Did Hillary Mean It?
Expert Says Her Body Language May Have Belied Strong Support She Voiced For Obama
-
Play CBS Video
Video
What Clinton's Body Said
Joe Navarro, a former FBI agent and body language expert, takes a look at what Hillary Clinton was saying in physical terms about her support for Sen. Barack Obama.
-
Photo
HIllary Clinton addressing the Democratic convention Tuesday night (AP)
-
Photos
Convention Clicks
Snapshots from the podium, the floor and host cities.
-
Photo Essay
Orange: The New Power Color
From convention podium to red carpet, orange makes a bold statement
But did her body language match her words?
Body language expert and former FBI agent Joe Navarro says he doesn't think so.
Navarro, who wrote the book "What Every BODY is Saying: An Ex-FBI Agent's Guide to Speed-Reading People," explained to Early Show co-anchor Maggie Rodriguez Wednesday, "We need non-verbal (cues) to tell us what is important, what is significant, and what should we be looking for."
And Clinton's non-verbals, he says, were revealing.
"What we wanted to see was a Churchillian speech, something that would move her candidate to cross that magic fence. And she delivered a speech, but the gestures -- the non-verbals that give us the emotion -- really weren't there."
Navarro later added, "I think her message was supposed to be, 'Hey, go with me and let's vote for Barack.' There should have been a lot more emotive displays, and we just simply did not see that."
For instance, "One of the things that you see is she has very limited hand gestures. And we look for hand gestures to tell us what's important. So, when we see them out, when we see them up, this is significant. And we saw them just a few times last night, but not enough. This was not an impassioned speech."
On the other hand, Rodriguez observed, "When she was talking about things that were important to her, I did notice (non-verbals), like healthcare."
"Health care -- there was a lot of self-touching," Navarro agreed. "When she was talking about McCain, there was a lot of emphasis, when she talked about her husband. We saw more non-verbals from the audience in regards to these issues than we saw from her."
Perhaps, Rodriguez suggested, Clinton just isn't one who uses her hands much while speaking. For example, "I noticed that she does something with her shoulders. Maybe that's how she emphasizes."
"One of the ways that we emphasize is by defying gravity," Navarro pointed out, "and our shoulders come up, or we stand on our toes. She does that a little bit. But that's so weak that we tend to miss it.
"Now, toward the end of her speech, we saw her hands come up and high and so forth. This is where emotion was truly there."
Rodriguez said she noticed Michelle Obama in the audience "pursing her lips a little bit" at times. Did that mean Michelle was as a little bit uncomfortable during Clinton's speech?
"It depends," Navarro replied, "on when you see her. I think a couple of times there when they were picturing her, perhaps she was thinking, 'This should be a little better' and so forth. (But) I think Michelle was very receptive. Her non-verbals actually were great at the beginning as she was, you know, you saw a lot of head tilt, which is indicative of 'I'm receptive,' and so forth."
Navarro was a big fan of Michelle's speech Monday night,
"I think it was a home run," Navarro observed. "She's a beautiful woman. You know, her hugs are genuine. She has those beautiful high cheek bones that we see in models. The broad shoulders. (She had a wide stance). Her gestures are huge. They are very encompassing. These things draw us in. These are the things we look for. Otherwise, just hand out a memo."
Copyright MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- next
See all 222 CommentsThey call Ruth Ginsburg some big liberal but in reality she was a person the Repubs gave to Clinton as an acceptable choice.
And the Commander in Chief test, Obama is far more prepared then McCain. He twice as smart and doesn''t think that war is the only answer but knows that sometimes it is the only but last option.
SHE UNLOADED 100 YEARS AND HER MISERABLE HEALTH CARE BAGGAGE ON HIM SO HE WILL FAIL HER LOFTY UNREALISTIC EXPECTATIONS BASED ON A PHONEY HEALTH CARE SYSEM OF RAT POISON DRUGS!
HILLARY AND BILL DONT LIKE ****** UNLESS THEY CAN MANIPULATE THEM, USE THEM, AND/OR LAUGH AT THEM!
WHAT A FAKEY COCKY NO-GOOD-FOR-NOTHING WHITTIE ARKANSAS CRACKER!!
SHE UNLOADED 100 YEARS AND HER MISERABLE HEALTH CARE BAGGAGE ON HIM SO HE WILL FAIL HER LOFTY UNREALISTIC EXPECTATIONS BASED ON A PHONEY HEALTH CARE SYSEM OF RAT POISON DRUGS!
HILLARY AND BILL DONT LIKE ****** UNLESS THEY CAN MANIPULATE THEM, USE THEM, AND/OR LAUGH AT THEM!
WHAT A FAKEY COCKY NO-GOOD-FOR-NOTHING WHITTIE ARKANSAS CRACKER!!
SHE UNLOADED 100 YEARS AND HER MISERABLE HEALTH CARE BAGGAGE ON HIM SO HE WILL FAIL HER LOFTY UNREALISTIC EXPECTATIONS BASED ON A PHONEY HEALTH CARE SYSEM OF RAT POISON DRUGS!
HILLARY AND BILL DONT LIKE ****** UNLESS THEY CAN MANIPULATE THEM, USE THEM, AND/OR LAUGH AT THEM!
WHAT A FAKEY COCKY NO-GOOD-FOR-NOTHING WHITTIE ARKANSAS CRACKER!!
She''s trying to do the RIGHT THING, according to half of the lying dems.
OBAMA "won" (stole) the primary, so let HIM do all the work; it''s what he wanted, right?
Why should Hillary be smashed in the face repeatedly, then get stuck for pushing this sack of *** over the finish line? Remember how obama''s wins pretty much stopped midway in the Primary, after all those dirty caucuses?
NOBAMA! PUMA!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by zorar at 09:30 AM : Aug 27, 2008
+ report abuse
HILLARIOUS!
Obama made 4,000,000 last year!!!!!
Who''s the "mental midget"?
I''m a liberal, but obama is no liberal.
Did you see his vote on FISA? On cheney''s energy bill?
Open to "offshore drilling"?!?
WAKE UP!!!!
Amusingly, she was right. Now she has to do her bit for the party, so she gritted her teeth and lied for them for a while. She''s used to doing that. LOL
Of course McCain is no sort of hawk. He has no record in the Senate of pushing for war. He did support the surge, and he was proven to be correct.
As for needing a Democrat in the White House for prosperity, you poor fools have been betrayed by them. The Democrat controlled Congress has sat on needed legislation for months, and in some cases years now, so that they could see things get worse during the election year and misdirect the blame. They have been quite happy to see Americans suffer so that they could have an election tactic.
For this, they deserve jail, not votes.
I notice most people that say negative comments about Black or women are insecure about their own identities
It''s now time to stop blaming Hillary for all the ills of the world. How about shifting it to the men for a while (after all, they are the ones in office and running for office)?
And for CBS, unbiased reporting would be more appreciated- guess that''s not possible is it?
I''ve watched many McCain speeches and debate appearances. I''ve only heard him mention his years as a POW when asked a question where the answer touched upon that experience. He does frequently mention his service and record in the Senate. Of course Obama has never served his country, either in the service or in the Senate. He''s sponsored no significant legislation, and has spent a significant percentage of his Senate career running for President or preparing to.
She gave a magnificent speech last night and CBS publishes a ridiculous article nitpicking about her hand gestures !
We''ll look forward to a similar article analyzing John McCain''s body language. Yeah, right.
Well, that''s OK, because a lot of us aren''t happy with the choices!
But, if she really expected him to give her the VP position, than she and her husband should have ''put on happy faces'' and done everything they could to ''mend fences'' and work for the ticket! Instead, since the end of the primary, both continue to make these somewhat derogatory, less than supportive statements about him! If I was him, after that, I wouldn''t want her as VP, either!
Just like the primary, the VP selection was hers to lose, and she did!
*Bush inherits from Clinton the .com bomb.
*World Trade Center dropped in retaliation for Clinton''s failed attempt to kill Osama Bin Laden.
*The economy tanks for a year but eventually improves and the Dow breaks 13K.
*Democrats and Republicans agree to go kick Iraq''s teeth in.
*Democrats decide it was a bad idea and now poo-poo the idea, claiming they were lied to.
*Democrats take control of Congress.
*Economy goes to doo-doo.
*Oil goes stratospheric on Obama''s friends buying up oil futures (Arabian Peninsula and Venezuelan buds who need a Muslim in office).
*The Republicans are to blame for inflation and unemployment caused by above.
*Obama wins in November
*Oil drops to $55 in December
*Obama hailed as savior in January.
Got it.
Although I think we would be better off with women in the White House I could not support Hillary for one reason because she campaigned like the RepubliCON Artists that we now have in the white house. Sleazy an lying straight out to the American people. To me nothing shows less respect and is more dishonorable (which is only one reason a RepubliCON will never get my vote).......................
I don''t think it was a concession speech, on the part of Hillary. I don''t think she has ever stopped running for President and I shudder to think what she is doing behind the scenes with some of her supporters.
******************************************************** HUH, listen a little more carefully. He is like Giuliani where every question lends itself to an answer that somehow manages to tie into 9/11.
McCain and his campaign have trivialized his experience as a POW and have dishonored all the other men who were POW''s at the same time as McCAin and had it a lot worse than he did.
Being a POW is not an accomplishment........It is something he endured........It does not demonstrate leadership abilities, it does not demonstrate good judgement and it does not demonstrate any concern for the American people and it makes it questionable whether the man is mentally fit for the highest office in the land.
If Obama accomplishes even 10 percent of the promises he''s made, he will tax us to DEATH. When will the American public learn that politicians will say ANYTHING to get elected. Obama is promising everything to everyone. He has no idea the challenges in front of him. We owe China more money than our great-great grandchildren can repay. The deep mess we''re in will require incredible experience to resolve. Obama doesn''t have it. Period.
===========================
========================
It only fits for the Hillary haters like you.
THX Hillary!!!
Does CBS believe Hillary is LYING? That IS the implication of the question!
EXPERTS? What kind of quackery is this?? Will this EXPERTS testimony stand in ANY court of law? Does this type of testimony have any standing ANYWHERE?
CBS has fallen a long damned way, a loooong damned way!
Yeah . . . but Hillary was masterful at it such that Obama supporters thought it was sincere, and Hillary supporters saw enough doubt not to be swayed.
If her goal was to steal front-runner of the future status from Mark Warner I think she knocked it out of the park!
Ummm, Mr. Ex-FBI agent, did you vote Republican or Democrat in the last election ??
Remember Mr. Ex-FBI agent...you must tell the truth now ...
Lol
Ummm, Mr. Ex-FBI agent, did you vote Republican or Democrat in the last election ??
Remember Mr. Ex-FBI agent...you must tell the truth now ..."
Lol
Posted by tejasdemo
Exactly Mr. tejasdemo.
A most excellent post.
Had she exchanged speeches with Dennis Kucinich, we''d already be hearing the death knell of the Republican party, his fired up speech has been the high point so far of the convention, and the one with the least coverage.
It would be a shoo-in if Mr. Obama can deliver the fire that Mr. Kucinich did, hitting hard on the failed policies of the current administration, linking McSame to them, and a few specifics on how he would take steps to reverse the current trend.
Thank you CBS for proving how stupid Katie really is.
Posted by Nancy_Naive at 11:37 AM : Aug 27, 2008
Nancy, I am not a McCain advocate. I was only stating an observance. Also, far from being a bigot! trust me...
Posted by cbs_tom
More importantly, does anyone care? Her husband just survived a bruising battle with one of the most clever political marketing teams in history, the Clintons, in which the "n-word" hovered just beneath the surface. Anyone expecting Mr. Obama''s wife to be all starry-eyed, like a Clinton cheerleader, as if nothing at all passed between them, is deluded.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- next
See all 222 Comments