Boeing Workers Vote To Strike In 2 Days
Machinists Approve 2nd Strike In 3 Years, But Give Management 48 More Hours
-
Photo
Boeing workers, including Paul Burton, lower center, rally in favor of a strike against the Boeing Co., Sept. 3, 2008, at Machinist union headquarters in Seattle. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)
-
Interactive
On The Job
Explore America's labor economy, track recent major layoffs and meet key economic players.
-
Interactive
Eye On The Economy
In-depth features on U.S. markets, taxes, employment and the Federal Reserve.
Their walkout was set to begin at 12:01 a.m. Pacific on Thursday but was put on hold after their expiring contract - covering more than 27,000 workers - was extended 48 hours at the request of Washington Gov. Chris Gregoire and a federal mediator.
Machinists District Lodge 751 President Tom Wroblewski and chief machinists' negotiator Mark Blondin said, however, that if Boeing doesn't come back with an acceptable deal within 48 hours, the strike is on.
The vote late Wednesday was 87 percent in favor of a strike as unanimously recommended by machinists' union negotiators. Under union rules, a strike requires at least two-thirds support from those voting.
In separate balloting, union members also voted 80 percent to reject Boeing's third and final three-year contract offer, which included pay raises averaging 11 percent.
Boeing's three-year "best and final" offer included bonuses totaling at least $5,000, raises averaging 11 percent, pension increases and a 3 percent cost-of-living adjustment - $34,000 in average pay and benefit gains per employee, according to the company.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



When is it going to sink in to the unions that they are self defeating in there actions.
Enjoy your vacation.
It''s political. That union does NOT care about it''s workers. They received their pay while were were standing in the line at food banks to feed our two small children. The economy in the area is DRIVEN by Boeing. We were always told, if you work for Boeing, you have a key to the city. In the age of Bush, the last things these families need is a strike. Trust me, they get paid well!!!! and the Benefits are outstanding.
THINK PEOPLE!!!!
not including out of pocket medical for him and his family.How do you dare to shake a finger at boeing employees who has to work in hazardous conditions.Why not ask for a better pension? You do the math and tell me how long you have to work to bring home $1500 to $2000 a month being paid a pension of $60 for each year of service. Tell me we don''t have the right to ask this company not to take away our surviving spouse and childrens right to be able to collect what we have worked so hard for in the event that we die.We are talking about a company with a profit of 13 billion dollars in the last 5 years who mind you was made possible by the SPEEA and IAM workers. Tell me that we don''t have the right to a measly $100 per year of service pension when they can pay low end scale excecutives $400 per year of service and high end excecutives $4000 per year of service. That is not to mention them paying executives 43 million just to come on board but pay hardworking laborers coming into the company less then $10 an hour so please before you pass judgement on the Boeing employees do your homework. Oh!! and as far as the job security, don''t believe the hipe, Boeing is already sending work over seas, it''s coming back because it is not getting done right.
Read a little closer - It''s a $34k pay INCREASE over 3 years. And for the part of hard workers, please give me a break. I contracted to Boeing and have seen workers sleeping in the fuselages while getting paid OT. Many of the workers are lazy SOB''s - my opinion is Boeing should move operations to places where people want work - Kansas, Nebraska, Carolina''s, anc the like. Let the whiny little union *** in Seattle drink their coffee and cry that $120k (base pay + voluntary OT -the sleeping on the job thing) for an assembly job wasn''t enough.
Posted by httpwwwnews
and now he''ll be out of work and ******** that his unemployment check isn''t big enough
a scab is a nasty thing
boeing made 14 BILLION AND THEY WANT TO GIVE
Posted by chatmandu002 at 01:51 PM : Sep 04, 2008
_____________________
Yes the unions are partly to blame, BUT the CEOs with their multimillion $$ salaries share at least equal, if not more fault. The suits havew been taking and taking and sending overseas more and more; and for what? To show their shareholders more dividend and themselves more pocket $$, new ring for wifey, larger house, and lavish gifts for their spoiled kids and grandkids.
It would be different if they were giving the extra $$ to the homless shelter or soup kitchens to help support thoise they have put out of work, But they don''t.
Think of this for a minute: for each $1M a CEO gets for compensation he/she could hire 20 people for say $40K each and still have $200K to cover the costs of insurance and pensions a year. Do the math and consider each CEO in America making over $4M per year reducing his pay to $1M. Corporate America giving up the luxury boxes at the sports arenas, naming stadiums, corporate air and travel business or commercial.
I think the union workers should have accepted the boeing contract, it does sound profitable for them.
Posted by gophockeymom at 11:40 AM : Sep 04, 2008
________________
Actually gop_forever, I believe it was Ronald Reagan''s idea first.
-
by whatever091
September 6, 2008 10:38 AM EDT
- now thats what im talking about
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 30 Comments