February 11, 2009 2:29 PM

Federal Budget Deficit Hits $102B In July

(AP)  The federal budget deficit soared in July, pushed higher by economic stimulus payments and $15 billion in outlays to protect depositors at failed banks.

The Treasury Department reported that the deficit for July totaled $102.8 billion, nearly triple the $36.4 billion deficit recorded in July 2007.

The deficit outstripped the $97 billion gap that Wall Street economists had been expecting for July.

The Treasury said outlays were pushed up by $15 billion because of payments the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. made to depositors at failed banks. The Treasury report did not identify the banks but federal regulators seized the assets of California-based IndyMac Bank, the largest regulated thrift to fail in U.S. history.

The FDIC is expected to be successful in recovering much of its outlays for failed banks, in part by selling the assets of seized institutions. The FDIC has also raised the possibility that it will increase insurance premiums on healthy banks to cover the cost of what are expected to be rising bank failures as the current credit crisis unfolds.

Besides the payouts by the FDIC, government outlays were increased by the final bulk mailings of government stimulus payments in July. The July deficit also looked worse than the July 2007 deficit because last year's figure was artificially deflated by timing issues that shifted about $19 billion in normal outlays into the prior month.

So far this year, the budget deficit totals $371.4 billion, more than double last year's deficit through the same time period of $157.4 billion.

The Bush administration recently revised its forecast for this year's deficit, lowering it from an estimate of $410 billion, down to $389 billion. However, the Congressional Budget Office is more pessimistic, projecting the deficit for this year will total $400 billion when the current budget year wraps up on Sept. 30.

For the 2009 budget year, which begins Oct. 1, the administration is now projecting a deficit of $482 billion, which would be the highest in dollar terms in history, surpassing the old mark of $413 billion set in 2004.

Through July, government revenues total $2.094 trillion, down 1 percent from the same period a year ago. Revenues have been weaker this year, reflecting the sharp slowdown in the overall economy.

Government spending so far this budget year totals $2.466 trillion, 8.5 percent higher than a year ago. That's in part due to the $168 billion stimulus package Congress passed at the beginning of the year in an effort to keep the country out of a deep recession and because of increased spending for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 110 Comments
by keithle1 August 14, 2008 7:31 AM EDT
Stimulus checks...please. What was the point of that? Anyone remember what they spent it on? Couple of tanks of gas? Sneakers for the kids?

Spending on Iraq & Afghanistan = $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
Do you feel any safer? Is it worth it?
Reply to this comment
by babooph August 13, 2008 10:21 PM EDT
No need for more debt,China may not lend deeper to a bad credit risk,& the current debt will already end the future of the old US middle class-mission accomplished!
Reply to this comment
by joecamp41 August 13, 2008 5:43 PM EDT
Posted by taotxzen at 11:28 AM : Aug 13, 2008


Do you ever have an original thought or just cut and paste MORON.ORG and huffington post far-left LIB articles


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by mbcsmith

Posted by taotxzen at 11:28 AM : Aug 13, 2008


Do you ever have an original thought or just cut and paste MORON.ORG and huffington post far-left LIB articles


Posted by mbcsmith

Do you ever have an original thought or just cut and paste MORON.ORG and huffington post far-left LIB articles


Posted by mbcsmith

Typical Karl Rove clone, when you don''t like the message attack the messenger. Notice they never acknowledge the facts, only try to *corrupt* the source (even if it is often one of their own.)

The other item taken straight from the Rove playbook that is often seen on this site: when you have no record to run on start making baseless allegations about your opponent.

Rove is the acknowledged King of Smear, he learned from the best, at the knee of Lee Atwater.

We can see how lame this is, why can''t they??
Reply to this comment
by omega39-2009 August 13, 2008 5:13 PM EDT
LIB distortions and LIB LIES. Look at TOTAL treasury receipts. Total U.S. Treasury tax receipts are at an ALL TIME HIGH!The 9% approval LIB congress is spending these RECORD HIGH tax receipts faster than we can send them in.


Now why would this LIB not look at total tax receipts by the Treasury. Oh, because it blows his lame argument out of the water.



Posted by mbcsmith

Nitwit, those numbers came from Congress.

SELECTED DATA RELATED TO THE FEDERAL TAX SYSTEM

Prepared by the Staff
of the
JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION
Reply to this comment
by taotxzen August 13, 2008 4:55 PM EDT
to mbcsmith

Dude let it go nobodies buying your lame conspiracies you just look stupid
Reply to this comment
by taotxzen August 13, 2008 4:47 PM EDT
Posted by taotxzen at 11:28 AM : Aug 13, 2008


Do you ever have an original thought or just cut and paste MORON.ORG and huffington post far-left LIB articles


Posted by mbcsmith

Yes, mbcsmith, proof you can fool some of the people ALL of the time.

But unlike you and your far right winged brethren I choose to use facts when I make a statement. Make no mistake, I lose no sleep over trying to sway you 20% Gah-Gah Club Dead-Enders. It''s the undecide voters (with reasoning skills) that I try to appeal to.



Reply to this comment
by mbcsmith August 13, 2008 4:12 PM EDT
Posted by taotxzen at 11:28 AM : Aug 13, 2008


Do you ever have an original thought or just cut and paste MORON.ORG and huffington post far-left LIB articles
Reply to this comment
by mbcsmith August 13, 2008 4:06 PM EDT
Let''s see, where do spending bills for the U.S. government originate?

Oh, that''s right. The 9% approval LIB congress.

STOP THE WASTEFUL SPENDING NOW!
Reply to this comment
by mbcsmith August 13, 2008 4:05 PM EDT
Another con lie
US personal tax receipts
Posted by omega39 at 11:19 AM : Aug 13, 2008



LIB distortions and LIB LIES. Look at TOTAL treasury receipts. Total U.S. Treasury tax receipts are at an ALL TIME HIGH!The 9% approval LIB congress is spending these RECORD HIGH tax receipts faster than we can send them in.


Now why would this LIB not look at total tax receipts by the Treasury. Oh, because it blows his lame argument out of the water.

The
Reply to this comment
by omega39-2009 August 13, 2008 2:34 PM EDT
But take another look. The reputation of the Congress would be very different had the Republican minority and George Bush not orchestrated a systematic campaign of obstruction to bottle up any progress.

Posted by taotxzen at

And if America is stupid enough to fall for this, they deserve the hard times coming...

Republicans Vote Against Moms; No Word Yet on Puppies, Kittens

By Dana Milbank
Friday, May 9, 2008; A03

It was already shaping up to be a difficult year for congressional Republicans. Now, on the cusp of Mother''s Day, comes this: A majority of the House GOP has voted against motherhood.

On Wednesday afternoon, the House had just voted, 412 to 0, to pass H. Res. 1113, "Celebrating the role of mothers in the United States and supporting the goals and ideals of Mother''s Day," when Rep. Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan.), rose in protest.

"Mr. Speaker, I move to reconsider the vote," he announced.

Rep. Kathy Castor (D-Fla.), who has two young daughters, moved to table Tiahrt''s request, setting up a revote. This time, 178 Republicans cast their votes against mothers.

It has long been the custom to compare a popular piece of legislation to motherhood and apple pie. Evidently, that is no longer the standard. Worse, Republicans are now confronted with a John Kerry-esque predicament: They actually voted for motherhood before they voted against it.

Reply to this comment
See all 110 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook