Airborne Cold Remedy Settles Suit For $30M
Company Claims Product Prevents Colds; Federal Trade Commission Says That's Bunk
-
Photo
(AP / CBS)
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Colds May Be Good For Kids
Children exposed to the common cold and other viruses may be less likely to develop childhood leukemia. Manuel Gallegus reports.
-
Video
Cold Medicine Overdoses Surge
Two thirds of children taken to the emergency room are reported as having taken medicine without supervision. Dr. Jon La Pook reports.
-
Video
Beware: Lethal Cold Virus
Dr. Emily Senay speaks with Julie Chen about a deadly cold virus that has killed 10 Americans and sickened hundreds more, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
-
Quiz
Common Cold Quiz
To avoid getting sick this winter, know the basics about preventing colds. Test your knowledge.
The Federal Trade Commission said Thursday there is no evidence that products from Bonita Springs, Fla.-based Airborne Health Inc. "provide any tangible benefit for people who are exposed to germs in crowded places."
The company, founded by Victoria Knight-McDowell and Thomas John McDowell, markets a line of water-dissolving tablets that are sold in pharmacies and grocery stores nationwide.
Airborne's chief executive stressed Thursday that the FTC charges deal with advertising and labeling that the company no longer uses.
The company's Web site provides links to over a dozen studies which it says show "that the key ingredients found in Airborne will help support a healthy immune system." Ingredients include various vitamins, minerals and herbs.
"A class action lawsuit sparked this matter," said Airborne CEO Elise Donahue. "We're just one of many major consumer brands across America that are under assault by class action lawyers."
The FTC action adds $6.5 million to a previous class action settlement in which Airborne agreed to pay $23.5 million in customer refunds and attorney fees. That agreement is pending approval in federal court in California.
After the FTC agreement is approved, Airborne's founders will be barred from making false or unsubstantiated claims about cold prevention products.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



Hello??? That''s because you''re damned liars!!! Poor frickin'' ***!
Don''t blame the makers of the product, blame yourself for being gullible.
This is capitalism at its absolute finest! The lawyers are just mad because they didn''t get in on the scheme first!
Posted by Voltaire777 at 06:03 PM : Aug 15, 2008
Well said and very true.
If Airborne made false claims about their product, I couldn''t be more pleased that they got busted. This is a good illustration of why we need the ability to apply punitive damages. If Airborne had only been assessed an amount equal to the profit they earned, it would have been "no harm, no foul," and they (or others) might be encouraged to do it again. The award has to HURT in order to be a disincentive to cheat or harm the public. In this case, it was merely a false claim to ward off colds; it could as easily have been a claim to ward off cancer that caused a customer to ignore a cancer indicator. Think about it the next time you hear some moron going off about how we need tort reform.
-
by cyberdjs4
August 17, 2008 3:18 PM EDT
- I remember when The "Barker Era" Price Is Right shilled this stuff.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 14 CommentsLuckily, The "Carey Era" Price Is Right stopped that.
R.