July 27, 2008
It's Time To Drill
The Weekly Standard: Democrats Are Losing The Fight Over Gas Prices, And They Know It
-
Photo
(iStockphoto)
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Water Shortage From Oil Spill
The oil spill in New Orleans, La. is affecting the public water supply. Five of the water intake stations were shut down as citizens are stocking up on bottled water. WWL's Bigad Shaban reports
-
Video
Energy Blowin' In The Wind
Al Gore says America needs to be free of foreign oil in 10 years, and billionaire oil man T. Boone Pickens talks to Harry Smith about the U.S. switching to wind power.
-
Video
Dow Takes Big Dip
The latest housing reports and higher oil prices brought Wall Street down this week. Jeff Glor reports.
-
Interactive
Gas Prices
State-by-state averages, tips to improve mileage and a look at what fuels prices at the pump.
Gas is still at $4 a gallon, but the good news is there's an emerging consensus on a measure that would help: Drill for more oil here at home. President Bush dropped the executive ban on offshore oil and natural gas exploration last week, and House GOP leader John Boehner plans to lead a congressional delegation to Colorado and Alaska to highlight America's abundant energy resources this week. Polls show more than two-thirds of the public support increased domestic energy exploration and production. Guess who stands in the way.
Congress has its own ban on offshore energy exploration, and the Democrats who run Congress have shown no sign that they are willing to follow Bush's example. They have preferred to make excuses--about why the price of oil is rising, who is to blame for its rise, and why increasing domestic supply won't do anything to ameliorate the problem.
It isn't working. Democrats are losing the fight over gas prices, and they know it, too.
They have slowly changed positions as the absurdity of their arguments has become clear. First they ignored the problem altogether. Earlier this summer, Senate Democrats wasted time debating a carbon cap-and-trade scheme that would have raised energy prices dramatically at a time when those prices were already at record highs. Cap and trade crashed and burned.
For a long while, Democrats simply blamed the oil companies for the spike in gasoline prices. They proposed new windfall profits taxes on "Big Oil," which would of course be passed on to the consumer, making gasoline even more expensive. They even threatened to sue OPEC. Nonstarters all. The price of oil didn't drop.|
Then the Democrats--and, to their discredit, plenty of Republicans--decided to scapegoat "speculators." The thinking here is that commodities traders have a financial interest in watching prices go up. Well, some do. Others--those betting prices will fall--do not. The fact that there are traders of oil futures has nothing to do with why those prices increase. The "speculators" just make bets on where the price of a commodity will be by a certain date. This year, the bets on higher oil prices have been good because the falling dollar, rising global demand, and political instability in the Middle East and Africa are driving the price of this particular commodity upward.
When ignorance and finger-pointing didn't work, Democrats dusted off the law of supply and demand. But they refused to acknowledge that one of the best ways to increase supply is to expand America's production capacity by opening new territory to exploration. Rather, they demanded that Bush release oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, forgetting that the reserve is called "strategic" for a reason. It's meant to be used in a national emergency. Bush has stopped new shipments to the reserve, increasing supply on the (microscopic) margins.
Meanwhile, New York senator Charles Schumer demanded that other oil-producing nations increase production in order to lower U.S. gas prices. If only the Saudis "produced half a million barrels more oil a day," Schumer said, "the price would come down a very significant amount." Maybe so. But why rely on the Saudis? Why not take steps to increase our own supply? Are we dependents?
The Democrats' next tack was to suggest that the oil companies are sitting on millions of acres of oil and not doing anything about it. Last week House Democrats tried to pass a "use it or lose it" law that would have denied federal land leases to oil companies if the companies couldn't demonstrate that they were producing energy on existing plots. The bill was rejected, and for good reasons. For one, there is already a "use it or lose it" provision in federal law. For another, the bill was premised on the idea that 4.8 million barrels of oil a day could be extracted from these "unused" lands. Boehner has asked Speaker Pelosi where this unsubstantiated statistic comes from. She hasn't said. That is because the number is a joke.
Finally, Democrats are attacking the pro-drilling folks for thinking ahead. Exploring deposits on the continental shelf "wouldn't produce a drop of oil for seven years or longer," wrote Senator Dianne Feinstein. Nobel laureate Al Gore said last week, "It is only a truly dysfunctional system that would buy into the perverse logic that the short-term answer to high gasoline prices is drilling for more oil ten years from now."
Leave aside, for a moment, the fact that no one is saying drilling is a short-term answer to the long-term energy challenge. Recall, instead, that Feinstein and Gore are simply echoing what critics say every time the drilling issue arises. Whether it is twenty or ten years ago or today, the answer is always, "You won't see anything for ten years." Okay, then. But if we had drilled ten years ago, wouldn't those supplies be on the market today?
No one pretends that drilling will solve all our problems overnight. But it will send a powerful signal to the markets that America is serious about energy and the global economy. It will send a signal that we are taking action, that we are not helpless. The 25-year boom of the 1980s and 1990s coincided with, and to an extent depended on, an era of cheap and plentiful energy. To get there again requires favoring the national interest over the parochial interests of environmentalists. No excuses. It's time to drill.
By Matthew Continetti
© 2008, News Corporations, Weekly Standard, All Rights Reserved.
| "Arguably the most influential opinion journal at the White House" - The New York Times For more information and to subscribe, click here. |




http://www.phoenixmotorcars.com/news-and-events/index.php
Our own Goverment is still paying people to keep their wells turned off FACT
If we have 70% of the worlds oil in our own country, let''s turn the wells back on and start drilling for more
Jesus, Republicans lie by reflex.
*********************************
LETS SEE NOW, THIS SEEMS LIKE A GOOD STATEMENT. AT SOME POINT IN TIME WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO BE DEPENDENT ON OUR COUNTRY. THAT BEING THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
WHAT IS SO WRONG WITH THAT???????
ANOTHER THING WE NEED TO DO IS REPEAL THE "NAFTA" LAW. IT IS KILLING US HERE IN THIS COUNTRY. WE SEE PEOPLE OUT OF WORK BY THE THOUSANDS. PLANTS CLOSING AND MOVING TO ANOTHER COUNTRY TO SET UP SHOP AND PAY ALMOST NOTHING FOR LABOR. THANKS TO MR. WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON WE ARE INVOLVED IN THIS MESS.
Gallup Daily: Obama 49%, McCain 40%
Third day with Obama holding a significant lead over McCain
%u2022 USA
%u2022 Election 2008
%u2022 Gallup Daily
%u2022 Americas
%u2022 Northern America
PRINCETON, NJ -- Barack Obama now leads John McCain among national registered voters by a 49% to 40% margin in Gallup Poll Daily tracking conducted July 24-26.
__________________________________________________________
July 26, 2008
Gallup Daily: Obama Retains Lead, 48% to 41%
Second day with Obama holding a significant lead over McCain
%u2022 USA
%u2022 Election 2008
%u2022 Gallup Daily
%u2022 Americas
%u2022 Northern America
PRINCETON, NJ -- Barack Obama has stretched his lead over John McCain among national registered voters to seven percentage points, 48% to 41%, in Gallup Poll Daily tracking conducted July 23-25.
__________________________________________________________
This is why McSame is becoming such a pathetic figure. Obama will beat him into the ground come November. And, McSame knows there isn''t anything he can do to stop it. McSame''s attacks will become even more negative as the election approaches. But, these attacks will only prove that McSame is devoid of any ideas as to how to clean up the mess left by the Bush/Cheney Administration. Obama 08!!!
Dems basically want higher gas prices for environmental reasons.
Reps want to open up American energy to lower prices. This includes offshore drilling, ANWR, oil shale, tar sands, nuclear, natural gas, and coal.
The same as the currrent war started by the same people, and then, came tho OIL embargo,
this same group of greed driven criminal conservatives, dismantled a very intelligent energy policy put into place by Jimmy Carter to make the USA energy independent.
we would be energy independent today, RIGHT NOW, BUT
FOR RONALD REAGAN and his conservative ilk,
these people are truely UnAmerican criminals
they belong in prison, Bush, cheney and McSame belong in prison for crimes against humanity
The Nannies like Nancy Pelosi want you to be green and clean, even if all your green is leaving your wallet or purse and sent overseas to buy more black, slimy, yucky, foreign, crude oil.
This little oversight will cost BHO the election.
If you think wind and solar is going to get your car down the road you are nieve, just like all liberals.
1981: Jim Carter signs the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) to allow future oil exploration and production in ANWR.
1982: Crude oil $31.83
1989: "We will be doing the country a serious disservice if we cast our vote on ANWR based upon the current price of oil. A much more relevant
question is what will be the price of oil in 10 years - the length of time it will
take to get the first drop." - Rep. Walter Jones, Sr. (D-NC)
1989: "Well, let me just explain to you...if you approved drilling in the Arctic slope today...it wouldn''t come online for 10 to 12 years."
- Rep. George Miller (D-CA)
1989: Crude oil $13.58
- Rep. Mo Udall (D-AZ)
1992: "You cannot get that oil out of ANWR quickly; it takes 10 to 15 years of extensive drilling to do that." - Rep. Phil Sharp (D-IN)
1992: "We should not forget that any jobs created by opening ANWR would not, for the most part, happen until sometime after 2000." - Rep Tim Wirth (D-CO)
1995: "For one thing, [they] assume that oil prices will be more than $30 a barrel in the year 2000. What are the chances of that? Right now the price of West Texas intermediate crude is $19.00 a barrel." - Bruce
Babbitt, Bill Clinton''s Interior Secretary.
2000: "[ANWR] would take 10 years to come on line and provide only a few month''s worth of energy supply for this country." - Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR)
2005: "It will open [ANWR] to oil and gas drilling all for the sake of a 6-month supply of oil that will not even be available for 10 years." - Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)
2005: "Drilling in ANWR will do little to reduce our current dependence on foreign oil because it will take more than 10 years, yes, more than 10 years to process what little oil may be there." Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-CA)
2008: "It is well known on both sides that it will take eight to 10 years before any oil could be produced in ANWR."- Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM)
2008: Crude oil $147.30
could, otherwise get the oil much sooner. It only took three years to build the entire Alaska pipeline.
For instance, "California''s 10 billion barrels in offshore oil could be brought to market in as little as a year "if the moratorium were lifted," according to a recent Sanford C. Bernstein report said, citing that the oil is under shallow water and drilling platforms already exist."
Posted by unmunificent
______________________
(CORRECTION)
Right, the Dems are backed by the tree huggers. They better not let us drill or they will lose.
If Pelosi and Reid are leadership, wow, my dog is smarter than either one of them.
Right, the Dems are backed by the tree huggers. They better not let us drill or they will lose.
If Pelosi and Reid are leadership, wow, my dog is smarter than either one of them.
Posted by Platteman at 09:41 AM : Jul 28, 2008
Scorched earth policy maker...
more: "a majority (54%) of Americans do not see more drilling as a solution to high gas prices. Instead, the public overwhelmingly believes (76% to 19%) that policymakers should focus on investing in new energy technologies including renewable fuels and more efficient vehicles rather than expanding exploration and drilling for more oil."
We always knew the Weakly Standard was unAmerican. Nice little confirmation there.
Translation in ''ordinary-speak'': "Just... one... more... hit... I...can... beat... this.... I''m... not... addicted"
and may not e even that
we need new technology, we need to make each individual home an energy producer,
we have a problem because greed driven conservatives only look for profit in their world and greed driven corporations produce all the energy, we have to pay them,
put solar panels on every home
I think there entire staff must be made up of bitter old ladies on menopause.
Oil on the Brain
Start Drilling
Just like we cut down
most of the Redwood trees
& used them for fence posts;
we are burning this
valuable substance away.
Future generations
will wonder in disbelief
that we wasted this
fundamental polymer
chemical building block
lighting bonfires in
ineffient internal
combustion engines !!
"Arguably the most idiotic opinion journal at the White House" - The New York Times
thanks,
peter
what americans really hate is standing in line for 5 dollars a gallon gas,
because of the greed driven conservatives
--------------------------
Matthew C. either does not know, or choses to ignore, that there is no law that mandates that the oil from offshore drilling will go to the American consumer.
For example, the oil from the Alaska Pipeline is largely destined for Asian markets. Another reason for not opening the leases for drilling is that the USA refining capability is full up. We have not built a new refinery since the 1970s. Unless we cure these two problems, new drilling will not help us at all.
Yet, all of the neoCONS are trying to make drilling an issue.
Hundreds of thousands of US acres are leased for oil yet they sit idle. Drill on them first, then when all of those leases are drilled, then we can talk about off-shore drilling.
I believe T. Boone Pickens before I believe any Repug!
The Grand Oil Party set this up 8 years ago when they invited the oil corporations to write the energy policy. Oh they also gave tax breaks to the brainless morons to buy Hummers (for their right wing buddies at GM).
Now you want to drill and cook the planet. How stupid is that?
It''s important to remember that oil is used for plastics, asphalt, tires, the list seems endless. A lot of folks will be out of work without the golden black liquid. It''s not as easy as some here would make it seem.
Why deplete our last native oil reserves just so the Chinese can have cheaper, more plentiful gas?
This may sound crazy to a lot of you younger people, but it worked then and very well.
Something like this might not work now days but it is worth talking about.
We are sure headed for a deep abyss if something is not done. People are losing work
they are losing their homes, and going down hill in general.
This may sound crazy to a lot of you younger people, but it worked then and very well.
Something like this might not work now days but it is worth talking about.
We are sure headed for a deep abyss if something is not done. People are losing work
they are losing their homes, and going down hill in general.
Solar,wind,conservation,
anyone that thinks drilling anywhere in the US is going
to make any noticeable difference is stupid,
thats like thinking there will be some big change if the republicons stay in office,
Drilling will make a lot of the wealthy , richer, and of course, that is just what the republicons want
-
by dashortround
July 29, 2008 5:24 PM PDT
- 1) Drill like crazy on US soil
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 44 Comments2) Sell all of that oil to China
3) Pay oil company stockholders around the globe big dividends
4) Repeat as needed until all US reserves are drained dry
It''s simply "The Republican Way". Business as usual.