KABUL, Afghanistan, Aug. 7, 2008

American Deaths In Afghanistan Reach 500

Last 3 Months The Deadliest For U.S. Troops In Afghanistan War

  • U.S. Marines from the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit patrol in the town of Garmser in the Helmand Province of Afghanistan, July 7, 2008.

    U.S. Marines from the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit patrol in the town of Garmser in the Helmand Province of Afghanistan, July 7, 2008.  (AP Photo/Rafiq Maqbool)

  • Interactive Assault On Al Qaeda

    The manhunt on the Afghan-Pakistan border.

  • Special Report War On Terror

    Complete coverage of the military's battle against terrorism.

(AP)  The deadliest three months for American forces in Afghanistan have pushed the U.S. death toll to at least 500, forcing a war long overshadowed by Iraq back into the headlines.

Larger, more sophisticated militant attacks have also caused a sharp rise in Afghan civilian deaths - at least 472 in the first seven months of the year, most in suicide bombings, according to an Associated Press count.

In all, at least 600 Afghan civilians were killed from January through July, a 30 percent increase from the same period last year, according to AP figures compiled from coalition and Afghan officials. That includes at least 128 killed by U.S. or NATO forces.

There are about 33,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, the highest since the war began, meaning more troops than ever are patrolling this country's mountainous terrain and exposed to ambushes and roadside bombs.

The U.S. military suffered 65 deaths in May, June and July, by far the deadliest three-month period in Afghanistan since the war began in 2001. The previous deadliest three-month period was in the spring of 2005, with 45 U.S. deaths.

In July, more U.S. troops died in Afghanistan than in Iraq for the month, for the first time since the Iraq war started in 2003. In all, 92 U.S. troops have died in Afghanistan this year, a pace that would surpass last year's death toll of 111.

The spike in violence is forcing U.S. leaders, including the presidential candidates, to call for still more troops here.

More than ever, the U.S. government recognizes the situation Afghanistan "is serious and needs to be dealt with," said Seth Jones, an Afghanistan expert at the RAND Corp., a Washington-based think tank that often does studies for the Pentagon.

"I think it is an important step that ... the gravity of the situation has been recognized and that there are some steps in place to turn the tide in Afghanistan," he said. "Whether that is successful or not is of course an open question."

Overall, at least 500 U.S. service members have died in Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Pakistan, Qatar and United Arab Emirates in support of the Afghan mission, according to an AP analysis based on Defense Department press releases.

"In terms of milestones, it's important to point out that no casualty is more significant than any other," said Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Mark Wright. "Each service member is equally precious, and each loss of life is equally tragic."

The AP count is based on information from U.S., NATO or Afghan officials, often impossible to independently verify because of the remote or dangerous locations of the incidents.

The Defense Department count often lags by several days. The most recent Defense Department count, issued Saturday, showed 496 U.S. troop deaths in and around Afghanistan.

Counting coalition troops, Taliban militants and Afghan civilians, more than 3,000 people have died in violence this year, according to the AP count.

Quote

In terms of milestones, it's important to point out that no casualty is more significant than any other. Each service member is equally precious, and each loss of life is equally tragic.

Lt. Col. Mark Wright, Pentagon spokesman
In the past, the Taliban appeared to try to minimize civilian casualties by launching its large-scale attacks primarily against U.S., NATO or Afghan troops.

But this year a February bombing at a dog fighting competition in Kandahar killed more than 100 people, mostly civilians. An attack on the Indian Embassy in Kabul last month killed more than 60.

Steven Simon, a senior fellow in Middle Eastern studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, said the recent attacks with high civilian death tolls reflect a migration of both tactics and fighters from Iraq to Afghanistan.

"The reported presence in Afghanistan of the head of al Qaeda in Iraq underscores the extent to which blowback from Iraq is being felt in Afghanistan," Simon said in an e-mail. "At this point, al Qaeda's leadership seems to be looking at the Afghan theater as the next big thing."

Afghan and U.S. officials say a big reason for the spike in violence is because militaries use sanctuaries in neighboring Pakistan where they can arm and train fighters who launch attacks across the border on U.S. and Afghan forces. More al Qaeda fighters have been using the region to launch attacks than in previous years, U.S. officials say.

Gen. Mohammad Zahir Azimi, spokesman for the Afghan Defense Ministry, blamed the rise on violence principally on two factors: a peace agreement earlier this year between the Pakistan government and some militants in its tribal areas near the Afghan border, and support given by Pakistan's intelligence agency to Taliban fighters.

Pakistan denies it is helping Taliban fighters or that it has entered into peace agreements with militants who launch attacks in Afghanistan.

Insurgent attacks have jumped by 50 percent in the first half of 2008, according to data from the Afghanistan NGO Safety Office, a Kabul-based group paid for by Western donors that advises relief groups on security.

In a report last week, ANSO said it logged 2,056 insurgent attacks in the first half of the year, a 52 percent increase from the same period last year.

The group said violence was up sharply in relatively peaceful northern and western Afghanistan and the region surrounding Kabul.

Both major presidential candidates, Democratic Sen. Barack Obama and Republican Sen. John McCain, have called for more troops to be sent to Afghanistan. President Bush has said more troops will be dedicated to the Afghan fight in 2009 but has not said how many.

U.S. military officials have said the Afghan effort needs three more brigades of troops, or about 10,500 forces.

Any new forces sent here can expect to face vicious attacks from an increasingly brazen Taliban force. Last month more than 200 militant fighters attacked a remote U.S. outpost in a dangerous and mountainous region of northeastern Afghanistan. Nine U.S. troops were killed and 15 wounded.

Even local Afghan civilians joined in on the attack, a sign the U.S. and NATO face steep challenges in their bid to win the population over to the side of the Afghan government.

"The size of the operation and the ability of the group to get support within the town was somewhat alarming, and it shows that there is clearly some concern with local Afghans, and that's a concern because civilians are the center of gravity in a counterinsurgency," said Jones. "The dangerous message is that there was involvement by the civilians."


© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 60 Comments
by shazam112 August 10, 2008 2:15 AM EDT
John mccain =rear end pain
Reply to this comment
by shazam112 August 10, 2008 2:12 AM EDT
we eradicate the bad guys, and leave.




------------------------
----------------------------------------
----------------

Posted by RosieOD4Prez at 04:26 PM : Aug 08, 2008
+

Eradicate your maggots first Rosie dosie posie hosie down the gutter.....good guys my asssssss...killers of innocent villagers...dogs of war


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by shazam112 at 11:09 PM : Aug 09, 2008
report abuse
Reply to this comment
by shazam112 August 10, 2008 2:09 AM EDT
we eradicate the bad guys, and leave.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by RosieOD4Prez at 04:26 PM : Aug 08, 2008
+

Eradicate your maggots firt Rosie dosie posie hosie down the gutter.....good guys my asssssss...killers of innocent villagers...dogs of war
Reply to this comment
by shazam112 August 10, 2008 2:05 AM EDT
Yankee doodles GET the hell out of AFGHANISTAN before you all perish....dumb soldiers of fortunes.....looking for ghost of some dude name bin laden....dumber as they come....
Reply to this comment
by downsteamjim August 9, 2008 3:38 PM EDT
Wow, 500 American deaths. That almost equals the number of Americans aborted every 4 hours.
Reply to this comment
by deacon20081 August 8, 2008 8:27 PM EDT
Element51 pay no heed to the Demwatcher....he/she is always posting simple minded nonsense.
Great post by the way, I also enlisted at 17 in the 70''s and have raised a family I can be very proud of.
Don''t let the Demwatcher get under your skin, consider the source and mentality of the posts.
Peace
Reply to this comment
by labrat9999 August 8, 2008 8:22 PM EDT
Don''t worry boys as soon as we get our feet un-stuck from the mud in Iraq where we shouldn''t have ever been we''ll try to send you some troops...that is unless they are all on the disabled or KIA list from Iraq. But if you vote for McSame you can bet it will be another 100 years before you get any help in Afganstan cause he wants to stay in Iraq with his oil buddies from Texas.
Reply to this comment
by deacon20081 August 8, 2008 8:20 PM EDT
Had Bush and Cheney not attacked Iraq for Oil Rights we would have finished off the Taliban a long time ago. 4000 service members killed in Iraq, for what?
OIL. Afghanistan and Pakistan are the central players in the terrorism game, it''s time to fire Bush and pals and get the job done.
Reply to this comment
by rosieod4prez August 8, 2008 7:26 PM EDT
See!!!! Now the truth comes out!!!!!


The FAR LEFT LIBERALS didn''t care about the "Bush''s War" in Iraq!!!!

They just don''t like BUSH!!!!! (or they just might be terrorist supporters.)




WHAT DON''T you idiots understand about you have to take it to them to exterminate these Muslim extremists ?

And if that creates more - fine - soon the Muslim religion will have nothing left but pacifists.

These extremists want to DOMINATE their religion. A surge like tactic that got the soldiers living in the feild with the locals will make the locals realize we are the good guys there to protect them, and take out the extremists. Then just like the good folks of Baghdad, they start to inform on the non-locals there to hurt them, we eradicate the bad guys, and leave.

Reply to this comment
by libsluv2spit August 8, 2008 6:08 PM EDT
the people who are whinning the most about these american deaths..are the very same people who protests in front of recruiting stations calling these same soldiers baby killers and facists..

think about...''DO THESE PEOPLE REALLY CARE ABOUT OUR SOLDIER''S DEATH..OR THIER CRIES ARE NOTHING MORE THAN SHALLOW AND PRETENTIOUS WHINES
Reply to this comment
by promaclaura August 8, 2008 5:08 PM EDT
ProMacLaura now you''''re some kind of "mother Teresa", let the people of Afghanistan sort out their problems...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by obama441 at 09:04 AM : Aug 08, 2008

I completely agree. Now, if you could convince the ones that flew planes into our buildings to stay in Afghanistan and stop gunning for us we could all live in peace. I won''t hold my breath.
Reply to this comment
by xxunknown August 8, 2008 4:30 PM EDT
American Deaths In Afghanistan Reach 500
-----------------------------------------
And what is the number of American caused deaths in Afghanistan? King George is a ***.
Reply to this comment
by hotpaulie August 8, 2008 4:10 PM EDT
notblue - Bush makes all his descisions based on politics...its no secret his first 4 years in office were run to get re-elected
Reply to this comment
by notblue August 8, 2008 3:31 PM EDT
leftyintexas, what is idiotic is the way you libs cherry pick your enemy countries based on politics. THe reality is Islamic extremism is an ideology that has no allegiance to any SPECIFIC country but if your type were to acknowledge that REALITY it would exemplify the fact that your critisism regarding the WAR ON TERROR is flat out wrong, just politcally driven nonsense.
Reply to this comment
by leftyintexas August 8, 2008 2:30 PM EDT
.... It is depressing to read the idiotic tripe spewed by the leftwing haters that frequeent these posts. To them it''''s all ones man''''s fault, the hated Bush, never once blaming the true evil that has caused all the unrest and war in the modern world, namely Islamic extremism.

Posted by notblue at 11:04 AM : Aug 08, 2008

I normally don''t bother with your posts because I believe you are an idiotic bushite but I want to correct something you said. You and the other bushites tend to believe in your own little minds that the other 75% of Americans are against the war in Afghanistan too. That is not true. We support THAT war because that is where Al Queda, namely Bin Laden and his leaders were hiding. The Taliban allied themselves with Bin Laden and thus became our enemy as well. YOU and the other DUMBYA supporters helped elect a President has that is incompetent, egotisical, and stubborn. He surrounds himself with other incompetents which makes matters worse. As a result, HE $crewed up big time by ALLOWING the Al Queda leaders to escape to Pakistan and withdrew needed troops from Afghanistan in order to fight HIS private war in Iraq. Get the picture now?... Probably not. Only 165 days left! Enjoy!
Reply to this comment
by notblue August 8, 2008 2:04 PM EDT
Afghanistan was taken over by the Islamic extremist group known as the Taliban. They tried to wipe out all semblance of Afghan culture and replace it with their own version of a barbaristic 6th century theocracy. They were defeated which allowed the Afghans to reinstate their own democracy. These savage extremists have been relegated to a wild mountanous region yet they still carry out attacks and take lives. It is depressing to read the idiotic tripe spewed by the leftwing haters that frequeent these posts. To them it''s all ones man''s fault, the hated Bush, never once blaming the true evil that has caused all the unrest and war in the modern world, namely Islamic extremism.
Reply to this comment
by element51 August 8, 2008 1:32 PM EDT
Demwatcher....Just to set the record straight, I joined the military at age 17, worked my way through college, taught for 26 years, raised a family, worked hard and saved for retirement and have never asked anyone for a cent. When you make statements that all democrats are looking for welfare checks and FEMA handouts you are simply showing your ignorance. You lose your credibility by saying things like that. It seems that you think that by posting insults it will bring people over to your side. I refuse to take part in the name calling because I realize that there are many people who are of a different opinion that are good decent people who actually want most of the same things that I want for their families and their country. May I suggest to you that you stop and think for a moment before you choose to post insulting statements.
Reply to this comment
by binloafin58k August 8, 2008 1:18 PM EDT
Osama spends too much time in Waziristan watering his exotic poppies. His clique can manufacture the tar heroin. Why not come out and watch the fighting between the Coalition and Taliban?
Reply to this comment
by talkingham August 8, 2008 1:07 PM EDT
Mission Accomplished Bush.
Reply to this comment
by obama441 August 8, 2008 12:04 PM EDT
ProMacLaura now you''re some kind of "mother Teresa", let the people of Afghanistan sort out their problems...
Reply to this comment
See all 60 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Iran OKs 10 New Uranium Enrichment Sites

    (254 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: