February 11, 2009 2:36 PM

Rice: Iran "Not Serious" About Nuke Talks

(AP)  U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice accused Iran on Monday of not being serious at weekend talks about its disputed nuclear program despite the presence of a senior U.S. diplomat, and warned it may soon face new sanctions.

In her first public comments since Saturday's meeting in Switzerland, Rice said Iran had given the run-around to envoys from the U.S. and five other world powers. She said all six nations were serious about a two-week deadline Iran now has to agree to freeze suspect activities and start negotiations or be hit with new penalties.

At the meeting, Iran had been expected to respond to a package of incentives offered in exchange for halting enrichment of uranium, which can be used to fuel atomic weapons. The Bush administration broke with long-standing policy to send a top diplomat to support the offer.

However, Rice said that instead of a coherent answer, Iran's chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili delivered a "meandering" monologue full of irrelevant "small talk about culture" that appeared to annoy many of the others present at the table in Geneva.

"We expected to hear an answer from the Iranians but, as has been the case so many times with the Iranians, what came through was not serious," Rice told reporters aboard her plane as she flew to the United Arab Emirates. "It's time for the Iranians to give a serious answer."

"They can't go and stall and make small talk about culture, they have to make a decision," she said. "People are tired of the Iranians and their stalling tactics."

Rice's remarks about the Iranian presentation were much harsher than those of the host of the meeting, European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana, who lamented only that Iran had not provided "all the answers to the questions."

On Sunday, Iranian state radio reported that President Mahmoud Ahmadenijad called the talks a "step ahead" and said country's formal assessment would be issued soon.

On Saturday, one member of the Iranian delegation said there was "no chance" Iran would suspend uranium enrichment, again denying assertions that Iran's nuclear program was for anything other than power production. Jalili avoided the suspension issue entirely.

Unless Iran responds positively in the next two weeks, it can expect more sanctions to be imposed by the United States and the European Union as early as late August or September and may then be hit with a fourth sanctions resolution at the U.N. Security Council, Rice said.

"We will see what Iran does in two weeks, but I think the diplomatic process now has a new kind of energy to it," she said. "If they do not decide to suspend then we will be in a situation where we have to return to the Security Council."

Rice was briefed on the meeting by the State Department's No. 3 diplomat, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs William Burns, who attended the session in a shift from Washington's previous insistence that it would not meet with the Iranians unless the enrichment had stopped.

High-level contact between the United States and Iran is extremely rare and Burns' presence at the talks may have confused the Iranians, Rice said, acknowledging a tactical change to demonstrate U.S. unity with the other five powers: Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia.

"From time to time, it is important to invigorate the diplomacy," she said. "I think that the fact that we went may have been a bit surprising to the Iranians, and they didn't react in a way that gave anyone any confidence."

The offer envisions a six-week commitment from Iran to stop expanding enrichment, during which time no additional sanctions would be imposed. That is intended to create the framework for formal negotiations that, it is hoped, will lead to a permanent halt of enrichment.

Rice was dismissive when asked if Burns or another U.S. diplomat would be present to hear Iran's response in two weeks.

"I think we've done enough to demonstrate that the United States is serious and to assure our partners that we're serious," she said.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 256 Comments
by jrobs4 July 23, 2008 3:53 PM EDT
From the south yall you best be praying to jesus
if any nukes go off we all pay the entire world your children and ther children whenit is all over if ther is anything left that is
Reply to this comment
by kollmuss July 22, 2008 6:58 PM EDT
"The M-n religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness..."

Adolf Hitler, 1889-1945
Reply to this comment
by wothah July 22, 2008 6:27 PM EDT
lets all start getting along with each other, lets give Alaska back to Russia, Hawaii to Japan, Texas to Mexico, Poland to Germany, ECT ECT, then every body will be happy an the US will be no more.
Reply to this comment
by tbweb July 22, 2008 4:44 PM EDT
Posted by samsel3 at 07:38 AM : Jul 22, 2008,,,

You keep Posting the same old cut-n-paste Russian butt kissing stuff, got anything new?
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 July 22, 2008 10:42 AM EDT
Nothing has changed on Iran. The administrations interest in Iran & nukes is a smoke screen for their real agenda. Their true interests are Cheney''s energy policy. Part of that policy is the The Caspian Sea pipeline which will go through Turkmenistan, Afghanistan,Pakistan, to the gulf of Oman and on to India & Nepal.It will be cheaper to construct if they can go through Iran, but regime change is necessary first.

The Caspian sea area holds one third of the world''s oil and south asian oil markets are their target market. This pipeline was also the reason for the Afghanistan invasion. Cheney''s energy policy is the root of all these middle east wars, a federal court judge sealed all documents associated with it for the administration. More troops are needed in Afghanistan to protect the contractors building the pipeline.

Iran stands in the way of total control of global oil now with sales of oil to China''s Sinopec Oil,deal signed Dec.10,2007. Months ago China said there would be dire consequences if the US interfered with there direct oil contracts with Iran. Both parties in the Congress should be very concerned with China''s growing war machine and need for oil. They are the real threat & the administration doesn''t care they are in control ! All that matters to them is BIG OIL and their corporate stock portfolios
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 July 22, 2008 10:38 AM EDT
Russia has multiple nuclear power plant contracts
with Iran. These plants are currently under construction.

Reuters uk January 18, 2008 : " Iran has some awesome colleagues. Russia and China have become guardians of the Iranian economy. They don''t put religion between business and political advantages. The US is sorely lacking in intelligent Foreign Policy. Hitler''s Foreign Policy has been resurrected to serve the needs of an oil agenda and turn the US into the most disrespected and despised world power ".
POSTED: Friday, January 18, 2008

Moscow -- Armed forces will be used if necessary, including preventively and with the use of nuclear weapons, for protection of Russia and its allies, the Russian Armed Forces'' Chief of the General Staff Yuri Baluyevsky said on Saturday.

"We do not intend to attack anybody. But all our partners must realize that for protection of Russia and its allies if necessary armed forces will be used, including preventively, including with the use of nuclear weapons," Baluyevsky was quoted by the Itar-Tass news agency as saying.

Baluyevsky reportedly made the statement at a scientific conference of the Academy of Military Sciences January 19, 2008.

Reply to this comment
by tbweb July 22, 2008 2:19 AM EDT
Posted by ToolMangler at 04:43 PM : Jul 21, 2008

Easy and convenience way to say it. The Arabs are not afraid of Israel, they are afraid of the American Empire.

Before you remind me Israel military is 2nd to none in the middle east, let me remind you that the Most Powerful military in the world USA cannot eliminate the weakest military in the world such as Taliban and Al-Qaeda.

Posted by lovegetpeace at 07:01 PM : Jul 21, 2008,,,

This idea that the U.S. can''t defeat the Taliban or al-Qaeda is nonsense! The U.S. can easily defeat both, the problem is the World will not like the way the U.S. does it, so the U.S. has to play along and fight them both in a politically correct way! Too bad the U.S. can''t tell U.S. Commanders to eliminate the Taliban and al-Qaeda using any methods it wants! Civilized societies have their Laws and Rules to follow when this enemy really needs a "medieval" or even a "barbaric" approach because thats the way they fight!
Reply to this comment
by libsluv2spit July 22, 2008 12:46 AM EDT
"Iran already is under three sets of U.N. sanctions for its refusal to suspend enrichment, which can generate both nuclear fuel and the fissile material at the core of nuclear warheads. While Tehran says it has a right to enrich for peaceful purposes, the sanctions reflect international concern that it might use its program to make weapons."

this is a snippet from associated press (a liberal newsource) stating a fact from a the UN (a liberal organization)..but yet..THESE AMERICAN LIBERALS still try to live in denial...

I dont think they care..the only think they care is iran is anti-american..and that is good enough for them
Reply to this comment
by libsluv2spit July 22, 2008 12:42 AM EDT
let me remind you that the Most Powerful military in the world USA cannot eliminate the weakest military in the world such as Taliban and Al-Qaeda.

Posted by lovegetpeace at 07:01 PM : Jul 21, 2008
+ report abuse

*******


and may i remind you that the taliban and al queda or any anit-american terrroist HAS A VERY POWER ALLY..

the american liberals..

honestly, you cry like you want some taliban blood but in reality..WELL CAN WE EVEN SPY ON THEM?? CAN WE EVEN INTERROGATE THEM without your whiney arses going into a hissy fit?
Reply to this comment
by lovegetpeace July 21, 2008 10:01 PM EDT
Posted by ToolMangler at 04:43 PM : Jul 21, 2008

Easy and convenience way to say it. The Arabs are not afraid of Israel, they are afraid of the American Empire.

Before you remind me Israel military is 2nd to none in the middle east, let me remind you that the Most Powerful military in the world USA cannot eliminate the weakest military in the world such as Taliban and Al-Qaeda.
Reply to this comment
See all 256 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook