Georgia: Russia Controls A Third Of Nation
President Says Russian Tanks Moving Deeper Into Georgia; Rice Pushes For Truce
-
Play CBS Video
Video
A New Cold War?
Harry Smith speaks with chief foreign affairs correspondent Lara Logan about escalating worldwide diplomatic tensions, as Russian tanks and troops remain in Georgia.
-
Video
Russia-Georgia Crisis Grows
Russian troops are still in neighboring Georgia despite a fragile ceasefire between the two nations. As Mark Phillips reports, a humanitarian crisis is looming in the region.
-
Video
Russia Rejects Plan To Recede
Russia and Georgia had agreed to withdraw to their positions before the fighting started. But Russian forces rolled forward, sparking concerns for Georgia's capital. Mark Phillips reports.
-
-
Photo
Russian tanks on the outskirts of Gori, northwest of capital Tbilisi, Georgia, Thursday, Aug. 14, 2008. Georgia early Thursday said the Russians were leaving Gori, but later alleged they were bringing in additional troops. (AP Photo/Darko Bandic)
-
Photo
Russian soldiers point their guns toward Georgian troops on the outskirts of Gori, northwest of capital Tbilisi, Georgia, Thursday, Aug. 14, 2008. (AP Photo/Darko Bandic)
-
Photo
A South Ossetian man looks at a destroyed OSCE observer's car in downtown Tskhinvali, capital of the separatist Georgian region, Aug. 13, 2008, where Russian and Georgian forces fought a brutal five-day battle. (AP Photo/Musa Sadulayev)
-
Photo
A Russian military convoy is seen outside Gori, Georgia, Aug. 13, 2008. (AP Photo/Sergei Grits)
-
Photo
Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili (AP Photo/Shakh Aivazov)
-
-
Interactive
Russia Rolls Into Georgia
Troops thrust deep into country after Georgia's attempt to reclaim South Ossetia.
-
Timeline
Georgia-Russia Dispute
Key events in the complex conflict between Russia and Georgia.
Mikhail Saakashvili, speaking to foreign reporters in the capital in an appeal for international help, said the convoy was about halfway between the western cities of Senaki and Kutaisi.
"We have no idea what they're doing," Georgian Prime Minister Lado Gurgenidze said of the Russian column. "One explanation could be they are trying to rattle the civilian population."
There was no immediate response from Russia to the claims. Both sides have made conflicting statements since fighting broke out Aug. 7, when Georgia sought to retake the breakaway province of South Ossetia.
According to two defense officials, the latest Pentagon information does not show any major movement by Russian troops or tanks Thursday. The officials said that if tanks are moving toward Kutaisi, the Russian troops might be headed to South Ossetia where they're supposed to be going.
The developments came on a day that Russian troops searched selected cities, forests and fields in Georgia looking for military equipment abandoned by Georgian forces during the week-old war. And Russia's foreign minister declared Georgia could "forget about" regaining two separatist provinces.
In Washington, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he saw no need to invoke American military force in the war between Russia and Georgia but warned that U.S.-Russian relations could suffer lasting damage if Moscow doesn't retreat.
"The United States spent 45 years working very hard to avoid a military confrontation with Russia," said Gates. "I see no reason to change that approach today."
Gates was adamant that sending U.S. troops is not an option, but the U.S. already had a number of its most elite Special Operations Forces on the ground in Georgia, assisting and training the Georgian army, reports CBS News chief foreign affairs correspondent Lara Logan.
That would put them in position to advise the Georgians in the current crisis, military and intelligence sources told CBS News.
Thursday's events presented a huge challenge to the EU-sponsored cease-fire agreement designed to end seven days of fighting that began after Georgia tried to regain control of South Ossetia. The accord had envisioned Russian and Georgian forces returning to their original positions.
"One can forget about any talk about Georgia's territorial integrity because, I believe, it is impossible to persuade South Ossetia and Abkhazia to agree with the logic that they can be forced back into the Georgian state," Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told reporters as Russia's president met in the Kremlin with the two separatist leaders. The comments and meeting were a clear sign that Moscow is considering the enclaves.
The Bush administration said it will ignore the "bluster" from Russia about the separatist regions. However, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice headed to Georgia to ask the U.S. ally to sign a cease-fire agreement with Russia that includes apparent concessions to Moscow but preserves Georgian borders, a U.S. official said.
The pact fleshes out a French-brokered agreement giving Russian peacekeepers the express right to patrol beyond South Ossetia, the disputed border region at the heart of the conflict.
The official, speaking on condition of anonymity because the pact is not finalized, said there are important clarifications still to be made and the U.S. would support more powers for the Russian peacekeepers only if they were limited, well defined and temporary.

Still, analysts said there were holes in the EU plan to end the war between Georgia and Russia.
Robert Hunter, former ambassador to NATO under President Clinton, said the EU plan has halted much of the fighting but hardly commits the Russians to much.
"As it stands, this proposal leaves the Russians in total control," he told the AP in New York. "There is nothing in here about the inviolability of Georgia's frontiers," which he said lets Russia move forward on absorbing the separatist regions.
The war has raised concerns among other former Soviet bloc nations. On Thursday, Poland and the United States reached an agreement that will see a battery of American missiles established inside Poland.
"Poland and the Poles do not want to be in alliances in which assistance comes at some point later - it is no good when assistance comes to dead people. Poland wants to be in alliances where assistance comes in the very first hours of - knock on wood - any possible conflict," Prime Minister Donald Tusk said.
Relief planes swooped into the Georgian capital of Tbilisi with tons of supplies for the estimated 100,000 people uprooted by the fighting. U.S. officials said the two planes carried cots, blankets, medicine and surgical supplies - but the Russians insinuated that the U.S. might have sent military aid as well.
Russia's deputy chief of General Staff Col.-Gen. Anatoly Nogovitsyn said he wasn't sure that the U.S. planes carried only humanitarian cargo. "It causes our concern," he said.
U.S. officials rejected the claim.
Georgia, bordering the Black Sea between Turkey and Russia, was ruled by Moscow for most of the two centuries preceding the 1991 breakup of the Soviet Union. Russia has distributed passports to most in South Ossetia and Abkhazia and stationed troops they call peacekeepers there since the early 1990s.
Georgia's Interior Ministry accused Russia of using Iskander short-range missiles on the Black Sea port of Poti and in the central city of Gori. Ministry official Shota Utiashvili showed reporters images of what he said were shrapnel and remains of the missiles.
Russian troops and Georgian troops briefly patrolled Gori together Thursday before relations between the sides broke down and the Georgians left. At least 20 explosions were heard later near Gori, along with small-arms fire. It was not clear whether it was renewed fighting or the disposal of ordnance from a Georgian military base.
Gori, battered by Russian bombing before Tuesday's cease-fire, lies on Georgia's main east-west road only 60 miles west of Tbilisi.
Terrified Georgians had to flee their village near Gori on foot, they said, because rampaging militias from South Ossetia are burning homes and farms, killing people and livestock, reports CBS News correspondent Mark Phillips.
Earlier, at a checkpoint outside Gori, Georgian Interior Minister Vano Merabishvili said Georgian engineers and special forces were searching for Russian mines. "We are cleaning roads because we have information that there are some mines," he told AP.
A Russian envoy denied that any roads around Gori were mined.
AP television footage showed Russian troops inside and outside Gori, with plumes of black smoke rising from behind a forest.
Nogovitsyn said Russian troops went into Gori to establish contact with its civilian administration and to take control over military depots abandoned by the Georgian forces. "The abandoned weapons needed protection," he said.
Danish journalists said drunken South Ossetia militiamen fired shots into the ground before them and a UNHCR representative Thursday as Russian tanks blocked them from entering Gori. One journalist's television camera was seized.
In Vienna, Victor Dolidze, Georgia's ambassador to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, said Russian troops were looting the Georgian military base in Senaki, as well Poti.
The Russian envoy to the OSCE, Vladimir Voronkov, strongly denied Dolidze's other claim, that Russian troops had laid mines in Gori and may be doing the same in Senaki and Poti.
An AP Television News crew heard explosions Thursday at a military base in Senaki and were told by officials from both sides that the Russians were destroying ordnance. Dozens of Russian armored vehicles and troops later set up for the night on the main road from Senaki north to Zugdidi.
Russian troops operated with confidence Thursday in and around Poti, the site of Georgia's key oil terminal. Georgia's coast guard said Russian troops burned four Georgian patrol boats in Poti on Wednesday, then returned Thursday to loot and destroy the coast guard's radar and other equipment.
Georgian port authorities told an AP television crew in Poti that Russian troops were at the Poti docks early Thursday and APTN saw a destroyed Georgian military boat about 60 feet long.
The same APTN crew followed Russian troops on the outskirts of Poti as they searched a field and a forest at an old Soviet military base for possible Georgian military equipment.
Nogovitsyn would not comment on the Russian presence in Poti, saying only that Russian forces were operating within their "area of responsibility." He also shrugged off as "nonsense" Ukraine's order restricting Russia's navy from moving freely in Ukraine's Black Sea waters.
Another APTN camera crew saw Russian soldiers and military vehicles parked Thursday inside the Georgian government's elegant gated residence in the western town of Zugdidi. Some of the Russian soldiers wore blue peacekeeping helmets, others wore green camouflage helmets, all were heavily armed. Other Russian troops patrolled the city.
"The Russian troops are here. They are occupying," Ygor Gegenava, an elderly Zugdidi resident told the APTN crew. "We don't want them here. What we need is friendship and good relations with the Russian people."
The United Nations estimates 100,000 people have been uprooted by the fighting, including 12,000 South Ossetians who fled north into Russia.
In Tbilisi, displaced Georgians set up tents at a makeshift refugee camp, hanging washing on lines and rolling out mattresses and bedding.
"We have no beds, six of us are sleeping on the floor. We don't have anything left," a Georgian woman named Manana told an APTN crew. She would not give her last name, fearing reprisals.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 16
- next
See all 766 CommentsBreak out the white flags.
yeah, the new reality is: don''t *** around with russia - it''s not iraq, or nicarauga, or grenada!
did you understand, neocon chickenhawks ?
who do you really want answering the phone???
Hillary Clinton 3 am Ad
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-VFA7L2RcE&feature=related
For some, right to secret ballot could be lost
http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/shared-blogs/ajc/thinkingright/entries/2008/08/13/right_to_vote_in_privacy_could.html
the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military personnel,,, inside job
the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel,,, inside job
the 1998 bombing of U.S . embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000,,, inside job
the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S. sailors,,, inside job
talk is no substitute for action,,,
kkklowntoon just gave us the same old tired speech and did nothing else,,,
"We will do whatever it takes, for as long as it takes, to find those who killed our sailors and hold them accountable."
yahhh right
In a moment of decision the best thing you can do is the right thing. The worst thing you can do is nothing. Theodore Roosevelt
It reminds me of Bush I, when he went into Kuwait at the request of the non-democratic Royal Family of Kuwait, which is entirely different from Ossetia, of course, as Ossetians are democracy loving people.
I remember how he kept the entire war inside Kuwait and respected the sovereignty of Iraq. Or rather, how he didn''t conduct the war that way at all. He didn''t bomb the hel* out of Kuwait...he bombed Iraq.
It''s common sense, you don''t contain a war inside the area you are trying to liberate.
Now, do you suppose only Bush I knew this, but Bush II, just doesn''t know how war works? No...no they know, they also know its a propaganda campaign, so you have the absurd propaganda coming out, that none of the players themselves really beleive, its just meant to full average joe.
I cannot say they are wrong, average joe is pretty *** stupid.
He ventured forth to bring light to the world
The anointed one''s pilgrimage to the Holy Land is a miracle in action - and a blessing to all his faithful followers
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/gerard_baker/article4392846.ece
The One
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mopkn0lPzM8
Send every military ship we can to the shores of Georgia.
Posted by Humanavance
i would qualify this comment as alarmist -
these 2 disputed regions are populated by peoples who have REFUSED to become part of Georgia and Georgia has been keen, too keen recently, to force them militarily. That is their objective. The bush objective is to secure more realestate to keep russia from caspian oil. therefore their common effort to force the question with russia. which failed miserably and which most likely will mean Georgia will never see these regions as part of their country again - after killing not only russians, who by the way have lived there since the 17th century, in their agressive attack, but also separtist ethic georgians.
sorry to say, but your call to arms is unfounded, the conflict is contrived by georgian & neocon american agendas and nothing to do with a "soviet" or "imperiaistic" russian revival.
russians will protect russians - period.
Iraqi repayment plan and were screaming
about the first small installment.
when Georgia''s attack left dead russians, they killed a couple of thousand guilty georgians -
stop being a complete hyocrites.
peole who launch unwarranted attacks are terrorists and should be treated as such.
good work Russia.
FACT: Georgia bombed and killed 2000 innocent South Ossetians, most of whom also happen to be Russian citizens.
FACT: Russia responded with force, as they warned they would.
FACT: Bush ignores the Georgian genocide (like he ignores Israel and his own) and threatens Russia.
FACT: Putin is still laughing at him, and quite right too.
Posted by neoconRcrazy
Dont you mean ..."we killed a million or so INNOCENT iraqis" ??
Posted by tapsettle
yes, inncocent - and the south ossetians killed by georgian terrorists were innocent too.
but the georgian terrorists, killed by the russians, were not innocents.
HEY, LIKE THE PUNCH LINE MAN!!
GIMME THE LEAD-IN,
MIGHT USE THIS ONE!!
Absolutely right. Now if only the rest of the US public and media opened there eyes ...
The comments section isn''t playing though...its obvious this is a Saakashvili adventure. But now we have Condi talking about this ''isn''t the Cold War''...when in fact, thats exactly how they are treating the situation.
In the modern era, when peacekeeping forces are attacked, they have the right to self defense. When you liberate an oppressed group, you take the fight to the oppressor, not to lands of the victim group. You treat terrorist groups like Hamas, even when they are elected (and they were), you treat their terrorist actions just the same as any terrorist group. Democracy is not the pretend protection Condi claims it is....and the fact of the matter, that we all know she will conveniently forget as it suits her in other matters.
I''m left scratching my head by the massive inconsistency.
well, that''s what chickenhawks look like when faced with reality - destroy harmless iraq and get 3% of their population killed (in america that''d be about 9 million people) is easy.....
Posted by Mark19712
no much to do with inconsistancy - alot to do with spin, i.e. last 8 years -
today''s spin is the "revival of the Soviet Union" or "imperialist Russia" and such BS
fact is bushit & henchmen gave their georgian proxies a green light for this and when the massive russian reaction came - they stood there flat-footed and said at first "we tried to stop them", then moved on to another spin depicting it as a "russian invaision".
this administration is hopelessly inept, corrupt, unfit.
Yet Bush''s statement, along with the moderate measures that came with it, served to underscore the limited options available to the United States, which has neither the wherewithal nor the willingness to enter into a military conflict with Russia on its territorial border
There''s no liar like a Neocon liar. Rice has pushed for installation of anti-missile systems in Poland and the Czech republic, supposedly to defend the US from Iran and North Korea. Of course, these locations are nowhere near the trajectory of any missiles from those countries to the US. They are placed there as a cold-war operation to intimidate the Russians.
Condie, you''re a liar. Go back to work for Exxon Mobil. Maybe they''ll name another oil tanker after you.
Posted by neoconRcrazy at 07:43 AM : Aug 14, 2008
Talk about spin! You''re saying Bush and his cronies greenlit this opearation? Au contraire mon frere. Russia has been fomenting unrest in both of these breakaway provinces for some time now. Not long ago in Abkhazia, Saakashvili wanted to quell some violence and looting occuring in that province. He was told by the west (more specifically, Germany) to practice some restraint. Unfortunately Mr. Saakashvili is a brash man and dedided Russia had gone too far this time and decided to do something about it. Misjudgement would be an understatement in this case.
And you are naive to think the Russians don''t have designs for the glory years of their previous empire.
If they do and this is truly the next generation to populate this nation, then it''s time for Americans to relocate. You can''t face the world if you won''t even face the big mouth punks that constantly degrade everything about the United States.
"The US was once the greatest nation on earth...then you came along"
Posted by jamesm12341
So many that we won... and you lost... you are a bit confused about what "LOSERS" means, but as you gain more experience at it you will begin to understand.
Posted by checkthepast
I don''t think you can blame the next generation for americas well-deserved position in the sewer. That was down to their ageing war-mongering peers for sure.
Posted by tapsettle at 07:59 AM : Aug 14, 2008
Look, I''m no apologist for the Bush administration. Our foreign policy is in the tank. We have very little leverage on the world stage. But just because our past adventures have been mistakes on the grandest scale doesn''t mean everything our adversaries do is correct.
Posted by tapsettle at 08:06 AM : Aug 14, 2008
Fortunately, I don''t hold such a bleak outlook. You should give more credit to reasonable peoples of the world and realize, if they condemn anybody it''s our current administration, they don''t condemn American''s as a whole.
Posted by rave_on3
avec toute ma sympathie mon frere - vous vous tromper! Ce la Georgia qui a fait le premiere pas en envoyant son armee !
If somehow they came into possession of these oil pipelines, then the Bush administration would be correct.
C''mon, it doesn''t take a rocket scientist, Bush isn''t talking about the oil pipelines all the time because Russia has threatened to take them...he''s talking about them all the time, because thats what he cares about, is concerned about, and its about how he views the world.
rave_on3, I take you at your word. I''m an american citizen, born here. At this point in time, of course George is being George. Of course, we are sending this ars* wipe packing pretty soon. He isn''t held in high respect, and nor are his gang of thugs.
McCain is a similar general pain...but feel sorry for us, we have only Obama and McCain to choose from as the main choices....a few minor party candidates beyond that. The system has been producing self serving populists for a few cycles now, and unfortunately I don''t see that changing soon.
NOW they want us to believe Russia has attacked Georgia (or as they term it "invaded" !
This is just another lie, in the long list.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 16
- next
See all 766 Comments