Tasered Grandpa Sues Hospital
Ohio Man, 67, Claims Guards Got Outraged Over What He Meant As Joke
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Hospital Tasers Sr. Citizen
Exclusive: A reverend claims his behavior at a hospital did not warrant staff removing him, beating him and using a taser to subdue him. Harry Smith talks to Rev. Al Poisson and his lawyer.
-
-
Photo
Video, taken by security cameras, showing incident involving Al Poisson (CBS/EARLY SHOW)
-
Photo
Al Poission on The Early Show Friday (CBS/EARLY SHOW)
-
Much of the incident was caught by surveillance cameras.
Al Poisson, 67, says he was visiting a friend in St. Vincent Mercy Medical Center a year ago and was in a very good mood when he came upon a glum-looking guard and joked with him.
"I said (to the guard), 'Are you happy today?' Poisson told Early Show co-anchor Harry Smith Friday. "He said, 'Yeah.' I said, 'Well, you oughta tell your face!' "
Poisson added that, "It went downhill from there" and turned into an "atrocious, unbelievable situation, to say the least."
The guards wound up taking Poisson outside the building, where they used a taser and/or stun gun on him, dropping him to his knees and, he says, beat, kicked and "manhandled" him when he was down.
It all happened in front of Poisson's son and Poisson's six-year-old grandson.
The Web site of CBS affiliate WTOL-TV in Toledo cites Poisson's lawsuit as claiming Poisson's son pleaded with the guards to stop because Poisson has a bad heart
The Web site also says a police report quotes the security guards as asserting that Poisson provoked them and that, once outside, Poisson elbowed one guard and tried to pull his hair while on the ground.
The guards called Toledo police and had Poisson arrested for alleged assault, but those charges have since been dropped.
Poisson says he used to go to St. Vincent's regularly to pray with patients, but no longer can cope with doing that. He also says he's had to give up his duties at a local soup kitchen that's since closed.
Poisson is seeking punitive damages of an unspecified amount, along with damages for pain, suffering, medical expenses and lost income. The lawsuit also says the hospital doesn't train its security personnel properly.
St. Vincent's issued a statement saying, "According to our policy regarding physical aggression, the use of a taser is warranted if someone attempts to physically attack a staff member, patient or visitor. We conducted an internal review of this incident that determined the response to the aggression was appropriate."
"That's not true at all," Poisson responded to Smith when the statement was read.
Copyright MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 108 Comments1. Poisson needs to realize that the time of "kidding around" even verbally with people who have weapons of any sort is long gone
2. The hospital should also be sued for lying and trying to cover for their guards
3. At no point should anything or anyone be taken off camera or out of a building to deal with as this is a clear indication they are trying to do something illegal or contrary to rules outside of surveillance.
4. The hospital should not be sued simply for failure to train their guards--by virtue of how they were allowed to act, they should also be sued for failing to monitor and screen the guards.
Giving people the legitimate means to harm others as part of their job is a very dangerous thing--companies must make sure those they give that power to would act appropriately at all times and not abuse that power.
Finally, Poisson should ask for a jury trial. Most of the public is tired of all this excess "tazing" for stupid reasons, that involve no criminal activity.
then sue them personally.
it seems to be the only defense against the loose fingered taser patrols these days.
Posted by luvNY at 10:21 AM : Jul 25, 2008
________
Of course he''ll win... he''s white. Our justice system works well for them, but just ask any person of color.
these devices should be completely banned ... for everyone ... including the highest levels of law enforcement.
use of this device against someone should be viewed as torture ... w/ appropriate criminal and financial recourse against them for it''s use.
absolutely shameful! we are living in a police state ... where the presumption of innocence has been sorrowfully lost.
Spoken like a true racist.
These tools are very beneficial to law enforcement when used proplerly and are used so deadly force isn''t required. They have their place in law enforcement. I would bet he ends up owning the hospital.
-----------
Unlikely. Bumpkins from Ohio aren''t that impressive.
I''ll bet Gramps doesn''t shoot his mouth off anymore.
However, the severity of the attack was unwarranted and I smell money for Gramps.
these devices should be completely banned ... for everyone ... including the highest levels of law enforcement.
use of this device against someone should be viewed as torture ... w/ appropriate criminal and financial recourse against them for it''''s use.
absolutely shameful! we are living in a police state ... where the presumption of innocence has been sorrowfully lost.
okey doke, Bob..
Police use batons,they are sued.Police interrogate someone too long while waiting for their attorney,they are sued.
Police use a weapon that is non-lethal except in rare cases (and those deaths often involved people who are high on drugs,so they''re near death anyway),they''re sued.
Shall police just talk a lot,and try to "defuse" situations that way?They do,someone is killed or hurt prior to all that "talking",police are sued.
I guess you''re among those who believe it''s better for a law enforcement officer to die than risk ANY injury to some supposed innocent. Liberal equivocation gone wild!
if what your saying is true then law enforcement definately needs improvement where you are at. I always believed in the motto To Protect and Serve
I think bob just doesn''t have a lot of knowledge about the use of these tools. I would give him the benefit of the doubt.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by DaVicar2 at 11:35 AM : Jul 25, 2008
------------
Again, unlikely. I live in Ohio. The natives are a bunch of petty sissies, particularly south of Toledo and east of Cincinnati.
I''m guessing both parties learned a lesson...Gramps knows not to shoot off his mouth and the hospital just might take a closer look at its hiring practices.
Dont TAZE Grandpa!
The question is are we moving to a police state where citizens should refrain from making eye contact with "authority figures" whether they are rent a cops or airline stewardesses?
As customers and clients we must expect respect from any authority figure whether it be law enforcement or security guards or airline TSA.
Posted by sociald63 at 12:07 PM : Jul 25, 2008
Look at the picture. The man is white. The guard was probably black.
If the idiots who run the place think this was "appropriate" they should be tasered themeselves, or tarred and feathered. There is no way tasering this man was justified, then to defend the incident, is unbelievable. Incredible!
If Administrators at St. Vincent''s Mercy believe this incident was ok, then they cannot be trusted for anything -- particularly your healthcare. People in this community would be wise to seek medical services elsewhere.
Hell, yeah! I would too, get off me you lame *** jerk-offs!
I thought that people had to be trained or certified to carry a Tazer. I thought they would have to take a dose of the Tazer JUST SO THEY WOULD UNDERSTAND WHY IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED IN SITUATIONS WHEN ALL OTHER OPTIONS ARE EXHAUSTED.
You GO, Grampa. Sue the C*R*A*P* out of them.
[Posted by monkfellow at 11:40 AM : Jul 25, 2008]
supposed innocent? how about presummed innocent ... does that phrase ring a bell ... are are you one of those who believes everyone should be completely and totally subserviant to anyone w/ a uniform and a weapon ... regardless of whether they''re right or wrong?
their role is to ''protect and serve'' ... and it looks like fewer and fewer of them understand the meaning of this.
officers jobs are inherently dangerous ... they should know that when they decide to do that job. they''ll have to deal w/ the problems (and problematic individuals) that others can''t or won''t deal with. it''s a not a tool to use so you don''t scuff your shoes and soil your uniform. it''s likely you''ll deal with problem cases and get injured in the process of mitigating these situations.
there''s a famous quote from English jurist William Blackstone "Better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer" ... it''s known as the ''blackstone ratio'' ... and it''s taught in law schools across the western world as a fundamental principle of law.
apparently you think differently than what the jurisprudence of the western legal world promotes and teaches to it''s recruits as dogma.
[Posted by patriot12436 at 11:44 AM : Jul 25, 2008]
i actually know quite a bit about these devices ... since they come up periodically in cases exactly like this ... where it''s abused ... and everyone argues that''s it serves good elsewhere.
i''ve read the studies that claim signifigant reduction in injuries associated w/ the interaction between officers and suspects ... with signifigant reductions in officer injuries when the have the taser.
i also know that they''re now selling these devices to anyone at all ... without any training in it''s use ... and no awareness of what''s it''s like to be on the receiving end of this. they''re using a ''tupperware party'' model to promote them.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/06/25/earlyshow/main4207156.shtml?source=search_story
get ready for many more stories of the abuse of this device ... which should be completely banned across the board due to failure of only a few ... to use it responsibly.
officers jobs are inherently dangerous ... they should know that when they decide to do that job. they''''ll have to deal w/ the problems (and problematic individuals) that others can''''t or won''''t deal with. it''''s a not a tool to use so you don''''t scuff your shoes and soil your uniform. it''''s likely you''''ll deal with problem cases and get injured in the process of mitigating these situations.
Well,it''s pretty obvious you''ve had problems with the criminal justice system,and that''s your business.But, in this day and age when the criminal element has a legal "green light" to proclaim "I''ll sue" for about anything, then, yes, I think officers have the right to protect themselves..despite your stupid and snotty comment about getting their uniforms soiled.Since you have apparent superior intellegence about the role law enforcement plays and what "risks" officers in the middle of American cities should anticipate and expect, including their own deaths, let''s see you take the training and put on the "unsoiled" uniform, and hit the street,and confront criminals in the middle of the night,instead of snoozing away comfy in your bed.Again, there''s more here from you that we don''t need to know about,but such anti-law enforcement invective should not and will not be ignored.
People better start getting p!ssed before it''s completly game over for all civil and human rightsin this country. The bill of rights has been torn to pieces, minus D.C.''s second Amendment ruling.
Posted by patriot04321 at 01:20 PM : Jul 25, 2008
----------------------
I agree. The best source for unbiased information on tasers would be the company that makes and markets them. Also, obviously, self proclaimed "patriots" never lie. Just because this one is the 4321st doesn''t mean he/she is as credible as the number 1 patriot. No offense to my transgender friends with the use of the term "he/she".
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 108 Comments