Republicans Defeat Gas Price Relief Bill
Democrats Claimed Releasing 70 Million Barrels Of Oil Would Loosen National Stockpile And Bring Down Prices
-
Photo
(CBS/iStockphoto)
-
Interactive
Gas Prices
State-by-state averages, tips to improve mileage and a look at what fuels prices at the pump.
Democrats promised that the action would have produced immediate relief at the pump, as was the case with similar releases in 1991, 2000 and 2005. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve now holds about 700 million barrels.
Despite winning a clear 268-157 majority, the measure still lost. Democratic leaders had brought the proposal up for debate under rules requiring a two-thirds vote to pass.
But passing the bill by just a majority would have meant allowing Republicans to force a vote on new offshore drilling leases.
"They're hiding from a vote," said GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio. "They're scared to death to allow us to ... force their members to vote on drilling."
Democrats said the release from the oil reserve could provide relief at the pump within two weeks, though they would not say how much it would help $4-per-gallon gas. Earlier releases, such as a 34 million barrel drawdown in 1991 during the Persian Gulf War, caused prices to fall.
As debate began, the White House threatened a veto. "Rather than drawing down a strategic reserve intended to protect our nation's energy security from a severe supply disruption, Congress should pass legislation to increase domestic oil supply," the White House said in a statement.
Across the Capitol, political squabbling promised to doom a Senate bill that would curb the kind of speculation in the oil markets that many people believe is partly responsible for the increases in oil prices.
Republicans appeared unlikely to agree to cut off debate and move the measure to a final vote. They complained that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., had blocked them from offering amendments.
The result of all of the political maneuvering is that Congress will adjourn for a five-week vacation without having passed into law any response to high gas prices since legislation in May that required President Bush to suspend filling the reserve.
Republicans believe they are gaining the political upper hand because of Democrats' refusal to allow new drilling in the Outer Continental Shelf. Democrats said they have not seen any erosion in their standing with voters and say it allows them to cast Republicans as doing the bidding of big oil companies.
"This is an issue that the Republicans have latched onto in the absence of any other issue they have to talk about," said the House's second-ranking Democrat, Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland. "Not the economy, not Iraq, not foreign policy ... it's the only issue they have."
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 6
- next
See all 265 CommentsOh ... yeah ... they need to drive up gas prices to try and force the democrats hands.
And now ... they can force the issue and if anything goes wrong they can blame the next administration which is looking more and more like a democratic one.
If Americans spends the same amount of money in subsidies and tax-breaks for alternate sources of energy over the next 10 years instead of giving it to the immoral oil industry, America will be that much better off. We cannot drill ourselves to self-sufficiency, but the oil industry wants to keep America dependent on their drug. The Democrats need to hold off this attempt to give our last reserves to Big Oil and hopefully in November America and the world will have true leaders that will make us energy independent. This will never occur if we let oil lead the way.
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING !! !! !!
Vote more out this November.
It''s time for America to accomplish the simple things if life.
YES IT IS !!!!!!!!!!!!
How anyone could be a Republican is beyond me...and I also find it typical of the COSNERVATIVE media to bury this story halfway down the headlines.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by afmca at 08:20 PM
Isn''t interesting how we pay for the gas companies through our taxes to turn around and extort more money from us?
Another STUPID idea, at best the price goes down a few cents for a brief period- that''s a 3 day supply- drop in the bucket!
Meanwhile, that would eventually have to be REPLACED and using what was probably $40 a barrel oil to drop a few cents for a week or two, it will have to be replaced later with $150 a barrel oil, what a freaking STUPID idea!
RepubliCONS don''t want to work with Democrats or assure Americans have affordable gasoline, so: they vote to defeat the bill!
Democrats don''t want RepubliCONS to get any credit for taking any action (whether it''s good or not), so: they act to see RepubliCONS don''t get a chance to vote on offshore drilling!
Mr. Bush doesn''t want the public to have affordable gas and wants to blame Congress for it so: he criticizes them for not allowing the vote on drilling!
And, so it goes! Our government at it''s worst!
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:11:02
The Tintomara and the Mel Oliver collided on the Mississippi
A tanker and a barge have collided on the Mississippi river, spilling thousands of gallons of oil resulting in the closure of the waterway.
The accident took place on Wednesday when the 600-foot tanker Tintomara rammed into the 61-foot barge, the Mel Oliver, carrying 9,983 barrels of fuel oil (more than 400,000 gallons) north of the bridges that connect downtown New Orleans to the west bank of the Mississippi.
The double-hulled tanker Tintomara was loaded with about 4.2 million gallons of biodiesel and nearly 1.3 million gallons of styrene, but did not leak, said Michael Wilson, president of ship management company Laurin Maritime (America) Inc.
The tar-like fuel oil spilled from the barge, forming the slick and closing about 47 miles of river, Coast Guard spokeswoman Lt. Cdr. Cheri Ben-Iesau said.
"It''s not the largest spill we''ve ever had, but it''s a large one," said Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality spokesman Rodney Mallett after visiting the scene.
According to local officials, the river could remain closed for several days, and full cleanup could take even weeks.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by dittomom1
***********************
And you, are a Limbaugh worshipping idiot!
Is that what that old Oxyconton popping right wing fat a** told you to say today while he was thinking for you?
Unless they know something the public doesn''t---like they are going to ''rig'' voting machines all across the country to hang onto their seats---they stand to suffer a defeat of historical measure!
This being the case, any SANE party would have worked with the other side this Spring to get legislation passed in order to at least look like they were trying to do their jobs, but not this group of ''CONS!
I''ll be interested to see how many of these defeated ''CONS express surprise when they get ''the boot''!?
No ditto Rush Limbaugh leach. The oil was in the earth long before private capitalist profiteers came along and mismanaged one of earths resources on behalf of the God of private profit maximizing.
That is what defines an anti-social personality disorder. No remorse. Of course it''s these same sociopaths that are more than ready to execute lower functioning sociopaths perhaps in an attempt to atone for their own subhuman deficiencies.
Posted by fairbalance2 at 09:28 PM : Jul 24, 200
----------------------
Wrong, my friend! They are not beholden to the ''extreme environmentalist''---as you put it.
1. Because they don''t have a lot of ''extreme DOLLAR$'' to give the Democrats in ''campaign contributions''!
What they do have is a legitimate point: that massive destruction of the environment is not feasible to survival! It''s a pretty persuasive argument!
2. Democrats don''t generally refuse money from oil companies, either! But, they cannot exceed a certain point when it comes to giving oil companies what they want!
Posted by l8c6 at 10:04 PM : Jul 24, 2008
--------------
I believe a LOT of people would agree with you.
Their actions tend to support your suggestion.
Man....McBush is exhausting to listen to. It''s like DickBush all over again.
If you like the high price of gas thank a Republican.
Posted by bullyforhim
Yes, bullies and hypocrites are a bad thing and an abomination in the eyes of God.
Posted by bullyforhim
Yes, that would be a very bad thing if public lands were turned over to private interests for profit. It would result in the ongoing enslavement of most people to the slave owners. It is a bad thing period. It truly is a bad thing and the masses of people need to put an end to the privateers, the antiquated bas*tards who ruled the old european world which this nation WAS NOT FOUNDED ON. Privatization is against democracy.
These Nazis ain''t stupid, just Criminal and Greedy....
various comments
Posted by dittomom1 at 09:22 PM : Jul 24, 2008
------------------
WOW! Too much to comment on, so I''ll do a couple:
1. The industrial revolution was made possible by a lot MORE than the oil industry!
2. Our style of life is dependent on---to some degree---but NOT determined by big oil!
3. Yes, I agree, at times the oil companies have acted immorally.
4. No, I disagree, there ARE technologies that WILL replace oil.
5. No, we do not have a supply of oil that makes us independent. Ultimately, we run out!
6. Some oil spills are seepage, all the big environmentally damaging ones, were a result
of human neglect!
7. The oil in the Arctic is being claimed by many countries, it''s not ALL ours!
8. You say, ''IF'' drilling would put money in the pockets of oil company execs..., the last
time I looked, oil execs were being paid millions of dollars a year! I''d say they''re doing OK!
9. You insinuate the gains of drilling exceed the losses! I suggest the losses WILL exceed the
any temporary gains achieved!
10. If anyone is brainwashed, political morons---it''s not US! Take care!
IT''S A DEMOCRAT DO NOTHING CONGRESS!!
sheez....
sheez....
Posted by hadenough43 at 10:41 P
The republicans blocked the effort by congress you moron. hehe...
Posted by dmw1167 at 10:41 P
Wow, you''re a huge moron!
Let''s just go over the numbers one more time:
Senate:
49 republicans
49 democratics
2 independents
tiebreaking vote: republican vice president.
House:
200 Republicans
235 Democratics
288 amount of votes needed for republican presidential veto override.
Whose in control of the congress?
Oh, and thank YOU, republicons, for using the last eight years to destroy our military readiness by involving us in multiple front, pointless foreign wars, destroying the economy, and basically turning the USA into a world-wide laughingstock.
You morons aren''t patriots. You''re traitors. Time for you to go. Your time is over. You''re done.
Time for a change.
Posted by IRLiberal
----------------
Can you recognize facetiouness when you see it??
Posted by hadenough43 at 10:45 PM
Some of the things the repubs say are so patently ridiculous it''s hard to tell!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by actornaught at 10:50 PM : Jul 24, 2008
+ report abuse
Even the Criminal Corporate MSM has alluded to at least 15 to 20 seats, but some sources place the figure much higher. I believe the 86% of Americans saying the Nation is going in the wrong direction under the Neocons as a good indication of a possible Blow-Out Massacre of Historical Preportions.
Posted by dmw1167 at 10:41 P
Wow, you''''re a huge moron!
Let''''s just go over the numbers one more time:
Senate:
49 republicans
49 democratics
2 independents
tiebreaking vote: republican vice president.
House:
200 Republicans
235 Democratics
288 amount of votes needed for republican presidential veto override.
Whose in control of the congress?
Oh, and thank YOU, republicons, for using the last eight years to destroy our military readiness by involving us in multiple front, pointless foreign wars, destroying the economy, and basically turning the USA into a world-wide laughingstock.
You morons aren''''t patriots. You''''re traitors. Time for you to go. Your time is over. You''''re done.
Time for a change.
Posted by IRLiberal
Thanks, if our media were for the people and by the people, such truths would be clearly illustrated. But since our media is a pimp/hoe machine it keeps a constant dribble of conflicted babble spewing to the people. The owners of the media may call themselves patriotic americans but they are neither for not bringing news and information clear and transparent for the people of this nation to see. The internet has been their worst nightmare and they are aggressively working to privatize it and control its content. Corporate privatization is un-American and against the interest of democracy.
Whats the current outlook for how many more ''''pubs will be voted out of congress this fall?
Repigs expected to lose 5 or 6 Senate seats, and 25 - 35 seats in the House. I personally expect 6 or 7 Senate seats, and 45 seats in the House. Until this happens, God will not be blessing America for awhile.
Posted by vnveteran72
We can hope but constitution hating elite oligarchs do not release their power easy and they pay their hoes well.
Nobody is.
Posted by dmw1167
Lieberhoe is not a democrat and the truth is, there are many more like him calling themselves democrat.
Conservatives are conservative with everyone but themselves and many who assign themselves to the right wing ideology will lose in the long run, if not them their children and grandchildren. Republican ideology leads to oligarchy and the old european world of private kingdoms and stifled advancement.
The republican answer to environmental problems? Denial!
McCain''s answer to his memory problems around the surge? Obfuscate, obfuscate, obfuscate.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 6
- next
See all 265 Comments