L.A. Ban Takes Aim At Fast Food
To Battle Obesity, City Wants To Block New Fast-Food Eateries That Don't Offer Less Fatty Fare
-
Pedestrians walk past an El Pollo Loco restaurant in Los Angeles on Monday, July 28, 2008. In South L.A., fast food is also the easiest cuisine to find, and that's a problem for elected officials who see it as an unhealthy source of calories and cholesterol in an area where obesity is on the rise. (AP Photo/Matt Sayles)
-
Interactive Diet And Nutrition Are you eating right? See the government's guidelines, calculate your body mass index and quiz yourself on healthy food choices.
-
Quiz Are You Food Savvy? Have you consumed myths about diet and nutrition? Take these quizzes to find out.
The City Council was poised to vote Tuesday on a moratorium on new fast-food restaurants in a swath of the city where a proliferation of such eateries goes hand-in-hand with obesity.
"Our communities have an extreme shortage of quality foods," City Councilman Bernard Parks said.
The aim of the year-long moratorium, which was approved last week in committee, is to give the city time to try to attract restaurants that serve healthier food.
The California Restaurant Association says the moratorium, which could be extended up to two years, is misguided.
Fast food "is the only industry that wants to be in South L.A.," said association spokesman Andrew Casana. "Sit-down restaurants don't want to go in. If they did, they'd be there. This moratorium isn't going to help them relocate."
The proposed ban comes at a time when governments of all levels are increasingly viewing menus as a matter of public health. Last Friday, California became the first state in the nation to bar trans fats, which lowers levels of good cholesterol and increases bad cholesterol.
It also comes as the Los Angeles City Council tackles issues beyond safety, schools and streets. The council last week decided to outlaw plastic bags.
Fast-food restaurants have found themselves in the frying pan in a number of cities. Some places, including Carmel-by-the Sea and Calistoga, have barred "formula" restaurants altogether; others have placed a cap on them - Arcata allows a maximum of nine fast-food eateries; others have prohibited the restaurants in certain areas, such as Port Jefferson, N.Y., in its waterfront area.
Most initiatives were designed to preserve a city's historic character. The Los Angeles bid is one of a few that cite residents' health.
What's next — security guards at the door saying 'You're overweight, you can't have a cheeseburger'?
Restaurant industry spokesman Andrew CasanaThat's why the restaurant industry says it's unfair to blame them for fat people.
"What's next - security guards at the door saying 'You're overweight, you can't have a cheeseburger'?" Casana said.
But public health officials say obesity has reached epidemic proportions in low-income areas such as South Los Angeles and diet is the key reason.
According to the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, 30 percent of adults in South Los Angeles area are obese, compared to 19.1 percent for the metropolitan area and 14.1 percent for the affluent Westside. Minorities are particularly affected: 28.7 percent of Latinos and 27.7 percent of blacks are obese, compared to 16.6 percent of whites.
Perry says that's no accident. South L.A. residents lack healthy food options, including grocery stores, fresh produce markets - and full-service restaurants with wait staff and food prepared to order.
A report by the Community Health Councils found 73 percent of South L.A. restaurants were fast food, compared to 42 percent in West Los Angeles.
If the moratorium is passed, Perry wants to lure restaurateurs and grocery retailers to area.
Rebeca Torres, a South Los Angeles mother of four, said she would welcome more dining choices, even if she had to pay a little more. "They should have better things for children," she said. "This fast-food really fattens them up."
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 53 CommentsWe as a society have to learn to live with what we''re given. I am overweight myself, and haven''t been to the doctor for any serious health problems in over 11 years. I am realtively healthy, with a few problems, I am eating less and exercising more than I did, I''m still not losing any weight.
Looking back, I am eating half of what I used to and weigh more. That''s the way my body works. I can''t change it. I deal with what I can, and go on :)
Today for breakfast I had some sunny side up eggs (cholesterol); toast with butter (even more cholesterol) and bacon. None of that is good for you, but it is cheap to fix and eat; and I didn''t have to leave the house to go to McD''s for it.
But, the whole point is, if they''re going to ban the restaurants for health reasons; might as well go back to banning the alcohol too, that is even more dangerous. At least we are only killing ourselves, not like with DUI, others die as a result.
I get hamburger at the store, press it into patties and put cheese and all the conidments on it. Still eating cheeseburgers. For 50 cents I can get a cheap bag of frozen fries, and throw them in the deep fryer. I can also make tacos & pizza. No more McD''s, KFC, Taco Bell or Pizza Hut here.
BUT........
I''m still eating the same way, the only thing I''ve done is maybe put the fast food chains out of business, MORE PEOPLE OUT OF WORK, and more unemployment out of our hard-earned money.
It''s called personal freedom and choice. I say do away with the IRS and we take care of our own and stop all social programs. Our money should stay our money. That way we are only paying for oursleves.
DUI is a crime, but people still go out drink, drive, then cause accidents killing & disabling people. So, I want the government to ban alcoholic beverage sales & make it a crime to drink any of it. There will be less DUI''s and less fatalities from it. Less lives will be ruined.
That would encourage me. Give me a tax break, that way I can continue to afford to eat healthier. But I don''t want ANYONE telling me what to do--fat or not.
What next, double-charge anyone we don''t feel as though deserves what they work for? The government has no place in this matter. This is AMERICA. LAND OF THE FREE????????
Fat people pay taxes too. They are entitled to whatever skinny people are. And, some "fatties" are healthier than you think. Anyone remember Florence Griffth-Joyner? She was an athlete, she died of natural causes and she wasn''t fat. IMAGINE THAT.....
If you only have so much to feed your family on, a 99cent double cheeseburger is cheaper than $1.30 for veggies. Both last the same amount of meals. One is cheaper. If a salad is $5 and all you have is $2, can you get the salad? Yeah, if you steal it.
Posted by rudy654 at 01:39 PM : Jul 29, 2008
But rudy, all this time you have been telling us that the reason produce is affordable is because of the illegal immigrants willing to work in the fields for slave wages. Now you changed your tune?
I don''t know if you are for or against it...but in my opinion ethanol production from corn is not a good idea.
~~~~~~~~~~~
If California bans all plastic bags...what are the drug dealers going to package their drugs in?
~~~~~~~~~~
California....the land of earthquakes, wildfires and big brother. Paradise indeed!
~~~~~~~~~~~
If California bans all plastic bags...what are the drug dealers going to package their drugs in?
~~~~~~~~~~
California....the land of earthquakes, wildfires and big brother. Paradise indeed!
I know who the gangs are they tag every where.
Oh wait, liberals love Starbucks. And cigarettes.
How true. The liberals will demonize an activity (such as smoking) so they can justify suing the manufacturers, and taxing the *** out of it, all the while taking part in the activity ,(is Obama still a closet smoker)look at hollywood. They want to make smoking in movies a reason for a PG13 rating, but how many of the "stars" smoke? Total hypocricy.
ubrew. Are you going to site the source of your stats?
Didn''t think so...
Oh wait, liberals love Starbucks. And cigarettes.
Get OUT of peoples lives.
In a cast-iron skillet add 3 tb spoons EVOO, medium heat and cook Chicken. Once chicken is 3/4 cook place in 275 degree oven.
Cut up
Squash - Yellow Summer, zucchini.
1 Yellow Onion Sliced
1 cup Sliced Mushrooms
1/4 Bell Pepper
2 Garlic
Saute these veggies in EVOO with light Salt, pepper, lemon until tender.
Baked potato as you wish.
Add to this a dish of slices Pears, Apples, Grapes
Takes 30-40 minutes to cook and is faster than driving to get a BIG MAC.
Of course, the libs are the true facists.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 53 Comments