ALEXANDRIA, Va., July 31, 2008

States Get Creative After Bridge Collapse

One Year After The Minneapolis Bridge Collapse, Inspections Are Up, But Repairs Lag

  • Play CBS Video Video Are U.S. Bridges Safe?

    Minneapolis' deadly bridge collapse exposed infrastructure problems throughout the U.S. A new report shows that little has been done to prevent a similar tragedy. Nancy Cordes reports.

  • The scene of the collapsed 35W bridge over the Mississippi River, Aug. 1, 2007.

    The scene of the collapsed 35W bridge over the Mississippi River, Aug. 1, 2007.  (AP Photo/Morry Gash)

  • Photo Essay Twin Cities Bridge Collapse

    A major bridge suddenly turned into a scene of horror as it collapsed into the Mississippi River.

  • Who's Who Bridge Collapse Survivors

    Drivers who were on the Minneapolis bridge when it collapsed during rush hour on Aug. 1, 2007, had different stories to tell.

(CBS)  It was the height of the afternoon rush hour when a seemingly sturdy Minneapolis bridge suddenly came apart at the seams - taking 13 lives down with it.

It was a wake-up call about the nation's crumbling infrastructure, CBS News correspondent Nancy Cordes reports.

"A bridge in America just shouldn't fall down," said Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn.

The country's 152,000 structurally deficient bridges would cost $140 billion to fix.

"The states have started to step up, which is good," said Andrew Herrmann of the American Society of Civil Engineers.

Herrmann, a bridge expert, says the Minneapolis collapse has spurred several states to get creative.

Missouri made a deal with a single contractor to improve 800 of its worst bridges and maintain them for 25 years.

Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell pushed through a $350 million bond issue. But during a visit to Minneapolis with New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Rendell told CBS News he needed $80 billion more.

"There is no way on this good God's earth that Pennsylvania alone can come up with that type of funding," said Rendell. "So this is something that's gonna need state and local and federal cooperation."

But federal cooperation has been slow in coming. Congress is still debating a bill proposed right after the collapse to provide $1 billion for emergency bridge repairs.

Meanwhile, federal gas tax funds used to pay for road repairs are shrinking as Americans drive less to avoid high gas prices.

"If you had enough funding, what would you do?" Cordes asked Nick Roper, a chief bridge engineer for Northern Virginia, one year ago.

"I would replace every deficient bridge that's in my district," he said.

CBS News asked Roper this year if anything's changed.

"Last year at this time you told me you have 30 deficient bridges in your district. How many do you have now?" Cordes said.

"Right now we have 56," he said.

What happened?

"Just inspections," he said.

And it's happening nationwide, which may not be a bad thing. After investigators determined that the Minneapolis bridge lacked proper support, 750 similar spans underwent thorough inspections.

"As a result of that, I believe significantly more bridges have been strengthened … in a way that enables them to be much safer than they were before," said Mark Rosenker, chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board

Sadly, it took a tragedy to start the nation on what is going to be a very long and expensive journey.


© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 20 Comments
by whiskyrokkr August 1, 2008 11:18 AM EDT
OneWorldUSA
-----------
Good point about SUV''s but diesel traffic has really picked up in the last 20 years.
Reply to this comment
by closethippy1 August 1, 2008 9:06 AM EDT
Is anyone in government doing their freaking jobs???
Congress allowing Jr. to go to war for bogus reasons, Katrina victims being blamed for suffering a flood, the mortgage crisis eating up the country because no one bother to put a stop to the party, the entire infraestructure falling down to pieces because no one is minding them or, if they do, they find themselves trying to pull money from out of their @sses!!
How can we keep electing to power people who ABSOLUTELY HATE government so much they don''t care if the country goes to hell instead of choosing people who understand what the problem is and try to make it better instead of getting rid of it?
Reply to this comment
by oneworldusa August 1, 2008 6:02 AM EDT
Posted by tbweb at 02:36 AM : Aug 01, 2008

-Good point. Another way illegals are hurting American citizens.
Reply to this comment
by tbweb August 1, 2008 5:36 AM EDT
The bridges are crumbling due to the excess unanticipated weight of oversized SUVs people don''''t need. So, not only are they burning perfectly good fuel that could accommodate 3 vehicles, they are hurting our infrastructures.

Posted by OneWorldUSA at 01:53 AM : Aug 01, 2008,,,

I agree, the extra loads are hurting our infrastructure, especially all those Tractor Trailers from Mexico, now that Mexican truck drivers can drive in the U.S., carrying all those illegals into the U.S., those illegals weight a lot when crammed in like sardines!
Reply to this comment
by jackie0428 August 1, 2008 4:59 AM EDT
Every time Rosie O''Donnell crosses a bridge, it collapses a couple weeks later. Coincidence? Hmmm, maybe not.
Reply to this comment
by oneworldusa August 1, 2008 4:53 AM EDT
The bridges are crumbling due to the excess unanticipated weight of oversized SUVs people don''t need. So, not only are they burning perfectly good fuel that could accommodate 3 vehicles, they are hurting our infrastructures.
Reply to this comment
by dcnewton2 August 1, 2008 4:13 AM EDT
This Story deliberately misleads viewers into believing that the I-35W bridge collapse was the result of poor maintenance.

Nonsense! This bridge collapse was caused by a critical flaw in the original design. The National Transportation Safety Board stated unequivocally that undersized gusset plates were the cause.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/transportation/jan-june08/bridge_01-15.html

Obviously CBS news feels that urban myths and hysterical conspiracy theories about spending priorities make more entertaining television than mundane engineering details.

Doug
Reply to this comment
by spadeisspade August 1, 2008 4:06 AM EDT
I have the answer! Along with conserving gas, stop driving on bridges-or risk death. Maybe if we risked death everytime we bought gas, it would actually make a difference.
Reply to this comment
by tbweb August 1, 2008 3:50 AM EDT
The answer is fairly simple. Send more goods by rail, restrict truck weights and people drive smaller, lighter cars. Less holes in roads, no danger to bridges, less fuel used.
Right now I agree with an oil company winfall tax to patch things up. Quickest way forward.

Posted by photoking at 12:45 AM : Aug 01, 2008,,,

This solution only applies to U.S. trucks, drivers and companies. You must remember the Bush administration recently allowed Mexican trucks and drivers delivery access within the U.S. with their unsafe trucks and drivers! What about them?
Reply to this comment
by August 1, 2008 3:45 AM EDT
The answer is fairly simple. Send more goods by rail, restrict truck weights and people drive smaller, lighter cars. Less holes in roads, no danger to bridges, less fuel used.
Right now I agree with an oil company winfall tax to patch things up. Quickest way forward.
Reply to this comment
by sistatee-2009 August 1, 2008 3:35 AM EDT
The bridge inspectors are former Fannie Mae appraisers.
Reply to this comment
by tbweb August 1, 2008 2:52 AM EDT
The United States created the Windfall Profits Tax Laws for Companies that made too much money in profits! ExxonMobil just made over $11.7 billion in profits for the second quarter alone and over $40 billion in profits last year! ExxonMobils $11.7 billion in profit for the second quarter is the largest recorded profit in American History for any Company! So who in Congress is ExxonMobile bribing or paying off or promising what to escape falling under the Windfall Profits Tax Axe? The Windfall Profits Tax Laws were created for situations like this and Companies like ExxonMobile in big profit situations! The Windfall Profit Taxes from ExxonMobile could repair Bridges across the U.S. and it`s also a related category, oil, cars, and bridges! But the problem is the profits from ExxonMobile go to foreign investors, not just Americans! In the days before the Global Economy, applying the Windfall Profits Tax would have been easier, now what?
Reply to this comment
by kenhamlett August 1, 2008 1:24 AM EDT
The solution is simple. Do it like they do in the south. Have the Governor''s buddies buy a construction company. They funnel the money to the friends and some of the roads and bridges get built.
Reply to this comment
by barbaram99 August 1, 2008 1:10 AM EDT
I know the bridges/roads can''t handle today''s traiffic. The roads/bridges were built years ago to handle what THEY were built for fewer cars. I ''member those days. Nation is busy over seas. Here,they don''t care. Our leaders wades the wars. Us little folks don''t have a say. bush..yep. He ruined this nation.
Reply to this comment
by mtdew101 July 31, 2008 11:36 PM EDT
Maybe we shouldn''t be giving millions of dollars away just for finishing the 35w bridge early. Spend that money on other things like making sure this never happens again.
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 July 31, 2008 11:22 PM EDT
random_radar said: "Who needs terrorist acts when government ineptitude will bring us to ruin just the same?"
Oh. I''d say McCain could use a few; they were so helpful to Bush''s reelection prospects.
Reply to this comment
by haydesigner July 31, 2008 11:04 PM EDT
@nlpatel, YOU should know your facts before you spout off!

The taxes are for a SET amount of every gallon purchased, not a PERCENTAGE, which is what you imply. The government gets the SAME amount from every gallon, regardless of its price.

One reason for that is so there is no incentive (good or bad) for the government to manipulate the price of gas.
Reply to this comment
by haydesigner July 31, 2008 11:03 PM EDT
@nlpatel, YOU should know your facts before you spout off!

The taxes are for a SET amount of every gallon purchased, not a PERCENTAGE, which is what you imply. The government gets the SAME amount from every gallon, regardless of its price.

One reason for that is so there is no incentive (good or bad) for the government to manipulate the price of gas.
Reply to this comment
by random_radar July 31, 2008 10:46 PM EDT
"The country''s 152,000 structurally deficient bridges would cost $140 billion to fix."

But we already spent that money rebuilding Iraq after intentionally destroying it. We are losing the war on terror insofar as our nation crumbles while we wage endless war. Who needs terrorist acts when government ineptitude will bring us to ruin just the same?
Reply to this comment
by nlpatel July 31, 2008 10:27 PM EDT
reportes mentioned less highway gas taxes are in due to less driving. he or she need to find the facts. 8 years ago, taxes were collected@$.99/ gallon. Now it is $4.00/ gal. revenue is uo 4 times, correct.
thanks,nlp
Reply to this comment
See all 20 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Can the Postal Service be Saved?

    (282 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.
Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: