The Growing Class Of "Underemployed"
As Unemployment Rises, Sometimes Part-Time Work Doesn't Cut It
-
Carlos Campo, a construction worker, is one of the growing class of "underemployed" Americans. (CBS)
-
Interactive Eye On The Economy In-depth features on U.S. markets, taxes, employment and the Federal Reserve.
"Have you gotten any nibbles?" she asked him.
"Here and there I get an offer, but it only lasts like two weeks, and then I lose my job again," Campo said. "I gotta reapply for unemployment."
As a result, Campo's income dropped from $45,000 last year to $19,000 this year, while the cost of food and utilities rose.
Does he worry about paying those bills?
"Every day," he said. "Bill collectors calls me every day."
The number of people like Campo - working part time - grew by 308,000 this month.
Year-to-year, the number of part time workers is up 1.4 million. That includes people who need the extra income - and those who want to work full-time but can't find a full-time job.
"Businesses are cautious about hiring, and they're trying to cut their labor costs any way they can. That's going across the board and it's reducing the number of full-time workers, it's reducing overtime, it's just reducing the average work week," said economist William Cheney.
And, it's increasing the number of workers looking for a second paycheck just to make ends meet. That means even more competition for fewer jobs.
Kevin Lloyd is a fiber optics engineer. Looking for work, any work since September.
"Even if it's not in the field I'm in, it's still, you know, if someone is laid off from working in a fast food place, they might try and get a job I'm going for," Lloyd said.
A job that for Carlos Campo could save the family home. He can't afford the mortgage, and can't find a buyer.
"I look for a job every day, but I can't … find a job," Campo said. "I just hope it gets better."
That is, before his finances get worse.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- I got cut off by the limit. Here''s the rest:
Anyways, sometimes, no matter how hard you try, you just can''t pull off saving the money you want to save. Yes, there are people who over-spend, and some do it be a huge margin. But not everyone is that way. Some are just trying to have a decent life with their family and having to stretch to make ends meet. - Reply to this comment
- I have a disagreement with some of the people on here that are basically saying if you haven''t saved any money, then it''s your own fault. My husband and I have tried over and over again to save some money. But unfortnately, we live pretty much paycheck to paycheck. There is no way we can afford to save anything at the moment. We have a 93 Subaru that my mom bought us at an auction when our last vehicle broke. We are renting to own a house from my in-laws. We have a three year old daughter that we have to provide for (which is the only our parents have helped us like they have).
My husband works full time and once in a while he gets between 2 and 12 hours of over-time during the week. I don''t work because we can''t afford day-care and have no one able to watch our daughter while I work. We can''t afford for him to get any schooling even though he could take (with some studying) the ASE Certifcation Tests. He loves cars. He went UTI for their Autmotives program. He''s not afraid of long hours and hard work, but we struggle. Sure, I could get a job, working opposite shifts from him. But our daughter would suffer, because she''d be getting up when I came home and I wouldn''t have the energy to take care of her. Our marriage would suffer, how could it not if we never saw each other? - Reply to this comment
- What most people want over the long run is independence. Nowadays we find it hard to achieve this because we have too many kids and get sucked into the materialism trap. Takes some discipline to avoid getting into debt. Retirement is something we can''t borrow for.
- Reply to this comment
- "The minimum wage should be raised to $15.00/hour. immediately. If the government wanted the economy to improve, they''''d pay people a living wage so that they could spend their extra income on things like toys and beer and restaurants. Keeping people at slave wages may keep us in line but it will be the death of this nation economically."
----
Why stop there? Why shouldn''t someone working at a minimum wage job also be able to afford a 50" HDTV, take an annual cruise, buy a new car every 3 years for each driver in the household and a laptop and gameboy for each child. Raise the minimum wage to $40/hr, mandate employer paid healthcare, mandate employer paid retirement in lieu of social security and up the child tax credit to 10k/yr.
Imagine how well the economy would do with this much income and cash flow.
For about one day. - Reply to this comment
- when has Part-Time Work EVER cut it except for teens, retired persons and 2nd income in house?
- Reply to this comment
- They will have to work them enough to pay the war debt & eat beans-no healthcare will be needed-the rich have all they need & it sounds so nice to send a bunch to Africa.The debt will have to be paid ,or the Chinese will not pay for the next one & permanent bases for these two.
- Reply to this comment
- How arrogant and smug you are. So judgemental. What about those that don''''t fall within your limited scope? So quick to demean others in order to elevate yourself. Keep telling yourself that they all made bad choices and brought this on on themselves, perhaps that will allay your fears and make you feel better about your circumstances and yourself.
Posted by IrishWench
There is no denying that many people spend way beyond their means and put themselves into debt. It has nothing to do with being smug. Many people have to have everything now and are unwilling to postpone purchases until they can afford them. Financial planners advise people to have an emergency fund equal to six months of income for things such as unexpected expenses and loss of jobs. How many people have saved six months of income for a rainy day? Instead they purchase homes and cars they really can''t afford and charge themselves into debt. This is reality, not smugness - Reply to this comment
- "Certainly the politicians are not doing their job, and corporations are trying to get into your pockets every day"
----
You''ve got that backwards. Corporations are not doing their jobs and it is politicians already in your pockets everyday and working on all nite long. - Reply to this comment
- "Anyone old enough will recall: America was a truly GREAT country between the 1950s and 1980s, when it taxed itself appropriately to create a ''''great society''''."
----
America was a truly GREAT country from 1776 until the first tax was enacted. Then things started going down hill. - Reply to this comment
- Everybody I know works two jobs. Not part time jobs, mind you, one full time and one part time. If you are single, that''s the only way to afford rent unless you like living in a one bedroom apartment with a roommate.
The minimum wage should be raised to $15.00/hour. immediately. If the government wanted the economy to improve, they''d pay people a living wage so that they could spend their extra income on things like toys and beer and restaurants. Keeping people at slave wages may keep us in line but it will be the death of this nation economically. - Reply to this comment
- Greed and bad decisions have caused this mess.
- Reply to this comment
- If the Nam vets march in DC,like the ww1 guys did ,will they be attacked by the new troops-like back then ?
- Reply to this comment
- Economy grows at soft pace Posted by terrorislamv
- Reply to this comment
- Sure, the economy is still growing, but for who? Many Americans are hurting; yet are told that America''s economy is still going strong (i.e. it must just be THEM). The fact is, America''s economy is NOT going well if you aren''t among the wealthiest 1% of the country. According to The Economist magazine, ''three-quarters of the economic gains during Mr Bush''s presidency went to that top 1%''. Furthermore, check out these statistics from the past:
Share of total income accruing to the wealthiest 1% of Americans:
1910s: 17%, 1920s: 17%, 1930s: 14%, 1940s: 11%, 1950s: 9%, 1960s: 8%, 1970s: 8%, 1980s: 11%, 1990s: 13%, 2000s: 16%, current: 17.5%
Anyone old enough will recall: America was a truly GREAT country between the 1950s and 1980s, when it taxed itself appropriately to create a ''great society''. In the 1910s-1920s, it was setting itself up for the Great Depression, and we all know whats happened since the 1980s (think: crumbling infrastructure). I don''t think that reality is unrelated to the statistics above.
If its your perception that the economy isn''t doing well, especially YOUR economy, you are NOT alone. Its just that the VERY wealthy are doing SO WELL that they float the economic statistics for the rest of us, making it look like we''re all in a ''rising tide that floats all boats''. LOL. Wish that were true. - Reply to this comment
- Most of the people who are in trouble of losing their homes are hardworking, honest people who never counted on paying over $4.00 a gallon for gas or the incredible inflation we are experiencing. I believe that many people bought houses within their means - but just didn''t count on economics getting out of hand the way they have.
Oil companies are making HUGE profits, WallStreeters will get their bonus(es), and George Bush and his cronies will continue to fatten their wallets. We have been a credit-driven economy for too long. "Buy now, pay later" screams advertisements for everything from vacuums to vacations. It is enticing. Folks are working their behinds off and there are no breaks. Our next President will inherit a mess. - Reply to this comment
- My late Father lived through the ''Great Depression.'' He told me many times that the conditions were so severe that had the economic conditions not recovered, we were in danger of anarchy and the total loss of our constitution. When WW II broke out and U S joined, after the attack on Pearl Harbor, what the New Deal didn''t fully correct, the production efforts of war brought new founded prosperty for this country. War, while devistating for those who had to fight it, and their loved ones, also used to mean prosperity for the rest of the country. Now we have something much worse. We had a much more devastating attack on 9/11. This was no conventional War. Civilians by the thousands died for no reason but being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Apparently, a war run by terrorist cells bares little resemblence to the other wars of the past. We have a war now that no one can agree on how long it should go on, or where the conflict should be centered at. Many smaller nations seem to be arming themselves with weapons of mass destruction no matter what we threaten them with. Our economy is not prospering this time. It is tanking, with fuel consumption tangled up in this mess. There really seems to be no difference, to me, between rebulican and democrat. Little difference between Liberal and Conservative. Just alot of fear and blame.
- Reply to this comment
- When the winter came the Grasshopper had no food and found itself dying of hunger, while it saw the ants distributing every day corn and grain from the stores they had collected in the summer. Posted by terrorislamv at 11:55 PM : Aug 02, 2008
-------------------
So the grasshopper called a Democrat, who declared a "special temporary tax" on the ants and gave the ant''s food supply to the grasshopper as long as the grasshopper PROMISES to try to store up some food NEXT winter.
The reasoning was "Give the hopper a break! He''s REALLY sorry. He made a mistake. He''s older and wiser now. Maybe now he''s learned his lesson, let''s give him a second chance. He didn''t realize winter was coming so soon. He was GOING to store up food, he just lost track of the time. It''s not his fault. He was trying to store up food, but the ants got in his way and took it all."
BTW, this has been the grasshopper''s story FOR THE PAST TWENTY YEARS. - Reply to this comment
- Sounds like he needs to find another career path. If one things not working out then TRY ANOTHER.... H e ll go to Mcdonalds at least it''s full time
- Reply to this comment
- But what we really have to worry about is how ''popular'' Obama is.
Ronald Reagan was popular too - so maybe you neocons are right that we have something to worry about... - Reply to this comment
- The Saudi''s and other muslem country''s within OPEC are attempting to destroy not just the USA but the World. It is time that the World put a stop to their greed and hatred once and for all. Bush can find another adoptive "family" eh Ban-dar Bush?
- Reply to this comment


Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.


