KABUL, Afghanistan, Sept. 8, 2008

Videos Show Afghan Children Casualties

U.S. Reopens Investigation Into Attack On Village; U.N., Afghanis Say 90 Civilians Killed

  • A destroyed house in Azizabad, August 23, 2008, a day after the Afghani village was attacked by U.S. forces. Military officials said 35 militants and seven civilians died, but recently-released video supports U.N. and Afghan claims that 90 civilians, including many children, were killed.

    A destroyed house in Azizabad, August 23, 2008, a day after the Afghani village was attacked by U.S. forces. Military officials said 35 militants and seven civilians died, but recently-released video supports U.N. and Afghan claims that 90 civilians, including many children, were killed.  (AP Photo/Fraidoon Pooyaa)

  • Fast Facts Afghanistan

    Learn about the people, economy and history.

(CBS/AP)  The bodies of at least 10 children and many more adults covered in blankets and white shrouds appear in videos obtained by The Associated Press on Monday, lending weight to Afghan and U.N. allegations that a U.S.-led raid last month killed more civilians than the U.S. reported.

The sounds of wailing women mixed with the voices of men shouting inside a white-walled mosque in the western village of Azizabad, where an Afghan government commission and U.N. report said some 90 civilians — including 60 children and 15 women — were killed.

The two grainy videos, apparently taken by cell phones, showed bodies lying side-by-side on the mosque floor, covered by floral-patterned blankets and black-and-white checkered shawls. One young boy lay curled in a fetal position; others looked as though they were asleep. One child had half its head blown off.

Turbaned men walked around, gently lifting the blankets covering the faces of the dead. At least two elderly men were among the dead. There appeared to be several dozen bodies lying on the mosque floor, though a precise count was difficult because of the poor quality of the images.

The videos do not provide proof that 60 children died in the operation, but the images do appear to contradict a U.S. military investigation that found only seven civilians were killed in Azizabad, along with up to 35 militants.

The New York Times reported on its Web site Sunday that Azizabad had 42 freshly dug graves, including 13 so small they could hold only children.

The U.S. said Sunday it would reopen the investigation because of emerging new evidence. On Monday, a Pentagon spokesman said new "imagery evidence" came to the attention over the weekend of Gen. David D. McKiernan, the American commander of the NATO-led force here.

"There is some evidence that suggests that the evidence that the U.S. military used in ... its investigation may not have been complete," Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said.

He said a general to be sent to Afghanistan by U.S. Central Command will review the initial investigation. But it is also possible there will be a new inquiry into the raid in Azizabad — this time conducted by Central Command, said Lt. Cmdr. Bill Speaks, a spokesman for the command in Tampa, Fla.

The Afghan government has agreed to a joint U.S.-U.N.-Afghan investigation, said Sultan Ahmad Baheen, spokesman for Afghanistan's Foreign Ministry. It's not clear when or how that will be conducted.

In the videos, several dozen bodies covered by blankets were lined up in two rows, some with their feet protruding. Veiled Afghan women were seen shrieking in grief, alongside a young boy who squatted and rocked back and forth, sobbing beside one of the bodies.

One video showed three young children wrapped in white shrouds. A fourth child had gruesome head wounds, while a fifth appeared to be a girl lying on her back, her head resting on a red blanket.

It was impossible to verify conclusively that the videos showed the aftermath of the Azizabad attack, but the contents appeared to back claims by Afghan and U.N. officials that the U.S. operation killed far more civilians than the military has acknowledged.

U.S. special forces and Afghan commandos carried out the operation.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai has repeatedly warned the U.S. and NATO that it must stop killing civilians in its bombing runs, saying such deaths undermine his government and the international mission. But the Azizabad incident could finally push Karzai to take action.

Karzai says the Azizabad bombings have brought relations between the Afghan government and the U.S. to one of its lowest points since the ouster of the Islamic militia from power in 2001.

Shortly after the Azizabad attack, he ordered a review of whether the U.S. and NATO should be allowed to use airstrikes or carry out raids in villages. He also called for an updated "status of force" agreement between the Afghan government and foreign militaries. That review has not yet been completed.

Afghan officials say U.S. special forces and Afghan commandos raided the village while hundreds of people were gathered in a large compound for a memorial service honoring a tribal leader, Timor Shah, who was killed eight months ago by a rival, Nader Tawakal.

The U.S. investigative report released last week said American and Afghan forces took fire from militants while approaching Azizabad and that "justified use of well-aimed small-arms fire and close air support to defend the combined force."

The report said investigators discovered evidence the militants planned to attack a nearby coalition base. This included weapons, explosives, intelligence materials and an access badge to the base, as well as photographs from inside and outside the base, the U.S. report said.


© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 43 Comments
by libluv2whine September 10, 2008 3:21 AM EDT
the only way to solve this problem once and for all is to dilute this poison we call ''ISLAM''
Reply to this comment
by libsluv2spit September 9, 2008 9:13 PM EDT
Why the heck are we even in Afghanistan?

Posted by OneWorldUSA at 04:57 AM : Sep 09, 2008
+ report abuse

********

to be pro-active instead of reactive to an islamic threat...a threat that comes from a few elite mullahs and clerics and nutjobs who poisons the minds of the masses to HATE YOU..enough to strap bombs on themselves and use it on civilian targets without any thought..

given the change, no matter how deep you orally copulate these terrroists, they would not hesitate to kill you..THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE TRAINED TO THINK..

now do you know WHY you oppose that??
Reply to this comment
by libsluv2spit September 9, 2008 9:10 PM EDT
George Bush says he wants a dang BODY COUNT! He could care less who dies, he just wants a Body Count saying more of them are dying. He wants proof our soldiers are fighting.

Posted by txpatriot4us at 05:28 PM : Sep 09, 2008
+ report abuse

***********

how come in really doubtful that you care about anybody from across the globle let alone to care about our military citizenry..

for you guys they are nothing more than just babykillers and a target to spit at..
Reply to this comment
by libsluv2spit September 9, 2008 9:08 PM EDT
are we so sure that the it did not pass associated press'' ''photoshop'' department?

I am sure that we can scoop up a lot more ''pictures'' and ''videos'' of other atrocities that really brought us this problem..

how many decades had the taliban been ruling afghanistan with draconian islamic rules??? where scores of women children and men were not just killed but tortured because of a simple word they said or whom they saw a few hours ago or how short thier skirt was..or whom they were seen walking with..JUST A REMINDER

THE LIBERAL MEDIA IS WORKING FEVERSHLY to remove thse ''pictures'' and ''videos''..ever wonder why?? because they care??? maybe it$ $omething el$se..
Reply to this comment
by txpatriot4us September 9, 2008 8:28 PM EDT
George Bush says he wants a dang BODY COUNT! He could care less who dies, he just wants a Body Count saying more of them are dying. He wants proof our soldiers are fighting.
Reply to this comment
by petro49l September 9, 2008 6:29 PM EDT
Bin Laden prefers that the Coalition kills women and children. The land is for growing exotic poppies. He needs plants to fill his isomizers that create tar heroin. The narcotic brings in substantial amounts of money for Al Qada. Osama deals drugs to finance terror throughout the world. Illicit sales of heroin buys the latest weapons and communications.
Reply to this comment
by babooph September 9, 2008 1:51 PM EDT
Just a little something that "slipped by" our embedded "journalists".
Reply to this comment
by tootall10142 September 9, 2008 1:08 PM EDT
AS LONG AS THE LOCALS ARE HARBOURING TERRORIST THEN THE PARENTS OF THESE CHILDREN AND THE MEN OF THE VILLAGE WITH NO GUTS ALLOW IT TO CONTINUE THEN WE SHOULD SLAUGHTER THEM BY THEM ACRE. SOONER OR LATER THEY WILL GET THW IDEA. THE V.C TRIED THE SAME THING WE KILLED THE NON COMBATANTS IN ASIA ALSO.SYMPATHY CAN BE FOUND IN THE DICTIONARY BETWEEN S-HIT AND SYPHILISS.
Reply to this comment
by intheshade-2009 September 9, 2008 12:27 PM EDT
Brings back memories of Mai Lai, the US army said it never happened. Sgt. Callie must be back in the army again.
Reply to this comment
by metsobitso September 9, 2008 12:23 PM EDT
The US Army is very good at killing unarmed women and children. Their US special forces commandos didn''t do very well aganst another army in Georgia.
Reply to this comment
by oneworldusa September 9, 2008 7:57 AM EDT
Why the heck are we even in Afghanistan?
Reply to this comment
by babooph September 9, 2008 3:18 AM EDT
I am sure the hearts & minds of US citizens can be won by blasting a school in the States & killing a few dozen kids-the propaganda system will make it sound ok to all.
Reply to this comment
by notfooled September 9, 2008 2:24 AM EDT
Innocent civilians, my a/s, They probably herded some women and children into a house and killed them, and then brought them out for the cameras. Typical terrorist motive.
Posted by gunfighter51 at 07:50 PM : Sep 08, 2008

What you say could be possible I suppose.

Any chance at all that you could ever possibly imagine that American forces did indeed wipe out these people and that the pentagon folks are the ones lying?

Considering the lies we were told about Pat Tillman,
Jessica Lynch, Haditha, Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo by the pentagon, which all later proved untrue, its hard to believe anyone would believe anything the pentagon has to say about anything.


Reply to this comment
by kohin-2009 September 9, 2008 12:27 AM EDT
What is happining to us? I use to see humanitatrian organisation distributing aides to the affected zones and now we see war ship that the USA are telling us they delivering humanitarian assistance??
What is going on, and where`s the UN and all the other humanitarian org.? Imagine Russian war ship coming to havana for Humanitarian assistance? What would Bush/Cheney Mcsame and the republican would say?
Reply to this comment
by kohin-2009 September 9, 2008 12:14 AM EDT
While Ilove to see al-qaida defeated, but in the other hand American armee are using a disproportionate force against civilian and back home some imbecils who doesn`t have a clou about human life value is celebrating the deathof inocent children,women,elders menwho probably didn`t even have some thing to eat.
It`s unhuman and immoral.
Reply to this comment
by downsteamjim September 8, 2008 11:09 PM EDT
Thore UN report was probably filed by someone close to the front in Switzerland or Tahiti. Finding dead bodies in a Taliban area has to be an easy job. Remeber when they used soccer stadiums to execute women. Of course, they could have just dug holes and then filled them up.
Reply to this comment
by gce65 September 8, 2008 9:46 PM EDT
Americans:

Remember all those Army, Navy, Air Force commercials you''re seeing on TV now about all the great opportunities that await your children in the US military and all the great hi-tech toys they''ll get to play with? Just like the video games they played at home, right?

They''re training your children to be remote control assassins with these unmanned drones firing missiles at anyone they''re told to fire them at. Bombs and missiles are a very messy, grotesque and imprecise way to kill people.

And most of the dead end up being civilians. The US military initially says they''re terrorists. Then video from the scene gets out disputing the facts and neutral UN officials who investigate find out they were mostly civilians.

Keep that in mind next time you see a military commercial on TV. That video game red button or trigger they pull could kill dozens of innocent people.
Reply to this comment
by gce65 September 8, 2008 8:59 PM EDT
So, the Pentagon wasn''t telling the truth. Big surprise there! They''re in the business of killing people, why would we think they''d bother with the truth?

Pat Tillman?
Jessica Lynch?
Haditha?
Abu Ghraib?
Guantanamo?
Reply to this comment
by shylove2 September 8, 2008 8:30 PM EDT
There is an blink spot in nationalism everywhere, Japan reported the beheading contests of civilians n Nanking but no one saw it. We have reported Abu Graib and numberous mini 9/11''s but no one sees them. China doesn''t see the people of Tibet being tortured, they only see soldiers handing out candy it think. In fact soldiers handing out candy to children seems to stand out in lots of countries behind which is hiding the ones hit by deadly accidents. We figure everyone would agree that we had no choice whatsoever but to bomb Hiroshima and then Nagasaki. All those pretty pictures make us put our trust in war to solve problems but I think rather it may solve one or two but create hundreds of problems every time. War is a form of rape of one country by another. Even the best of men can succumb to anger and hatred after seeing his sides dead and so with the other side. The gods of war also put an unreasonable power in the hands of the victors to wield anyway they want. There is no winning in war and unmanned drones may look good for the drone pilots but how would you like one flying over your head all day continually analyzing your every move as good or bad. Those villages I hear don''t really have much but what they do have is hope for their children''s future so do you have to wonder what they are thinking?
Reply to this comment
by shylove2 September 8, 2008 8:24 PM EDT

McCain says he abhors war and I''m sure he does the part he sees, but he also sings Bomb, Bomb, Iran and talks of hundred year occupations! Some things you see and some thing you don''t but you should be able to imagine I imagine. We need to learn not to put our trust in war. We and most other countries need to remove that from our currency. If we didn''t we might not resort to it so easily, we might even shudder at the thought of a frivolous war. usually it takes a war on ones own soil before it starts to sink in and you never know, someday it may happen and we may even be hastening that day by our actions. It is worth thinking about.
Reply to this comment
See all 43 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: