BOSTON, Aug. 5, 2008

Calif. Authorities To Question Kidnap Dad

Mystery Father Possibly Linked To Calif. Homicide; No Record Of Him Before 1993

  • Law enforcement officials escort Clark Rockefeller, center in handcuffs, to a waiting vehicle on the tarmac at Logan International Airport, Aug. 5, 2008, in Boston. Photo

    Law enforcement officials escort Clark Rockefeller, center in handcuffs, to a waiting vehicle on the tarmac at Logan International Airport, Aug. 5, 2008, in Boston.  (AP Photo/Josh Reynolds)

  • Photo Essay Daughter Abducted

    Father accused of snatching his 7-year-old daughter from a Boston street.

  • Interactive Out Of Sight: Missing Kids

    Get the facts on kidnappings, learn predator profiles and check out resources for locating missing children.

(CBS/AP)  The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department confirmed Tuesday it was sending two homicide detectives to Boston to interview a mysterious father accused of kidnapping his 7-year-old daughter during a visit in Boston.

The man known as Clark Rockefeller - and by several other aliases - was arraigned in Boston Municipal Court on Tuesday on charges related to the July 27 disappearance of his daughter, Reigh Boss.

Authorities say they have been stymied in their efforts to figure out exactly who Rockefeller is. Suffolk District Attorney Dan Conley said they have no record of him before 1993, and said Rockefeller has claimed he doesn't remember details ranging from where he is from, where his parents are and even whether he is from the United States.

"At this point he provided essentially no biographical data about himself before 1993," assistant district attorney David Deakin said in court. Deakin said that after thousands of hours of collaboration - by the FBI, local and state officials and even Homeland Security - authorities are still unsure of the details of Rockefeller's real identity.

Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department spokesman Steve Whitmore said Tuesday that two homicide detectives were en route to Boston to interview Rockefeller "in connection with a missing person report back in the early 1990s."

Rockefeller's attorney Stephen Hrones denied his client had any link to the California case, and said Clark Rockefeller was his legal name.

The Boston Herald reported that Los Angeles authorities were investigating human remains discovered in 1994 in San Marino, Calif. The newspaper said three plastic bags containing human bones were found by workers digging a swimming pool. Investigators said at the time that the bones may have belonged to Jonathan Sohus, a man who disappeared along with his wife in 1985.

The Boston Globe, citing two unnamed sources, reported Thursday that Rockefeller's fingerprints were linked to an out-of-state license application under a different name. The Globe said that name is on a list of people wanted in a homicide case in California.

Whitmore refused to release details of the case.

Police have said Rockefeller, 48, snatched his daughter from a Boston street on July 27 in an elaborately planned kidnapping in which he hired two people to drive them to New York. He was caught Saturday in Baltimore, where he had bought a home and boat. Deakin said 300 one-ounce gold coins and $12,000 in cash also were found in Rockefeller's apartment following his arrest.

In court Tuesday, an unkempt-looking Rockefeller - wearing the same wrinkled Lacoste shirt and dark-framed glasses he was arrested in - stood still and looked down as the charges against him were read: felony parental kidnapping, assault and battery and assault and battery with a dangerous weapon.

He didn't speak to the judge during the hearing, though a court microphone caught him muttering, "That's not me," when a prosecutor mentioned an alias attributed to him.

Rockefeller was flown to Logan International Airport earlier Tuesday, accompanied by law enforcement. Passengers said he smiled, drank coffee and read The New York Times on the short flight.

"Our experience tells us he's more of a schemer than someone who has lost his memory," Conley said.

Hrones said Rockefeller did not "kidnap" his daughter.

"How could you kidnap your own daughter?" Hrones asked. "He loves his daughter. Kidnapping doesn't apply, it was his own kid."

But Conley noted Massachusetts has a law against parental kidnapping.

"Just because he's Reigh's natural father, it doesn't absolve him," he said.

Hrones said he knew Rockefeller socially before Rockefeller hired him Tuesday, but he wouldn't say how they knew each other.

Hrones complained that police have been leaking information to the news media that have already painted Rockefeller as guilty.

Rockefeller served as a director of Boston's exclusive Algonquin Club, but resigned about three months ago.

There is no indication Rockefeller is related to the famous family descended from Standard Oil billionaire John D. Rockefeller Sr., family members said.

Reigh, known to family and friends as "Snooks," was found in good condition in Baltimore and has been reunited with her mother, Sandra Boss. The two live together in London, where Boss is a senior partner in the London office of the management consulting firm McKinsey & Co.

When Sandra Boss was told that her little girl was found safe and sound, "she collapsed into my arms. She was overjoyed," a Boston Police deputy superintendent said Monday.

Thomas Lee, speaking to CBS' The Early Show, called it "one of the most rewarding moments in my police career."

Boston police told the Boston Globe that it appears Rockefeller was setting up a new life in Baltimore at the time of arrest.

The seller of a home Rockefeller bought for $450,000 cash a month ago says he called himself Chip Smith and mentioned his daughter was coming to live with him.

"We understand his boat has been down there at least two years and he had been traveling in the area for some time over the last year," Lee told The Early Show.

Conley said that he would not comment on whether Boss and her daughter were back in England or still in Boston. He said that Boss is in contact with authorities and has been cooperative.

A pre-trial hearing for Rockefeller is set for Sept. 3.


© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Video and Galleries from U.S.

Add a Comment See all 31 Comments
by oneworldusa August 6, 2008 6:41 AM EDT
Committed murder, changed identity, tried to cover it up and hide the trail becoming a family man? Just to get caught stealing a child. Hmmm. The story unfolds.
Reply to this comment
by emmer94 August 6, 2008 11:15 AM EDT
The Boston Globe has a more indepth article about the couple they are trying to link him to in CA. Being that there are no witnesses to that and no evidence (they only found one body of the missing couple), they''ll have a hard time proving anything.

I hope Tucker reads the article. I know he thinks that this guy has been railroaded. Must be one of "Rockerfeller"''s good buddies who was paid with some of those gold coins and untraceable bills.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 6, 2008 6:01 PM EDT
"Sounds like he is a real good liar and also good at covering his tracks." Posted by lilturkey at 01:52 PM : Aug 06, 2008

Sounds to me like she''s pretty freakin'' stupid. Surely in that 12 years there must have been at least one clue that something wasn''t right. I know people are becoming more brain dead as time goes on, but THAT brain dead?

And judging from the posts, from other women, on this subject, it seems she isn''t alone in being brain dead. I can''t actually believe that they think there isn''t anything wrong with this picture. It sounds like they have no clue about their husbands either. I always thought women were just a tinch smarter than men.:) You know, us being able to use both sides of our brains.

"Looks like even the police can''''t figure out who he is..."

It isn''t a matter of her knowing WHO he is. It is a matter of knowing that something isn''t right. There had to be plenty of clues.

Do you marry someone you know nothing about? From the sounds of it, I guess you do.


Reply to this comment
by tuckersuxkok August 6, 2008 7:43 PM EDT
The inescapable fact is that regardless what Mr. Rockefeller, or whomever he is, has done, that does not alter the fact that anyone who lives in an intimate relationship with someone for 12 or more years and they do not know what he does for a living or from where he came is an unfit parent.

Ms. Boss is an unfit parent.
Posted by tuckerndfw


LOL!!! And the endless repetitive littany of tucker - who has NO other support for her infitness than "she didn''t know he was a fraud" mantra!!!!! Can anyone even imagine the stupid he11 he is in with his obsessive compulsive disorder??? People like tuck are so sick and out of touch with reality, that they can only fixate on one thought at a time, one thing, one idea, and generally fantasize and lie their way through life. I''ll bet ANYONE: he is single, maybe divorced (that''s where he got his a$$ kicked and developed his hatred of women), has no job or some loser job working at the local Dairy Queen, is fat, ugly, and obviously stupid - and living off of someone else.
Reply to this comment
by tuckersuxkok August 6, 2008 7:45 PM EDT
And judging from the posts, from other women, on this subject, it seems she isn''''t alone in being brain dead. I can''''t actually believe that they think there isn''''t anything wrong with this picture.
Posted by erasmus81

News flash dumbdick: the JUDGE who awarded full custody to HER and supervised visits for him was a MAN.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 6, 2008 9:25 PM EDT
"News flash dumbdick: the JUDGE who awarded full custody to HER and supervised visits for him was a MAN." Posted by tuckerSUXkok at 04:45 PM : Aug 06, 2008

I don''t have a d-i-c-k, moron. And what the hell is your point? It goes to show that you need to get rid of all those stupid a-s-s judges.


Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 6, 2008 9:32 PM EDT
Posted by tuckerSUXkok at 04:43 PM : Aug 06, 2008

What''s with the name? OBSESSED with a particular someone, are we?
Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 6, 2008 10:05 PM EDT
And as for YOU, tuckerndfw, that is the ONLY thing I agree with you on.

"...and all women are saints..."
Well, not ALL, just some.

Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 6, 2008 10:06 PM EDT
And what the hell is "ndfw"?
Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 6, 2008 10:19 PM EDT
Posted by tuckerSUXkok at 04:43 PM : Aug 06, 2008

What''''s with the name? OBSESSED with a particular someone, are we?

Posted by erasmus81 at 06:32 PM : Aug 06, 2008

Oops, I''m sorry. I never thought, maybe your name is "tucker", too?:)
Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 6, 2008 10:29 PM EDT
"Actually, I live in rural Johnson County. Johnson County, TX is best known for prosecuting the woman who sold "sex_ toys" to her friends in her own home (like Tupperware parties)." Posted by tuckerndfw at 07:15 PM : Aug 06, 2008

That''s against the law?


"I''''m still hiding from violent feminists who would like to see me dead (castrated, mutilated, run over by a bus, etc.)."

I can believe that!




Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 6, 2008 10:31 PM EDT
"Don''''t bother looking me up in the phone book (or anywhere else), I''''m not in there."

What''s the matter, Tucker, afraid I might want to plan a surprise ATTACK?
Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 6, 2008 10:53 PM EDT
"I don''''t keep up with Texas porn laws, but the last I heard it was a felony to sell various items that are used for sexual stimulation." Posted by tuckerndfw at 07:39 PM : Aug 06, 2008

Really? We have stores here that sell s-e-x toys and they have adult movies in our video stores.

"Don''''t ask how I ended up here, it''''s a long story that involves hiding from violent feminists. . .
(and I''''m not kidding)"

Okay, now you''re REALLY scaring me. You must have been a very, very, BAD BOY.



Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 6, 2008 11:16 PM EDT
"Eraser, do you see the venom in the comments posted on this and related boards?"

"I''''ve encountered that same venom in real life."

Tucker, Tucker, Tucker, don''t you know why?
HELLO! It''s because you are VICIOUS towards women!!
How do you expect them to react? I can''t believe one of them hasn''t hunted you down and killed you yet. It''s amazing you are still alive!

Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 6, 2008 11:18 PM EDT
"I got over licking pictures about 40 years ago. And, the only sex_ toy I need is attached to my body" Posted by tuckerndfw at 08:12 PM : Aug 06, 2008

Ha ha.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 6, 2008 11:48 PM EDT
Tucker

"I''''m still alive because I routinely checked my car & office for bombs"

You''re in bad shape.

"And, I seriously disagree with their claim that ALL men are child molesters, sexual deviants, etc."

I can''t believe they think that ALL men are like that.


Explain to me what a "radical" feminist is.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 7, 2008 12:22 AM EDT
"Enough about me, why do you hate men?"

I don''t hate men. Why would you think that?


Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 7, 2008 12:39 AM EDT
I don''t like men who treat women like c-r-a-p, or try to control them. And I believe in equal rights. I don''t judge all men by the actions of one.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 7, 2008 5:04 AM EDT
"BTW, Eraser, what does erasmus81 mean?"

erasmus is an Irish name. It was a name of a cat. I couldn''t get the name I wanted so I picked this one. It used to be erasmus6, but I got booted off, so had to change it. Actually I have been booted off a number of times, so the number has been change more than once.:)

"What did you eat?"

What do you mean?


Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 7, 2008 5:29 AM EDT
Tucker

The last time I told you I was Irish, you flipped out on me and you were ranting and raving about your ex-wife. I''m NOT your ex-wife. You told me that I should marry you, so you could divorce me. And I told you that I would, just so I could get the chance to cut of your you-know-what, when you were sleeping!
Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 7, 2008 6:26 AM EDT
Posted by tuckerndfw at 02:47 AM : Aug 07, 2008

My comments were being deleted sometimes, but then I think someone in particular was reporting me and then I started getting booted off. So much for free speech.:)

81= ate one

Ahh, I get it now.
The number used to be 88. 8 is my favorite number.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 7, 2008 6:34 AM EDT
"That''''s one reason I like you. You don''''t let me run over you."

My dad was a control freak. I will NEVER allow a man to run over me.

"I like toldyouso other than her obsession with abnormal sex_."

Please do not mention "toldyouso''s" name to me. She makes me ill.:)

"I like feisty ("strong") women, up to a point.
The point being when they beat me up."

Haha.

"And I''''m not in the marriage market so any comment that relates to marrying anyone is definitely intended as sarcasm."

There was no doubt in my mind about that!




Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 7, 2008 7:18 AM EDT
"My employee number was 88. Coincidence?"

I don''t believe in "coincidence".
Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 7, 2008 7:30 AM EDT
My dad used to tell my mom that she had to have dinner on the table at such and such a time. It''s okay to want to eat dinner at a certain time, but if she was late, he would have a stinking fit.

You couldn''t have your own opinion on anything and nothing you ever said was right. It was like he was always looking for a fight and you had to watch everything you said. He wasn''t physically abusive. Well, he did slap me across the face twice.

"I do not blame women for wanting to get out of abusive relationships, the question is why do they enter into them in the first place?"

That''s a very good question. If a woman can see that a man is abusive before she marries him, she has to know that he will be abusive afterwards. And only a very stupid person would not see it. I guess if they got married in a very short time, then maybe she may not notice.


Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 7, 2008 7:34 AM EDT
If a man hit me, he would be history, right now.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 7, 2008 8:35 AM EDT
"My dad was the total opposite. He was the stereotypical go to work, come home, eat dinner (or supper as we called it), watch tv and go to bed." Posted by tuckerndfw at 04:54 AM : Aug 07, 2008

This was my dad too, but he was a real jerk.

"I don''''t recall them ever arguing over anything other than his drinking..."

Mine didn''t argue either. She was a doormat and did everything he said. What''s to argue about?:) My dad didn''t drink, except on holidys and then it would just be a couple.



Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 7, 2008 8:39 AM EDT
"I thought it was funny except the knife my ex pulled on me one night when she was drunk. That wasn''''t funny."

No I guess it wasn''t. Did you do something to make her mad?

Did you boot their a-s-s-e-s out when they physically assaulted you?
Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 7, 2008 8:50 AM EDT
, "I don''''t know how old you are, but back in the ''''50''''s, it was not uncommon for parents to beat their kids."

I''m 54. I have a brother who is 8 years older than me. My dad or mom never beat us. My dad used to run around waving a razor strap, but he never hit us with it.

"My brother-in-law used to beat my nieces until they could not walk..."
"My mother used to beat us (six boys) with a belt."

That is too bad. I guess I am lucky that my parents weren''t abusive.

Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 7, 2008 8:52 AM EDT
Tucker, I have to go to bed now, my eyes are beginning to close. They feel like grit!:)

Goodnight!
Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 August 7, 2008 9:00 AM EDT
"That is too bad. I guess I am lucky that my parents weren''''t abusive."

I want to correct that. My dad was verbally abusive, but not physically abusive, other than the slaps to the face.
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso12 August 7, 2008 11:49 AM EDT
"Rockefeller''s attorney Stephen Hrones denied his client had any link to the California case, and said Clark Rockefeller was his legal name."

If the man supposedly can''t remember events or anything about himself before 1993 then he can''t say or establish that Clark Rockefeller is his legal name. If it IS his legal name, then when did he acquire it, and what was his name before that?
Reply to this comment
See all 31 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs