BOSTON, July 29, 2008

Mass. To Welcome Out-Of-State Gay Weds

State Lawmakers Vote To Allow Gay Marriages Involving Out-Of-State Couples

  • Photo

     (AP / CBS)

(AP)  The Massachusetts House voted Tuesday to repeal a 1913 law that had been used to block gay marriages involving out-of-state couples, all but assuring that the state will lay out the welcome mat for such weddings.

The 118-35 vote came after the state Senate voted for the repeal earlier this month, and Gov. Deval Patrick has said he will sign the bill. The measure required one more procedural vote in each chamber before being forwarded to the governor.

"Sometimes what you hope and pray for actually happens, which is kind of overwhelming," Michael Thorne, 55, of Cape Elizabeth, Maine, said after telling his 6-year-old son his parents could soon get married. Thorne and his partner of 25 years, James Theberge, have an Aug. 18 wedding planned in Provincetown.

Massachusetts became the first state to allow gay marriage in 2004, but then-Gov. Mitt Romney ordered city and town clerks to enforce the long-dormant 1913 law to bar out-of-state same-sex couples from marrying. The law prohibits couples from marrying if the unions would be illegal in their home states.

Romney had argued that repealing the ban would turn the state into the "Las Vegas of gay marriage." Since then, however, another state — California — has begun allowing same-sex marriages.

Some proponents say that repealing the law would allow Massachusetts to share in some of the economic boon California is enjoying. Patrick and other supporters of repeal also argued that the old law carried racial undertones from a time when interracial marriage was discouraged or illegal in some states.

Opponents said the reasons the 1913 law was passed are unclear, and that repealing the ban amounted to meddling in the affairs of other states.

Rep. John Lepper, R-Attleboro, said sanctioning a marriage that is illegal elsewhere would "create a relationship and then set it adrift to settle in a disapproving state."

He spoke of a gay couple from Rhode Island that married in Massachusetts and now is seeking a divorce, saying it was typical of the "legal nightmare" a repeal would create.

"They can't divorce in Rhode Island because the law does not recognize (the marriage)," Lepper said. "They can't divorce in Massachusetts because there is a one-year residency requirement for filing."

The repeal effort passed after a relatively quick, 40-minute House debate free of the massive protests that accompanied other gay marriage debates in the state. Only seven legislators spoke on the issue, four in favor of the repeal, three who wanted to maintain the ban.

Rep. Byron Rushing, D-Boston, said continuing to ban out-of-state gays from marrying was unfair after the state's highest court ruled in 2003 that gay and lesbian couples have a constitutional right to be married.

"This is question of fairness, and it is a question of equity," Rushing said.

Rushing said the 1913 law undoubtedly has not been applied in many cases of marriages by first cousins. Massachusetts allows first cousins to marry, but half the states in the country do not.

"The fairness in this question is that we have allowed people to marry in Massachusetts who could not legally marry in their own state for decades, and now we want to change our way we are applying a bit of law we have never enforced. That, I think, is unfair," Rushing said.



© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Video and Galleries from U.S.

Add a Comment See all 78 Comments
by questionnews July 29, 2008 5:08 PM PDT
Romney had argued that repealing the ban would turn the state into the "Las Vegas of gay marriage."

Not quite right, what happens in Massachusetts will not stay in Massachusetts.
Time to buy stock in Astro-Glide!
Reply to this comment
by whiskyrokkr July 29, 2008 5:17 PM PDT
Please welcome all the gay''s and whatever you do don''t upset them.
Reply to this comment
by msay3 July 29, 2008 5:45 PM PDT
For your information, it is not a DISEASE!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by lilturkey at 05:33 PM : Jul 29, 2008
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well it sure in hell isn''t an attribute.....
Reply to this comment
by ontheleft July 29, 2008 5:58 PM PDT
Most states have been voting against gay marriage for their own citizens. It''s funny that Massachusetts is in effect legalizing gay marriage for people in Kansas, Missouri, Mississippi, Tennessee, etc. etc.
Reply to this comment
by sistatee-2009 July 29, 2008 6:37 PM PDT
Speaking of Mass; what''s green, has four legs, and half a brain?
A. The dumpster behind the Duke University Medical Center.
Reply to this comment
by mensarino July 29, 2008 7:12 PM PDT
Good for Mass.---the time is near when all states will turn their back on the prejudices and the discrimination of the past.The religious right must be having fits-----LOVE IT!!!!
Reply to this comment
by spadeisspade July 29, 2008 7:12 PM PDT
Gay marriage is the funniest debate in the world to me. Can anyone actual give a valid argument (and "marriage is a man and a woman" is NOT a valid argument) as to why *** shouldn''t be allowed to marry? Honestly, we are going to look back on this when it becomes a right in every state and wonder why we were so backward before, just like with racial segregation. The people out there reading this that think it''s wrong to give *** the same rights should think very hard about what that implies about who they are as people.
Reply to this comment
by jeffstersf July 29, 2008 7:19 PM PDT
MyOpinion1: Surprised to hear from you. Thought they wouldnt let you use the net in jail. It WAS you who shot those folks in the church on Sunday, right? If not, when are YOU going to start killing folks over your pea-brained ideas?
Reply to this comment
by dmhphils July 29, 2008 7:36 PM PDT
just like with racial segregation. The people out there reading this that think it''''s wrong to give *** the same rights should think very hard about what that implies about who they are as people.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by spadeisspade at 07:12 PM : Jul 29, 2008

This has nothing to do with race......people are born black, white, whatever......homosexuality is behavior that is chosen, and therefore are accountable for. This is why they will argue that this is the same as the race segregation thing, so bozos like you will believe it.

This is not about hatred.....it is about what is right and wrong. If everybody is ''right'', then nobody is wrong.......and that is laughable.
Reply to this comment
by haoli25 July 29, 2008 7:39 PM PDT
From Tea Revolt to Tea-baggers...what a Mass. mess.
Reply to this comment
by vietnam21 July 29, 2008 7:44 PM PDT
Wow, this is so important.
Reply to this comment
by dmhphils July 29, 2008 7:45 PM PDT
Just keep it up people.......

We have clamored to get God and His words out of government buildings, out of schools, out of marriages, out of churches, out of homes, out of television, out out out! And God, being the gentleman that He is, will withdraw when He is unwanted.

Now we are about to find out what life is like without God. It is already beginning to happen. Violence in schools as students with dark thoughts blow eachother away. Government going to the dogs without God to guide. Financial markets with the bottoms dropping out......etc. etc.

This is what you asked for.....and now you are getting it.
Reply to this comment
by dmhphils July 29, 2008 7:53 PM PDT
No one is talking about hate here......this is not about hate.....this is about taking something that is considered holy and ordained by God and perverting it and making it something twisted and dark and then asking God to bless it.
Reply to this comment
by rimbaud1970 July 29, 2008 8:06 PM PDT
Just keep it up people.......

We have clamored to get God and His words out of government buildings, out of schools, out of marriages, out of churches, out of homes, out of television, out out out! And God, being the gentleman that He is, will withdraw when He is unwanted.

Now we are about to find out what life is like without God. It is already beginning to happen. Violence in schools as students with dark thoughts blow eachother away. Government going to the dogs without God to guide. Financial markets with the bottoms dropping out......etc. etc.

This is what you asked for.....and now you are getting it.
___________________
We have had God in government for the past 7 years with the Evangelical choice in President Bush. The problem with schools is much deeper than God. If you want God, GO TO CHURCH..religion has no place in a public environment. Not everyone in this country is Christian. As a teacher I have students who are Atheists, Christians, Jews, Muslims..if we are forced to cater to one religion then we have to include ALL. We have a moment of silence at the beg. of each day if kids want to pray, we also have student Christian clubs, therefore, i don''t know what you are talking about. The problem with our schools is much greater than "God" it''s lack of funds, like of parental involvement, unqualified teachers..etc I could go on...
Reply to this comment
by jmurrieta1 July 29, 2008 8:07 PM PDT
One of the best things about gay marriage is the way it pisses off the born-agains.
Reply to this comment
by July 29, 2008 8:07 PM PDT
Who is this "God" you speak of? And where is he? Just because you have a "book" that guides you (so erringly, I might add) that book doesn''t mean anything to alot of people. There can be no God because all beings are created out of compassion, and since he is not compassionate (according to your "book") then he cannot ever have existed. I know that''s really deep for people like you, so don''t try to understand it, it is beyond you, like self-determination, sexual equalty, women''s rights, and non-discrimination of all kinds. The saddest thing about Judeo-Christian religion%u2014which no one has the gall to admit%u2014is that you believe in fairy tales and then try to force other to believe your ignorance...Surely, you yourselves are your own worst enemy.
Reply to this comment
by rimbaud1970 July 29, 2008 8:15 PM PDT
Posted by spadeisspade at 07:12 PM : Jul 29, 2008

This has nothing to do with race......people are born black, white, whatever......homosexuality is behavior that is chosen, and therefore are accountable for. This is why they will argue that this is the same as the race segregation thing, so bozos like you will believe it.

This is not about hatred.....it is about what is right and wrong. If everybody is ''''right'''', then nobody is wrong.......and that is laughable.
________________________
When did you chose to be straight? When did you consciously wake up and decide "Hey, I could be gay but being straight is more natural"? WHEN?! It is not a choice and it may not me completely biological (Who knows for sure, eventually we will know)yet my brother is gay and it was NOT NOT NOT a choice. I am so sick to death of hearing that! Who would chose to be hated, discriminated against, beaten, killed, refused employment, ridiculed, verbally assaulted, denied basic rights, pay taxes to a country, die for a country that treats you like a 2nd class citizen..essentially be the last minority in the country that can legally and popularly mistreated? No sir. It is not a choice. If it were, is this not the land of the free? Is this not America where ALL are created equal? This is such a ridiculous, petty, ignorance driven opinion and one day I hope America will realize what we have done to our fellow citizens and truly live up to the promise of freedom for all.
Reply to this comment
by nothappyatall July 29, 2008 8:22 PM PDT
"The law prohibits couples from marrying if the unions would be illegal in their home states. "

Why bother?? just take the LICENSE FEES, marry them and let them deal with the fact their new license is invalid in their home states. Seems like yet another way for city and county govt to fleece the dumb sheeple of America with more fees for things they use or can''t use or don''t use.
Reply to this comment
by nothappyatall July 29, 2008 8:27 PM PDT
No one is talking about hate here this is not about hate this is about taking something that is considered holy and ordained by *** and perverting it and making it something twisted and dark and then asking *** to bless it.

Posted by noseonurface

NAH, its NEVER about hate RIGHT?? the history of your corrupt church proves otherwise.
Marriage was a scheme devised by MAN to fleece license fees, control property, minor children, estates, real estate, alimony, child payments, inheritance and taxes.

If your version of *** dislikes this so much then he/she/it can wave the magic wand and let it be CLEARLY known, the fact this doesn''t occur says a lot.



Reply to this comment
by daysrnumbrd July 29, 2008 8:41 PM PDT
Gee, no major fires or earthquakes in Massachusetts since the time they introduced g-a-y marriage.

So much for the end-time bibull thumpers theories!

LOL!
Reply to this comment
by summarex July 29, 2008 8:45 PM PDT


Why bother?? just take the LICENSE FEES, marry them and let them deal with the fact their new license is invalid in their home states.


That''s exactly what they''re looking for. With those licenses they can challenge home state laws and gradually chip away at them using the huge financial resources the homosexual movement has in this country. I''m afraid the only solution is to get downright talibanstic on their *****.
Reply to this comment
by daysrnumbrd July 29, 2008 8:46 PM PDT
One of the best things about gay marriage is the way it pisses off the born-agains.

Posted by jmurrieta1 at 08:07 PM : Jul 29, 2008
..................

LOL!

That''s why I''m voting for it here in CA this November.

When it passes... guess what...

...I will still be able to marry a woman like every other hetero in this state!

Again... so much for the bibull thumpers theories!
Reply to this comment
by dmhphils July 29, 2008 8:46 PM PDT
No sir. It is not a choice. If it were, is this not the land of the free? Is this not America where ALL are created equal? This is such a ridiculous, petty, ignorance driven opinion and one day I hope America will realize what we have done to our fellow citizens and truly live up to the promise of freedom for all.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by rimbaud1970 at 08:15 PM : Jul 29, 2008

I am truly sorry about your brother. The truth is, we are all born as fallen men, sinful men, so in that sense, yes, he is born that way. That behavior is of the natural, sinful man, and must be repented of if he is ever to know life.
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 July 29, 2008 8:49 PM PDT
God bless Massachusettes.
Reply to this comment
by dmhphils July 29, 2008 8:54 PM PDT
Marriage was a scheme devised by MAN to fleece license fees, control property, minor children, estates, real estate, alimony, child payments, inheritance and taxes.

If your version of *** dislikes this so much then he/she/it can wave the magic wand and let it be CLEARLY known, the fact this doesn''''t occur says a lot.






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by newster1 at 08:27 PM : Jul 29, 2008
Ah....so it is the money you''re concerned about...that''s what I thought.

God has already made it abundantly clear.
Reply to this comment
by dmhphils July 29, 2008 9:04 PM PDT
When did you chose to be straight? When did you consciously wake up and decide "Hey, I could be gay but being straight is more natural"?
Posted by rimbaud1970

Simple.....round peg goes in the round hole.....no matter what you do.....you can''t get the round peg in the square hole.....it really doesn''t take a brain surgeon to get this one. Lust is the only thing that is never fulllllll.....it can always find something else to lust after.....it is never satisfied....that is where the desire of homosexuals comes from.
Reply to this comment
by s57g67l July 29, 2008 9:05 PM PDT
Posted by newster1 at 08:27 PM : Jul 29, 2008
Marriage was a scheme devised by MAN to fleece license fees
------------
This is one of the truest posts on here---just substitute GOVERNMENT for MAN. Up until the middle ages, marriage was a private contract between 2 people or the families of 2 people. Marriage licenses began to be issued in the middle ages to allow a marriage which would otherwise be illegal (based on Church "laws"--- usually the fact that notice could not be posted for 3 weeks). Marriage licenses were granted by church officials. Governments got involved because they saw it as a way to make money for themselves instead of letting the church have it all.

The solution is for governments to get back out of the marriage licensing business.
Reply to this comment
by dmhphils July 29, 2008 9:22 PM PDT
The solution is for governments to get back out of the marriage licensing business.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by s57g67L at 09:05 PM : Jul 29, 2008

Read between the lines.....this is not about marriage licenses.....it is about what Marriage Is in the first place. If marriage is just about a contract.....yea, government is going to get involved....and I agree, they should butt out....they have no business being involved in what belongs to the Church.....this is not state business.
Reply to this comment
by dmhphils July 29, 2008 9:30 PM PDT
Interesting how the media includes the picture of the two dudes in a lip-lock on the front page of their article.....knowing that exposure breeds acceptance of things that were once taboo.

We look and then the next time, it won''t be so shocking, and the next time, and so on, until this behavior becomes quite the ordinary. Except for one thing.....God has not changed His opinion or His judgement about what this is. He corrects those He loves, just like a parent will correct a child for playing on the freeway because of love.....and it is dangerous to play on the freeway.
Reply to this comment
by hedonist3 July 29, 2008 10:02 PM PDT
noseonurface and maxify55 -- How presumptuous of you to speak for God Almighty -- all based on the writings of flesh-and-blood, naturally biased humans. Who do you suppose created those you''re against? How would you like it if you were told to whom you could formally commit? You do NOT speak for my God. And, just for the record, I am a straight great-grandmother. Whoever raised you should not have been raising children.
Reply to this comment
by mensarino July 29, 2008 10:10 PM PDT
Hedonist3~I heartily agree with you and I am a straight grandfather.These people must think they have a lock on the truth--such arrogance!!!IF your god is the way you describe...then I am glad I am not religious because I want no part of a god like that.
Reply to this comment
by irliberal July 29, 2008 10:24 PM PDT
"The Massachusetts House voted Tuesday to repeal a 1913 law that had been used to block gay marriages involving out-of-state couples, all but assuring that the state will lay out the welcome mat for such weddings."

Way to go Massachusetts! Woohoo!
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt July 29, 2008 10:44 PM PDT
Bank on Pat Robertson attributing the next calamity that should befall MA on this ending of descrimination - because "God" wants man to descriminate........
Reply to this comment
by dmhphils July 30, 2008 12:05 AM PDT
And, just for the record, I am a straight great-grandmother. Whoever raised you should not have been raising children.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Hedonist3 at 10:02 PM : Jul 29, 2008

Let''s just say I am glad you are somebody else''s grandmother....and keep your judgements to yourself granny.
Reply to this comment
by dmhphils July 30, 2008 12:07 AM PDT
These people must think they have a lock on the truth--such arrogance!!!IF your god is the way you describe...then I am glad I am not religious because I want no part of a god like that.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by mensarino

God has the lock on the truth!
Reply to this comment
by nojoy01 July 30, 2008 12:14 AM PDT
Who cares if ''they'' get ''married''. And besides, it will be fun watching ''them'' find out how much a ''good'' divorce lawyer costs these days.
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 July 30, 2008 12:27 AM PDT
noseonurface and maxify55 -- How presumptuous of you to speak for God Almighty -- all based on the writings of flesh-and-blood, naturally biased humans. Who do you suppose created those you''''re against? How would you like it if you were told to whom you could formally commit? You do NOT speak for my God. And, just for the record, I am a straight great-grandmother. Whoever raised you should not have been raising children.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Hedonist3 at 10:02 PM : Jul 29, 2008
*******************************

I am a straight grandmother and I agree. I think that those folks have never really read the Bible in the first place, and in the second place, that is their religion, not anyone elses. Everyone has their own spiritual connection, and that is not to be questioned by men. If they really believe in this punishing God, they he will take care of it in his own time, not theirs. They just need to mind their own back yards and quit hanging over their neighbors fence.
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 July 30, 2008 12:28 AM PDT
God has the lock on the truth!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by noseonurface at 12:07 AM : Jul 30, 2008
+ report abuse
***************************************

Maybe, but you don''t.
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 July 30, 2008 12:36 AM PDT
"Sometimes what you hope and pray for actually happens, which is kind of overwhelming," Michael Thorne, 55, of Cape Elizabeth, Maine, said after telling his 6-year-old son his parents could soon get married. Thorne and his partner of 25 years, James Theberge, have an Aug. 18 wedding planned in Provincetown.
****************************************

Gosh, these just sound like horrible people. Together for 25 years and have a son. These are the real people that the bigots harm. Real people with real families that love each other. It is a sick world when people use God as an excuse to hurt people like this.
Reply to this comment
by hermitdave July 30, 2008 12:38 AM PDT
What''s with all this God talk? Don''t the know his son Jesus hung out with 12 GUYS.
Reply to this comment
by feeelfree4u July 30, 2008 1:55 AM PDT
Good, let all the ga*ys go there, that state went to total he*ll in a handbasket years ago.
Reply to this comment
by zzmonkeyzz July 30, 2008 2:11 AM PDT
DOMA is a piece of s***. A disgusting decision that seeks to enshrine bigotry within quite possibly the most magnificent social experiment of all: the U.S. Constitution and its constituent laws and acts. Since when do religious nut jobs have the right to hijack the American way? Gay marriage is the Pursuit of Happiness for a significant percentage of upstanding, tax-paying, proud and patriotic Americans. Taxation Without Representation is one of the reasons behind the Revolutionary War. Remember? Don''t let the holier-than-thou right wing pull the wool over your eyes in service of their evil, un-Christian, and anti-American agenda.
Reply to this comment
by dmhphils July 30, 2008 2:43 AM PDT
Interesting how the media includes the picture of the two dudes in a lip-lock on the front page of their article.....knowing that exposure breeds acceptance of things that were once taboo.

We look and then the next time, it won''''t be so shocking, and the next time, and so on, until this behavior becomes quite the ordinary. Except for one thing.....God has not changed His opinion or His judgement about what this is. He corrects those He loves, just like a parent will correct a child for playing on the freeway because of love.....and it is dangerous to play on the freeway.
Reply to this comment
by dmhphils July 30, 2008 2:53 AM PDT
Did you know that as you walk up the steps to the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington D.C., near the top of the building there is a row of the world''s law givers? Each one is facing Moses, who is in the middle, holding the Ten Commandments. As you enter the Supreme Court, the two huge oak doors have the Ten Commandments engraved on each lower portion of each door. As you sit inside the courtroom, you will see another display of the Ten Commandments--this one is directly above where the Supreme Court resides.

James Madison, the fourth President--known as %u201CThe Father of Our Constitution,%u201D said,

%u201CWe have staked the whole of all our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God.%u201D

Reply to this comment
by daysrnumbrd July 30, 2008 3:28 AM PDT
What''s with all this God talk? Don''t they know his son Jesus hung out with 12 GUYS.

Posted by hermitdave at 12:38 AM : Jul 30, 2008
.............

Well, at least they were adult guys!

(So that means Jesus was not a Catholic).

:-)
Reply to this comment
by irliberal July 30, 2008 5:23 AM PDT
Gosh, these just sound like horrible people. Together for 25 years and have a son. These are the real people that the bigots harm. Real people with real families that love each other. It is a sick world when people use God as an excuse to hurt people like this.

Posted by kansas1946 at 12:36 AM

Good point, but that''s the neocon agenda for ya.
Reply to this comment
by wl7bzh July 30, 2008 5:42 AM PDT
Bank on Pat Robertson attributing the next calamity that should befall MA on this ending of descrimination - because "God" wants man to descriminate........

Posted by formrusmcsgt at 10:44 PM : Jul 29, 2008


Both sides of this issue take notice:

As of this moment, there are no Mass. fires, earthquakes, floods or other disasters as in California.


Let the experiment begin.
Reply to this comment
by slim1h2o July 30, 2008 5:53 AM PDT
They are going to have ga/y weddings on wednesdays?

On a serious note, This ought to bring in some extra money during this recession, going on depression.

Its a smart business decision.
Reply to this comment
by rafterman1 July 30, 2008 6:26 AM PDT
===If the people of Massachusetts could vote, homosexual marriage in Massachusetts would be banned.===
Posted by AmJoe

Civil rights are not up to a vote. If people were allowed to vote on slavery in 1865, they would have kept it overwhelmingly. Sometimes, people have to be hauled into the future, kicking and screaming.
Reply to this comment
by cheetah-man7 July 30, 2008 6:31 AM PDT
All I can say is that I am very proud and happy to be living in Massahusetts! This state cares for its citizens and gives us all equal rights. What other state allows gay people to marry? What other state has a health care program for every citizen? Massachusetts is the coolest state to live in by far. Again, I am very proud to live in a state that recognizes the right of tax-paying *** to marry.
Reply to this comment
See all 78 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs