MOSCOW, July 27, 2008
Russia Wields RICO Law Against U.S. Bank
Racketeering Law Applied In Moscow Court In $22.5B Lawsuit Against Bank Of New York Mellon
-
Photo
(AP Photo)
-
Fast Facts
Russia
Learn about the people, economy and history.
Hearings resume Monday in the Russian Federal Customs Service's $22.5 billion lawsuit against the bank, which was at the center of a major money-laundering scandal in the late 1990s.
The lawsuit couldn't come at a more sensitive time, as U.S. banks are facing substantial writedowns following the subprime mortgage crisis.
In a highly unusual move, Russia has brought the case under a famous U.S. law used to fight organized crime, and both sides have drawn on the expert opinion of some of America's best-known legal minds in preparing their case.
The Russians have brought in Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz and Robert Blakey, one of the authors of the 1970 statute on racketeer-influenced and corrupt organizations, or RICO. Bank of New York Mellon lawyers are fielding Richard Thornburgh, a former U.S. attorney general and Pennsylvania governor.
The RICO statue has never been successfully ruled on in a foreign court, according to lawyers. If the Moscow court agrees to apply the U.S. law, some lawyers predict it would open the floodgates for a slew of similar claims.
"Corporations would be buried under RICO claims in Russian courts in the next six months," said Ivan Marisin of Clifford Chance, the bank's lead counsel.
Others are less convinced it would set a precedent, given the unique nature of the suit.
In one of the world's best-known banking scandals, Lucy Edwards, a Russian emigre and a vice president at Bank of New York, and her husband Peter Berlin, were accused of illegally moving $7.5 billion of Russian money into accounts at the bank, before sending the money to accounts worldwide.
The pair pleaded guilty to conspiracy to launder money. They were fined, put under house arrest for six months and given suspended sentences.
The Russian authorities are claiming lost tax revenues on those transfers.
Bank of New York, which later merged with Mellon, was never charged with money laundering activities. It paid a non-prosecution fee of $14 million to U.S. federal prosecutors in 2005.
But two years later, American litigation lawyers - working for a 29 percent contingency fee - filed the Russian claim, based on the RICO provision that they can claim treble the amount of estimated damages.
Bank of New York's lawyers argue that RICO can only be applied when there is proof of criminal activity. In this case, they argue, the bank was not charged with a crime, and Edwards and her husband admitted only to conspiracy to launder money.
But Steven Marks of the Podhurst Orseck law firm, one of the U.S. lawyers for the Russian side, claims that the 2005 settlement was an admission of guilt and that the civil RICO law requires a lower burden of proof.
Russian efforts to reach a settlement have been rebuffed, the plaintiffs say. Marisin, the lawyer for Bank of New York, told a hearing in early July that the plaintiffs approached the bank before the case was filed, asking for a much lower amount compared to the damages currently being sought.
Analysts and legal experts are divided on the merits of the case.
Maxim Kulkov, a Russian lawyer not acting for either party, says the Russian side's arguments are "pretty convincing." Others insist the Russian case is weak and was being brought in Moscow because Russian courts often rule in favor of the government.
In any case, Bank of New York says it does not intend to pay out in the event of an adverse ruling, and has not set aside a provision for the claim.
Ken Thomas, an independent economist retained by the Russian side, warned in a recent letter to U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke that an adverse ruling could damage the bank's financial standing and pose a serious systemic risk to U.S. financial markets.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



Mr. Renyi, the bank''s executive chairman, was paid $28.5 million in 2007, $1.5 million more than the runner-up, Alcoa Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Alain J.P. Belda.
Bank of New York Mellon CEO Robert P. Kelly, the previous year''s champ, fell to No. 4. He and Mr. Renyi were two of five Bank of New York Mellon executives in the Fortunate 50 Top 10."
Nobody can say the lying swindlers don''t pay themselves very nicely!
Let''s hope they get to count the birches in Siberia.
In an article written by James Petras, Professor of Sociology at Binghamton University in Binghamton, New York in 9-02, he states; "In other words, an incomplete figure of dirty money (laundered criminal and corrupt money) flowing into U.S. coffers during the 1990s amounted to $3-$5.5 trillion. This is not the complete picture but it gives us a basis to estimate the significance of the "dirty money factor" in evaluating the U.S. economy. In the first place, it is clear that the combined laundered and dirty money flows cover part of the U.S. deficit in its balance of merchandise trade which ranges in the hundreds of billions annually."
Also, Senator Carl Levin summarizes,"Estimates are that $500 billion to $1 trillion of international criminal proceeds are moved internationally and deposited into bank accounts annually. It is estimated that half of that money comes to the United States".
Yet, not one bank has ever been prosecuted under RICO.
Well, isn''t it something when foreign countries are becoming the system of checks and balances. Should this country turn to it''s military more and more to to deal with such cases, it''ll be clear who the evil empire is.
Yet, not one bank has ever been prosecuted under RICO.
Posted by renrivers
That spells broken and corrupt.
The bigger story should be the two TRAITORS from Harvard; law professor Alan Dershowitz and Robert Blakey. They know what could happen to the US banking system by the frivilous lawsuits, yet they will assist Russia anyway.
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE president Bush, if you could do just ONE THING RIGHT before you leave office, PLEASE put Alan Dershowitz and Robert Blakey on the "do not fly" list so they cannot come back to the U.S. after a trial. Those comrades BELONG in Russia.
Everybody seems to forget that anybody who is in business is, under the financial atmosphere of the neocon Fascist Nazi Republicans, out to make a profit, A HUGE PROFIT!!! Banks, lending companies, and utilities charge "usuary" fees which are pure PROFIT to them and at YOUR EXPENSE! It''s all a big racket designed to make the rich richer and to keep the poor, POOR!
Incidentally, anyone who thinks that sinply because the trial is being held in a Russian court, means that automatically the Russian government will win, had better explain to me how different that is from a trial held in the US(SA) when BIG BUSINESS or a BANK is the defendant here? How many of our "judges" are unbiased in handing down judgements in trial cases where a BANK or BIG BUSINESS is ABSOLUTELY at fault??
And, in the rare cases where BIG BUSINESS or a BANK loses, they can turn right around and go thru the appeals process for years. They have the money for legal fees( which they can deduct from their tax returns!), and they have the clout, so they go thru the legal process until they get a ruling favorable FOR THEM!
What chance does the average citizen have????
NONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It tells you who really runs this country and it''s not US!
SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!!!
sig heil, TOTALLY MORE OF THE SAME, "SURGE" McCain!!!!
Interesting case. This should keep the lawyers busy for awhile.
Apparently they haven''t learned it makes them look like dirt in the eyes of the world.
Hypocracy will be the theme; and criminal financial activity will be the prosecution. If media coverage is allowed, this be the greatest public exposure to American government and corporate corruption; and deteriorating foreign trade.
I want front row tickets to this circus. It''s going to be the best soap opera the world has ever witnessed.
It will be a blood bath for you in congress and the senate.
Also, the Bank of New York, which really wasn''t a bank, hid money from the CIS governments, probably with ex-KGBers in the U.S.
Now if only the U.S. Justice Dept could follow suit, or are they still controlled GHW Bush.
Thank you republicans and democrats, you''re the greatest!
Why should tax payers bail out these criminals. They pay their ceos millions every year and they now screwed the soviets. Let then soviets win againstthem in court and collect from them.
RICO applies to organized crime, if these bankers aren''t organized i don''t know who is.
And that Texas as*hole, Phil ''Ph*ckin'' Gramm.
Enough is enough, already. The CEO Ninties are finally coming to an end.
Then, if he doesn''t have his 20th heart attack by Jan 10, 2009, Prick Cheney to Afghanistan to look for Bin Laden on the front line with the USMC.
Posted by BajaJohn1 at 05:38 PM : Jul 27, 2008
Thats "GOOD OLE EDINTEX" to you Baja!
What type of policy papers are this administration reading? AEI? Heritage Foudation? The Krystols. Yeah... to the spreading of democracy. Next stop, Canada.
I agree, i hope this is only the beginning to start cleaning house and will continue to the highest levels.
Do not deceive yourself we have as much corruption as any other country.
Thank you republicans and democrats, you''''re the greatest!
Posted by tvtoy1000
I swear that this would be the funniest thing I''ve ever heard if only it wasn''t so da*n scary!
-
by Scooter68
July 29, 2008 5:14 PM PDT
- What makes this entire case so laughable is that that RICO law if used by Russian courts would close down most current Russian business because the Russian mafia has a strangle hold on businesses in that country. When the USSR collapsed the Mafia stood up and took over filling in the voids with their version of control.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 42 Comments