Convention Speeches Tricky For Defeated

CBS Evening News: For Politicians Not Seeking Nomination, It's All About What's Next

(CBS)  What do you say if you're talking to a convention that isn't going to give you the nomination you want? Well, it often turns out that the speech isn't about what's already happened, but what you hope will happen next, CBS News senior political correspondent Jeff Greenfield reports.

In 1976, President Gerald Ford invited Ronald Reagan to speak to the delegates that had narrowly defeated him. Reagan offered perfunctory support for Ford, and a stark warning about the next generation:

"Whether they have the freedoms we have known up to now will depend on what we do here," Reagan said.

Ford blamed that speech for his narrow loss to Carter. But it positioned Reagan to win the nomination and the White House four years later.

When Ted Kennedy narrowly lost to Jimmy Carter in 1980, his speech was a ringing endorsement of liberalism that did little to bring his backers over to Carter's side.

Carter lost to Reagan in a landslide.

And sometimes you can use your speech to build bridges to your opponents within the party. Four years after John McCain lost a bruising primary fight to George W. Bush, he won conservative hearts with a scornful attack on the left wing filmmaker Michael Moore.

"And certainly not a disingenuous filmmaker who would have us believe that Saddam's Iraq was an oasis of peace," McCain said.

"Part of Hillary Clinton's speech will be based on her thinking, 'What am I going to do in 2012. If Barack Obama loses, God forbid, how will I use this speech as a wedge?' " said CBS News analyst Douglas Brinkley.

But, whatever her intentions, Clinton knows full well that any hopes for the future depend on endearing herself to this Democratic convention. It's a tricky bit of tightrope walking.

[tibu987]

Having just seen Hillary''s talk at the convention I would like to say this.
I am no fan of the Clintons and I wish they would just fade away.
However, Hillary''s speech at the DNC was excellent and without fault.
Kudos to her for that speech.
That said, I hope that Obama does NOT offer Hillary a cabinet post.

[samthetvcat]

---"But, whatever her intentions, Clinton knows full well that any hopes for the future depend on endearing herself to this Democratic convention. It''s a tricky bit of tightrope walking."---

Yeah, on it''s face it was a spectacular speech, but when you add into consideration all the competing interests she had to factor into it, it was like a tactical mastery! wow . . .

You know what in the larger picture, I feel like the Clintons came into this thing wanting to add a new chapter to their sort of ''tarnished'' legacy from the 90''s. Maybe their campaign didn''t end up with the storybook ending, but I think they were successful in achieving their goal :) And it''s not over yet :o

[oneworldusa]

Hillary''s gearing up for 2012. That''s all there is to it. I missed the speech. Must have been something else, cause I''ve seen Dems and Repubs saying it was fantastic. I''m not a Hillary fan myself, but her presence during this election, along with Obama is historic, for sure.

[closethippy1]

EVERYBODY PLEASE YOUTUBE DENNIS KUCINICH SPEECH AND LISTEN TO THIS GUY.
WHY THE F'''' IS THE MEDIA IGNORING WHAT HE HAD TO SAY?
WHY? WHY? WHY?!

[lordmi]

KUCINICH was the best on the day.
I found it on CNN and watched 3 times with leasure, excitment and proud of my country and my people.
People do NOT matter for McWar. That is why he will lose.
I will puull Kucinich on Youtube, sure!!!!
Yes, we can : from down to UP.