AUGUSTA, Me., July 27, 2008

Verizon Refuses Phone Records Query

Refuses To Address Maine Legislator's Question On Customer Records Because Of "National Security"

  • Photo

     (CBS/AP)

  • Interactive Domestic Surveillance

    The debate over the Bush administration's controversial wiretapping program.

(AP)  Now that Congress has given immunity to telecommunications companies that helped the government spy on Americans in suspected terrorism cases, a Maine legislator is asking Verizon anew if it turned over any customer records to the federal government.

As it has in the past when faced with such queries, Verizon Communications Inc. says it is not commenting on matters involving national security.

State Rep. Herbert Adams posed the question about phone records on July 18, eight days after President Bush signed into law a bill that overhauled government eavesdropping rules and granted immunity to telecommunications companies that helped the government monitor Americans in suspected terrorism cases.

The law in effect nullified a lawsuit by Maine which sought to know what kind of phone customer information was turned over to the National Security Agency as part of its anti-terror efforts. That and several other similar cases brought by consumers, privacy advocates and others had been consolidated before Congress granted immunity.

Adams, a member of the Legislature's Utilities and Energy Committee, posed similar questions about phone records to an executive for FairPoint Communications earlier this year. FairPoint is taking over Verizon's landline phone and Internet service in northern New England. While FairPoint said it had not turned over records, it said it could not speak for Verizon.

Adams posed the question anew on July 18, saying that Verizon could answer "under protection of Federal law (and) without fear of lawsuits."

"At any time prior to the 2008 sale of FairPoint Communications, did Verizon ever surrender, voluntarily or under subpoena, any individual or aggregate customer information to any agency of the U.S. government?" says his letter.

A copy was furnished to company spokesman John Bonomo, who said there would be no response.

"We do not comment on matters involving national security," Bonomo said in an e-mail to The Associated Press.

Adams, D-Portland, had anticipated his query would not be answered.

"Possibly tens of thousands of Mainers have had their private phone records leaked to the federal government without their knowledge or say-so, and now none of them may ever know," he said.

© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Video and Galleries from U.S.

Add a Comment See all 58 Comments
by nothappyatall July 27, 2008 12:30 PM PDT
"Verizon Communications Inc. says it is not commenting on matters involving national security. "

That''s corporate bullchit double-speak for YEAH, we turned tail and spurted our customer''s PRIVATE records to a sham Govt agency started by the George Bush cartel.

CANCEL your Verizon account and tell them why.
Reply to this comment
by nothappyatall July 27, 2008 12:37 PM PDT
EMail verizon here and tell them what you think of their shady business practices and tell them you cancelled your account as a result. Enter whatever info you think of for name etc it works;

https://www22.verizon.com/foryourhome/ContactUs/ContactUs_Email_Form.aspx

Reply to this comment
by monkfellow July 27, 2008 12:46 PM PDT
GOD BLESS and I do mean GOD BLESS Verizon Wireless for obeying FISA AS IT WAS WRITTEN,and has been amended and rewritten.This is a law that predates the pathological Bush-haters..ask your hero Bill Clinton whose phone records HIS "Administration" rifled through under the guise of "national security".Probably the same people who tax records were "scrutinized".
The legislator from Maine should just go back to counting fish or something.
I am A PROUD VERIZON WIRELESS CUSTOMER and will REMAIN SO!
Reply to this comment
by wdrussell1 July 27, 2008 12:55 PM PDT
National security?????????????????
Since when is Verizon part of the federal government?
Reply to this comment
by ioweign July 27, 2008 1:00 PM PDT
National security?????????????????
Since when is Verizon part of the federal government?

Posted by WDrussell1 at 12:55 PM : Jul 27, 2008

Where is Georgie with his "Executive Privilege"??
Reply to this comment
by July 27, 2008 1:12 PM PDT
It is good to see that someone in industry has the guts to stand up to a spurious request by a politician interested only in his self agrandizment. How many of the "tens of thousands" people of Maine are really concerned that the Federal Gov''t may have seen their telephone records while in pursuit of terrorists? Probably far fewer than this political hack would have you imagine. Get over it Dems,(or should I say Dims), Bush will finish his term of office regardless of your constant sniping.
Does it take much imagination to see why the House has a 9% approval rating?
Reply to this comment
by jmurrieta1 July 27, 2008 1:31 PM PDT
So now those "pro-freedom" and "states'' rights" Republican hypocrits deny Maine the right to enforce its own laws?

Let Congress give immunity from FEDERAL law suits, if they foolishly choose to do so. They hardly have the authority to make lying telecons immune from state prosecution.

The state police power is plenary; the federal is limited by the Constitution.

Or did the Bushites forget that?
Reply to this comment
by edintex July 27, 2008 1:44 PM PDT
State Rep. Herbert Adams said "Possibly tens of thousands of Mainers have had their private phone records leaked to the federal government without their knowledge or say-so, and now none of them may ever know". I wonder if he is worried that HIS personal calls were listened to. Is he afraid of something, or does he have something to hide?

I personally dont CARE if the feds listen to my calls if it helps them find the terrorists who want to kill me and my family. It would be fine by me as long as the policy is changed BACK to privacy after terrorism has been abated.
Reply to this comment
by jrc007 July 27, 2008 1:55 PM PDT
Yet another opportunity for right-wing hypocrites to stick their heads in the sand while our Fourth Amendment rights are shredded. (They only pull their heads out to complain about too much government interference in their lives. Sheesh.)
Reply to this comment
by trillion1 July 27, 2008 2:02 PM PDT
Who are these morons that will happily give up their Constitinanal (sp) rights and freedoms in the goverments laughable ''hunt for terrorists''.
Reply to this comment
by richnj1 July 27, 2008 2:45 PM PDT
I personally dont CARE if the feds listen to my calls if it helps them find the terrorists who want to kill me and my family. ... Posted by edintex
---
One of the founding credos of this nation was "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death." If you are willing to give up your freedom just because you''re afraid to die, you are betraying the principles upon which our country was founded.

I would rather die than be illegally spied upon by what is supposed to be my own government.

Reply to this comment
by lmartink July 27, 2008 3:01 PM PDT
The whole purpos of going to war aganst terrorists was to make the enemy give up their rights. When the war stumbled, and with Osama bin Laden still out there, our leadership decided we should give up our rights. A fundamental failure.

As for Verizon, they have an arrogant superiority complex.
Reply to this comment
by trglazier July 27, 2008 3:08 PM PDT
Only true cowards would be willing to throw out the US constitution because they are afraid of terrorists. What a ridiculous argument. If Islamic terrorists are truly attacking us because they hate our freedoms - they win! Our constitutional rights have been impaired by this new FISA law and there is nobody allowed to question it. What a country!
Reply to this comment
by pvperson July 27, 2008 3:22 PM PDT
edintex, "It would be fine by me as long as the policy is changed BACK to privacy after terrorism has been abated"

And what on earth makes you think the government woupd EVER change things back? Once you give up your rights, they are GONE.......Don''t you know that?
Reply to this comment
by edintex July 27, 2008 3:24 PM PDT
One of the founding credos of this nation was "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death." If you are willing to give up your freedom just because you''''re afraid to die...Posted by richnj1 at 02:45 PM : Jul 27, 2008

How about MORE on that famous speech?
"It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, "Peace! Peace!" -- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!"

Patrick Henry - March 23, 1775

Sounds more like Patrick Henry would have fought and died for liberty, rather than to stay under Britains rule (chains/slavery) for "peace".
Reply to this comment
by pvperson July 27, 2008 3:31 PM PDT
edintex, I''ve read you Patrick Henry post three times and don''t find anything anywhere about it being OK for the government to wiretap American conversations with immunity.
Reply to this comment
by edintex July 27, 2008 3:35 PM PDT
And what on earth makes you think the government woupd EVER change things back? Once you give up your rights, they are GONE.......Don''''t you know that?
Posted by PVperson at 03:22 PM : Jul 27, 2008

Every single time a "State of Emergency" is declared in the U.S., either during war or natural disaster, some of our civil rights are suspended! When the potential danger has passed, the freedoms are restored. "Don''''t you know that?"
Reply to this comment
by pvperson July 27, 2008 3:36 PM PDT
"Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?"

Sounds to me like Patrick Henry would be outraged over the governments actions.
Reply to this comment
by pvperson July 27, 2008 3:38 PM PDT
There you go with that "suspended" again. Know I don''t know that. The governmaet never gives back anything unless forced. Don''t you know that?
Reply to this comment
by pvperson July 27, 2008 3:40 PM PDT
Did the immjmuity bill just passed, have a provision to reverse itself at some time in the future? No it didn''t.
Reply to this comment
by edintex July 27, 2008 3:41 PM PDT
I''''ve read you Patrick Henry post three times and don''''t find anything anywhere about it being OK for the government to wiretap American conversations with immunity.
Posted by PVperson at 03:31 PM : Jul 27, 2008

richnj1 quoted: One of the founding credos of this nation was "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death." If you are willing to give up your freedom just because you''''''''re afraid to die...

This person aparently never read the entire speech and did not know the context. Where in richnj1''s post did it say ANYTHING about a wiretap?

Oh, wait...do you hear that clicking on your phone? You better be careful about what you say or they''ll come during the night and take you away. Its advisable that you DONT sleep at night just in case they come...

Reply to this comment
by pvperson July 27, 2008 3:46 PM PDT
I''m sure the germans felt the same way ed and look how well it turned out for them. How many rights and laws are you willing to sacrifice so that you can think your safe at night?
Reply to this comment
by nextgenman July 27, 2008 3:51 PM PDT

"Possibly tens of thousands of Mainers have had their private phone records leaked to the federal government without their knowledge or say-so, and now none of them may ever know," he said.
------------

Republican supporters don''t mind when the Government spies on them because they''re afraid of a few terrorists.
Reply to this comment
by deacon20081 July 27, 2008 3:57 PM PDT
I am A PROUD VERIZON WIRELESS CUSTOMER and will REMAIN SO!
Posted by monkfellow at 12:46 PM : Jul 27, 2008

AMEN to that I am to. These two bit politicians should find a life. It doesn''''t bother me at all I wonder what he has to hide.
-------------------------------------------

You freely give up your rights to Verizon? I am a customer as well, and I am not happy with any company that invades my privacy. I am going to cancel my contracts as they come up for renewal on my business lines. You both must be Verizon mouth pieces or employees.
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10-2009 July 27, 2008 3:57 PM PDT
BUSH SHOULD BE IMPEACHED-- 4

Bush saw 911 not as a national disaster and failure on his watch, but a joyous opportunity to bend every rule, tell every untruth to put his hands on Iraq, as if in imitation of his father. We recall Bush, Sr. managed to wrap himself in the American flag to rescue grateful Kuwait, and none called him on the hypocrisy-- not even to remind him he was the one who kept Saddam in power, and even shipped the monster his own supply of American nerve gas to use at will against whomever he might.

So, like father, like son? Not quite-- from most appearances, Bush Sr., had lost his moral compass by degrees as the cost of doing business. But son George Bush did not even understand the questions of ethics and responsibility, in the first place.

In that respect, alone, Bush is the all-time American anti-patriot. Not content with a nondescript career, he was hungry for power in the worst way. Bush is the individual who, in November, 2005, facing an assembly of his own party members critical of his NSA spying program, bristled like a teenager caught drinking after curfew-- "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face! It''s just a GD)((#@*! piece of paper!"

Is this figure, who claims to be president of the United States, the same who pledged an oath to "protect, preserve and defend" the document he calls a "GD)((#@*! piece of paper"?
Reply to this comment
by edintex July 27, 2008 3:59 PM PDT
I''''m sure the germans felt the same way ed and look how well it turned out for them. How many rights and laws are you willing to sacrifice so that you can think your safe at night?
Posted by PVperson at 03:46 PM : Jul 27, 2008

If listening in on my phone conversation in any way helps our government detect terrorists so they may be KILLED, I''m all for it. I prefer not to stand in their way. I would help in any way I could.

Your buddy Hussain Obama will undoubtedly be in office along with a democrapic congress and senate, so they will get their chance to BLIND our intelligence agencies to the point that they wouldnt be able to detect ANYTHING, just like pre 911. They will also make it impossible to SHARE intelligence between our agencies, just like pre 911. We will just see how well the democraps can "protect us" starting January, now wont we?
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10-2009 July 27, 2008 4:00 PM PDT
BUSH SHOULD BE IMPEACHED-- 3

And well they might. By now, as the oil majors rush to the landgrab in Iraq, it becomes clear that those Americans shouting "No blood for oil!" had it exactly right.

Bushscam put the progress of America into reverse for eight long years, demolished our standing among nations, plundered the treasury, ruined the economy and wasted more than 4,000 American lives (not to mention hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives) and tens of thousands of American wounded-- all to launch the biggest political crime in American history. The Bushscam is bigger than Teapot Dome and Tammany Hall by an order of magnitude-- our grandchildren will wonder about us as they read about Bush''s War in history class

Bushscam is a classic case of misplaced trust. In the wake of 911, the US congress gave Bush the critical mission to bring bin Laden to justice. Bush, instead, began his campaign to do anything but. The first order Bush gave Clarke, his national security adviser, was to find out how the Iraqis were involved.

(see Bush Should Be Impeached-- 4)
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10-2009 July 27, 2008 4:03 PM PDT
BUSH SHOULD BE IMPEACHED-- 2

The conspiracy blackened the reputation of an entire party, the GOP congress which abdicated its responsibility and sold its soul for power, while Bush and Cheney ran amok through the American constitutional system. .

The Bush / Cheney scam called into serious doubt the morals and integrity of even the judicial branch-- the same US Supreme Court which had so dishonored itself with shamefully partisan behavior to put Bush in office.

The Bush scam was all about what Cheney called the "remaining prize" in the MidEast-- the vast oil assets of Iraq. The plot began six months before the twin towers fell, when Cheney held a secret meeting with Big Oil-- the details of which Bush and Cheney continue to deny the American public to this day.

(see "Bush Should Be Impeached"-- 3)
Reply to this comment
by edintex July 27, 2008 4:04 PM PDT
see Bush Should Be Impeached-- 4)
Posted by alphaa10 at 04:00 PM : Jul 27, 2008

You LOST !!! Its too late now, not enough time left for the impeachment process to finish before Bush finishes his term...Heheheeee.

Now why dont you quit your full time impeach Bush job and go get a REAL job.
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10-2009 July 27, 2008 4:04 PM PDT
Rep. Dennis Kucinich has been right all along-- the nation''s chief executive officer is a crook and a scoundrel.

While being a soundrel is not technical grounds for impeachment, high crimes and misdeanors against the United States and its people very definitely are.

The Bush crime and its modus operandi are now exposed for all to see.

The Bush / Cheney scam is the most massive conspiracy of all in American politics, compromising the integrity of the entire federal executive branch.

(see "Bush Should Be Impeached"-- 2)
Reply to this comment
by pvperson July 27, 2008 4:17 PM PDT
"I am A PROUD VERIZON WIRELESS CUSTOMER"

Proud to be a customer of a company, huh.

Are you PROUD to be a customer of the local trash service or gas station? How about PROUD to be a customer of Dishnetwork or DirectTV or Cox cable? Are you PROUD that you bought your tires from Walmart? You don''t have much to be proud about, do you?


Reply to this comment
by edintex July 27, 2008 4:18 PM PDT
The morons who don''''t want to see thousands of Americans killed by terrorist again. You are really the morons you liberal idiots won''''t be satisfied until more Americans are killed in this country. Times have changed so get use to it.
Posted by dmw1167 at 04:00 PM : Jul 27, 2008

Yeah, I''ll bet the families of those killed on 911 would rather have their loved ones alive at home right now, wondering if their phone was being listened to! I TRULY wish they were alive at home.

I think about our brothers and sisters up there in NY frequently. I''m still SEETHING about 911.
Reply to this comment
by pvperson July 27, 2008 4:25 PM PDT
There you go ed, is there any article that you won''t drag in 911? Are you Rudy Giuliani?

911 was a bad event, not the worst event to ever happen and probably not the last, but it wasn''t re excuse for destroying our country. You neo-cons are the most anti-american unpatriotic pack I''ve ever seen. Who needs terrorist to ruin America, we''ve got you people to do that.
Reply to this comment
by edintex July 27, 2008 4:26 PM PDT
"I am A PROUD VERIZON WIRELESS CUSTOMER"
Proud to be a customer of a company, huh...
Posted by PVperson at 04:17 PM : Jul 27, 2008

Sounds like that person that is PROUD to be a Verizon customer is realy proud to be with a company that ASSISTS the government in the intelligence gathering against terrorists.
Reply to this comment
by pvperson July 27, 2008 4:28 PM PDT
He didn''t say that ed, but I''m sure you know what he meant. I''m sure you think you know what everone means and thinks. Republicans always do.
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10-2009 July 27, 2008 4:30 PM PDT

Actually, if you ever pause to think about it, Bush himself arranged for "thousands of Americans [to be] killed by terrorist[s] again..." by sending Americans on a fool''s errand to destabilize the MidEast, overthrow Saddam, and then, without any plan for occupation, baby-sit a developing insurgency.

How is that anything but moronic? "Ad hoc" is not a plan, not even an excuse for the leadership Bush and the GOP never provided.

Asked what tangible evidence he had to show that his so-called war on teror was doing anything more than graduating a new class of jihadis in the MidEast, Bush had nothing to show.

Even if we generously credit Bush under the Cheney logic that "absence of proof is not proof of absence" Bush has had ample opportunity in the last five years to show at least something to prove his effectiveness.

Instead, we have little evidence of anything except the signs of a developing police state here in America. Meanwhile, al Qaeda thrives all over the world, and bin Laden continues to laugh us to scorn.

Bush has had only one success-- his struggle to prove to Americans he is the anti-patriot, scheming against the very rule of law and Constitution he pledged to "preserve, protect and defend".

Bush is the equivalent of the con artist who asks, "Have I ever lied to you? Hmmmm?!!!!"
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10-2009 July 27, 2008 4:32 PM PDT

Actually, if you ever pause to think about it, Bush himself arranged for "thousands of Americans [to be] killed by terrorist[s] again..." by sending Americans on a fool''s errand to destabilize the MidEast, overthrow Saddam, and then, without any plan for occupation, baby-sit a developing insurgency.

How is that anything but moronic? "Ad hoc" is not a plan, not even an excuse for the leadership Bush and the GOP never provided.

Asked what tangible evidence he had to show that his so-called war on teror was doing anything more than graduating a new class of jihadis in the MidEast, Bush had nothing to show.

Even if we generously credit Bush under the Cheney logic that "absence of proof is not proof of absence" Bush has had ample opportunity in the last five years to show at least something to prove his effectiveness.

Instead, we have little evidence of anything except the signs of a developing police state here in America. Meanwhile, al Qaeda thrives all over the world, and bin Laden continues to laugh us to scorn.

Bush has had only one success-- his struggle to prove to Americans he is the anti-patriot, scheming against the very rule of law and Constitution he pledged to "preserve, protect and defend".

Bush is the equivalent of the con artist who asks, "Have I ever lied to you? Hmmmm?!!!!"
Reply to this comment
by pvperson July 27, 2008 4:33 PM PDT
Actually alphaa10, Bush has been responsible for several hundred thousand deaths, about 4,200 Americans and 4 or 5 hundred thousand Iraqis.
Reply to this comment
by edintex July 27, 2008 4:34 PM PDT
Who needs terrorist to ruin America, we''''ve got you people to do that.
Posted by PVperson at 04:25 PM : Jul 27, 2008

Dont worry. You "patriots", the liberal dems, will get your chance to do your "patriotic" thing once your kind are in power. We''ll see how many lives will be lost here in the US after you and your buddies BLIND the intelligence community in the name of your "rights".
Of course, if there was another terrorist strike on our soil during your time, I''m SURE you would still be posting the "virtues" of your rights on here. Yeah, right...
Reply to this comment
by pvperson July 27, 2008 4:44 PM PDT
edintex, seems to me the BLIND intelligence community has existed for quite some time. "if there was another terrorist strike on our soil", of course there will be, only a fool would think otherwise. But when it happens I hope there is a government in place will NOT use it for political gain and thrashing of the Constitution.
Reply to this comment
by pvperson July 27, 2008 4:48 PM PDT
ed, Bin Laden''s goal was to damage the US. To plant fear in our hearts. You people are playing right into his hands, doing exactly what he wants. Every time we break our own laws, ignore our rules of right and wrong, he wins.
Reply to this comment
by richnj1 July 27, 2008 5:24 PM PDT
I think about our brothers and sisters up there in NY frequently. I''''m still SEETHING about 911. -- Posted by edintex

What''s funny is that you say "up there", so I guess you aren''t from NYC. I live so close to NYC (2 miles) that I could see the smoke on 9/11 from my porch. I know someone who died in the towers - her office was facing almost exactly where the first plane hit. Virtually everyone I know had a friend or neighbor die. I spent the day calling friends'' families to see if they were alive, helping to pick up kids from school for neighbors who couldn''t get out of Manhattan, etc. That was what 9/11 was for us.

And you know what? WE aren''t "seething." We were the main area hit. We are the area that is very likely to be hit again. I constantly cross the bridges and tunnels that Al Qaeda may target. YET, "up here" we keep electing anti-war Democrats. Why isn''t NYC the headquarters of the pro-war factions?? That should make you think.

You see, when the violence is actually at your front door, you see your principles more clearly. There''s far more pro-war rhetoric coming from places for whom 9/11 was a television event. Around here, we lived it, and though we don''t want to live it again, we know that love, kindness, and respect is the way forward. Why is there more anti-Muslim stuff elsewhere than there is around here? That should make you think.

Don''t use OUR tragedy as an excuse for your jingoism.
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica July 27, 2008 5:26 PM PDT
You are so right,
This war on terror has been a sorry excuse to violate personal rights and freedoms guaranteed by the the Constitution. Every person who has worked to this effect are criminals and should be tried as terrorists themselves. Terrorists against the American way.

After the way the GOP has hurt and abused the people of the US to their gain I can''t imagine why anyone would want this party to have any say in government what so ever.
Reply to this comment
by richnj1 July 27, 2008 5:33 PM PDT
Or let me put it more simply: living 2 miles from NYC, the primary victims of the last attack and the likely victims of the next attack ... why is it that I can''t name a single friend around here who actually thinks that the "war on terror" has made us safer?
Reply to this comment
by ioweign July 27, 2008 8:12 PM PDT
Your post makes about as much sense as a roll of toilet paper and what it is used for.

Posted by dmw1167 at 04:30 PM : Jul 27, 2008

A new experience for you, no doubt...

Reply to this comment
by Michael Arnold July 27, 2008 8:12 PM PDT
Criminals.

Remember, Verizon... the pendulum swings both ways. Your day will come you unAmerican, a-holes.

Better keep a clean act. We''re watching you.
Reply to this comment
by eddom949 July 27, 2008 9:00 PM PDT
The citizens by the Constitution of the United States of America are granted the right to petition the government. By all means, call, write, and/or email your Congressman/woman, representative, judge, justice, and/or President regarding this issue.

This is akin to the California ''Do Not Call'' list, which telemarketers flout by claiming a business relationship with their callees. In Orange County, we have had two teens 18 years old arraigned on 38 felony counts for altering grade records at school. Clearly, precedence and legislation are needed and in layman''s terms.
Reply to this comment
by johnsole1 July 27, 2008 9:19 PM PDT
If Verizon previously turned records over to the Federal Government, why can''t the Feds find them, why do the Feds have to ask Verizon for what they already received? Another example of redundant bureaucracy in our federal government. I hope Verizon sticks to its decision.
"Now that Congress has given immunity to telecommunications companies that helped the government spy on Americans in suspected terrorism cases, a Maine legislator is asking Verizon anew if it turned over any customer records to the federal government."
Reply to this comment
by apprxam July 27, 2008 9:21 PM PDT
Every fair-minded American should leave Verizon, AT&T and the other companies involved with hiding records and documents requested by state and federal reps.
Reply to this comment
by pirmin3 July 28, 2008 12:53 AM PDT
The companies are only too happy to work with Herr Bush and his jack booted regime. Sieg Heil Georgie
Reply to this comment
See all 58 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs