D.C. Police Checkpoints Prompt Lawsuit
Chief Says Roadblocks Keep Thugs Out Of Murder-Plagued Area, Some Residents Disagree
-
Play CBS Video
Video
D.C. Checkpoints Spark Outrage
Police have set up checkpoints in a Washington D.C. community that has been plagued by violence. Some residents think the blockades are more of a nuisance than a help. Thalia Assuras reports.
-
Photo
Washington D.C. police set up roadblocks around the Trinidad neighborhood again this weekend after another recent spate of violence in the area. (CBS)
-
Interactive
Crime Beat
Statistics and specifics on crime in America.
-
Interactive
FBI Crime Statistics
Explore the latest information on U.S. crime, from acts of violence to property damage.
Washington's police chief described the recent violence in the capital's troubled Trinidad section as a brazen assault.
"To shoot two 13-year-old children in the back or to shoot them as they were trying to run away is the most cowardice act I have ever seen in 18 years," said Chief Cathy Lanier.
In the early hours Saturday, one person was stabbed, and seven people were shot -- one of them a 13-year-old boy who later died.
Trinidad, just four miles east of the White House, is a neighborhood in transition -- but in this police district, 22 people were killed through June -- more than double the number last year.
In response, Assuras reports, controversial checkpoints went up in an effort to "fence out" violent intruders. At the edge of the troubled neighborhood police stopped cars and asked drivers about their business.
"Do you have any reason to be passing through Trinidad today?" one checkpoint officer asked a local woman.
"I live two blocks up the street," she answered.
Reaction from residents is mixed.
"I can understand where the police officers are coming from, you know, helping the community," said one woman.
"Do they keep the bad guys out?" Assuras asked another woman.
For them to take a roadblock and impede my progress, it's unconstitutional.
William Robinson, who is suing the city over the checkpointsThe checkpoints in this area were initially set up last month after a similar spike in violence over nine hours left seven men dead. But the program also sparked a lawsuit.
"For them to take a roadblock and impede my progress, it's unconstitutional," said William Robinson. "That means that I'm living under martial law in a police state."
Robinson, who's lived here for more than 50 years, is part of a class-action suit demanding an end to the roadblock program. He also says it just doesn't work.
But police claim the checkpoints have been a huge success. During the last run -- no one was killed here.
"Until a judge orders me to stop I'm going to do everything I can to protect the people in Trinidad," said Chief Lanier.
Police plan to keep the checkpoints in place for another four days -- at least.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Video and Galleries from CBS Evening News
- Latest in CBS Evening News
- Summer Camps Slammed by Swine Flu
- Probe of Cheney's Covert CIA Plan Urged
- Tiny Airports Get Big Cut of Stimulus Cash



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 84 CommentsPolice can''t win sometimes. if crime is out of control then blame them, if they try to take measures to stop it then were in a police state.
Police have the ''right'' to establish roadblocks and ask for identification, as long as they stop everyone and do not engage in profiling.
Answering any questions such as ''Where are you going?'' or ''Why are you here?'' is strictly voluntary, and using coercion or forcing an answer is illegal and unconstitutional.
Aren''t we all?
Posted by steeepe at 08:07 PM : Jul 20, 2008
Then the police would be accused of "racial profiling" since they are not doing the same increased patrolling in a majority white community.
Why do they mess with every body when they know that 90 percent of the crimes are commited young males?
************************************
They should have had one at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. a while back, then they could have kept Karl Rove, Scooter Libby and D*ck Cheney out! Oh, I''m sorry..I read it wrong...I thought it said SLUGS.
Maybe DC could offer that alternative to people who CHOOSE to live in an anti-gun, pro-checkpoint neighborhood? People with young kids might prefer a gun-free zone (?)
That right there is IMO the center point of the problem we have with police and the government, rather than doing whats right they do what they want until a judge tells them to stop .. then they change a small thing and do it some more and the cycle starts anew.
Look at the gun ban in DC .. they made new laws that really didn''t change all that much, so until someone else can take the case to the supreme court its status quo.
***********************************
*
They should have had one at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. a while back, then they could have kept Karl Rove, Scooter Libby and D*ck Cheney out! Oh, I''''m sorry..I read it wrong...I thought it said SLUGS.
Posted by timdgrim at 10:32 PM
LOL funny... but you forgot McSame!
Posted by bhappy2-2 at 08:54 PM
Better yet, why not deliver ak-47s as prizes from gumball machines?
Moron.
It''s like Alex Jones says over and over again..."It''s already here folks, the New World Order Neo-Fuedalism Under Debt Serfdom has ARRIVED" !!!
All you can do is just embrace it folks.
I''m telling you folks, the police are their to protect the rich and their property. The rest of us serfs can go to hell.
Just go to any other 3rd world country and you will see the same thing folks.
A prime example of a city structured by politicians.
Our militarized police force is looking more like the Nazis every day.
Heil!!!
Posted by steeepe at 08:07 PM : Jul 20, 2008
Driving is not a right - it is a privilege.
Stopping you is not unconstitutional - it maybe a pain in the arse but it is "public" safety...
I''''m telling you folks, the police are their to protect the rich and their property. The rest of us serfs can go to hell.
Just go to any other 3rd world country and you will see the same thing folks.
Posted by whitemale08
----------------------------------------------------
What are you talking about? That really made NO sense
Then came "roadblocks" only to be used as a "deterrent" to driving under the influence.
Yep, "Papers, I need to see your papers Herr nextGenMan."
Each time they are there I see these thugs being carried off and their guns and drugs taken off the street. I only wish the check points were there 24/7 for several months so we could regain our neighborhood.
You people in D.C. should rejoice that your city is willing to spend money, manpower and resources to fight crime.
Why do "some" people need so much more police to watch over them than "others"?
Just a question. Oh and don''t say economics. It just doesn''t wash anymore.
I''''''''m telling you folks, the police are their to protect the rich and their property. The rest of us serfs can go to hell.
Just go to any other 3rd world country and you will see the same thing folks.
Posted by whitemale08
--------------------------------------
--------------
What are you talking about? That really made NO sense
Posted by DSR57 at 05:00 AM : Jul 21, 2008
__________________________________
It made obvious sense to me. While the nation is fighting the "Democrat vs Republican" fight, we''ve traded our liberties for a false sense of security, and we will never get them back again.
which way do want it?
Posted by SamTheTVCat at 10:38 PM : Jul 20, 2008
The entire city has been a gun free zone up till now and I guess we all see how that worked out. Until the people of the community want to stand up and take back their neighborhoods from the thugs, the current situation will exist. Evil prospers when good men do nothing.
What do we do? I believe it starts at the top. Corrupt leaders set the example for the rest. Lets start with prosecuting the criminals in the white house and work our way thru congress. Oh, except the cops don''t patrol the rich. And Americans argue amongst themselves, divided and voiceless, powerless to stop a corrupt bought and paid for national gov.
Then try bringing back jobs to America, instead of passing laws that allow, again by design, nationless, greedy, corporations to hire the poor of the third world at slaver wages and then dump cheap products here. Buying only American-made products and boycotting foreign-made would help, but instead we sacrifice our future for discounts at Wal-Mart.
And of course certain groups of people seem hellbent on sabatoging themselves and those around them, while looking for that proverbial handout, with ready excuses, not personal responsibility. Small wonder many feel the deck stacked, and choose non-conforming behavior. Acceptable behavior is easier when economic situations rise above hopeless.
I personally believe the powers that be are committed to turning America into a 3rd world country. Until we start caring about citizens here instead of wasting money killing foreigners for oil profit, expect more of the same.
The poor get squeezed, worsening their already tough situation. They feel abandoned by their government and society. Consequently, they are more likely to resort to crime and violence to survive.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 84 Comments