A Spirited Debate On A Lower Drinking Age
More Than 100 College Presidents Say Reducing Drinking Age From 21 May Cut Binge Drinking
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Advocating Lower Drinking Age
A group of college presidents wants a public debate on the negative effects of the current drinking age on binge drinking and alcohol related deaths. Harry Smith reports.
-
Photo
(AP)
It seems like an age-old question: Is the current drinking age of 21 the appropriate one, or should it be lowered, to 18? The answer is lowered, according to a movement called the Amethyst Initiative.
College presidents from more than 100 of the nation's best-known universities, including Duke, Dartmouth and Ohio State, were recruited by the Amethyst Initiative more than a year ago to provoke a national debate about the drinking age. And provoke it has.
While petitions are being circulated on some campuses to lower the legal drinking age, other activists say such a move would only cost more young lives to alcohol and alcohol-related accidents.
The drinking age was raised to 21 nationwide in 1984 when Congress passed the National Minimum Drinking Age Act.
"This is a law that is routinely evaded," said John McCardell, the former president of Middlebury College in Vermont who founded the Amethyst Initiative. "It is a law that the people at whom it is directed believe is unjust and unfair and discriminatory."
Caitlin McCarthy, a University of Arizona junior, said, "Should they initiate the draft, you know, the age is 18. If we can go out and fight and die for our country, and you can't have a beer, that doesn't make a lot of sense to me."
An Epidemic Of Binge Drinking
Studies tells us parents like the drinking age as-is. But many students disagree. One told CBS News, "Whether the drinking age is 18 or 21 I don't think it really matters, because if people are going to abuse alcohol they're going to do it regardless of the law."
According to a 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health by the Department of Health and Human Services, 28.3 percent of Americans aged 12-20 (about 10.8 million people) reported drinking within the past month; 7.2 million were binge drinkers (at least 5 drinks in one sitting).
Alcohol is relatively cheap, is heavily marketed, and often packaged in youth-friendly products like sweet alcohol beverages and malt liquors. Accessibility is key: A 2002 study said that, despite laws against sales to minors, 11 percent of all alcohol purchased in the United States is consumed by underage drinkers.
With underage binge drinking on the rise, seven states have explored the possibility of lowering the drinking age.
McCardell said that binge drinking occurs primarily because students must hide their behavior.
In its statement (currently signed by 114 college heads), Amethyst says, "Twenty-one is not working" and "A culture of dangerous, clandestine 'binge-drinking' - often conducted off-campus - has developed.
"Alcohol education that mandates abstinence as the only legal option has not resulted in significant constructive behavioral change among our students. …
"By choosing to use fake IDs, students make ethical compromises that erode respect for the law."
Research has found more than 40 percent of college students reported at least one symptom of alcohol abuse or dependance. One study has estimated more than 500,000 full-time students at four-year colleges suffer injuries each year related in some way to drinking, and about 1,700 die in such accidents.
A recent Associated Press analysis of federal records found that 157 college-age people, 18 to 23, drank themselves to death from 1999 through 2005.
"We also need to keep in mind that alcohol-related traffic fatalities reached a ten-year high in 2006," McCardell said on The Early Show. "They've been going up in the last ten years. We also need to keep in mind that peer-reviewed research shows more than 1,000 lives of 18- to 24-year-olds are lost each year off the highways to alcohol. The evidence is not all on one side of this debate, and we need to consider all of those data and consider whether 21 is, in fact, serving us well."
But Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) says lowering the drinking age would lead to more fatal car crashes. It accuses the presidents of misrepresenting science and looking for an easy way out of an inconvenient problem. MADD officials are even urging parents to think carefully about the safety of colleges whose presidents have signed on.
"It's very clear the 21-year-old drinking age will not be enforced at those campuses," said Laura Dean-Mooney, national president of MADD.
Dean-Mooney told The Early Show she was "alarmed" when she heard of the Amethyst Institute's statement, and suggests that those university presidents who signed on were perhaps misguided or misled.
11 percent of all alcohol purchased in the United States is consumed by underage drinkers
"College presidents don't want this passed down to them from college presidents who are being irresponsible," she said.
When asked if raising the driving age to 18 would lower the risk of young people drinking and driving, Mooney discounted the suggestions. "We know that people continue to drive, for instance, after a drunk driving conviction," she told Early Show anchor Harry Smith. "They'll simply drive without their license. Up to 75 percent of convicted drunk drivers continue to drive. Why would we think that 18-year-olds would drive or not drive, you know? It's not the solution."
McCardell said the presidential statement released does not call for a change in the drinking age. "The presidential statement simply says that based on our own experience and 24 years of this law on the books, we believe there's evidence to show that 21 is not working - that it has had unintended consequences, and that it is well past time to open public debate about all of the effects of this law on our campuses and elsewhere."
Federal law would impose a heavy penalty on any state which opts to lower its drinking age: a loss of ten percent of its federal highway funds. "That penalty needs to go," McCardell said. "Removing that 10 percent incentive is the surest way to resume the debate that needs to take place."
Waving The White Flag?
Both sides agree alcohol abuse by college students is a huge problem.
"I'm not sure where the dialogue will lead, but it's an important topic to American families and it deserves a straightforward dialogue," said William Troutt, president of Rhodes College in Memphis, Tenn., who has signed the statement.
But some other college administrators sharply disagree that lowering the drinking age would help. University of Miami President Donna Shalala, who served as secretary of health and human services under President Clinton, declined to sign.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 86 CommentsAt 18 you can vote,be drafted,enlist in the military,fight in a war,but you cannot drink because you are to young to decide for yourself if you want to take a chance of drinking and dying.
But you don''t get the choice when you enlist of whether you want to go into a war zone and die.
Put the drinking age back to 18 they are going to find a way to buy it anyways.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by gop_forever at 11:24 AM : Aug 20, 2008
-------------------------------------------------------------
Well Said, More bush regime rhetoric,A moral statement from the amoral majority.
This just shows the sad state of this nation%u2019s colleges.
These people thing it''s a good idea to let irresponsibility get hold of our kids even before they can spell irresponsibility.
_____________________
Not likely. More likely is that you will have younger less mature binge drinkers, not fewer, not to mention more DWI and DUIers on the road.
You''d think college deans, chancelors, predidents would recognize this.
this makes as much or more sense as lowering the drinking age.
But in reality, I believe they should lower the drinking age. This is because at 18 you graduate from high school, should be considered an adult, whether you join the military or go to college. Its an important time in life and its a learning experience.
From what I get here, people belive that 18 year olds today are not resposible enough, and this is not true at all. We all make decisions in life, whether it is good or bad. Mistake can be made, thats life. When the drinking age was 18 back in the 1970''s , what changed?
In retorspect, we all have to look at the rest of the world, because it seems to me that American''s are most targeted for our mistakes rather, that what we do good, such as that of our high rate of drunk driving.
If drunk driving teenagers are the biggest concern here, lets get our governement to start actuallly running more public transportations, at all times of the day, 24 hours.
This is what Europe does! And their drinking age over that is 18! Its the government who is a fault, if kids today were given more options of public transportations, that ran all the time, again 24 hour services AND AT A LOW COST, our changes of drunk driving inccidents would decrease dramatically.
The European''s know what they are doing. They don''t put 16 year old KIDS behind the wheel either, which is a another topic for another day.
But you don''''t get the choice when you enlist of whether you want to go into a war zone and die.
Put the drinking age back to 18 they are going to find a way to buy it anyways.
Posted by GodzFan at 11:28 AM : Aug 20, 2008.
______________________________________
Good response, I appreciate your thought, BUT instead of rolling back the drinking age to 18,how about a novel approach and idea. Lets up the age for voting, enlisting in the armed services, etc. to 21.
if you raised enlisting to 21, no one would join. With youth there is impulse. With age there is rational decision.
Posted by jeff-fla at 11:45 AM : Aug 20, 2008
_________________________
Finally another reasonable, rational thinker.
------------
Posted by jeff-fla
If no-one volunteered, we would have a draft and I am quite sure that those flaming Liberals out there would cry like their was no tomorrow.
As in Great Britain, zero tolerance for driving with alcohol use.
As in some European countries, no driver''s license until the age of 21.
Might be some good ideas ~
Posted by sunspro at 12:02 PM : Aug 20, 2008
________________
WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!
I have known several 19 yo highschool seniors and juniors.
It''s not only the Libs who would cry but the "social elite" ie . . . rich b@stards would too. No one from zip codes such as 90210 volunteers for the armed services.
It''''s not only the Libs who would cry but the "social elite" ie . . . rich b@stards would too. No one from zip codes such as 90210 volunteers for the armed services.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by endpcnow at 12:11 PM : Aug 20, 2008
No they wouldn''t, they would get deferments or their daddy would get them into the Reserve.
A sad situation happened a couple of weeks ago in College Station, Texas. 15-year old girl gets new RX-8 sportscar. Too young to drive, lets 16-year old boyfriend drive. 18-year-old brother of driver is in car, and they end up with a keg in the back seat. When the cops are summoned for a suspicious vehicle cruising in the neighborhood, the 16-year-old guns it, and runs into tree at 100 miles an house. All three kids die, burned to death. Over a keg.
I believe that the problem isn''t alcohol; it''s stupidity. People don''t learn how to handle alcohol when they''re young, so they do stupid things. Someone drunk and stupid will still be stupid when they sober up. Give kids something more useful than the ineffective "just say no" pap, and maybe they''ll do something intelligent with it.
At 21, the USA has the highest legal drinking age in the world. Frankly I don''t see how it is constitutional, since in every other way you are an adult with full adult rights at age 18. (you can get married at 18, but apparently, it''s illegal to drink champagne at your own wedding if you are under 21!)
Something for parents to think about, would you rather come home and find your 18 year old daughter drinking a glass of wine with a friend, or making love with her boyfriend on the sofa? So why is it the drinking is what''s not legal ???
From the article: "Alcohol education that mandates abstinence as the only legal option has not resulted in significant constructive behavioral change among our students. ..."
So why do Republicans think abstinence-only seks education will work any better?
"Something for parents to think about, would you rather come home and find your 18 year old daughter drinking a glass of wine with a friend, or making love with her boyfriend on the sofa?"
One leads to the other.
Posted by aggiekat2004
Sad for sure, but an RX8 for a 15-year-old?!?!
They only try to control what we do so they can make money off of us. It''s the bottom line.
Posted by aggiekat2004
They died over the fact that they would have been in trouble if the police discovered the keg in the car. If the age for both driving and drinking were 18, this would have been avoided.
Legalize [pot] and ban alcohol for anyone under 30.
30 is recognized as being an adult in some countries.
Posted by nrgmizer at 01:01 PM : Aug 20, 2008
nrgmizer, welcome to America.
As Art Carney use to say on Laugh-in, " Very intersting, but stupid!"
Posted by dkf218
Your post makes great points logically. Unfortunately the mind operates illogically when it comes to alcohol. Remember all the otherwise upstanding citizens arrested during Prohibition??
As Art Carney use to say on Laugh-in, " Very intersting, but stupid!"
Posted by far_point200
"PFeeeerrry EEEneresting" was Arte Johnson, not Art Carney. Laugh-in was a great show - bet it wasn''t real popular with conservatives though!!
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 86 Comments