Musharraf Ends Rumors, Resigns
Pakistani President Avoids Impeachment; Defends Position As U.S. Ally In War On Terror
-
Photo
Pervez Musharraf dominated Pakistan for years after seizing power in a 1999 military coup, making the country a key strategic ally of the U.S. by supporting the war on terror. (AP Photo/Emilio Morenatti)
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Pakistan's President Resigns
President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan resigns amid calls leave office. Musharraf's alliance with the United States in the war on terror will likely highlight his legacy. Allen Pizzey reports.
-
Video
Move To Impeach Musharraf
"CBS News RAW": Pakistan's ruling coalition has moved to impeach President Pervez Musharraf. The party accused Musharraf of severely weakening the nation's institutions and economy.
-
Video
Pakistan's Power Fragmented
The defeat of Gen. Pervez Musharraf in Pakistan's tumultuous general election casts uncertainty over Pakistan's role in America's war on terror. Mark Phillips reports.
-
Timeline
Musharraf's March
Key events in President Gen. Pervez Musharraf's command of Pakistan's army and his presidency.
-
Fast Facts
Pakistan
Learn about the people, economy and history.
An emotional Musharraf said he wanted to spare the nation from a perilous impeachment battle and that he was satisfied that all he had done "was for the people and for the country."
"I hope the nation and the people will forgive my mistakes," Musharraf said in a televised address, much of which was devoted to defending his record and refuting criticisms.
Musharraf dominated Pakistan for years after seizing power in a 1999 military coup, making the country a key strategic ally of the U.S. by supporting the war on terror. But his popularity at home sank over the years.
In addition, Musharraf's loss of power within the military may have also doomed his presidency.
"The military has been central to this major shift in Pakistan," said one senior western diplomat, who spoke to CBS News on condition of anonymity Monday after Musharraf's announcement.
Last week, senior army officers told CBS News, they had conveyed to the former president that the powerful army would not actively support him.
The message from the army made a fundamental difference to Musharraf in a country where the armed forces have ruled Pakistan for more than half its 61 year existence as an independent state, reports CBS News reporter Farhan Bokhari.
The Pakistani military is considered to be the only main institution which can play a role in curbing the flow of Taliban' and al Qaeda militants from Pakistan's border region in to Afghan territory where troops from NATO and the US are deployed to fight a raging Islamist insurgency, Bokhari reports.
With Musharraf's utility fading, the West has appeared less concerned with his fate than about how the clamor was affecting the halting efforts of the new civilian government against terrorism and the gathering economic woes.
Many Pakistanis blame the rising militant violence in their country on Musharraf's alliance with the U.S. His reputation suffered blows in 2007 when he ousted dozens of judges and imposed emergency rule. His rivals won February parliamentary elections and have since sought his ouster, announcing impeachment plans earlier this month.
A U.S. Embassy spokesman declined to comment after Musharraf's speech, referring calls to Washington. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Sunday the Pakistani president's future was an internal issue.
While Musharraf was a "good ally" who "kept his word" on ending military rule when he stepped down as army chief last year, whether he should resign "is a matter for Pakistan to determine," she said.
People celebrated in the streets of some Pakistani cities at the news of the resignation. resignation. In Rawalpindi, supporters of the Pakistan People's Party shot into the air with rifles. Lawyers gathered and waved flags outside the Parliament building in Islamabad.
Musharraf said he will turn in his resignation to the National Assembly speaker on Monday but it was not immediately clear whether it would become effective the same day. The chairman of Pakistan's Senate, Mohammedmian Soomro, will take over as acting president when Musharraf steps down, Law Minister Farooq Naek said.
It also was not clear whether Musharraf, a stalwart U.S. ally, would stay in Pakistan.
Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi said leaders of the ruling coalition would discuss later Monday whether to prosecute Musharraf in court on charges that that were being planned for the impeachment process.
Musharraf's political foes celebrated.
"It is a victory of democratic forces," Information Minister Sherry Rehman said. "Today the shadow of dictatorship, that has prevailed for long over this country, that chapter has been closed."
Musharraf, who has been largely sidelined since his rivals came to power, had resisted the mounting calls to quit, even after the coalition finalized impeachment charges against him and threatened to send a motion to Parliament later this week.
The charges were expected to include violating the constitution and gross misconduct, likely in connection with the ouster of the judges and the declaration of emergency rule.
In announcing he would quit after all, Musharraf mentioned the many problems facing Pakistan, including its sinking economy. He said his opponents were wrong to blame him for the mounting difficulties. "I pray the government stops this down-sliding and take the country out of this crisis," he said.
Allies and rivals of the president said talks had been under way to get him to step down by possibly granting him legal immunity from future prosecution. The second biggest party in the government has said he should be tried for treason, which carries a maximum punishment of death.
Who will ultimately succeed Musharraf is an open question. There has been speculation that both Nawaz Sharif and Asif Ali Zardari, the leaders of the two main parties are interested in the role.
But the ruling coalition has sought to strip the presidency of many of its powers. Sharif spokesman Saiqul Farooq recently dismissed the idea that his boss wants the job because the presidency would likely be reduced to a ceremonial position.
Qureshi would not say whether Musharraf might be granted a "safe exit" - speculation has focused on whether he might go into exile in Saudi Arabia or Turkey - or dragged through the courts.
"That is a decision that has to be taken by the democratic leadership," Qureshi, who is from the main ruling Pakistan People's Party, told Dawn News television. The leaders would assess the speech and the political situation, he said.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 67 Comments"Many Pakistanis blame rising violence in their country on Musharraf''s alliance with the U.S."
It was clear that the Pakistanis wanted no part of Bush and his lies, so Musharraf, in 2007, "...ousted dozens of judges and imposed emergency rule", or in other words stacked the deck with unpopular and corrupt Bush sycophants, thus ensuring his own demise, it was only a question of when.
Well so much for our foreign policy.
This same scenario could be said about Bush. Except he is not stepping down, his many breaches in the Constitution are not being challenged and the "opposition" is either in collusion or in his pocket or are being blackmailed by him and therefore have not sought impeachment. Without a doubt the proof is there--what is missing is the will from a Congress intent on checks and balances to oust a man who has not only harmed this country but also caused great harm overseas.
The legacy of Bush are record deficits, record destruction in an unprovoked war with Iraq, record inflation and almost universal disdain and disrespect now--for both the US and Britain--around the world.
As goes the Bush, so declines the esteem of any who allied and supported him. Blair is out. The Australian Prime minister is out, Musharraf will be out--and the exodus will slowly continue.
As for Tomflint--never praise the arsonist for his attempts to put out the fires that he, himself has started--it only encourages pyromania.
Posted by onemoretim at 07:12 AM : Aug 18, 2008
No one wants to live on that border--since such a border does NOT exist. LOL
...A! NECKS!
...A! NECKS!
...A! NECKS!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by Bob5ford at 09:14 AM : Aug 18, 2008
+
Sorry buffoon you are too dumb for such a misguided adventure....uncle BOB
Shame on the posters that blame the U.S. for everything in the world. I believe it was the U.S. that came charging to the rescue after their earthquake that killed thousands. Those same nasty American''s were in the thick of it after the tidal wave in Indonesia. How quickly we forget that the U.S. is the most giving Country in the World or that we shuck out the most money for aids in Africa due to President Bush. This analyzing of the U.S. as the reason for all the woes in the world is ridiculous and I suggest if you hate it so bad here you should move to these radical countries that you so revere.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by mrmazerati at 09:51 AM : Aug 18, 2008
That''s the problem, this isn''t Bush''s country or his issues. Pakistan wanted our money and aid so they cooperated for years. Domestically, Musharraf did squat to address the radical schools that are pumping out jihad wannabees. This has been going on way before Bush or the war in Iraq. It is the fault of the moderate muslims in Pakistan that refuse to turn against their jihad brothers. Bhutto was corrupt and they welcomed her back hoping for domestic peace, radicals killed her. It is so blind to blame Prez. Bush for everything and very naive to believe he holds so much sway.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by shazam115 at 08:56 AM : Aug 18, 2008
+ report abuse
SearingTruth
A Future of the Brave
Posted by Humanavance at 08:07 AM : Aug 18, 2008
Spot on!
