hurt you but once... a lie will hurt you Forever.

[hacker101001]

It''s becoming clear that all hell is going to break loose when we leave Iraq regardless of whether we leave now or in a year or in 5 years. It just seems like keeping troops there is prolonging the inevitable....

[hacker101001]

Somebody please just tell me this: what does Victory look like? In WWII the day we marched into Berlin that was it, Nazism was essentially defeated. So what event has to transpire that I can say look, we won. When I turn on the tv the day we can officially pull out of Iraq what am I going to see? Will there be daises falling from the sky? a sunni/shia orgy in the middle of Baghdad? maybe it will be on Christmas and they will all be singing Noel?

[edward1975-2009]

Hacker: You will know victory has happened if the fractured government of Iraq finds a way to work. History will record what history will, it is up to the individual to decide if the sacrifices made by our brave soldiers was worth it. In my mind though, nobody wins when war is involved.

[justgames]

Oh my, what wonderful and spontaneous timing Mr. President!!!

Okay people, starting to get the gist of republicans and the way they do things? Or are we still blind and stupid?!?

[royalia]

Whaaaat? Troop withdrawal? Is this a...timeline? Oh no, a time HORIZON. You should have waited until October to announce this in order to maximize the politcal benefit. But at least some troops will be coming home, starting in the next term.

[royalia]

Republicans put country over party!!! Bwaaahahahaha! Whew! Lying your way into a war in Iraq, that''s putting country FIRST! Doubling the national debt, that''s putting country FIRST! Not capturing Osama bin Laden, letting him escape from Afghanistan, now that''s putting country FIRST!

[nerfff-2009]

Bush Wins In Iraq, Turns Attention To Afghan.

Anarchist Retards Frantic To Find Negative Spin.

[thevicar1]

And all the Liber-Brats said George Bush and John McCain were gonna keep us in Iraq for 100 years!

HA!

[armydog2]

get a grip guys these Troops are scheduled to redeploy in Feb. anyway. I know because my son is in a group of about 2500 scheduled to come home after their 15 month tour is up. This is just more bull from bush and the neocons.

[petro49l]

Why increase the number of American Troops in Afghanistan? Bin Laden will order their deaths. Osama invites the Coalition to kill Taliban, Afghanis, or Pakistanis. The Coalition will not penetrate the Waziristan underground sanctuary because Politicians in Islamabad are paid to protect it.

[royalia]

"George Bush and John McCain were gonna keep us in Iraq for 100 years!"

How do you know that we won''t be? We''ll have to wait and see now won''t we. And Afghanistan is where we should have been all along. We wouldn''t have to be turning there now if we had put the resources where they should have been in the first place. "Liberal!" You don''t know who you''re talking to. It''s called logic and analysis. It''s called thinking.

[coventina-2009]

Some videos of John McCain in his own words that voters for or against him ought to be aware of.


http://bravenewfilms.org/blog/49248-mccain-s-mansions-the-houses-that-greed-built

[rmiles4015]

8,000 troops leaving Iraq!. Could this be more misleading spin from our "leaders". They just announced that 3,600 Wisconsin troops are to be deployed to Irag. The largest deployment since WWII.

[presjfk]

"As we learned in Iraq, the best way to restore the confidence of the people is to restore basic security, and that requires more troops, said Bush"

Bush is a learn as he goes kind of President.

Every decision he makes is a mistake, other opinions are wrong, he goes forward stubbornly and stupidly and when his plan doesn''t work - he adopts the opposite strategy then calling it his own.

If McCain wins, Palin will be exactly the same. If McCain were to die and Palin became President, this know-nothing, bold-face-lying, 20 month-on-the-job governor would be the next trial by fire President.

Do the Republicans deserve another 4 years in office after what they have doen to us over the last 8 years? Of course not.

[presjfk]

"But we won, we won! Woot. Posted by daffy64 "

The Republicans call it victory. What a friggin joke.

[antoniof123]

Musical chairs move the troops from one place to another. The violence will increase one we decrease out troops in one place to put them in another.

I can see we either need a draft to keep these wars up or we need to get out. Take you pick but once you do don''t cry like a baby about it once it is done and you don''t like it.

[hotpaulie]

What are we winning in Iraq??? Absolutely nothing. The U.S. has nothing to gain from this war. The real conflict (the war that Bush didn''t start)is in Afghanistan and is far far from victory.

[presjfk]

If the Republicans want Victory in Iraq, here is what they must do:

1. Conquer Iraq completely, using violence unprecedented in modern times. We''re talking massacres and the raising of cities that defy us in any way.
2. They must take every ounce of oil from the country and transport it directly to the USA.
3. They must turn Iraq into a Protectorate and eventually a Territory of the USA.
4. They must displace a majority of Iraqis from the country.
5. They must threaten every country surrounding Iraq with exactly the same if they interfere in any way.
6. Institute a draft.
7. Every Republicans must go and fight this war. Congressional Republicans go first.

I bet some Republicans just love what I wrote.

[miamimama3]

Bush is just doing what the GOP does best these days. Pander, pander, pander. Get your votes and then flip-flop with some backwards, stupid excuse as to why they lied to the American people, can''t live up to their word, and then of course blame the democrats.

[pensacola98]

The more Sarah Palin and John McCain open their mouths, the more they sound like Barack Obama, which tells me "if you can''''t beat ''''em - join them!"

It sounds like Barack Obama has ownership of what the USA wants in their government....it is so good that Republicans want to be like him!!!

[dbor77]

If we have achieved victory in Iraq then bring the troops home. How about send "some" to Afganistan to get Bin Laden. I don''t even know why we ever even went to Iraq..It''s time to bring all this nonsense in Iraq to an end and focus on the man that actually is responsible for the attacks on 9/11. WAKE UP AMERICA!

[gramto8]

skyk, you really need to move on in life....quit obsessing over whether Bush lied or not....you are obsessed!! it is not good for you

Posted by jamesm12341 at 01:21 PM : Sep 09, 2008

When Bush brings all the dead American troops, dead Blackwater and other private company employees, and dead Iraqi citizens back to life, the perhaps we can quit ''obsessing'' over whether he lied to us.

[upto007]

The two big jokes of my life, Bush and Ronald Reagan. They are both no good. Any thing to try and look good, it is to late for you Bush, as it was for Ronald Reagan

[royalia]

If Bush and Co. lied to the American people about a war we should just "get over it" and not obsess about it? Seriously? The man works (hypothetically) for the American people. Who is going to hold them accountable if we don''t obsess about it? The answer is nobody.

[seetheway]

Could any of you complainers do any better? NO! I thought so. You you never made mistakes (or sins)cast the first stone. OH shut up. No presidient has been perfect, and you''d complain no matter who wins! So SHUT UP!

[royalia]

Of course presidents make mistakes. But we need to find out if this was premeditated. We''re not talking about a little mistake here. We''re talking about thousands of dead, injured, and displaced people and a cost that will end up in the trillions of dollars.

[ibzjem]

I bet some Republicans just love what I wrote.




Posted by presjfk at 03:23 PM : Sep 09, 2008

I know a few that think we have been liberal with Iraq.

[inventagod2]

Bu$h would say anything to get McSame elected...

[ajmarine111]

Of course presidents make mistakes. But we need to find out if this was premeditated. We''''re not talking about a little mistake here. We''''re talking about thousands of dead, injured, and displaced people and a cost that will end up in the trillions of dollars.


Posted by royalia at 04:37 PM : Sep 09, 2008



There is enough blame to go around.




"We are less than a decade removed from impeaching a president and nearly relieving him of office because of a lie in a civil deposition about ********. Yet when congressman Dennis Kucinich recently attempted to impeach Bush over torture, extraordinary rendition and other grotesque constitutional abuses, Kucinich''''s embarrassed fellow Democrats couldn''''t kill the measure quickly enough.

Why? Top Democrats are so complicit in what has happened since 9/11 that my guess is they dare not travel down that road. From voting in favor of the war in Iraq to holding the telecommunications companies guiltless for their role in spying on Americans (Barack Obama infuriated much of his progressive base by voting for immunity), the Democrats have often acted more as enablers than as a true opposition party. From their point of view, no doubt it''''s best to move on."

[edward1975-2009]

The Democratic Party are a bunch of lawyers, do you not think that if Bush was guilty of anything that they would not have charged him, do you think they are that incompetent, you know, maybe they are, maybe that''s why their politicians. And maybe too, they are just as knee deep in this as anyone.

[antepamfe200]

I do not support this war. I do support our men and women over there. God bless them and their families back home.

[airboatboy]

What a government when an election is needed to get troops out of a war they shouldn''t be in to begin with. I''ll be so glad when "the smirk" is gone.

[iphyt4u]

Saddam Hussein and his supporters have been out of power for 5 years. At 10 billion a month, I would think the american taxpayer would step up and say, that''s enough. Democrats would rather spend that tax money on americans.

[b-gene]

U.S. Presence In Afghanistan To Be Upped To Handle Increased Violence There.

I knew there had to be a catch.

[royalia]

Yes, the Democrats are complicit. I believe the fallout from the lead up to the Iraq War is far from over. The press, the Democrats, the Republicans, and the American people are at fault for failing to question Bush hard enough about the rush to war.

[misha128-2009]

George "Katrina" Bush is well on his way to adding George "Afghanistan" Bush to his legacy for leaving his generals waiting for troops he will never send as president. He is send 4,500 troops when both he and McCain acknowledged in the range of 10,000 troops are required.

[lostcountry1]

all you people who defend gouge worthless bushit, easily forgot that he lied to you too when he said the reason for war was WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION!i dont likebeing lied to, especially by a scrawny, pathetic, spoiled little murdering, theiving,grifter, who comes from a long line of arab loving oil mongers. it cant be pride that makes you defend him, but a inborn hatred for democrats. are only democrats suffering from this inept dip-sticks selfish policies, or are there some republicans out there having a tough time in this country as well?

[lostcountry1]

heres what i think. bin laden was just an excuse to start a war with an easy to beat country. he''s probably been dead for ten years,or maybe living in crawford.either way no one will get the fifty million dollar reward. the attack on the towers and the pentagon was orchestrated by cheny and friends. the planes were real, but the pentagon was hit with a cruise missle. no plane parts were seen there, only the blurry pictures of what is a missle.when you have all the cards in the deck, you can play whatever game you want. ask yourself ,who stood to gain the most from it? they are still playing their hand by refusing to leave iraq.watch the movie "the long kiss goodnight" it will start you wondering.either way g.w. sissyboy was hiding in a school full of children anyway. some leader!

[tryhonesty]

W is a WIMP. He needs to go to Iraq (and stay there) and our fine men and women in uniform need to come home and help rebuild our country.

[tryhonesty]

Does the American people really want more of the McSAME??? Do not complain about Bush if you plan to vote for McSAME...

[txgrouch2006]

8,000 troops to leave Iraq.

8,000,000 voters to leave Bush for following through on the promise of NO-RISK HIGH RETURNS for investors who funded Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac''s subprime loans that went sour.

No risk because of the guarantee to STEAL OUR MONEY to repay investors if they lost money.

ROBBERS! BANDITS! STEALING FROM US AND GIVING TO THE RICH!!!!

And yes, I''M VOTING OBAMA!!!!!!