Feds: Ivins Was Lone Anthrax Killer

Documents Allege Scientist Had Anthrax Linked To 2001 Attacks, Planned To Kill Those Who "Wronged Him"

(CBS/ AP)  Bruce Ivins, a brilliant yet deeply troubled Army scientist, was solely responsible for the anthrax attacks that killed five and rattled the nation in 2001, the government declared Wednesday, alleging he had custody of the lethal spores involved and access to the distinctive envelopes used to mail them.

Ivins, who committed suicide last week, submitted false anthrax samples to the FBI to throw investigators off his trail and was unable to provide "an adequate explanation for his late laboratory work hours" around the time of the attacks, according to documents that officials made public to support their case.

Investigators also said he sought to frame unnamed co-workers and had immunized himself against anthrax and yellow fever in early September 2001, several weeks before the first anthrax-laced envelope was received in the mail.

Ivins killed himself last week as investigators closed in, and U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Taylor said at a Justice Department news conference, "We regret that we will not have the opportunity to present evidence to the jury."

Ivins' attorney, Paul Kemp, has repeatedly asserted his late client's innocence, and Taylor conceded the evidence was largely if not wholly circumstantial.

The prosecutor's news conference capped a fast-paced series of events in which the government partially lifted its veil of secrecy in the investigation of the poisonings that followed closely after the airliner terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

The newly released records depict Ivins as deeply troubled, increasingly so as he confronted the possibility of being charged.

"He said he was not going to face the death penalty, but instead had a plan to kill co-workers and other individuals who had wronged him," according to one affidavit. In e-mails to colleagues, Ivins described a feeling of dual personalities, the material said.

Ivins had sole custody of highly purified anthrax spores with "certain genetic mutations identical" to the poison used in the attacks, according to an affidavit among a stack of documents the government released, all seemingly pointing to his guilt. Investigators also said they had traced back to his lab the type of envelopes used to send the deadly powder through the mails.

The FBI's investigation had dragged on for years, tarnishing the reputation of the agency in the process. Investigators had long focused on Steven J. Hatfill, whose career as a bioscientist was ruined after then-Attorney General John Ashcroft named him a "person of interest" in 2002. The government recently paid $6 million to settle a lawsuit by Hatfill, who worked in the same lab as Ivins.

Taylor said Wednesday that investigators concluded in 2005 that Hatfill couldn't have had access to a crucial flask of anthrax spores.

The prosecutor called the flask the murder weapon in the worst case of bioterror in the nation's history.

Authorities say that language Ivins used in an e-mail days before a second round of anthrax attacks was similar to the messages in anthrax-laced letters received soon after by Democratic Sens. Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy.

CBS News correspondent Bob Orr reports that just before the deadly letters were mailed, Ivins sent a chilling e-mail to a friend warning: "Bin Laden terrorists for sure have anthrax and sarin gas...." and have "just decreed death to all Jews and all Americans."

The e-mail was strikingly similar, investigators say, to the language of the letters themselves, which read: "We have this anthrax... Death to America... Death to Israel."

Wednesday's documents were released as FBI Director Robert Mueller met privately with families of the victims of the attacks to lay out the evidence officials said the agency was preparing to close the case.

"He would periodically return in the evenings, presumably to check on the status of various experiments. Beginning in mid-August 2001, however, there was a noticeable spike in Dr. Ivins's evening access to the B3 hot suite" of the laboratory, according to the affidavit obtained by CBS News.

---

Read the affidavit.

---

As for motive, investigators seemed to offer two possible reasons for the attacks: that the brilliant scientist wanted to bolster support for a vaccine he helped create and that the anti-abortion Catholic targeted two pro-choice Catholic lawmakers.

"We are confident that Dr. Ivins was the only person responsible for these attacks," Taylor told a news conference at the Justice Department.

Noting that Ivins would have been entitled to a presumption of innocence, Taylor nevertheless said prosecutors were confident "we could prove his guilt to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt."

The events in Washington unfolded as a memorial service was held for Ivins at Fort Detrick, the secret government installation in Frederick, Md., where he worked. Reporters were barred.

More than 200 pages of documents were made public by the FBI, virtually all of them describing the government's attempts to link Ivins to the crimes.

---

Read the court documents in the anthrax case.

---

"It is a very compelling case," said Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., who attended a briefing for lawmakers and staff.

It says that in his lab, Ivins had custody of a flask of anthrax termed "the genetic parent" to the powder involved - a source that investigators say was used to grow spores for the attacks on "at least two separate occasions."

Anthrax culled from the letters was quickly discovered to be the so-called Ames strain of bacteria, but with genetic mutations that made it distinct. Scientists developed more sophisticated tests for four of those mutations, and concluded that all the samples that matched came from a single batch, code-named RMR-1029, stored at Fort Detrick.

Ivins "has been the sole custodian of RMR-1029 since it was first grown in 1997," said one affidavit.

Powder from anthrax-laden letters sent to the New York Post and Tom Brokaw of NBC contained a bacterial contaminant not found in the anthrax-containing envelopes mailed to Sens. Patrick Leahy or Tom Daschle, the affidavit said.

Investigators say Ivins strongly disagreed with Senators Daschle and Leahy's support for abortion rights, CBS' Orr reports.

Investigators concluded that "the contaminant must have been introduced during the production of the Post and Brokaw spores," the affidavit said.

The documents disclosed that authorities searched Ivins' home on Nov. 2, 2007, taking 22 swabs of vacuum filters and radiators and seizing dozens of items. Among them were video cassettes, family photos, information about guns and a copy of "The Plague" by Albert Camus.

Investigators also reported seizing three cardboard boxes labeled "Paul Kemp ... attorney client privilege."

Ivins' cars and his safe deposit box also were searched as investigators closed in on the respected government scientist who had been troubled by mental health problems for years.

According to an affidavit filed by Charles B. Wickersham, a postal inspector, the scientist told an unnamed co-worker "that he had `incredible paranoid, delusional thoughts at times' and 'feared that he might not be able to control his behavior."'

A mental health worker who was involved in treating Ivins disclosed last week that she was so concerned about his behavior that she recently sought a court order to keep him away from her.

Allegations that Ivins sought to mislead investigators ran through the material made public.

One FBI document said Ivins "repeatedly named other researchers as possible mailers and claimed that the anthrax used in the attacks resembled that of another researcher" at the same facility.

The name of the other researcher was not disclosed.

The documents painted a picture of Ivins seeking to mislead investigators beginning in 2002, when he allegedly submitted the wrong samples to FBI investigators.

It wasn't until more than two years later, in March 2005, that he was confronted with the alleged switch, according to U.S. Postal Inspector Thomas Dellafera, who added that Ivins insisted he had not sought to deceive.

The victims of the attacks had little in common.

Robert Stevens, 63, a photo editor at the Sun, a supermarket tabloid published in Boca Raton, Fla., was the first to die. Thomas Morris Jr. 55, and Joseph Curseen, 47, worked at a Washington-area postal facility that was a hub for sorting the capital's mail. Kathy Nguyen, 61, who had emigrated from Vietnam and lived in the Bronx, worked in a stock room at Manhattan Eye Ear & Throat Hospital. Ottilie Lundgren, 94, who lived in Oxford, Conn., was the last to die.

[blackyowe]

Yeah, like we believe anything said by the FBI under Bush and Cheney?

[rhs648]

correction:

There is another theory of why Ivins might be the person who sent the anthrax through the mail. He may have feared losing his job. As someone who lived near Fort Detrick, knows some of the scientists who have worked at Fort Detrick, and knows some of its history, it would not surprise me if Ivins may have felt that his job or the projects on which he worked would be terminated. At one time, Fort Detrick was known for its research on biological warfare. Dreaded diseases to be used for biological warfare was the major theme at Fort Detrick until President Reagan abolished it. Fort Detrick then became a center for cancer research. Over the years, there have been many scientists who have come and gone as the emphasis of research changed. As only a handful of anthrax researchers, Ivins may have feared that his position would be terminated. Considering his questionable mental stability, it would be easy to see how he may have feared losing his job even if it wasn''t really being threatened.

[rhs648]

There is another theory of why Ivins might be the person who sent the anthrax through the mail. He may have feared losing his job. As someone who lived near Fort Detrick, knows some of the scientists who have worked at Fort Detrick, and knowing of its history, Ivins may have felt that his job or the projects on which he worked would be terminated. At one time, Fort Detrick was known for its research on biological warfare. Dreaded diseases to be used for biological warfare was the major theme at Fort Detrick until President Reagan abolished it. Fort Detrick then became a center for cancer research. Over the years, there have been many scientists who have come and gone as the emphasis of research changed. As only a handful of anthrax researchers, Ivins may have feared that his position would be terminated. Considering his questionable mental stability, it would be easy to see how he may have feared losing his job even if it wasn''''t really being threatened.

[txgrouch2006]

This was NOT a one-man job.

NOBODY could have made that much powder form anthrax in secret, unless he had the COOPERATION OF LAB MANAGEMENT.

Ivins was a patsy. NOBODY IN WASHINGTON DC WANTS YOU TO KNOW WHO THE REAL GUILTY PARTY IS.

[txgrouch2006]

they don''''t want to bring any focus unneccessarily to an issue of security or terrorism (domestic or otherwise). this will play to the republicans ... Posted by bobnjersey at 01:06 PM : Aug 07, 2008
----------------------

After the White House has done such a LOUSY JOB of the war - bankrupting our nation while Iraq is swimming in a $79 BILLION surplus of oil money - much of it OUR MONEY FROM OUR POCKETS - all over WMD''s that WERE NEVER FOUND - and Afghanistan is falling into insurgency like Iraq was...

remember the anti-war protests?

If the Democrats can''t take on the Bush administration over war and terrorism, IT''S ONLY BECAUSE THEY ARE AS MUCH TO BLAME.

Their silence over Ivins in the face of such an OBVIOUS TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE has MADE THEM COMPLICIT.

[bobnjersey]

[No, really COMPLICITY is the only explanation. With all the negative campaigning, there''''s NO WAY they''''d resist unless THEY''''RE JUST AS DIRTY.]
[Posted by txgrouch2006 at 12:46 PM : Aug 07, 2008]

again ... i believe the silence it tied to the stategic realities of a presidential election. the dems have historically not done well when the focus is on war/terrorism/security. they''re better served w/ discussions of the economy, corruption, general republican failings.

they don''t want to bring any focus unneccessarily to an issue of security or terrorism (domestic or otherwise). this will play to the republicans ... unless there''s d@mning evidence showing the republicans were behind it ... for which there''s no evidence to date.

if this is what''s behind their silence ... it''s not neccessarily a ''complicity'' issue ... unless you''re speaking of the complicity to not represent the best interests of the electorate at large (not just the electorate that thinks similarly) ... for which they''re all guilty of ... regardless of party affiliation.

[txgrouch2006]

Come to think of it, the TIMING of the FBI closing the case WHILE CONGRESS IS ON VACATION is also disturbing. Hoping the news coverage will die down and we''ll all be distracted by something else by the time Congress reads its mail?

[txgrouch2006]

1- Congress (some, not all) are complicit, involved in some way, shape, form - therefore don''''t move

2- Democracts are just sitting and watching the repubs self-destruct

oh, and a third - shell shock

Posted by neoconRcrazy at 12:36 PM : Aug 07, 2008

4 - THEY''RE ON VACATION AND THEY DON''T CARE.

No, really COMPLICITY is the only explanation.

With all the negative campaigning, there''s NO WAY they''d resist unless THEY''RE JUST AS DIRTY.

[neoconrcrazy]

WHY?? WHY?? WHY?? WHY??

Posted by txgrouch2006


i am of your opinion and ask myself also - but - there are only 2 possibilities;

1- Congress (some, not all) are complicit, involved in some way, shape, form - therefore don''t move

2- Democracts are just sitting and watching the repubs self-destruct

oh, and a third - shell shock

[txgrouch2006]

this is an election year. is this issue going to help any candidate in an election year?
Posted by bobnjersey at 12:08 PM : Aug 07, 2008

YES, IT WOULD DESTROY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!!! If only the White House was involved in the conspiracy and cover-up, then the Democrats would rule our nation unopposed for decades.

THE SILENCE AMONG DEMOCRATS *PROVES* that this goes beyond the White House.

NONE OF THEM WANT US TO KNOW THE TRUTH. THE DEMOCRATS WOULD BE DESTROYED ALONG WITH THE REPUBLICANS.

So Congress conspires with the White House AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE to preserve their power.

RAISE THE DRAWBRIDGE!!! The truth is coming...

[txgrouch2006]

This cover-up goes beyond the White House.

The silence on Capitol Hill is deafening.

The silence of the Democrats PROVES that they are involved in the cover-up, too. WHY?

Because they ALL KNOW the trail leads to BILL CLINTON. Not just Ivins, but MANY in Washington DC were vaccinated BEFORE 9/11. THEY HAD FOREKNOWLEDGE of a coming attack.

THAT FOREKNOWLEDGE PROVES A 9/11 CONSPIRACY. And based on the known and documented fact that the 9/11 pilots were taking flying lessons in the summer of 2000 (one of them was turned in FIVE TIMES but the Clinton admin "found nothing suspicious") any 9/11 conspiracy NECESSARILY involves the Clinton administration.

Clinton was receiving HUGE contributions from terrorist groups, properly laundered of course, in exchange for his cooperation.

THIS COVER-UP EXTENDS TO BILL CLINTON. BILL CLINTON WILL HANG LIKE SADDAM.

[bobnjersey]

[DEMOCRATS - CONGRESS - WHY THE SILENCE??? Your silence is DEAFENING.]
[Posted by txgrouch2006 at 11:38 AM : Aug 07, 2008]

this is an election year. is this issue going to help any candidate in an election year?

candidates speak to issues that ''reverberate'' for their like minded constituency. what constituency will this issue mean something to ... postal workers, bio-weapon scientists, sororities, therapists? can you win an election w/ all these people behind you ... or against you?

lapel flag pins, race cards, drilling, and what your pastor says is way more important than this ... to some.

[txgrouch2006]

when the crime is too big to imagine, 7 years investigation without charges, look to your government for the answer.......
Posted by neoconRcrazy at 11:39 AM : Aug 07, 2008
-------------------
Then WHY AREN''T THE DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS SCREAMING BLOODY MURDER over this travesty?????

WHY?? WHY?? WHY?? WHY??

[txgrouch2006]

WHERE IS THE EXPLANATION FOR HOW ONE MAN COULD HAVE PRODUCED SO MUCH POWDER FORM ANTHRAX IN SECRET???

Where is the evidence to make them so sure he acted alone??? WHY CAN''T WE SEE THIS EVIDENCE??????

[neoconrcrazy]

Feds: Ivins Was Lone Anthrax Killer

backtrack


Feds: Oswald was Lone Killer...


when the crime is too big to imagine, 7 years investigation without charges, look to your government for the answer.......

dirty business running a democracy, or as cheney says "we have to go over to the dark side...."

[txgrouch2006]

DEMOCRATS - CONGRESS - WHY THE SILENCE???

Your silence is DEAFENING. Why are you allowing this poor, tortured man to go to his grave bearing the blame, when THERE IS NO WAY HE COULD HAVE ACTED ALONE.

By your silence, you are ALLOWING THE GUILTY PARTIES TO GO FREE.

Just like the 9/11 attack itself.

[godseyesore-2009]

Once again we see so called ''christians'' acting as god. They are no different than islamics whose terriorist actions are done in name of god.
Coward as*es all.

[txgrouch2006]

Yesterday, half the posts on this list were about Bush being involved in 9/11 and Bush/Cheney being involved in the anthrax attack itself.

WOULDN''T THIS BE PRIME ATTACK POINTS FOR THE DEMOCRATS??? SHOULDN''T THEY BE HAVING A MEDIA FIELD DAY DEMANDING A CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION?????

WHY ARE THE DEMOCRATS SILENT ON THIS CASE?????

[txgrouch2006]

WHO is so eager to declare "case closed???"

If it''s the Republican administration, WHERE IS THE DEMOCRAT OUTCRY???

WHERE ARE THE DEMOCRATS ON THIS ISSUE??? How can we blame the White House for this cover-up when they are getting NO PUSHBACK FROM THE DEMOCRATS?????????

[txgrouch2006]

he had custody of the lethal spores involved
---------------------
So did 30 other individuals

-----------------
and access to the distinctive envelopes used to mail them.
-----------------
So did EVERYONE ELSE IN THE LAB.

-----------------
Investigators say Ivins strongly disagreed with Senators Daschle and Leahy''s support for abortion rights
----------------
So does ABOUT HALF OF THIS COUNTRY

THIS CASE IS SO WEAK IT''S PATHETIC!!! IT''S ACTUALLY FRIGHTENING THAT THE GOVERNMENT IS SO EAGER TO DECLARE "CASE CLOSED" BASED ON SUCH UTTERLY FEEBLE EVIDENCE!!!!!!

This is as bad as the time the 9/11 pilot was reported to the FAA FIVE TIMES, but the Clinton administration found "nothing suspicious" about a foreign person trying to get a license to fly jetliners but HE COULDN''T SPEAK ENGLISH WELL ENOUGH to qualify for a simple commercial license. BUT HE ALREADY HAD ONE!!! How did he get a license he didn''t qualify for, and he was going for higher licenses??? BUT THERE WAS NOTHING SUSPICIOUS - CASE CLOSED!!!

NOBODY could have done the anthrax attack alone. It was NOT a one-man operation. Whether Ivins was involved or not THE LAB MANAGEMENT WAS INVOLVED!!!