Party People Zombies are so committed by allegiance to the "party" that they are blinded to see that neither Dems Or Repubs are worthy of any praise or votes.
The Repub President''s ratings are in the toilet and the Dem''s congress is half of that! Just look at the two candidates that they put on the ballots! That alone should tell you that both parties are inept!!
they cant help it...it makes them feel better about their worthless lives to bash america -----------
Posted by jamesm12341 at 09:44 AM : Aug 18, 2008
-------------------------------------------------
Don''t flatter yourselves with self serving arrogant and shallow comments. You forget most of the terrorism is a reflection of failed US policies of intrusion then abandonment, while selling massive armaments for AMERICAN profit, to these groups by successive Republican administrations.
Also thousands of people from these countries work in major US industries and contribute a great deal to America.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by TomMarAlem19 at 10:14 AM : Aug 18, 2008
Okey technology tom to mars fellow get you bags packing and take your candy rear to the front lines of war on terror ...why are you hiding in your 50 square foot cage ....so much for technology goon ... you retards don''t even educate your self out side your trailer park ....a typical symptoms of an illiterate american that you are .....techno thumper that part of the world was the silicon valley of the world in the eleventh century when your ancestors wee willie wonk vikings and the barbarain germanic tribes were in dark the ages and ....based on conection in human history you luckly find your rear in modern day technologically advanced countries ....show some gratitudes to your past humans contributions to the world as you find your a-s-s cousy ...The question is a duffus like you ,would you be able leave anything for future generations or just use and abuse the past acheivements of mankind...
Psted by ProMacLaura at 09:42 AM : Aug 18, 2008
I have yet to hear of anyone who blames the U.S. for ''everything in the world.'' For one thing, there are Democrats and independents who don''t toe the Republican party line and can be counted on to still speak with the voice of reason.
Posted by Petro49L at 12:18 PM : Aug 18, 2008
_________________
Well, partially right. The Continental Army was established by a resolution of the Continental Congress on June 14, 1775. The Americans formed an alliance with France in 1778. The British and the Continental Army did engage in formal combat between 1775 and 1778.
.
Note to Nancy "Impeachment-is-off-the-table" Pelosi: see what good can happen when somebody with a backbone stands up to criminals instead of granting them immunity from prosecution for their high crimes and misdemeanors.
As an utterly incompetent political hack, you will go down in history as the worst Speaker of the House ever. You will live in infamy for openly declaring to the most criminal president and vice president ever that "You can do whatever you want, we in Congress won''t do our constitutional duty and stop your high crimes and misdemeanors. H*ll, we won''t even bother to open a serious impeachment investigation, and we''ll basically ignore Kucinich''s Articles of Impeachment for Cheney and his Articles of Impeachment for Dumbya. So go ahead, destroy the Constitution, abuse the Bill of Rights and make a mockery of the American democracy. We''ll look the other way."
The uncontested, arrogant, lawless and un-Constitutional behavior of CheneyBush has provided motivation for criminal thugs around the world - like Musharraf and Putin --to thumb their noses at democracy and act like these American criminals.
Any rational person will hope and pray and do all they can to ensure that Cindy Sheehan defeats Pelosi in the next election.
/
Be careful of what you ask. I we impreach Bush, we get Cheney. Cheney will Pardon Bush.
Be careful of what you ask. If we impreach Bush, we get the devil Cheney. Cheney will Pardon Bush.
Posted by SgtStedenko at 02:05 PM : Aug 18, 2008
------------------------------------------------------
The Clinton impeachment was pretty good, don''t your think?
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 67 Comments