Dogs Trained For Bestiality Get Reprieve

Animal Sanctuary To Accept 2 Canines Allegedly Taped Having Sex With Female Owner

(AP)  The nation's largest animal sanctuary has agreed to accept two dogs that authorities say were trained to have sex with women.

A mixed breed and a Labrador, formerly owned by Diane Sue Whalen of Tulsa County, have been accepted by the Best Friends Animal Society in Kanab, Utah, said Barbara Williamson, spokeswoman for the animal sanctuary.

The dogs - named Lucky and Buddy - will be taken to the no-kill sanctuary next month.

Whalen, 54, and Donald Roy Seigfried, 55, were charged with felony crimes against nature after Whalen's adult son found more than 150 tapes of his mother performing sex acts with her dogs and a blue heeler owned by Seigfried. Seigfried was accused of filming the acts.

The dogs were placed in the Tulsa Animal Shelter following the arrests. While Whalen relinquished custody of her dogs, Seigfried is fighting for ownership of the blue heeler, named Merlin.

Earlier this month, a judge ordered that the dogs be examined by a veterinarian and found suitable for adoption before being placed in homes. Both of Whalen's dogs have been deemed adoptable.

The dogs were neutered at a Tulsa veterinary clinic. Jamee Suarez, president and founder of the Oklahoma Alliance for Animals, said the dogs are healthy and are recovering from their surgeries.

The Oklahoma Alliance for Animals is a nonprofit organization that works with the Tulsa County sheriff's office on cases involving animal cruelty.

Volunteers for the organization will drive the dogs more than 1,000 miles to the animal sanctuary in Utah. Once there, the dogs will become candidates for adoption.

"Each dog (at the sanctuary) is treated as an individual," said Williamson, the sanctuary spokeswoman. "We felt we could help these dogs."

A deputy who investigated the case had recommended that the dogs be euthanized and wrote in court affidavits that they had been trained to rape.

Williamson said euthanizing the dogs would have been "the easy thing to do."

"These dogs are totally victims," she said.

The sanctuary has room for 2,000 animals, mostly dogs and cats. Williamson said there are that many "urgent pleas" every month asking the shelter to take in animals.

Animals that are not adopted live permanently at the sanctuary.

[drjamesdsmith]

Were they zoophiles, true zoophiles, bestialists, true bestialists, zoosadists, or what?

About time media and law got the terminology right, this, for certain, was zoophilia or bestiality.

But you don't say?

Is this an official report by CBSNEWS or a copy from another news network?

Here's the terms...
#Zoophile: - Someone with a strong, loving, affectional, bonding relationship with a non-human/non-same-species, species.
*Affectional Zoophile - Someone with zoophilia, with near enough like any human-human romantic (as in sweethearts, not golddiggers (unlike the world today)) relationship.
*Fantasy Zoophile - Someone with Affectional Zoophilia, but who also fantasises/dreams about having sex with their partner, but dares not resort to such a deep affection because of worries that they'd lose their beloved, and/or get a criminal charge for having sex with them, and being called a perverted 'bestialist' (even though they aren't).
*Erotic Zoophilia - Someone who used to have Fantastical Zoophilia, but now actually shares their carnal passions, in hope that their non-human animal sex partner will have pleasure, and sex is used for showing how much the two different species love each other.

#Bestialist: - Someone who is a desperate/coercive/fantastical zoosexual.
*Mild Bestialist: - Someone who has sex with an animals, ISN'T coercive, but ('may') have/has a remote relationship with someone else's animals.
**Fence Hopper - A Mild Bestialist who has a sexual and/or remote romantic relationship with someone else's animal(s), or a one/few-times fling; trespassing sometimes happens, and having no relationship affects the animal, and hence, the fence-hopper may have coerced the animals into have sex with the fence hopper, and could potentially psychologically/physically harm the animal.
**Polygamous Mild Bestialist - A Mild Bestialist who has sex with more than one animals, perhaps originating from a fantasy (hence may be due to a mental health problem), even if the animals experience pleasure, and aren't harmed, it is wrong to have favourtism, and it can affect the animals psychologically/physically.

*True Bestialist - Someone who has sex with an animals, IS coercive, but ('may') have/has a remote relationship with someone else's animals; it feature all the subcategories of Mild Bestiality, but coercion takes place, and romance is less likely, and desperation is more.

#Zoosadist: - Someone who has sex with, and harms animals, via the use of brutal coercion and/or submissive, or non-sexual sadism.
*Non-Zoosexual Zoosadist - Someone who hurts animals for self-gratification, sexual or not, and is hence a sadist; and likes to dominate, but does not have sexual intercourse with his/her victims.
*Brutal Biastophilic Bestialist - Someone who hurts animals so they submiss to forced sexual activity, so they can 'have their way with it'; perhaps because they are very desperate because of the inavailablity of the 'preferred sexual object', 'zoosexual', 'human' or 'anything', or just likes to have power over potentially 'lesser beings'.

#Zoosexual: - A zoophile, bestialist, or zoosadist.

Note: Bestialists sometimes sedate their animals, in order to avoid the need of committing zoosadism; some zoosadist use sedation to calm the animals down, before beating them and sexually interfering.

Bestiality and zoosadism are both evil; zoophilia is genuine, and brought down by these horrible counterparts, because they have sex with animals, too.

People often say 'zoophiles' are 'mentally ill'; and they come into conversation and make expletive and insulting remarks; what happens if they are 'mentally ill' (which has been proven wrong in most, if not all cases), surely those 'anti-zoos' are just bullying them, and making them feel worse, no?

Anti-zoosexuals do seem to judge to conclusions that all zoosexuals are the same people, even when one rapes/harms, and the other doesn't.

That's like calling all non-rapist people in a sexuality, that isn't your own, 'rapists', even though they aren't all.

And I can reassure you, there's a lot more zoophiles out there (not all true zoophiles, but are there sweethearted humans, in this money-based world, anymore? At least they don't hurt/coerce their animals!), than there are bestialists and zoosadists.

And there are a lot more non-zoosexual zoosadists, than zoosexual, the simple reason being, most zoosadists genuinely hate animals so much, they'd rather beat them, than give them any form of pleasure.

Thanks for reading my comments.

I have much, much more to say!

[bullishgirl]

Hey Republic1776,

Your sick! Sounds like you like to **** aminals too. Wish I could turn you in!

What is the world coming to? Humans are the deadliest of animals..

[drjamesdsmith]

May be he just saw sense in a matter that is being concurrently suppressed.

Before you say anything, this is my line of research. And you can check my social network profile to see I'm more than a sexologist exploring zoophilia, I'm also a technologist and philosopher, and I most certainly am non-zoosexual.

[crimsonthemastiff]

Ok people, for starters im a zoo. Theres a slight difference between zoo and beast. And as for this title we got going on, thats all off :P Bestiality is sexual lust for an animal. Zoo is genuine love and affection for an animal. These f*&K-tards making the movies and just using animals for sex, yea, there ****** up. Dont punish their dogs becuase of it. *** ppl, why cant they just go to a relative of that persons house, or a friend or something. Nope, gotta chop their balls off (they did what to diserve this?) and then toss them in a tiny ass kennle that reeks of chlorine for god knows how long. Yea, bet that sounds really peachy, how about we take that cop ******* and cut his boys off, make him eat them, then dip him in diesel fuel and set him alight, plenty of bacon for everyone :) ill be awaiting fanmail at crimsonthemastiff (AT) gmail (DOT) com

[drjamesdsmith]

You're 100% correct.

...At least someone got the wording right for a change.

Even realist, Wikipedia and Wiktionary have got their facts right; and official documents have, as the references, obviously.

[fedupredneck]

"Why do you fools feel compelled to post to a story that's a year old?"
Posted by tmittelstaed at 9:39 PM : Jun 3, 2009

You did. Does that make you a fool too? LOL

[drjamesdsmith]

I thought that, too!

[tmittelstaed]

Why do you fools feel compelled to post to a story that's a year old?

[drjamesdsmith]

Extensive, revisional, historical, research?

[tireslinger]

A dog, trained to rape...shakes head...to say that's ludicrous, isn't even close to what I want to say. Even if the deputy was enough of an idiot to put something like that in an affidavit, I cannot even begin to believe, what could've possesed CBS to print such a thing. Do online articles get to skip the editor, before they're put on the website??!!

[drjamesdsmith]

May be the editor snuck it in???

[wyo-kid]

Train a dog to rape, give me a break. I wonder if anyone fell for that line.

[drjamesdsmith]

How does an animal get trained to do something so natural?
How do they think dogs exist right now; by being trained to have sex?

They'd have sex with anything that moves and 'fits', let alone 'humans'.

Coercion is natural in all animals, anyway.

At least zoosexuals can decide to stop coercing/harming their non-human mates.

Yes, other animals can decide, too.

True zoophiles are losing out, thanks to its desperate, evil, and self-gratifying counterparts, bestiality and zoosadist.

Thanks for reading my comments.

[ulfvitr]

and may i remind you that se x with children and same se x IS NOTHING NEW WITH LIBERALS..as a matter of fact that is such a norm ITS ALREADY ACCEPTED..

the difference here is LIBERAL MEDIA PROMOTES these kind of sick and twisted behaviour...

Go back to letting talk radio do your thinking for you sir...it''s probably better off that way.

[radman5000]

So is it safe to say the Lady was getting Lucky

[libsluv2spit]

Because we all know that perversion is limited to liberals. I mean the Priest *** scandals, the recent congressional same *** / airport scandals, Haggard and such are all examples of liberal perversion..... oh wait...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by ulfvitr at 05:54 PM : Jul 23, 2008
+ report abuse

and may i remind you that se x with children and same se x IS NOTHING NEW WITH LIBERALS..as a matter of fact that is such a norm ITS ALREADY ACCEPTED..

the difference here is LIBERAL MEDIA PROMOTES these kind of sick and twisted behaviour...

[drjamesdsmith]

Zoosexuality is much more common than what you see in the media.

In every state in the USA, and smaller country, there is at least one case of bestiality/zoophilia/zoosadism 'criminal charges'; but there are millions of zoosexuals out there, that is what I call a norm.

I mean 1,000,000/6,740,000,000 humans? That's an awful a lot of zoosexuals; and that's just the active members of the online zoosexual communities.

It's rare in the news, because they like to keep their heads down in fear they'll lose their non-human animal partner, be called perverts, or face a criminal charge - lover, rapist, or sadist, it doesn't matter.

But still, the true loving zoophiles are not bad.