Official: Many Factors Caused Madrid Crash
Engine Failure Not Enough To Bring Jet Down, Aviation Chief Speculates
-
Play CBS Video Video Spanair Crash Under Scrutiny As investigators search the debris of a deadly Spanish air crash, questions have been raised as to how this plane was permitted to attempt a take off in the first place. Nancy Cordes reports.
-
Video Deadly Plane Crash In Spain A Spanish airliner bound for the Canary Islands crashed while taking off from a Madrid airport, leaving over 150 passengers and crew members dead. Nancy Cordes reports.
-
Video Deadly Plane Crash In Madrid The death toll has jumped in a plane crash in Madrid. Officials now say at least 150 people died after the jetliner swerved off the runway and caught fire. Alison Harmelin reports from New York.
-
-
Relatives of victims of the Spanair jet crash wait for transportation outside a hotel to go to the makeshift morgue at the IFEMA fairgrounds in Madrid, Spain, Friday, Aug. 22, 2008. (AP Photo/I. Lopez)
-
A part of the fuselage of the Spanair jet that crashed on take off at Madrid airport is lifted by a crane on Aug. 20, 2008. (AP Photo/EFE)
-
A Red Cross worker walks near the body of a victim of the Spanair jet crashed at Madrid airport on Wednesday, Aug. 20, 2008. (AP Photo)
-
Medical personel tend an injured passenger in Madrid's Barajas airport, Aug. 20, 2008. (AP Photo/Juan Carlos Hidalgo)
-
(AP/ESRI)
-
-
Photo Essay Tragedy On Takeoff Spanish airliner bound for Canary Islands swerves off Madrid runway, bursts into flames.
-
Interactive Air Disasters Review the worst air disasters in the past four decades, see how safety officials investigate plane crashes and more.
In an interview with The Associated Press, Manuel Bautista said a failure of one of the Spanair MD-82's two engines by itself - if such a failure did in fact occur - should not normally be enough to bring down a modern aircraft because they are designed to fly on just one if necessary.
"A set of causes probably came together to cause the accident," Bautista said.
With an investigation under way with help from the United States and the airplane's manufacturer, he said it was too early to say if human error was involved.
Bautista said he has seen - but would not comment on - video footage from Madrid airport that shows the doomed airliner trying to take off. The newspapers El Pais and ABC said it shows no engine explosion, contrary to some witness accounts.
The plane abandoned one takeoff attempt because of a mechanical problem with what the airline called an air intake temperature gauge near the cockpit. The gauge was essentially turned off and the plane cleared for takeoff. It crashed on takeoff.
Aviation experts have said the gauge problem, usually a relatively minor glitch, was unlikely to have caused the crash, but Bautista would not rule out the possibility that it contributed to the accident.
"A problem with a temperature sensor may not matter at all or it can be very important, depending on what other circumstances accompany it," Bautista told the AP. "We will have to see what other issues were present."
On Thursday, a survivor told of the heaving, hellish final minutes of the MD-82's flight, saying she feared she was going to die.
"The plane was rocking back and forth, until I suspected it was going to fall," Ligia Palomino, a 41-year-old emergency rescue worker who happened to be on board, told Spain's Cadena Ser radio station. "I saw people, smoke, explosions. I think that is what woke me up because I had lost consciousness."
"I thought that if help did not arrive soon I would die," said Palomino, who suffered leg injuries and a broken rib.
The government released a list of the nationalities of 19 foreigners from at least 11 countries who were on the plane. Of the 19, only one survived, a Swedish citizen.
The other 10 countries are: Germany with five citizens among the dead, France with two, and one each from Mauritania, Turkey, Brazil, Indonesia, Bulgaria, Italy, Colombia and Gambia. The nationalities of three other foreign victims had yet to be determined. The list did not name the foreigners.
As the shock of the tragedy began to sink in, Spain began three days of mourning Thursday. Flags in Madrid flew at half-staff and silent vigils were held at noon around the country. The king and queen visited the morgue, consoling relatives of those who died.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
- Ill share something with you. My very first was a 707 I was sitting over the wing and saw it flex but I guess it was meant to do that. Then came the MD11 that was a smooth flight not much to see except the flaps then the 747-400 you did not even know you were moving. That is a great plane. Now you have that airbus 780? Made out of plastic. I will take aluminum any day. Plastic does not last long in sunny dry places and I don%u2019t want to be one of 800 trying to get out. Trust me a plastic plane with some fancy glue will come apart at some point while you%u2019re in your personal 19,000 ticket private suite. Take offs are optional landings are required.
- Reply to this comment
- The MD80 scares the heck out of me a very long aluminum cylinder with two engines hanging off the back. With engines in the rear the pilots have even more to worry about the balance. I have been on a few and never felt safe. Thank god my flying days are over. I do not go far these days but im not going splat in some field. Give me the 737 anyday
- Reply to this comment
- marizara: you are correct. 153 soles died and im sure the bosses are all sitting around a big table woundering what to say. The NTSB has a good track record of putting the parts in place but in another country their input can be ignored. We will know what they want us to know nothing more
- Reply to this comment
- We''ll see what happened. Sometimes, people do everything right, and something still fails. If you read, watch, shows about airline crash investigations, what ends up having happened, sometimes it''s amazingly subtle. A slightly larger gauge wire used to secure a cable that results in rubbing when the wing is in a particular position on a hose that kinks in an unusual way and results in a loss of pressure that causes.... so many weird things can go wrong. A crack in a piece of metal that is impossible to view and is expected simply to never crack. You just never know. Might be negligence, might be human error, might be something so subtle that no one should have caught it.
- Reply to this comment
lewiston14 -- *...always the pressure from the boss that say sign here or you be cleaning toilets in 15 minutes for ever...* -- That logic applies even more to the pressure to say the *right thing* AFTER something bad has happened. -- The *BOSS* aspect does not go away during investigation. -- Just because they investigate does not mean we will ever hear the actual truth.- Reply to this comment
- michaelt302,
ROTFLMAO - Reply to this comment
- I would think that the crash was caused by ''lack of height''.
- Reply to this comment
- Funny story. I was trying to back home from Denver. I got there 11 hours later because I did not want to spent more money on a hotel. Sacked out for many hours here comes the pilot. He asked me did a plane show up? I said yes but they towed it away. He come back a second hour and ask the same question. I said yes but they towed that one out also. Three house later he comes back and ask the same question. I said ye but this time they let the plane back away under its own power. He was ticked. To make a long story short he told me the first two had such major problems they were not allowed to fire the engines. the third the radios were not working. I got a free return trip from him but it only took 11:00 hours to get back home. He was a nice guy
- Reply to this comment
- rational_1: Follow the money. Insurance will pay for the plane and the $10,000 each dead person gets before taxes.
- Reply to this comment
- "What the helll are you doing! This flight was suppose to leave an hour ago!"
"The temp gauge is reading too high."
"Well rip the damnn thing out and get that plane in the air. What do think I pay you for!"
"Okay, sir."
Posted by SistaTee at 12:56 PM : Aug 22, 2008
Good point - I''ve considered exactly that issue when delayed because of mechanical problems. Harassing the staff to get you on a plane unsafe to fly does seem more than a little stupid (and shortsighted!). - Reply to this comment
- "What the helll are you doing! This flight was suppose to leave an hour ago!"
"The temp gauge is reading too high."
"Well rip the damnn thing out and get that plane in the air. What do think I pay you for!"
"Okay, sir." - Reply to this comment
- Ok, lets stop pointing fingers and bringing out the gallows just yet. Nobody knows what happened to cause this terrible accident so just calm down. You seem to forget that when we fly, we are there too, in the same situation as our passengers. Do you REALLY think that anyone in their right mind would put themselves in a situation that could possibly kill themselves along with their passengers? We know our aircraft inside and out. We know what it can and can not do and when it''s safe and not. When it''s not, I don''t fly until it''s fixed, PERIOD.
It''s sad that an aircraft went down. People seem to forget how many flights happen everyday in the world and how many hundreds of thousands of people reach their destination safely. I am way more likely to die in an auto accident on the way to the airport than my aircraft going down.
May God take care of all that were involved in this accident. - Reply to this comment
- oldpilot954: MOST take their job serious. They check it once they check it twice and just before they walk away they check it a third time but the is always the pressure from the boss that say sign here or you be cleaning toilets in 15 minutes for ever. The answers will come but the information in the black boxes hold alot of data that needs to be sorted. One pitcure shows an engine fire another does not and there is always what the country, inspectors, or manufactures dont want you to know about. Follow the money.
- Reply to this comment
- How very sad.
My thoughts are with all those impacted by this tragedy. - Reply to this comment
- By the way arlvabear, no mechanic in his/her right mind will deliberately release an aircraft if he thinks it is unsafe. However, most of us are getting out of the business because of the pressure of trying to guess which of the 1/4 million parts is going to fail, kill someone, and get us sent to jail. The ease of making a mistake in aircraft maintenance is about the same as forgetting a turn signal while driving in city traffic. Should you be charged with murder if you forget a turn signal and cause an accident? Probably "yes" but it would sure be hard to convince a jury to convict you. Thankfully, most mistakes never cause accidents but once in a while they do. To my knowledge, an aircraft mechanic is the only job around where you try to do everything correctly and if you make an honest mistake you are in violation of federal law and subject to both criminal and civil action. You can also be in total compliance with federal law and lose your business due to lawsuit after a pilot does something you have no control over.
- Reply to this comment
- "The Associated Press said it was not likely that such a seemingly minor problem could bring down a modern plane."
----
Can you say, out of context?
Seriously,
Wasn''''t it an o-ring that brought back the shuttle pilots?
Posted by payasyougo at 08:19 PM : Aug 21, 2008
Yes it was an o-ring that brought the shuttle down. But, that o-ring that failed was on one of the solid rocket boosters. That let the flame burn through and caused the whole thing to blow up.
This airplane seems to be something else. There are several things that can cause an engine fire. We will just have to wait and see what the inspectors come up with in the days ahead.
God speed to the survivors and the the relatives of the poor people that died. This will be very hard to deal with for all of the people involved. - Reply to this comment
- We don''t really have enough information to speculate what caused the crash. A transport-category aircraft should be able to fly on one engine if the engine failure happens at or above the speed commonly known as the "accelerate-go" speed. What caused the failure is anyone''s guess. It could have sucked in a large bird, etc. Regardless, it is a time of great sadness for everyone involved.
- Reply to this comment
- "The Associated Press said it was not likely that such a seemingly minor problem could bring down a modern plane."
----
Can you say, out of context?
Seriously,
Wasn''t it an o-ring that brought back the shuttle pilots? - Reply to this comment
- My condolences to the families of the deceased.
- Reply to this comment
- My heart and prayers go to the families and the crews at spanair. I hope that during these times they could find peace.
- Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.




