Study: Monkeys Like Giving And Receiving
Show Empathy Toward Monkeys In Same Social Group, But Are Less Generous With Strangers
-
Photo
Mi casa su casa. Capuchin monkeys like to be generous with monkeys from their social group. (AP Photo/KEYSTONE/Lisa Maire)
-
Interactive
Animal Crackers
Photos of some of our favorite critters
At least, that is what researchers at the Yerkes National Primate Research Center at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, have found.
Monkeys were given a choice of receiving a food reward, or receiving a food reward and also having another monkey receive food.
When paired with relative or "friend" the monkeys primarily went for the double reward, known as the "prosocial" choice, researchers led by Frans de Waal report in Tuesday's edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
"The fact the capuchins predominantly selected the prosocial option must mean seeing another monkey receive food is satisfying or rewarding for them," said de Waal.
But the monkeys were not so generous with strangers, choosing the so-called "selfish" option instead.
"We believe prosocial behavior is empathy based. Empathy increases in both humans and animals with social closeness, and in our study, closer partners made more prosocial choices. They seem to care for the welfare of those they know," de Waal said in a statement.
Now the question is whether giving is self-rewarding to capuchins because they can eat together, or if the monkeys simply like to see the other monkey enjoying the food.
In the study, eight adult female capuchins were given tokens to exchange for food. One token got them a slice of apple. The other also got an apple slice, plus a similar slice was given to another monkey they could see.
In a series of tests, when the "partner" monkey was a relative or a familiar female from the same social group, the one choosing the token moved closer to the partner and primarily chose the prosocial token that got them both food. But when the second monkey was a stranger, the selfish token was more likely to be chosen, often with the lead monkey turning her back to the stranger.
Since the reward was the same for the monkey making the choice, de Waal suggested there must be some intangible benefit to the prosocial choice, perhaps an indication of empathy.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



Posted by SistaTee at 02:21 PM : Aug 26, 2008
SistaTee, That''s a good one. LOL
Posted by Xoynx
------
Like a politician once said. We''re not a society. Only individual men, women, and families. I hope that politician doesn''t get any taxpayer money.
So does Bill Clinton - heeheeheehee
-BUTT--
Republicans just like sticking it to you.
Socilism was is NOT why the USA was founded.
America is a Rebublic.
There''s plenty of Socialist Countries, one can move to any apply for citizenship AND 78 percent tax rate!
I give him food, He gives me a cage to clean.
Like Republicans, we give them Tax Dollars and they give us crapola to clean up.
GREAT Point!
We should pay very little in taxes NOT Hundrerds per paycheck.
We''ll take care of our own affairs.
Health Care
Travel
Food we consume.
Drugs.
Just to get rid of a few.....to start.
Socilism was is NOT why the USA was founded.
America is a Rebublic.
There''''s plenty of Socialist Countries, one can move to any apply for citizenship AND 78 percent tax rate!
Posted by republic1776
----------
Wasn''t the US founded to escape religious persecution and to throw tea into a harbor because they thought Gaia needed a caffeine buzz?
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is no monkey.
_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is not as good as the monkey.
-
by mnbrant
August 27, 2008 4:19 AM PDT
- Was this study completed at the White House over the last 8 years?
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 38 Comments_________________________________________________
I believe the investment firm Motley Fool used a monkey to choose stocks to see how it would compare against the average stockbroker. The monkey won. Prez Bush is no monkey.