Russia Threatens U.S. Over Missile Deal
Moscow Warns That Response To Missile Defense Pact With Poland Will Go Beyond Diplomacy
-
Play CBS Video
Video
U.S.-Russia Relations Worsen
Despite threats of Russian retaliation, the U.S. is planning to build a missile defense base in Poland, barely 100 miles from the Russian border. David Martin reports.
-
Video
Rice Signs Poland Missile Deal
Secretary Of State Condoleeza Rice is in Poland formalizing a missile defense pact that has enraged Russia. Lara Logan reports from Warsaw.
-
Video
U.S. To Place Missiles In Poland
Russia is seething because Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has signed a deal to station missiles in Poland. CBS News Military Consultant Maj. Mike Lyons (Ret.) weighs in on the decision.
-
Photo
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Polish President Lech Kaczynski shake hands after a meeting in Warsaw, Poland, Aug. 20, 2008. (AP Photo/Alik Keplicz)
For many Poles - whose country has been a staunch U.S. ally in Iraq and Afghanistan - the accord represented what they believed would be a guarantee of safety for themselves in the face of a newly assertive Russia.
Negotiators sealed the deal last week against a backdrop of Russian military action in Georgia, a former Soviet republic turned U.S. ally, that has worried former Soviet satellites across eastern Europe. It prompted Moscow's sharpest rhetoric yet over the system, which it contends is aimed at Russia despite Washington's insistence the site is purely defensive.
After Wednesday's signing, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice dismissed any suggestion the 10 missile defense interceptors - which Washington says are intended to defend Europe and the U.S. from the possible threat of long-distance missiles from Iran - represent a threat to Russia.
"Missile defense, of course, is aimed at no one," Rice said. "It is in our defense that we do this."
She denounced an earlier threat from a Russian general to target NATO member Poland, possibly even with nuclear weapons, for accepting the facility.
Such comments "border on the bizarre, frankly," Rice told reporters in Warsaw. "The Russians are losing their credibility," she said, adding that Moscow would pay a price for its actions in Georgia, though she did not specify how.
"It's also the case that when you threaten Poland, you perhaps forget that it is not 1988," Rice said. "It's 2008 and the United States has a ... firm treaty guarantee to defend Poland's territory as if it was the territory of the United States. So it's probably not wise to throw these threats around."
Hours after the signing, Russia's Foreign Ministry warned that Moscow's response would go beyond diplomacy. The system to be based in Poland lacks "any target other than Russian intercontinental ballistic missiles," it said in a statement, contending the U.S. system "will be broadened and modernized."
"In this case Russia will be forced to react, and not only through diplomatic" channels, it said without elaborating.
Michael Mandelbaum, a foreign policy expert at Johns Hopkins University, told CBS News national security correspondent David Martin that placing missile defenses so close to its territory is a red line for Russia.
"No deployment of ballistic missile defense systems in their neighborhoods, at least not without their cooperation," Mandelbaum said.
Another red line: the two former Soviet republics of Ukraine and Georgia must not be allowed to join the NATO alliance, Martin adds.
"The Russian attitude is when we had a good reputation, we were pushed around by the West so maybe an edgy reputation, in the Russian view, isn't such a bad thing," Mandelbaum said.
The Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation in Washington criticized the deal, saying the U.S. missile interceptors are technologically unproven and will only confirm Russian suspicions the system is directed against Moscow and not at Iran.
It's probably not wise to throw these threats around.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice"We have achieved our main goals, which means that our country and the United States will be more secure," Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk told Rice after the signing.
Many Poles agreed. "After what happened in Georgia, I believe that this is good protection for us," said Kazimierz Dziuba, 49, a hospital worker in Warsaw.
The Georgian conflict "made the Americans agree to this deal sooner because the Russians are getting too bossy," Dziuba said.
Not all Poles were happy, however.
Alina Kesek, an 82-year-old retired office clerk who lived through World War II, when Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union divided Poland between them, and then experienced four decades of Moscow-dominated communist rule, said the Patriot missiles were a "kind of provocation" toward Russia.
"This means a threat from the Russian side," said Kesek. "I am not very pleased with this deal."
Some residents in the northern Polish town of Redzikowo, where the missile defense facility will be located, fear it may expose them to retaliatory attacks or other dangers.
Along with the main deal, the two nations signed a so-called "declaration on strategic cooperation," which is to deepen their military and political partnership.
It includes a mutual commitment to come to each other's assistance immediately if one is under attack - enhancing existing obligations both have as NATO members.
The declaration also was accompanied by a promise from the U.S. to help modernize Poland's armed forces and to place a battery of Patriot missiles there by 2012.
Rice said the deal "will help both the alliance and Poland and the United States respond to the coming threats."
Poland and the United States spent a year and a half in formal talks, which snagged in the final phase on Poland's demands for the Patriot missiles and other points.
However, the deepening U.S.-Polish friendship dominated Wednesday's proceedings.
"In troubled times the most important thing is to have friends," Rice said. "But it is more important to have friends who share your values and your aspirations and your dreams. And Poland and the United States are those kind of friends."
Approval for the missile defense sites is still needed from the Czech and Polish parliaments. No date has been set for lawmakers in Warsaw to vote, but the deal enjoys the support of the largest opposition party as well as of the government.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 20
- next
See all 952 CommentsYes, the majority are against it but the numbers you quote are months old but you''re stretching things a bit, by saying 70% are "vehemently" against the missile radar. I am sitting here on Vaclavske namesti in Prague and you must be reading some different info.
Posted by pirmin3
He sure wont. Watch out for a statement from him soon, and the US better listen because, unlike Bush, when Putin says he is going to do something ... he does it.
I suppose you are more expert at what a ''thinking'' nation is. Please, enlighten us. Is Russia a thinking nation? They don''t seem to be on your list.
You''re an arrogant pri-ck. Not all of us here in America have suffered from having a public school education. I''ve been to your little backwater country and things aren''t so peachy keen there either. So get off your high horse.
Personally, I agree with you about the missile defense shield. Why on earth should America be paying to protect the likes of you and your oh-so-educated population? As far as I''m concerned, you can take care of yourselves. Good luck...
Posted by Michaelm07
Yes, I think modern Russia is a thinking nation, and although you wouldn''t know it from US corporate media, I believe they did a great job humiliating Bush and Rice over the last two weeks. They have so much up their sleeves too - NATO needs Russias permission to cross its territory into Afghanistan, and to pressure the likes of Iran on nuclear issues. Europe needs Russias natural resources, and it wont be long before they need its membership in the EU. Yes, I think Russia knows what it is doing, and Putin seems to be a brilliant strategist who is very popular with his people.
Posted by georgew1956
Why the heck would you? She has played at least her part in the provocative war-mongering of this administration, helping to downgrade global perception of US integrity to below Cyprus. Why the heck would anybody back her?
Posted by anon00 at 06:37 AM : Aug 20, 2008
----------
Are you insane with this comment? Or just a Republican in disguise?
and we can say goodbye to our little white rearends!
thx...Boy George and Condoleeza Con.
As for oil, using oil as leverage does require a little thought, but it is probably more akin to extortion. Putin is who he is so there should be no surpirse. Scheming yes, thinking - not really. But I would agree that the U.S. has not been thinking when it comes to letting it''s guard down by mistakenly thinking the Cold War was over. The day George Bush looked into Putin''s eyes and said he found a man he could trust, was a supreme blunder.
Posted by georgew1956 at 07:24 AM : Aug 20, 2008
------
I doubt it. By the way, why isn''t Condi wearing a flag pin? Why does she hate America?
Posted by georgew1956
Maybe you should ask him. If you catch him on a good day, he may even give you a coherent answer ... don''t expect too much though.
Posted by Michaelm07
I''d say it was more of a PR misjudgement. He has consistently underestimated Putin, and to continue to do so would be a supreme blunder ... for us all.
Nah--if Poland, Israel, Honduras and Samoa are with us, who dares be against us?
Posted by kazoodan
What is it with you guys and your flag pins. I am the last person to defend condi but for goodness sake will you just GET OVER YOURSELVES ?? It''s just a flag pin - it does not determine love and/or hate.
Do you doubt me now?
Can''t you see why everyone has to evacuate? I am.
And can''t you see that all Presidents are just puppets who performs for their puppet masters?
The Missile Shield in Poland is a great bargaining chip. Many will now feel the addition of Polish resolve in the future of Russian politics.
I agree and think it is very likely that Russia will arrange for similar ''defenses'' close to the US, as has already been reported in ITAR-TASS. When they do, once again the US will huff and puff under a veil of hypocracy, and once again Russia will largely ignore them, and once again america will probably do nothing, and once again we will have a dangerous stand-off.
It''s almost like they long for the good old days when the Russians were putting nukes in Cuba. There was a lot of money to be made then by the military-industrial complex.
And the system, which would have to be located in Antarctica to be less useful in blocking missiles flying from Iran or North Korea to the US, certainly provoked the Russians into their expedition in Gruziya (Georgia).
It''s called war-mongering, and McCain has a premier subscription. McCain''s stupid threats continue the inanity, and insanity, of the Bushit-Cheney regime.
And McCain''s threats are stupid, and not a general in the Pentagon would stand by as US forces were landed on a Black Sea beach to take on the Russian Army. That would be a death sentence. Let McCain volunteer for a solo mission to retake Abkhazia!
And can''''t you see that all Presidents are just puppets who performs for their puppet masters? Posted by whitemale08 yep I agree with you..Americans are asleep at the wheel...
A: "He makes himself a target so there won''t be any surprises".
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by Pensacola88 at 07:51 AM : Aug 20, 2008--
First of all, this was all planned years ago in Bzrenski''s book "The Grand Chessboard" and when Poland''s Prime Minister said a few weeks that it wouldn''t sign the "missel-defense" deal, to watch out for a "scandel" or "crisis".
And sure enough Darth Cheney was working on a "crisis" back in the "shadows" and "dark places".
Now look! Poland is signing the "missel defense" deal.
But what you don''t understand and even Condoleeza Con doesn''t understand is that they know Russia is not going to give up oil-pipeline access to the Caspian Sea.
So that means they will use "thermo-nuclear war" to reduce the population just like so-called Prince Phillip of England has called for and Prince Bandehar of the Netherlands.
So you''re not "cute" in saying what your saying, just "stupid" and "ignorant".
Do you see what I mean about why the world perceives america to be so stupid? After the last 8 years, how can so many americans not see the catastrophy of this thinking? Thankfully, also in the news is a report about an increase to 20 percent of american women going through life childless. Maybe this is natures way of reducing stupidity on the planet.
This video captures an interview between FOX NEWS Trace Gallagher and Col. Tom McInerney, a FOX NEWS consultant whose credentials indicate he has a vested interest in seeing the U.S. at war with ANYONE.
http://www.youtube.com/v/qJFnIgMTir8&hl=en&fs=1
The SUBSTITUTE for military intervention
to stop The Bad Man Sadda,,,
I mean The Bad Man Putin !!??,,,,
Condileeza Rice SHAKING HANDS with
The POLISH PRESIDENT !!??
And the DEMS?? THEY are the ones
afraid to fight!??
Oh I see, the best way to avoid being
accused as having "cut and run" is to
not to show up for the battle
in the first place
Bush made a quick right turn onto Wimply AVE.
with Putin just a bit farther on down
Gung Ho Boulevard.
Miss Otis regrets that she is
unable to dine with you tonight.
There has been much speculation that the US and NATO stoked the trouble in Georgia as a distraction to advancing preparations to attack Iran, as well as trying to hurt Russia via manipulative international condemnation. If the US attacks Iran, I hope the US and its allies are severely repelled, as much of the planet has suffered enough already at their hands.
U.S. Death Toll in Iraq for August Already Tops July -- As Two More Soldier Suicides Reported
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/greg-mitchell/us-death-toll-in-iraq-for_b_119396.html
This Administration has failed miserably to further the efforts of the "one world order" supporters to globalize our every enterprise/industry, BUT, they are working around the clock to do whatever damage they can till they have to leave office. January cannot come soon enough.
This Administration has failed miserably to further the efforts of the "one world order" supporters to globalize our every enterprise/industry, BUT, they are working around the clock to do whatever damage they can till they have to leave office. January cannot come soon enough.
Posted by panhandlpete at 08:40 AM : Aug 20, 2008
I couldn''t have said it any better than you did. This is absolutely the WORST administration ever to enter the White House. A two year old could do a better job than bush of running the country. And some have the nerve to question OBAMA''S experience in foreign affairs! If we elect McCain, then this country deserves what it gets...and I don''t mean anything GOOD either!
Posted by Leftyintexas
-------
I agree. January can''t get here fast enough for the USA.....but if it''s McSame taking the oath then God help us all.
The Burnt Earth Policy.
Whoever follows, Takes over a Sinking Ship
and makes Bush look good, in his eyes!
Poland builds spectacular modern submarine with a screen door. They can also have ice in their beverages now because they found the recipe to make ice!
Or will they be with Cheney in "an undisclosed location"?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 20
- next
See all 952 Comments