U.S. Drug Use Shows Little Change In 2007

Cocaine, Methamphetamine Use Among Young Adults Drops Significantly; Overall Use Steady, Report Says

(AP)  Cocaine and methamphetamine use among young adults declined significantly last year as supplies dried up, leading to higher prices and reduced purity, the government reports. Overall use of illicit drugs showed little change.

About one in five young adults last year acknowledged illicit drug use within the previous month, a rate similar to previous years. But cocaine use declined by one-quarter and methamphetamine use by one-third.

Drug use increased among the 50-59 age group as more baby boomers joined that category. Their past month drug use rose from 4.3 percent in 2006 to 5 percent in 2007.

"The baby boomers have much higher rates of self-destructive behavior than any parallel age group we have data from," said John Walters, director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy. Walter, 55, is a boomer himself.

The National Survey on Drug Use and Health, being released Thursday by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, is based on interviews with about 67,500 people.

Overall, about 20 million people 12 or older reported using illicit drugs within the past month. Marijuana was the most popular by far, with 14.4 million acknowledging use of marijuana in the past month.

Among adolescents, age 12 to 17, drug use dipped from 9.8 percent in 2006 to 9.5 percent last year, continuing a five-year trend. Their use of alcohol and cigarettes also fell during the same period.

"The earlier you use drugs, alcohol and cigarettes, the more likely you are to have a lifelong problem," Walters said.

Much of the progress in curbing drug use occurred between 2002 and 2005. Critics of the nation's drug policies warned not to read too much into the latest numbers.

"Use of marijuana and other drugs naturally fluctuates and if you look at long-term trends, current rates are smack in the middle of the range they've been in for decades," said Bruce Mirken of the Marijuana Policy Project, which advocates the decriminalization of marijuana. "There is simply no evidence that current policies ... have made any difference."

A World Health Organization survey of 17 countries this year showed that people in the U.S. were more likely than people elsewhere to have tried illicit drugs. The U.S. tied New Zealand for the highest rate of marijuana use and far outpaced other countries on cocaine use, the survey found.

The U.S. report measured drug use over the past month, while the WHO's looked at drug use over a lifetime.

The WHO survey concluded: "The use of drugs seems to be a feature of more affluent countries. The U.S., which has been driving much of the world's drug research and drug policy agenda, stands out with higher levels of alcohol, cocaine, and cannabis, despite punitive illegal drug policies as well as a higher minimum legal alcohol drinking age than many comparable developed countries."

More than half the people who tried drugs for the first time in 2007 used marijuana, according to the U.S. survey. The rate of new marijuana users came to about 6,000 people a day.

The overall rate of illicit drug use dropped from 8.3 percent of those 12 and older to 8.0 percent in 2007.

Walters also acknowledged concern about nonmedical use of prescription pain relievers among young adults. He urged parents to have more awareness of where they keep their prescriptions and to throw them away when the drugs are no longer needed.

The survey, which also examined mental health, indicated that 24.3 million people 18 or older experienced "serious psychological distress over the past year." It stressed the link between mental health and substance abuse, noting that adults experiencing depression within the past year were more than twice as like to have tried illicit drugs during that time than other adults.

[babooph]

Cannot be !! I thought all the addicts were in prison on "manditory " sentences[except Rush]''& the drug tsar was going to fix all ??Sure hope all our other wars are just as short & successful !!

[slim1h2o]

I drank plenty of them pretty, though"

Posted by honestabe8 at 12:21 PM : Sep 04, 2008

ROFLAMFAO,, ah yes, The six pack beauty queen!

[honestabe8]

balboa: i hope there is a drunk driver with walter''s name on his car.

[meanunclemik]

The war on drugs (like the war on terror) is a scheme to funnel tons of tax dollars to political buddies and excuses for a war on addicts (a medical issue). Keep those privatized jails filled up. And with more privatized rehabs, send the casualties of this "war" to them next. Citizens would be a lot safer and be paying much less if the drugs were just given to addicts which means they don''t have to do crime to afford drugs. That takes the $$ out of the traffickers. And put a walk-in rehab next door to the drug distribution center so when the addict is finally sick of his/her crappy life, they can choose to walk in and get help.

The US

[meanunclemik]

The war on drugs (like the war on terror) is a scheme to funnel tons of tax dollars to political buddies and excuses for a war on addicts (a medical issue). Keep those privatized jails filled up. And with more privatized rehabs, send the casualties of this "war" to them next. Citizens would be a lot safer and be paying much less if the drugs were just given to addicts which means they don''t have to do crime to afford drugs. That takes the $$ out of the traffickers. And put a walk-in rehab next door to the drug distribution center so when the addict is finally sick of his/her crappy life, they can choose to walk in and get help.

The US

[honestabe8]

slim1: as a friend said "I never smoked any woman pretty...I drank plenty of them pretty, though"

[trillion1]

The drug war is a total and expensive failure which the goverment refuses to admit. Recently they passed a law classifing pot smokers with heron addicts. For years my doctor has been prescribing a painkiller for a lower back injury. Now he can''t prescribe ANY painkillers. Now thanks to the idiots in congress I still have my pain and no way to control it.

[meanunclemik]

The war on drugs (like the war on terror) is a scheme to funnel tons of tax dollars to political buddies and excuses for a war on addicts (a medical issue). Keep those privatized jails filled up. And with more privatized rehabs, send the casualties of this "war" to them next. Citizens would be a lot safer and be paying much less if the drugs were just given to addicts which means they don''t have to do crime to afford drugs. That takes the $$ out of the traffickers. And put a walk-in rehab next door to the drug distribution center so when the addict is finally sick of his/her crappy life, they can choose to walk in and get help.

The US

[meanunclemik]

The war on drugs (like the war on terror) is a scheme to funnel tons of tax dollars to political buddies and excuses for a war on addicts (a medical issue). Keep those privatized jails filled up. And with more privatized rehabs, send the casualties of this "war" to them next. Citizens would be a lot safer and be paying much less if the drugs were just given to addicts which means they don''t have to do crime to afford drugs. That takes the $$ out of the traffickers. And put a walk-in rehab next door to the drug distribution center so when the addict is finally sick of his/her crappy life, they can choose to walk in and get help.

The US

[republic1776]

ootall10142,
Why, No one should be punished.
If you do not hurt anybody with your choices, how is that breaking the law?
I think our fore fathers would flip out over a simple thing like parking tickets!
Our Government is Big Brother, they OWN us.

[balboa26]

What is funny about this is that the 1st drug used was marijuana, an illegal drug that isn''t controlled by the government. It wasn''t beer, which is a legal drug and controlled by the government and Cindy McCain.

One has to wonder if Marijuana was legal like beer and whiskey, if it would still be a problem?

Letting the dark side control illegal drugs has only made the problem worse. They have the money and the bullets to make sure it gets through.

Look at Mexico right now. Thousands of men, woman and children are being killed in the name of the drug war. If it was legal, these people would still be alive.

It is also interesting that even though the potency has gone up, as stated by Walters, no one has died from smoking grass. Thousands of our kids die every year by drinking to much or by alcohol posioning, as the government likes to call it.

Which is worse?

[tootall10142]

I think if you are in high school and you use pot you should be made to repeat the previous school year.If you are caught using or dealing in harsher drugs such as cocaine meth heroin exstacy and the such you should lose your privilage to drive in this country for two years.Also if have a auto accident of any degree and test positive for anything other than pot your automobiles should be seized and sold at auction and the money put into the national health care system.

[pirmin3]

War on drugs??? LMAO The Colombian drug lords always tell the US, "get rid of the addicts and we''re out of business." So come on America. How about a war on drug USERS. Oops, forgot. The GOP has a hospitality bowl and RNHQ.

[cryonbrian]

Just say no! Ha ha ha ha ha

[slim1h2o]

honestabe8;

THis country has never been drug free. We have always had alcohol around, which I beleive is considered a drug, weather it was wine, rum, or Grog, we have always had it.

I think it was in the 1800''s (late) that the alcohol industry realised that cannibus just might hinder future sales that the push was on to illegalise it.

A shame really. Pot has never killed, harmed the user, or made the user run over somebody in a car either, like alcohol has. And you can''t convince anybody of that either. If you legalised pot, you''d see a 50 to 60% reduction in crime. Of course Law Enforcement would seeth at that notion, it would cut into their profits too much.

[honestabe8]

A counter punch to their counter punch is "If you acknowledge this to be the case, why should the more toxic choice have a legal leg up?"

[honestabe8]

nagognog: it seems to me that cannabis prohibition is largely a generational issue. the more that people realize that cannabis is safer, the more likely they are to allow it to compete on a level playing field with alcohol. law enforcement empire building is not unknown, though.

[honestabe8]

slim1h2o: I agree. Drug Free America my ever growing arse.

[nagognog]

Using the "Alcohol is more dangerous/damaging" rationale won''t work. They''re counter-punch is: "This may be so - but why should we let another dangerous substance legally imperil our darling, little children?" Then they proceed to lock up young folks with killers and rapists for smoking/selling/growing some pot. Genius.

So what we need to do is forget the Alcohol v. Cannabis routine, and truly pull down the pants of those behind these archaic, moralistic laws. Little trivial facts can be used, such as: Who sponsors and pays for such TV advertising as "Partnership For A Drug Free America?" Follow the money-trail. It''s the liquor industry. Not the government, and not some benevolent foundation like the Salvation Army. This is one way to show the average citizen how they are paying to be duped.

[slim1h2o]

Alcohol is way more dangerous to the citizenry than pot, but pot is way more dangerous to the prohibitionists than alcohol. Money grubbing pukes is what they are.

Posted by honestabe8 at 05:28 AM : Sep 04, 2008

I agree, and lets not forget Big Pharma too. With the billions flowing into their coffers, that would certainly be missed, if pot was made legal.

With all the uppers and downers that get prescribed out on a regular basis. If people needed a mind altering drug, you could just turn to pot instead of all these other lethal garbage being turned out by Big Pharma.

What a mess this country is in, due to all the greed of money.