WASHINGTON, Aug. 28, 2008

Industry Groups Sue Over Polar Bear Rule

Suit Claims Interior Dept.'s Rule On Bears Unfairly Singles Out Businesses In Alaska

  •  (AP/J. Hayward, The Canadian Press)

  • Interactive Global Warming

    The greenhouse effect, a look at the Kyoto Protocol and a history of the Earth's climate.

(AP)  Five industry groups have sued the Interior Department over a rule to protect the polar bear that they say unfairly singles out business operations in Alaska for their contribution to global warming.

Groups representing the oil and gas, mining, and manufacturing industries asked a federal judge Wednesday to ensure that laws designed to protect the bear, which was recently designated a threatened species, are not used to block projects that release heat-trapping gases in the state.

The American Petroleum Institute was joined by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Mining Association, the National Association of Manufacturers and the American Iron and Steel Institute in the lawsuit, which explicitly challenges three words - except in Alaska - that appear in a 62-page rule issued in May.

That's when the polar bear became the first species with a population that the government has classified as threatened by global warming. The bear depends on sea ice, which is expected to melt as temperatures climb, for survival.

The Bush administration made clear that it did not want the polar bear's status to become a tool of environmentalists seeking to regulate the gases blamed for global warming.

On the day it announced the polar bear as a threatened species, which bars harm to the bear or its habitat, the administration also issued a special rule limiting the types of projects that could be evaluated.

To further block attempts to use endangered species law to control greenhouse gas emissions, it exempted projects in all states but Alaska from undergoing reviews.

The groups say the three words - which they refer to as The Alaska Gap - are unlawful and run counter to the administration's belief that it is impossible to link emissions from a single project to the increasing temperatures that threaten the polar bear.

"Anchorage has no more effect on climate change or polar ice than does an emission in Ankara," the suit reads.

The lawsuit filed Thursday is the latest to target the polar bear. Environmentalists and the state of Alaska have also sued the Interior Department over the polar bear's protection.

In the meantime, energy companies have paid billions for the right to explore for oil and natural gas in polar bear habitat.

The Interior Department would not comment on the lawsuit.

Brendan Cummings, the oceans program director for the Center for Biological Diversity, which is challenging the rule in court on the grounds that it is illegal, said Thursday that the lawsuit brought by industry is another attempt to "make the polar bear's protections more meaningless than they already are."

© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 36 Comments
by timfitz42 August 31, 2008 1:04 PM EDT
Before I even make this comment (because I know I''ll get hassled over it) let me first say I am an environmentally conscious person.

Polar bears are not optimally suited for survival on a long term basis, their extinction is inevitable even without human interference. Within 300 years or so they would no longer be around due to natural warmings and coolings of the planet. We''re just accelerating it to 50 years.

However, human beings are unique in that we can manipulate our environment (badly for the most part). We''ve saved species on the brink of extinction before. What I''m getting at is that we may not be able to save them, but shame on us if we fast-track their demise or don''t at least try to save them.
Reply to this comment
by aerhed August 30, 2008 8:36 PM EDT
Hey, can you hear that low frequency hum in the earth? No, it''s not a drilling rig (good one though) IT''S FREAKIN TEDDY ROOSEVELT SPINNING IN HIS GRAVE!
Lets make cbsfan king. What the hey, he gotta do better "those two guys" (draft dodgers).
Reply to this comment
by noboundary August 29, 2008 11:55 PM EDT
The solution is simple - give Polar Bears the right to vote. Let them decide the election in November!
Reply to this comment
by armydog2 August 29, 2008 6:02 PM EDT
It is amazing how greed of the neocons and their big oil buddies hold such little concern for God''s beautiful creatures. Have you ever been to Alaska? It is breathtaking country, truly our final frontier why would anyone want to destroy it, the love of money is that strong, this is truly a disgrace!
Reply to this comment
by lovesamerica August 29, 2008 4:07 PM EDT
I don''t care about that either,but when I saw Alaska after her name it made my blood curdle..environmentaly. Have a good holiday.bye
Reply to this comment
by cbsfan73 August 29, 2008 3:56 PM EDT
lovesamerica wrote:
"I am a woman and I know about PMS, heaven help us and keep her away from the red button!!!!!!lol seriously though, it is a bad thing for the environment,in my humble opinion."

I have nothing against women in politics. But I believe that one should not vote simply because of race or gender.
Reply to this comment
by lovesamerica August 29, 2008 3:48 PM EDT
I am a woman and I know about PMS, heaven help us and keep her away from the red button!!!!!!lol seriously though, it is a bad thing for the environment,in my humble opinion.
Reply to this comment
by cbsfan73 August 29, 2008 3:45 PM EDT
lovesamerica wrote:
"Just saw Mcain''''s running mate. Drilling in Alaska would start about 30seconds after the inaugeration."

This is a political strategy designed to capture Hillary votes. I guess he assumes that women are dumb and will throw their vote towards a candidate embellishing a woman rather than throw it towards logic.
Reply to this comment
by cbsfan73 August 29, 2008 3:39 PM EDT
nrgmizer wrote:
"This administration has played a crucial role in global warming and has shown that as long as Corporate policy overrules practical politics, another step toward extinction is taken."

Well, it''s a lot like drilling a tiny hole in your boat every day.
Reply to this comment
by cbsfan73 August 29, 2008 3:37 PM EDT
nrgmizer wrote:
"The earth, polar bears and us are in danger and you guys are wondering why the polar bear doesn''''t evolve."

The national parks are trying very hard to induce evolution on bears by creating cowardly bears that will accommodate humans. This is not natural.

Reply to this comment
by lovesamerica August 29, 2008 3:27 PM EDT
They are skrewed. Just saw Mcain''s running mate. Drilling in Alaska would start about 30seconds after the inaugeration. Polar bears are a symbol of the destruction by man and the consequences of our greed. The Artic refuge was set aside for these and other creatures that live there. Another take back,just like our national parks and what happened to our trusting native Americans.I am NOT promoting Obama,just taking notice of the republican''s choice.Sad,Sad,Sad
Reply to this comment
by cbsfan73 August 29, 2008 3:20 PM EDT
To: yongamerica

If you want to help Polar Bears, the best things you can do are to advocate green energy and population control.
Reply to this comment
by cbsfan73 August 29, 2008 3:17 PM EDT
yongamerica wrote:
"If bears were meant to spend so much of their time swimming in the ocean don''''t you think they''''d have evolved flippers by now?"

Maybe they are evolving because their feet are indeed designed for swimming (There are tiny webs between their toes.).

But their feet are also designed for walking on snow and ice.
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica August 29, 2008 2:13 PM EDT
Polar bears can swim up to sixty miles without resting. Unlike humans, they can rest in water.

Posted by cbsfan73

If bears were meant to spend so much of their time swimming in the ocean don''t you think they''d have evolved flippers by now?

Humans can swim the English Channel, but that doesn''t mean that''s what they do all the time.
Reply to this comment
by cbsfan73 August 29, 2008 1:40 PM EDT
lovesamerica wrote:
"okay,well I guess my info. was incorrect and stand corrected. But it still is a sign that things are not right. they shouldn''''t have to swim that far and I am sure that distance taxes their stores of fat."

I''m with you 100 percent. I just like accurate data.
Reply to this comment
by cbsfan73 August 29, 2008 1:39 PM EDT
If I were king:

I''d require every community to install solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, etc, power (depending on geography) to supply electricity to the homes. All would be tied into a grid and would operate as a non-profit organization. We could soon power our cars from this system too. It would take a while to implement, but it would work and be better for the earth and its inhabitants.

As it stands now, most of the wealthy are in businesses that require little innovation. Like: energy, insurance, usury, etc...

My plan would take control of the energy away from the wealthy and force them to be creative if they want to make money.

Power to the people.

Reply to this comment
by lovesamerica August 29, 2008 1:28 PM EDT
okay,well I guess my info. was incorrect and stand corrected. But it still is a sign that things are not right. they shouldn''t have to swim that far and I am sure that distance taxes their stores of fat.
Reply to this comment
by cbsfan73 August 29, 2008 1:25 PM EDT
lovesamerica said:
"I read an article last week about a group out counting whales. during their trip they spotted 9 polarbears swimming upto 50 miles from any ice flows.They do not know what happened to the bears,but don''''t hold out much hope as the optimum distance for a healthy bear to swim is about 15miles."

Polar bears can swim up to sixty miles without resting. Unlike humans, they can rest in water.
Reply to this comment
by lovesamerica August 29, 2008 1:15 PM EDT
I read an article last week about a group out counting whales. during their trip they spotted 9 polarbears swimming upto 50 miles from any ice flows.They do not know what happened to the bears,but don''t hold out much hope as the optimum distance for a healthy bear to swim is about 15miles..And the nay sayers think there is no real problem?The bears were not getting ready for the olympics people, they are trying to find food and ice.
Reply to this comment
by cbsfan73 August 29, 2008 1:06 PM EDT
SistaTee wrote:
"Don''''t polar bears kill baby seals? They grab them and bite them and tear their guts out; right in front of their mommas. I ask you. Is that GREEN?"

The bear does not dig minerals from the earth and make guns to kill the seal. It does not haul the carcass away in a fossil fuel powered truck or boat.

I''d say the Polar Bear is very GREEN.
Reply to this comment
See all 36 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: