June 2, 2010 7:31 PM

Why The Palin Baby Story Matters

By
CBSNews
(National Review Online)  This column was written by Byron York.
At 6:30 Monday morning, at a hotel here in St. Paul, a team of senior McCain staffers got word from even more senior staffers that there was news about vice-presidential pick Sarah Palin. Everybody had heard the rumors, spread on The Atlantic and DailyKos websites, that Palin's fifth child, Trig, born last April, was not really hers - that Trig was really Palin's 17 year-old daughter's child, and Palin faked pregnancy to cover up her daughter's condition. None of that was true, they all knew. But the top McCain staffers revealed that a story would be breaking on the wires in a few hours reporting that Palin's daughter, Bristol, is, in fact, pregnant now. The father is Bristol's boyfriend, the staffers were told, and she intends to marry him.

The McCain aides' assignment was to call a list of about 40 top evangelical and other cultural conservative leaders. Each one would get a personal explanation of the story, and each was asked for his or her reaction. The McCain people reached nearly everyone before the story broke, and the verdict was unanimous - all the leaders supported Palin and her place on the McCain ticket.

The news spread throughout the day as GOP delegates arrived at the Xcel Energy Center for an abbreviated first session of the convention. Unlike the press, which was buzzing about the story from the first moment, a number of delegates were in the dark for a good part of the day; they were going from event to event, often on a bus, and didn't have time to catch up. Nobody did a poll or took a roll-call vote, so it's not exactly clear how many support Palin and McCain's choice of her as vice president. But the number appears to be very, very high.

When the day's business was over, I drifted around the Colorado and Ohio delegations - two critical swing states - to get a feel for the delegates' reaction. In the Colorado section, I ran into Sue Sharkey, from Windsor. When I asked what she thought, her reaction was not about Palin but herself.

"For me personally, it hit my heart this morning," Sharkey told me, "because I was a 17 year-old girl, just like Sarah Palin's daughter, and I had - I was in those shoes. And my son is with me, who will be 35 years old next week, and so I know what a difficult road there is for her."

"I chose to have my son, and from that point I realized that I was a very strong right-to-life advocate," Sharkey continued, her voice wavering ever so slightly. Roe v. Wade had been passed just the year before, and I already knew girls who were going through abortions. It wasn't a choice for me; it wasn't in my heart to do that. So when I heard the news this morning, it struck close to home for me."

A few feet away, members of the Ohio delegation were finishing up business, and I asked Patricia Murray, a delegate from Cincinnati, what she thought. "I don't even think this is an issue," she told me. "It's a family issue. It's a personal issue. The only reason it was made public was because of her mother." Nearby, Ben Rose, a delegate from Lima, said that, "In every case where I heard delegates talk about this, the first thought was to the human nature of it."

Earlier in the day, just after I heard the news, I called Marlys Popma, the well-known Iowa evangelical leader who is now the head of evangelical outreach for the McCain campaign. Like Sue Sharkey from Colorado, Popma had a story to tell. It turns out she had had a child out of wedlock nearly 30 years ago, and it changed her life. "It was my crisis pregnancy that brought me into the movement," Popma told me. "My reaction is that this shows that the governor's family is just like so many families. That's how my first child came into the world, and I'm just thrilled that [Bristol Palin] is choosing to give this child life."

I asked Popma what she thought the larger reaction among evangelicals will be. "Their reaction is going to be exactly as mine," she told me. "There hasn't been one evangelical family that hasn't gone through some sort of situation. Many of us are in this movement because of something that has happened in our lives."

As for now, at least, evangelicals seem to be completely on Palin's side. And McCain's. This is a group that has been skeptical of McCain in the past. Now, it's probably fair to say that he has never been more popular among evangelicals than he is at this moment. Whether that will last, or whether Palin will cost McCain support among other voters, is not yet clear. But within the confines of the Republican Convention, McCain's surprising choice of Palin - and the equally surprising news about her family - is paying off.

By Byron York
Reprinted with permission from National Review Online

National Review Online
Add a Comment See all 131 Comments
by ioweign September 5, 2008 9:57 PM EDT
It doesn''''t matter that is just what these idiot media and liberal a$sholes want you to think it does. Anything to dig up dirt the past and what they do dig up doesn''''t even compare to what the Clitons have done, Obuma the people he has associated himself with, so you media fucckers, shove it up your a$s!

Posted by zgomer at 09:20 PM : Sep 04, 2008

Typical Republican - "Do as I say, Not as I Do..."

The Republican message about the Palin offspring comes across as contradictory: Hey, media, leave those kids alone - so we can use them as we see fit.

If you doubt this scenario, consider this: On Wednesday morning, a teenage boy from Alaska stood in a receiving line on an airport tarmac, being glad-handed by the potential next president of the United States - because he got his girlfriend pregnant. TV cameras were lined up in advance.

The mind boggles.
Reply to this comment
by ioweign September 5, 2008 9:51 PM EDT
As an independent, I can proudly say that I LOVE SARAH PALIN and will proudly vote for her as will any of my family members, neighbors, friends and people that I chance to meet, if I can convince them and I know I will---so take that to the bank---Progressives!

Posted by linymo at 12:06 PM : Sep 05, 2008

With this Republican Economy, that will all you will take to the bank...
Reply to this comment
by caldwellptr September 5, 2008 9:23 PM EDT
This is all very, "Do as I say, not as I do."
Reply to this comment
by quatermass2 September 5, 2008 4:25 PM EDT
Mycomment asks:

"Please provide statistics and source."

"The Barna Research Group''s national study showed that members of nondenominational churches divorce 34 percent of the time in contrast to 25 percent for the general population."
http://www.adherents.com/largecom/baptist_divorce.html

I offer John McCain, Rudy Giuliani, Ronald Reagan and Newt Gingrich as examples of Republicans who all had extramarital affairs and divorced.
Reply to this comment
by samson12341 September 5, 2008 4:08 PM EDT
I want to know what the legal age of consent is in alaska cause in most states when a 18 year old boy gets a minor pregnant it is considered a crime...
Reply to this comment
by ademeyer September 5, 2008 3:28 PM EDT
And yet...evangelicals are against vaccinating girls against cervical cancer because "their daughters won''t be having unprotected ***." The hypocrisy of the religious right is staggering. Now they celebrate *** out of wedlock, because their pit bull VP has a pregnant teen age daughter.
Reply to this comment
by chenz66 September 5, 2008 2:12 PM EDT
Watch the rise in teenage pregnancies in America. "Whether these people become the First Family or not, the poor child has been paraded around before all of the teenagers and everyone else in America as if that was the norm. I don''''t judge her, but rather feel sad for her."


Where have you been? This is already happening BEFORE Palin was on the ticket.
Reply to this comment
by chenz66 September 5, 2008 2:10 PM EDT
"What kind of mother would do that to her child? Surely Sarah Palin had an idea what the response would be." (Midwestwife)
Palin had no choice but to air out her dirty laundry BEFORE the media did it for her. Once the media gets involved you cannot hide anything. She did the right thing to come out so she can control the situation. What the media is saying about the daughter is disgraceful. They should back off of the children. Their not running for office. I''m sure you realize by now if you have children is that they have their own mind. As a parent you can only teach them the best you can but the children have to make their own choices. A parent can only hope they did a good job. BUT, in this day an age where children think it is fashionable to have a baby early along with their present day role models such as Britney Spears and Paris Hilton. It is an up hill battle now-a-days.
Reply to this comment
by mycomment-2009 September 5, 2008 10:05 AM EDT
Since they have a far higher divorce rate than non-Evangelicals
Posted by Quatermass2 at 09:31 PM : Sep 04, 2008

Please provide statistics and source.
Reply to this comment
by ml62mm46 September 5, 2008 7:18 AM EDT
Watch the rise in teenage pregnancies in America. Whether these people become the First Family or not, the poor child has been paraded around before all of the teenagers and everyone else in America as if that was the norm. I don''t judge her, but rather feel sad for her.
Reply to this comment
See all 131 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook