April 28, 2010 8:34 AM

EPA Cracks Down On Polluting Lawnmowers

(AP)  Gasoline-powered lawnmowers that are a big cause of summertime air pollution will have to be dramatically cleaner under rules issued Thursday by the Environmental Protection Agency.

The long-awaited regulation requires a 35 percent reduction in emissions from new lawn and garden equipment beginning in 2011. Big emission reductions are also required for speedboats and other recreational watercraft, beginning in 2010.

The reductions will be the equivalent of removing one out of every five cars and trucks on the road, according to Bill Becker, executive director of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies.

EPA said approximately 190 million gallons of gasoline will be saved each year when the rules take effect, and more than 300 premature deaths prevented annually.

"These standards help fight smog in our neighborhoods and waterways as we continue to improve the environmental landscape," said EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson.

The regulation had been delayed for years by opposition from Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., who took up the cause of small-engine manufacturer Briggs & Stratton Corp., which builds many of its engines in Missouri. The final rule Thursday was issued more than a year after the draft rule came out in April 2007.

EPA estimated the cost of implementing the reductions at $236 million a year, which will likely make its way to consumers in the form of more expensive lawnmowers and other machines.

Industry groups said exact figures were difficult to calculate, but the California Air Resources Board has estimated that walk-behind mowers would cost 18 percent more under the new regulation, while the price of commercial turf care mowers would rise about 3 percent.

"It's been an undertaking," said Kris Kiser, vice president of public affairs at the Outdoor Power Equipment Institute, Inc. "Challenging, but again, fair and achievable and it's the right thing to do."

Environmentalists welcomed the regulation, which applies to lawn care engines under 25 horsepower and to a full range of gas-powered personal watercraft. The rule requires a 70 percent reduction in emissions from recreational watercraft.

"These new clean air standards will reduce dangerous smog pollution from high-emitting gasoline engines while helping to cut costs at the gas pump," said Vickie Patton, the Environmental Defense Fund's deputy general counsel.

The reductions on lawn mower emissions will probably be accomplished by adding catalytic converters that reduce pollution from exhaust but add cost.

Some in industry resisted the change, and Briggs & Stratton found a vocal champion in Bond. He and fellow Appropriations Committee member Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., spent years sparring over the issue after California sought EPA permission to implement its own small engine controls in 2003.

Bond tried to insert language in a spending bill to keep the state from doing so, but backed off under pressure from Feinstein, and California began implementing its rules last year. Bond did succeed in blocking other states from being able to copy California's rule, something the Clean Air Act normally allows. Instead, he required EPA to write the national standard that was issued Thursday.

Bond had questioned whether mowers with catalytic converters could spark fires, but an EPA study done at his behest found there was no safety problem - even while further delaying implementation of the rule.

© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 27 Comments
by oldpilot954 September 6, 2008 2:58 PM EDT
I''m for passing the law. I don''t have a problem with cleaning up pollution but I find it hard to believe that lawnmowers produce that much pollution in relationship to automobiles. Sounds like a spin-job to me. I need to check some numbers that have not been processed through the media.
Reply to this comment
by oldpilot954 September 6, 2008 2:47 PM EDT
cbsfan731 -- GE built the Electrak electric lawn tractor a several decades ago. I never tried mowing grass but modified an old one in the ''80s to move small aircraft around. It used golf cart batteries and worked great for our purposes. Blades or other accessories simply plugged into sockets. I don''t know if it would mow 3 acres.
Reply to this comment
by drinuk September 5, 2008 3:41 PM EDT
The comment regarding trucks is quite correct, tax dollars spent on cutting down emissions on lawnmowers is laughable by comparison. Yet another layer of regulations to be laid against the taxpayer, just stupid.

America and Canada are the only civilised countries to allow semi''s/artics to be driven on a public highway without mudguards and spray supression, the spray and pollution from one truck is far worse than 200 lawnmowers.
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica September 5, 2008 3:20 PM EDT
This a positive step forward, but it sounds a little backwards considering how much pollution is being emitted by the diesel trucks on the road.

Diesel truck emissions and particulates have gone unregulated for decades. Clean this main spot source of pollution first. Lawn mowers, and water craft contribute nothing to the pollution problem compared to the diesel trucks on the road.
Reply to this comment
by shaihalud-2009 September 5, 2008 3:19 PM EDT
Well said, bobnjersey! How odd that some people are upset that our government is regulating pollution. Nimrods. It''s a responsible step to combat an atmosphere choking with rapidly rising carbon dioxide. I say they should regulate more before this planet becomes a toxic wasteland for your children to raise their families in.
Reply to this comment
by jimfinster September 5, 2008 3:13 PM EDT
"The reductions will be the equivalent of removing one out of every five cars and trucks on the road, according to Bill Becker, executive director of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies."

That is a 20% reduction! Why the negative comments here?

Do you losers really like breathing polluted air?



Reply to this comment
by republic1776 September 5, 2008 2:58 PM EDT
Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.
Should have known wacky Dianne would be behind this.
I think she should add up carbon credit on her annual face lifts.
Reply to this comment
by republic1776 September 5, 2008 2:55 PM EDT
Give me a break....Lawnmowers

Our Tax dollars at work.
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey September 5, 2008 2:26 PM EDT
[EPA said approximately 190 million gallons of gasoline will be saved each year when the rules take effect, and more than 300 premature deaths prevented annually. ]

i recall cutting the lawn (as a kid) w/ a manual push mower ... we trimed the edges w/ a pair of scissor like trimmers, we consolidated the cutting w/ a rake, and we composted it with all the organic waste from the kitchen.

now, everyone sits on their *** while riding around in a little (internal combustion) car w/ a spinning blade beneath it ... they trim the edges w/ a little internal combustion engine attached to a spinning string ... and they consolidate the clippings w/ another internal combustion engine that is really just the output side of a vacuum cleaner.

this is then generally placed at the curb and requires a big truck ... again w/ an internal combustion engine to come pick it up ... the town then spent a million dollars to buy a big machine (w/ an internal combustion engine) that turns the compost pile every week or so.
Reply to this comment
by ajapierce September 5, 2008 12:52 PM EDT
Hey guys, here''s a easy idea. Get a Cordless Electric mower. Not only is there no pollution from it. You save a lot of money tooo buy not having to buy gas. To charge the battery takes about the same amount of electricity as a CMF Bulb.

And no to mention most cordless electric mowers are a lot more quiet so you won''t go deaf mowing, or at least won''t need anymore ear protection.
Reply to this comment
See all 27 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook