Was Speech Setting Over The Top?
Expert Analyzes Whether Obama Accepting Dem Nod In Packed Stadium Worked, Or Went Too Far
-
Photo
Crowd cheers and confetti flies after Barack Obama gave his acceptance speech at Democratic National Convention at Invesco Field in Denver Thursday (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Quantifying Image Politics
Maggie Rodriguez asks author Joe Navarro to explain the imagery Democrats used at the national convention to convey their message to voters and viewers.
-
In-Depth
Convention Center
Latest news and video from the Democratic National Convention in Denver.
-
Photos
Convention Clicks
Snapshots from the podium, the floor and host cities.
The scene shifted from a convention center that holds 20,000 people, where the Democratic convention's first three days were held, to Denver's Ivesco Field, home of the Broncos, which seats 80,000.
The lights, the fireworks, the superstar performers, the packed house -- did it all work? Or was it, as many Republican politicians and operatives were suggesting it would be long before the event was even held Thursday -- too much?
On The Early Show Friday, former FBI agent Joe Navarro, author of "What Every Body Is Saying," says the imagery had its desired effect -- very much so.
It "absolutely" worked, Navarro told co-anchor Maggie Rodriguez. ”This was democracy at its best. It was open... You look at ... everything -- the people, the surroundings, the colors, the imagery. It reminds you of Athenian democracy."
Rodriguez pointed out that one of the charges made by critics beforehand was the columns on the stage made it look a little bit too much like a temple, like this was meant to worship Obama as a god.
"Not at all," Navarro responded. "This is about that, you know -- we use images of these columns from Athens to tell us about our history of democracy, about openness, about the people. And we have a great example of this where this has been opened up, I think, for the first time and may set a precedent for future conventions. Very powerful."
Navarro added that columns are used in structures throughout Washington: "They're at the White House, they are at the Library of Congress, they are at the largest memorials, and they draw us in, and they remind us, this is about democracy. Extremely powerful images."
One part of the night Navarro says he particularly liked was afterwards, when the Obamas walked off, as a family. He said the setting looked like that of "the White House. And you see them walking off into (it). ... (It showed that), 'Hey, we're normal. Just like you. We are a family.' Very, very powerful images here. We haven't seen these, by the way, since the Kennedys. ... And when you see them walking away, you see that they fit in. They're comfortable here. We're comfortable with them. This is extremely powerful. They're going to be talking about this for a very long time. Very tough to top."
Navarro noted to CBS News that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was criticized for giving his famous "I Have a Dream" speech (45 years to-the-day before Obama's speech Thursday night) at the Lincoln Memorial but, Navarro said, it wouldn't have looked the same if he did it at a concert hall or a hotel conference center.
And Navarro, a body language expert, was impressed with Obama's. Navarro told CBS News Obama spoke with his palms up -- "that is excellent ... It's like saying, 'Take what I present to you.' "
Also, Obama put his hand over his heart with an open, wide palm, as opposed to holding it sort of closed, which is what people do because it looks good, not because they mean it.
Copyright MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 116 CommentsCBS announces appointment of new political editor...Joe Navarro.
Seriously, CBS, can''t you come up with anything more substantive than this crystal ball reader?
******************************************************
The video of his speech is on most of the news websites as well as youtube. If you really have interest in what Obama believes needs changing and some of his very specific ideas and plans on this, tune in.
Most of Obama supporters have listened to most of his speeches and the several Addresses to the Nation that he has given. We have also listened to respectable voices who have offered us insight into what an Obama Presidency might look like.
As a white middle aged female. I won''t be voting for him because he is black, like you suggest, but because he believes that the one best hope for America is that the Government be more open and that Americans step up to the plate and get more involved and take some responsibility for what is going on in Government. In other words this is our Country; it doesn''t belong to Exxon Mobil.
Also, do you think do you think he should be referring to himself as a white man?
Not if your name is Nero, Trajan or Claudius! But Barack....?
.
Not since adolf have so many been fooled by so little.
/
The vacuous message of "Change!" without details is also part of the persona. Do not ask deeps questions or you will be pilloried as an unbeliever.
Follow the crowd with palm leaves in your hands. The Messiah has appeared and will lead you to the promised land.
You will dine on milk and honey--the milk and honey the government takes from you and returns in fractional amounts once they have satiated themselves on your labors. If you ignore the manacles, you verily can imagine you are free.
Not sure you were watching the same speech I was. I counted over 25 SPECIFIC policy changes or initatives in the speech. Just because you keep saying it doesnt make it so.
"...Follow the crowd with palm leaves in your hands. The Messiah has appeared and will lead you to the promised land. You will dine on milk and honey--the milk and honey the government takes from you and returns in fractional amounts once they have satiated themselves on your labors. If you ignore the manacles, you verily can imagine you are free..."
Posted by random_radar
Wow. Gotta tell ya--that is one giant pile o-***, but at least you wrote it well. Props to you.
CBS, your "expert" needs to have his head examined. I haven''t seen anything that off-putting in a while.
Posted by VastR-WCon at 12:19 PM : Aug 29, 2008
----------------------
Who EXACTLY are you talking about, Vast? George W. Bush ---or--- Barack Obama?! Because right now, we have proof that it fits ''W''! Whether or not it fits Obama, we shall see!
I guess he felt he had to show up the Clintons somehow. BTW...what nice things DID Hillary actually say about Obama in HER speech?
Once a gain, the Dem''s (in general) show they are the spoiled brat brigade.
(assertions applied to Obama but reflect Bush)
Posted by random_radar at 12:19 PM : Aug 29, 2008
---------------------
1. Personality cults & religions. Bush is a guy you can have a beer with. He''s a nice guy.
He gave a powerful speech. His words were powerful. We can expect powerful actions.
2. Well-staged events & effect. ''W'' shows up in a jet! It has his name on it as if HE were the pilot!
He''s in a flight suit! He''s surrounded by military pageantry, including a banner that proclaims
''Mission Accomplished''. He announces we have been victorious!
3. Vacuous message without details. WMD in Iraq! But where? Nowhere. Who? No one. Bin Laden. Where?
In Afghanistan! No. In Pakistan! Maybe. Dead! Maybe. Fighting the war in Iraq! How? No plan.
Piecemeal. Fighting terrorism. How? No plan. Piecemeal. Katrina relief. How? FEMA! Plan? No plan!
Kaos! Homes destroyed. Death. Relief STILL not paid! Hundreds if not thousands of Americans have
been threatened and intimidated by the FBI and other security groups by Bush and by his followers
on the internet blog sites! Hundreds of lawsuits for millions of dollars have been paid to victims
of these political terrorism attacks!
4. Get ''in line'' or else, implies ''W'' and the GOP! The war president will lead you to victory!
Part 1, continued
(assertions applied to Obama but reflect Bush)
Posted by random_radar at 12:19 PM : Aug 29, 2008
---------------------
5. You will eat and drink less because of the inflationary economy created by irresponsible GOP
spending that has created a HUGE national debt, budget deficit, a weak dollar, a housing market
collapse, an ongoing banking system collapse, increased homelessness, unemployment, and cost
structure from everything from food to health care to insurance! If you ignore your declining
well-being or poverty you can pretend you are free living in a democracy instead of a fascist
state!
My point, as usual what you accuse Obama of, more readily applies to your own republican
president in reality! And it''s NOT a pretty picture!
Part 2, finis
Posted by dan19491 at 12:58 PM : Aug 29, 2008
------------------
Dan! Were you worried when ''W'' was giving the wealthy millions of dollars in tax reductions while starting TWO wars?! How about when he was steamrolling Republican porkbarrel spending through Congress?! There wasn''t an earmark not worth throwing tax money at then! Or, when he was letting the oil industry write the energy bill, did you worry about that! NO!?
Well, Dan! If you didn''t, you sure as h3ll should have! Worry about reality, not about things that probably won''t come to pass! Unless your a big money earner, in which case, I''d say your taxes probably will go up, because they''ll have to! Whether a ''D'' or an ''R'' get in there, they''ll be going up!
And yet, Bush Senior also had columns, but it was OK for the Republican?
Pure and simple!
If MCSAME could do that, you can bet the GOP would book the stadium! But, on a short-notice, volunteer basis, it can''t be done! And, why not?! Because---
MCSAME (and the GOP) are without a compelling agenda or ideas, they just want to continue spending vast sums of money in Iraq instead of the good ole USA!
No patriotism. They just want to cause death and destruction and embarass us internationally! Well---
The public is tired of THAT agenda! We want a new agenda that is positive and not negative. That is creative and not destructive. And, finally one that is American and NOT un-American!
Posted by mtracy9 at 12:52 PM : Aug 29, 2008
------------------
I agree with you. Some of these ''pieces'' should be beneath their dignity to do. But, what I REALLY don''t like is when they ACT to make one candidate or the other appear better by covering up their mistakes by altering their comments as broadcast over the airwaves or written in the newsprint! Then, they lose any credibility they have as a news organization!
Posted by jjreding at 01:21 PM : Aug 29, 2008
Posted by stn_sage at 01:21 PM : Aug 29, 2008
You''re both on the money.
Of course, in 1953, the corporate tax rate was something like 88% (and they still whine about it being too high in 2008, when it''s - what - 20%? I don''t know the precise figure, but do know it''s a heck of a lot lower than it used to be...). Up until 1980, exec pay was only 40x that the average worker (more than 400x now and it''s easier to see how). And it''s almost wrecked the Country in the process.
Country first? How will the economy be dealt with - both candidates need to talk reality.
Perhaps the subtle meaning of this stage was to show the collapse of the Roman Empire... ooops, the Bush Empire
Posted by specialty8 at 02:11 PM : Aug 29, 2008
********************************************************** This seems to be a common problem with a particular group of people.
Millions of us are able to recite specifics that have been relayed by Obama and his campaign and yet there is your group who have heard nothing or don''t understand any of it.
Perhaps you should consider educating yourself.
Country first? How will the economy be dealt with - both candidates need to talk reality.
Posted by hypnotoad72
******************************************************* The tax rate for corporations is hardly relevent when only 20% of American corporations are paying any tax at all thanks to the loopholes that have been put into place specifically for them to avoid making any contributions to this country. And that has never stopped them from looking for still more handouts in the form of corporate subisidies.
Well this a great news. We are going to get rid of every thing that does not work. Pelosi and congress better start packing their bags after they get back from the 5 week vacation!
Posted by DSR57
********************************************************* That was paid for by the donations to his campaign. I am extremely impressed by how frugal and responsible the Obama campaign has been with his campaign funds. I am a small donater (25.00 twice a month), and I donate for him to use as a means to help get him elected. I trust his judgement in how he chooses to spend it.
We will continue to support him the best we can financially and other wise.
McCain will be taking 85 million taxpayer dollars as soon as he becomes the official nominee for the Republicon party.
Posted by specialty8
*********************************************************** The Republicons have blocked more legislation than at any other time in history.
Once again the Republicons make history and once again in a way that has a very negative impact on this country and the people.
Why do Repbublicons hate Americans so much?
McCain is trying to dazzle us with his judgement I guess.
in this country.Where will this money come from to make all this up for all the handouts that he has planned.Is it from failed goverment programs,do you think Ted and Nancy are going to let him cut all of the perks they get?Yea,dream on.
-----------------------------------
I don''t know what type of world she lives in, but in this one our democracies are not about rainbows & pretty colors...
Our Country has two choices; 1. Pull up a chair order a cherry coke and taste the sweetness of a government ran for the people and by the people or 2.Try to stomach the taste and eat old prunes left over from the ruins of a republican majority and its president!
Another point to ponder...McCain will be the oldest U.S. President to stake his claim on the Oval Office''s desk and chair, Viagra supply and fiber supplements. The likely hood (considering his remarkable life) is that a very cold lady from Alaska will have to be sworn in at some point in the McCain administration, as a replacement for a mission in the elected office he could not complete.
The bottom line is? Forget about McCain, you are either considering Alaska''s Sarah Palin or that America%u2019s Illinois resident Barack Obama. McCain will be the rusty old train sent to Train Heaven once Palin is delivered to the White House!
Posted by DSR57
AMERICA defines Obama as a black man, one drop of black blood makes you black remember. and as for his white mother raising him, that still does not make him white in America. Are you suggesting that because his mother was white, he is a better person? I think his mother dived into the black gene pool because she saw the value of that Kenyan mojo that she wanted her child to have.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 116 Comments