NEW YORK, July 24, 2008

Newspaper Profits Plummet; Future Bleak

Drop In Ad Revenue Worst Since Great Depression; May Get Worse

  •  (CBS/iStockphoto)

(AP)  Regional and national newspaper publishers, already staggering with a drop in ad revenue more severe than the industry has seen since the Great Depression, say the second half of 2008 may be even worse.

Three publishers - McClatchy Co., Lee Enterprises Inc. and E.W. Scripps Co. - reported Thursday that their profits had fallen by nearly half in the second quarter compared to last year.

They joined industry heavyweights New York Times Co. and Gannet Co., which reported earnings Wednesday and last week, in saying double-digit drops in ad revenue were most to blame for plunging profits, though rising costs played a role too.

All five publishers said ad revenue fell fastest in June, and most said July is looking as bad or worse.

"It really shows we haven't yet reached a bottom for revenue declines," said Mike Simonton, a media analyst with Fitch Ratings.

Also Thursday, new government unemployment figures and housing market data from the National Association of Realtors offered gloomier portraits of the economy than expected. All the reports buffeted an industry reeling from almost daily announcements of layoffs and other cost-cutting measures that continued this week.

Thursday afternoon, The Copley Press Inc., parent company of the San Diego Union-Tribune, where the work force was cut 10 percent this year, announced it was exploring a sale. Executives cited the impact of the housing slump and falling ad revenue as the two main factors in the company's decision.

E.W. Scripps, the newspaper and broadcast TV company, which spun off its Internet and cable divisions on July 1, warned Thursday that its third-quarter earnings would fall short of analysts' expectations. After it reviews the fair value of its assets, the company said, it may post a non-cash charge to reflect how far the value has fallen.

Rich Boehne, chief executive of E.W. Scripps, told analysts in a conference call the company was surprised at the severity of the economic downturn, especially in California and Florida. Those two states have been slammed by the housing slump, and national home sales data released Thursday showed the market worsened last month.

E.W. Scripps, in its final combined earnings report, said newspaper revenue fell 13 percent, to $144 million, and profits dropped to $16.3 million. It expects another 13 percent to 15 percent decline in newspaper revenue in the third-quarter.

In contrast, its online and cable operations, now separately known as Scripps Networks Interactive Inc., saw ad revenue rise 13 percent in the second quarter and profits rise nearly 10 percent.

McClatchy Co., whose papers include The Miami Herald and The Sacramento Bee, said Thursday the market for ad spending will not improve until the current economic slump abates.

"Whether revenues improve from recent trends depends upon the direction of the overall economy," Chairman and Chief Executive Gary Pruitt said in a statement.

The Sacramento-based publisher's second-quarter earnings tumbled 44 percent as ad revenue continued to shrink in the company's key markets. Net income slid to $19.7 million. Adjusted to exclude one-time items, the profit fell to $17.3 million, or 21 cents per share, matching the average estimate of analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial.

Revenue dropped 16 percent to $489.7 million and missed Wall Street's projection of $495 million. Advertising revenue fell 17 percent, circulation revenue 5 percent.

Ad sales "continued to be hurt by the weak economy and the secular shift in advertising to the internet," Pruitt said.

The earnings decline was more pronounced at Lee Enterprises Inc., where profit tumbled 87 percent to $2.8 million, or 6 cents per share, in its fiscal third quarter. Excluding one-time charges, partly to write down the declining implied value of its newspaper brands, Lee earned $12.6 million, or 28 cents per share, down 44 percent from the third quarter of 2007. Revenue fell 8 percent to $256.4 million. Davenport, Iowa-based Lee counts the St. Louis Post-Dispatch among its 50 daily papers.

Each publisher reported the sharpest ad declines in classifieds, with job ads faring worst as employers cut hiring. Data released Thursday showed a bigger-than-expected increase in jobless claims for the last week.

While the economy is a major factor hurting advertising, the revenue won't magically reappear when the economy recovers, analysts said.

"The pressure from the shift toward Internet advertising makes it unlikely that classified and other categories will rebound in an upturn," Simonton said.

He praised McClatchy's and Times Co.'s hikes in online ad revenue beyond 12 percent of total revenue. In addition to trimming costs, the publishers' strategy, to varying degrees, has been to invest in increasing online ad sales.

But Simonton said even the best online ad growth rates seen so far won't offset the decline in print advertising.

McClatchy is eliminating 1,400 jobs, or about 10 percent of its staff, and said Thursday that its board will review the company's dividend policy when it meets this quarter.

The Times Co. announced 100 newsroom layoffs at its flagship paper this year. Smaller newspapers around the country, including most recently the Santa Fe New Mexican and Portland Press Herald, are also cutting scores of jobs, while The Los Angeles Times, owned by Chicago-based Tribune Co., is trimming 250.

It was Tribune CEO Sam Zell who - during a talk Tuesday with staffers nationwide - reportedly likened the current advertising downturn to the impact the industry felt from the Great Depression, though he implied that his company wouldn't see many more cuts.

The major costs hitting publishers are in distribution and newsprint. Scores of papers have reduced their newsprint consumption, by trimming the number or size of pages they print, to offset prices that have jumped in the past year. Media General Corp. and McClatchy both said they expect still higher newsprint prices in the second half.

More papers are also seeking distribution agreements to help with rising fuel prices. The New York Post and New York Daily News, fierce tabloid rivals, said even they are exploring a cooperation agreement with The Wall Street Journal, which is owned by News Co., along with the Post.

"It is difficult to remove a commensurate level of costs to keep up with the pace of advertising revenue declines," Simonton said. "There is enough uncertainty that we are pretty cautious about the rest of the year."


© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 22 Comments
by wl7bzh July 27, 2008 5:08 PM EDT
Lemmie see,

by the time the paper hits my front porch, by internet standards, the news is old. Then again, there is the weekend edition the local telemarketing lady calls during dinner asking me to buy.

Weekend edition is more expensive and is full of junk mail/advertisements and again the news is outdated.

All the trees cut down in one year to print all the daily papers gets expensive in many ways.

Sorry telemarketing lady I can''t afford your outdated service. Did I mention my dinner is getting cold?
Reply to this comment
by keithle1 July 27, 2008 2:19 PM EDT
Maybe some newspapers will stop putting out a paper on Saturdays. It''s not worth it. Money loser. Nobody reads it.

People still like to get the Sunday paper (NY TIMES) & lie around & read it. But the heyday of newspapers is over & it''s not coming back. WASH POST has offered buyouts to quite a few of their writers including one of their film critics.

Anyone thinking about a career as a newspaperman might want to think about getting into TV news instead.
Reply to this comment
by wardoglrs July 27, 2008 4:09 AM EDT
This should help us to let them Neo Cons know that we are stronger, If we all work together we can take on the world for the better. Then show them who rules
Reply to this comment
by emperorlotku July 26, 2008 1:48 AM EDT
Oh no, How will I Keep up with Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan and Brad/Angelina without the insightful coverage by my local newspaper?
Reply to this comment
by dougmsbbs July 25, 2008 10:31 PM EDT
my2centss, you are on to it! The papers are killing themselfs by being biased, and not reporting news, instead pushing thier own ideas. People arn''t stupid, and they are getting fed up with it.
I have seen a report where media people were asked who they are contributing money to, and it came back 100 to 1 Obama. No bias? Give me a break. Let them all go bust and we can get our news, from all points of view, from the internet.
Reply to this comment
by my2centss July 25, 2008 9:44 PM EDT
Do I want to buy a newspaper and hear all about Obama, without actually telling you what he stands for? No thanks, I will just read free ads for him here for free.
Reply to this comment
by libsluv2spit July 25, 2008 5:17 PM EDT
WOULD I pay a buck for the LA Times or read the same things on a bathroom walls for free.

These liberal newspaper had taken the wrong issues and are promoting these issues..AND NOBODY IS BUYING IT...end of story
Reply to this comment
by petro49l July 25, 2008 3:40 PM EDT
Newspapers made the mistake of printing national and international reports. Those topics are better for magazines. Also, newspapers reluctantly publish on the Internet. Smart strategies are the exclusive coverage of area stories and producing an updated website.
Reply to this comment
by whitemale08 July 25, 2008 12:24 PM EDT
Newspapers need to go anyways.

All they do is lie, lie, lie. Lie about everything from WMD''s to 911, to "let''s go to war with Iran"

I never learned anythiing about what the private "Federal Reserve System" is up to, or who the real enemy is.

Now watch Newspapers ask for a taxpayer bailout like Chrysler or Fannie and Freddie.

I''m telling you folks, we do not live in a "free market system", we live under a "Federal Reserve System" whose founding banks like JP Morgan are the underwriters of all of these major newspapers.

It''s sickening.
Reply to this comment
by whatsup49 July 25, 2008 12:00 PM EDT
there will always be some kind of print newspaper, i believe, but i''m glad i am not in the business anymore. the hearst newspaper where i once worked, and was laid off from in the early 1990s, recently laid off 4 people in its accounting department, and prior to that, escorted several out of the building who worked in other departments. if print news does go away, it will be a sad day.
Reply to this comment
by slim1h2o July 25, 2008 11:07 AM EDT
Sorry, I don''t agree with some of you peoples glee, on the demise of our newspapers.

We can not remain free as a nation, without an effective free press!

It''s too bad that we haven''t had an effective press for some time now.
Reply to this comment
by thisandthat1 July 25, 2008 5:30 AM EDT
Anyone in this country who is working at a print newspaper and isn''t actively looking for another line of work ... is an idiot, plain and simple. Ten years from now, there will be NO newspapers left. Blame technology, but more and more people will be getting all their news online in the future. Back in the early 1900''s , the best wagon wheel makers were left out in the cold when the automobile was invented.
Reply to this comment
by shanev137 July 25, 2008 5:09 AM EDT
90% of all "journalism" out there is C-R-A-P.

uh...geee...it''s no wonder that people aren''t paying to read *** anymore....plus there''s as much *** as you want to read on the internet....FOR FREE.

It''s a freaken no-brainer.
Reply to this comment
by deacon20081 July 25, 2008 2:59 AM EDT
The News Papers have no one to blame but themselves.
I ran a four day ad for a job opening.....it cost me nearly $400.00. Too much for too little....for too long.
Reply to this comment
by randynason July 25, 2008 2:41 AM EDT
Newspaper, internet news- What''s the difference? Personally, I prefer to listen to NPR, AAR and BBC for my news. That way, I know it''s liberal and true.
Reply to this comment
by ragnar30066 July 25, 2008 1:26 AM EDT
That''s really too bad about the newspapers. I remember back when I was young that they were the primary source of news and information for discerning adults. That''s back before they began taking sides politically, and became thinly concealed propaganda vehicles.

So what are we going to use to start campfires and wrap fish?
Reply to this comment
by oneamerican_ July 25, 2008 1:15 AM EDT
Why pay for the cow when you can get your milk for free?

Goodbye, New York Times!
Reply to this comment
by irliberal July 25, 2008 12:43 AM EDT
Printed newspapers are a horrendous waste of paper, ink and trees as well as fuel to deliver. More people read the articles they want, ad free on the web.

Print papers will eventually go the way of the trolly.

Posted by newster1

Agreed on all points. DOWN WITH NEWSPAPERS!
Reply to this comment
by l8c6 July 25, 2008 12:35 AM EDT
Printed newspapers are a horrendous waste of paper, ink and trees as well as fuel to deliver. More people read the articles they want, ad free on the web.

Print papers will eventually go the way of the trolly.

Posted by newster1

Ad free? A shame that isn''t the case. So many ads on the internet pop up with the aggression of the porn industry... likely now a subsidiary of the "mainstream" at this point, to actually interfere with the viewers ability to read the article.
Reply to this comment
by nothappyatall July 25, 2008 12:17 AM EDT
Printed newspapers are a horrendous waste of paper, ink and trees as well as fuel to deliver. More people read the articles they want, ad free on the web.

Print papers will eventually go the way of the trolly.
Reply to this comment
See all 22 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Fort Hood's Fallen Heroes Fort Hood's Fallen Heroes

    A Look at Those Who Lost Their Lives in the Fort Hood Massacre

  • Veterans Day 2009 Veterans Day 2009

    Respects are Paid to Soldiers Around the Country and Abroad

  • BMI Country Awards BMI Country Awards

    Country's Finest Walk the Red Carpet for the 57th BMI Country Music Awards

  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Celebrity Circuit Celebrity Circuit

    James Woods in Court, Michelle Obama on "Sesame Street"; Plus, Premieres for "The Road" and "A Single Man"

Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: