Aug. 31, 2008
Joe Trippi: Don't LOL At Sarah Palin
Democrats Risk Letting Their Guard Down By Dismissing McCain's VP Choice, CBS News Consultant Says
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Comparing V.P. Choices
Dean Reynolds compares and contrasts the campaign benefits of Barack Obama and John McCain's vice presidential running mate choices of Joe Biden and Sarah Palin, respectively.
-
Video
John McCain's Maverick Move
Bob Schieffer talks with New York Times Columnist David Brooks on whether Sarah Palin was the best choice for GOP VP and what she brings to the McCain campaign.
-
Photo
(CBS)
-
Photo Essay
Sarah Palin
Alaska's youngest and first female governor tabbed to be McCain's running mate.
I have seen a lot of commentary on why John McCain’s pick of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin is a cynical and transparent ploy to bring disaffected women who supported Hillary Clinton to his cause - and why this ploy would fail.
But I don’t think John McCain and the people around him are that stupid.
Something else in his speech introducing Palin as his choice caught my attention and I believe shines some light on the real reason McCain chose the Alaskan.
McCain said of this pick “I have found the right partner to help me stand up to those who value their privileges over their responsibilities, who put power over principle, and put their interests before your needs...I found someone with an outstanding reputation for standing up to special interests and entrenched bureaucracies; someone who has fought against corruption and the failed policies of the past."
The McCain campaign plans on making an assault on Barack Obama’s strength as a change agent. And challenge, what the McCain campaign will describe as, Obama’s weak or non-existent attacks on corruption within the Democratic Party and other institutions throughout his career.
Like the Swift boat attacks of 2004 on Senator John Kerry, a decorated Viet Nam Veteran -- this assault will be on what is now a strength of Barack Obama's -- his focus on changing a broken system in Washington.
To make this assault, McCain picked in Palin someone who has taken on the corruption in the GOP in Alaska, turned against her own party’s establishment, and fought for reform.
The McCain/Palin duo will challenge Barack Obama’s claim of “a new kind of politics” and chastise Obama and Democratic vice presidential Nominee, Joe Biden, for their “silence” in taking on corruption in their own party in Illinois, Delaware and Washington, DC.
The McCain campaign intends to claim that “more of the same” in Washington means Barack Obama and Joe Biden and will make the argument that if you want to “shake things up” then McCain and his reform minded running mate from Alaska will get the job done.
My initial reaction was that in picking Palin, McCain had taken away the argument that Barack Obama wasn’t ready to be president. I now think my initial assessment on that score was wrong. Over time, the McCain team will insinuate that if you think a first-term Governor isn’t ready for the number 2 slot, are your really sure that a first-term Senator is ready for the number 1 spot?
There are flaws in all these arguments. There is McCain’s own brush with corruption as a member of the Keating Five, as the country was wracked by the savings and loan scandal.
And Barack Obama has withstood the pressure of 19 months in the limelight as he secured the Democratic nomination, and proved he can handle the pressure--Sarah Palin has not. Palin could thrive and strongly help McCain make his case, or she could crumble and damage his candidacy. My first impression is that she is not going to crumble.
She isn’t Dan Quayle, and besides, Dan Quayle was elected vice president.
My take? Don’t LOL. Take the McCain/Palin ticket seriously.
Hurricane Gustav may hit the GOP convention as hard as it hits the Gulf Coast - but somewhere during his convention I expect John McCain to say “I love my party, but I love my country more."
Sarah Palin amplifies that part of the McCain brand, and helps to move McCain further from being identified with the Bush GOP, even while exciting some of the most conservative elements within it.
That’s accomplishing a lot and none of it involves Palin garnering votes from women “just because she is one."
Can the McCain of 2008 morph back to the McCain of 2000? Only if Democrats laugh out loud at Palin, let their guard down, and let it happen.
(Read this analysis and others at JoeTrippi.com)
By Joe Trippi
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Video and Galleries from Opinion
- MOST POPULAR
- Viewed
- Commented
-
Obama Seeks New Start in U.S.-Russia Ties
In Advance of President's Trip To Moscow, White House Says It Expects Progress in New Arms Control Talks
-
Ex-D.C. Mayor Barry Charged With Stalking
Barry Arrested After Woman Complained He Was Stalking Her
-
McNair's Death Ruled a Homicide
Tenn. Police Have Reached No Conclusion on Death of Woman Found with Former NFL Star
-
Political Hotsheet
Senators Debate as Health Care Bill Reaches MarkupGrassley, Schumer Argue Public vs. Private on "Face the Nation"
Read Blog Post -
Econwatch
Swiss Banks To Yanks: Get LostAs IRS Hunt For Tax Evaders Heats Up, Swiss Institutions Want To Avoid Investigations
Read Blog Post -
World Watch
Tackling the Summit in MoscowAs Obama Travels to Russia, Both Countries Hope for Improved Relations, but There Are Some Sticking Points
Read Blog Post






- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 118 CommentsThe palin selection by McCain is LUNACY at its HIGHEST because she is just a heartbeat away. but it show the sinister plan by the republican to use this woman in other ways , like having her steady talk and patrol her down syndrome kid.. and also use the other son thats off to iraq , Something you hardly hear Joe Biden talk about on his son who is also off to IRAQ.
HAD the Democrat convention been a complete FLOP no way mcCain selects Palin. this MOVE should offend and upset women because we know Miss palin was not selected on MERIT but more out of DESPERATION.
In the end it will not matter.. because the women that supported Hillary are democrats and firmly supports the rights of women , and when it comes a party that have the interest of women and childcare at hand thats the Democrat. look at the democrat platform when it comes to women and children issues its a mile long , good luck finding programs and issues for women and kids in the Republican platform.
NOT so long ago Pres Bush VETO a child healthcare BILL .... need i say more.
Nothing less than him saying ''I want to apologize on behalf of my party for doubling the nations debt by giving unneeded tax cuts to the already wealthy and NOT cutting spending to balance it'' will get him my vote.
If he says that, I''ll seriously think of him for President, in part because of the points about Palin that Trippi just brought up. We cannot afford same ''ol, same ''ol, and that means Obama unless McCain does a good job convincing he''s not a Bush clone.
Sarah Palin = a much older version of Paris Hilton (in a pantsuit)
GO SARAH PALIN!! Don''t hate her because she is SMART and BEAUTIFUL!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by paris1969 at 07:20 PM : Aug 31, 2008---------------------- you need to back off those meds
-McCane needs to be assaulted, himself, by Palin. He''s corrupt to the bones. Actually he ''hired'' her because he''s afraind she would start criticising him ad his rotting surroundings.
-McCane needs, yet, a bleach cycle in the washing machine. Too bad he''s already stained by the white house corrupts that lied America 935 times and McCane was agreeing, never stood up against it... 100 more years. Yet again he hit the war drumms, another one against Iran.
-Palin why don''t you start scrubbing the rotten, next to you?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by cyndilu9 at 07:17 PM : Aug 31, 2008
I was a Hillary fan to,....but what the DNC did to Hillary and Obama camp.....they need to be smacked right in the face......I don''t trust Obama never have never will and to vote for him would be the worst mistake....a vote for mcain IS a vote for Hillary....she will run in 2012 (Watch).
Posted by kstar42
No it isn''t. McCain and Hillary stand far apart on many issues. You are voting for someone who, if you consider yourself a Democrat, does not share your values. You are not voting on issues, you are voting on cult of personality. And if you consider yourself Republcian, then why would you have voted for Hillary? Obama and Hillary are much closer philosophically than either is with McCain. Voting for McCain because you are mad Hillary didn''t win is dumb.
Posted by paris1969 at 07:17 PM : Aug 31, 2008
-The doll will deflate pretty soon, and forgotten. Dull Doll!
Posted by fragglerawk
No, it means we are merely pointing out the hypocrisy of the right for blasting Obama''s lack of exprerience, but trying to sell everyone on how Palin is so experienced, even though she has less govt experience than Obama.
Unless you want a repeat of the Carter economy: double digit inflation, near double digit unemployment, 17% prime rate ... plus very high taxes ... you''d better not vote for Obama based on the issues either then. Obama is nothing more than a lot of wild theories, and Carter showed us that wild theories spell disaster.
As has been pointing out, Palin has experience where Obama has only talk. Obama has never fought a corrupt office, he has never shot down a pork barrel project. He''s hardly been in Washington to vote since he was elected to the Senate. He has NO executive experience of ANY type. He talks pretty, but read below ... if he get his economy in, he loses your job in the process.
---"The McCain campaign plans on making an assault on Barack Obama%u2019s strength as a change agent."---
Thank you so much Mr. Trippi for writing such a respectful piece - I can''t tell you nice it is to hear somebody talk about a person''s skill set as opposed to how somebody hasn''t been in the Senate for over 25 years.
More importantly I think that''s accurate. Because what I think Barack brings to the table that demonstrate equivalent guarantees of trustworthiness to people who generally rely on experience as a measure of a candidate''s fitness is his ability to inspire. It touches a part of people that makes them WANT to believe that what he says is true, and as somebody pointed out to me the other evening that''s an important element to leadership.
Palin brings guts, and proven record of acting on those guts to successfully enact change. I guess the job''s on her and the RNC to sell it, because Barack''s already had a year and a half to make his case and has indeed evolved before our eyes and has had the chance to broaden his message and his appeal.
Not everybody''s going to see those qualities in the candidates, but right now isn''t McCain succeeding more in getting his message of change heard than Barack? And the poll numbers are going their way.
One thing people ought not to so quickly dismiss is the role of identity politics. Because don''t people tend to vote in greater numbers for people who are the same race, age, and gender as themselves, even demonstrating a willingness to cross party lines? It''s human nature. That it didn''t happen instantaneously doesn''t necessarily mean it isn''t going to happen by November.
Palin had a couple of things going against her right out of the gate - her relative youth compared to the average Hillary supporter, her inexperience combined with McCain''s unabashed play for the female vote, nobody knows her, her views are Conservative, and she''s attractive. However if she doesn''t end up being the bimbo everybody''s made her out to be, she''s for sure going to win over some hearts and minds - and votes. Because who here actually thought of Hillary has having 35 years of experience such that he had more than McCain? A lot of her supporters did, but it wasn''t a unanimously held view.
Probably from now until November people aren''t going to stop calling Barack and Palin the ''muslim'' and the ''pageant bimbo'', but I''m not sure undecideds really think of the two in that way . . .
Wow, but you are an amazing hypocrite.
You claim that Obama''s plans will bankrupt the country? Too late, dodo. Your party has already done that, with the most obvious and vicious redistribution of wealth from the middle class to the rich in the history of this country.
Your party has not only raped America, but it has borrowed trillions of dollars from China to line the pockets of Halliburton (*** Cheney''s company, of course) and all the rest of the ripoff war profiteers.
So please, don''t be so hypocritical as to make totally unsupported claims as to what Barack Obama will do to the economy in office. I''ve read his published plans, and NOTHING of what you claim is in there. You''re making it up out of whole cloth because you are an acolyte of the most corrupt party in American history.
At least we''ll have one thing when Obama is elected: the smartest, best-educated man to ever hold the office. Unfortunately, your party managed to elect someone to the Presidency whom people thought they''d like to have a beer with - while he picked their pockets.
84% of Americans say "wrong track". I''m one of them.
We''ll have to see. Surely she could do a better job than ANY Bush appointee in there now. maybe she could gut the DOJ like a moose.
Yeah, I just can''t see the image of an old man with a much younger attractive woman by his side as something that will appeal to Hillary Clinton''s supporters. There have to be other reasons for picking Palin. All of those running around speculating may be inventing the reasons for McCain after the fact. I wonder if he read this article and took some notes.
The "cleaning house" idea seems to me to be a bit of a stretch with the Keating Five situation in mind and the current investigation of Palin for abuse of power. As I understand it, she is accused of lying about attempting to get her ex-brother-in-law fired from his job as a state trooper in Alaska while he was involved in a child custody dispute with Palin''s sister. By the way, doesn''t just being a Republican from Alaska make your integrity suspect at this point?
And, putting a woman on the ticket for V.P. only brings the Republicans up to date with the 1984 Democrats (Ferraro). I guess pulling us up a decade from reliving the Vietnam War era (ala G.W. Bush) is the %u201Cchange we can believe in.%u201D
She is Monster!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-j-elisberg/the-worst-vice-presidenti_b_122491.html
Palin has lowered taxes in Alaska!
Posted by christiansin
She might actually appeal to a totally different group of women - right-leaning Democrats who didn''t identify with Hillary and voted for Obama in the Primaries. Age trumped gender in the Primaries when it came to the female vote, but if Palin and Barack both have younger appeal . . . maybe younger conservative Democratic females are the target (?)
I''m in . . .
Clinton, not only produced record growth and higher income for the lower and middle classes, he produced a massive budget surplus squandered by GW Bush along with our Social Security reserve.
One can only imagine out debt to China and other nations.
The other Republicans: Reagan, GHW Bush and GW Bush have produced record deficits.
Democrats and Obama stand for Fiscal Responsibility.
The reality of fiscal conservative is record deficits, downturn growth despite wars to stimulate, more money and tax breaks for the rich, lower income for everyone else.
Our ecomomy is in a nosedive with record deficits during this Republican administration.
McCain has offered no solutions, but then he doesn''t have to worry about money. His wife pays for everything.
As it turns out, however, Palin did back the bridge during her campaign for governor. The Anchorage Daily News reports that %u201C[t]he Alaska governor campaigned in 2006 on a build-the-bridge platform, telling Ketchikan residents she felt their pain when politicians called them %u2018nowhere.%u2019%u201D Palin later designated money earmarked for the bridge to other projects.
LMAO!!!!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-j-elisberg/the-worst-vice-presidenti_b_122491.html
My friends, I''ve wanted to be president for a long time. I''ve sacrificed my principles, my integrity and convictions for the presidential nomination. And at long last, I''ve finally caved in completely to the extreme right wing of the republican party. I know I said I''d put country first, but I want to win this thing sooo bad, that I just really don''t care that I also sacrificed any credibility I may have had. Yes, I''m 100% yours now, I have no spine, no plans, no integrity - but I represent each of and every one of you dupes foolish enough to believe that Ms Palin is even remotely qualified for the vice presidency. I know, I know, I said "experience" was important but Ms Palin brings something special to the campaign...a uterus and extreme right views on abortion! She''s a foreign policy expert too - she went to Ireland once, and you know Russia is real real close to Alaska. She''s also a real economic wiz (whew! lucky for me huh) - when she was mayor, she could have paid $125,000 for a piece of property for a sports complex, but instead she worked a little magic and paid $1.2 million for it. Isn''t that great! And when she left her mayoral position, she did leave a $20 million deficit. That''s not too bad, huh? And, God willing she gets a favorable ruling on her ethics investigation, she''ll be joining me in the white house in January.
And now, it''s my pleasure to introduce-my soulmate-Sharon Palin...uh, uh, Sara Palin.
Mainly because the very successful Clinton years were pulled off with a republican congress.
But I don%u2019t think John McCain and the people around him are that stupid."
Don''t overestimate John (bottom .6% of his class) McCain.
That said, plenty of voters drank Bush''s kool-aid so due diligence will need to be done.
Read up on conception, it does not take effect immediately as you have been told.
Also to those of you making comments about the "pageant queen", beauty and looks DO GO HAND IN HAND.
Read up on conception, it does not take effect immediately as you have been told.
Also to those of you making comments about the "pageant queen", beauty and looks DO GO HAND IN HAND. "--Posted by BarbJC1
Unfortunately the Bush administration has quietly pushed through rules and definitions that make "day after pills" the legal equivalent of abortion, because they interfere with the development of the fertilized egg.
So, if Sarah Palin''s daughter were raped, Palin would presumably want the government to force the daughter to bear the child, no matter how damaging such a compulsory pregnancy would be to the daughter.
That is pure extremism.
Or, perhaps your belief system doesn''t allow them.
Bush is trying to push policies that prevent retribution against medical practicioners who object to providing reproductive services such as the morning after pill.
So your claim ''not to worry'' doesn''t hold water.
Be afraid. Be VERY afraid.
And when she left her mayoral position, she did leave a $20 million deficit. That''''s not too bad, huh?"
Posted by NotFooledTX
yeah.... 20 Million in the hole, with a population of 6,000 .... but, they didn''t have new taxes, right??! That''s all that matters, when you can only see today, tomorrow, and the next day...
Incredible
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 118 Comments