KABUL, Afghanistan, July 19, 2008

Obama Tours Afghan War Zone

After Visiting Troops In Kuwait, Democrat Talks To Commanders During High-Stakes Visit To Afghan Front

  • Play CBS Video Video Obama Tours Afghanistan

    Barack Obama traveled to Eastern Afghanistan, as Al-Qaida and Taliban forces have increased their attacks in this region. Lara Logan reports on the Democratic presidential candidate's journey.

  • Video Obama Visits Middle East

    "CBS News RAW:" Speaking before U.S. Army soldiers at a military base in Kuwait, presumptive Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama addressed various issues, such as the War on Terror.

  • Senator Barack Obama speaks to American troops in Kuwait about their service and the future of the military, July 19, 2008. Photo

    Senator Barack Obama speaks to American troops in Kuwait about their service and the future of the military, July 19, 2008.  (CBS)

  • Photo Essay Barack Obama

    A look at the life and meteoric rise of the president-elect.

  • In-Depth VP Hot Sheet: Obama

    CBSNews.com ranks the top contenders to be Obama's running mate.

(CBS/AP)  Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama started a campaign-season tour of combat zones and foreign capitals, visiting first with U.S. troops in Kuwait and then flying to Afghanistan - the scene of a war he says deserves more attention and more troops.

The delegation met with top military leaders and troops at Bagram Air Field, the main U.S. military base in the country, according to a U.S. military statement.

The Senator also stopped in Jalalabad in eastern Afghanistan to meet with local Afghan leaders and U.S. military commanders for a first-hand assessment, reports CBS News chief foreign affairs correspondent Lara Logan.

Jalalabad lies near the Tora Bora mountains where al Qaeda leaders fled to and faced a U.S. bombardment during the U.S.-led invasion that ousted the Taliban regime in late 2001 after the Sept. 11 attacks.

Obama and others in the delegation received a briefing inside the U.S. base from the Afghan provincial governor of Nangarhar, Gul Agha Sherzai, a no-nonsense, bullish former warlord.

"Obama promised us that if he becomes a president in the future, he will support and help Afghanistan not only in its security sector but also in reconstruction, development and economic sector," Sherzai told The Associated Press.

The Illinois senator arrived Saturday as part of an official congressional delegation, but the Afghan visit, Obama's first and coming less than four months before the general election, was rich with political implications. Republican presidential rival John McCain has criticized Obama for his lack of time in the region. Obama is also expected to stop later in Iraq.

Logan, traveling with the delegation in Kabul, said that by visiting Afghanistan before Iraq, Obama is signaling the primary importance of the war in Afghanistan in his campaign.

Obama has criticized the Bush administration for making Iraq the focus of American foreign policy rather than Afghanistan, which he deems a grave mistake.

Obama wants to make Afghanistan the focus of the U.S. war on terror and has promised more aid, money and more troops, reports Logan. It's the centerpiece of his foreign policy strategy for the presidential campaign.

Robert Gibbs, a campaign spokesman, said Obama arrived in Kabul around noon. En route from Washington, he made a stopover in Kuwait to meet with U.S. forces stationed there, Gibbs said.

Lt. Col. Bill Nutter, a spokesman for the U.S. military in Kuwait, said Obama "talked to soldiers and constituents and met with senior military leadership."

During the two-hour visit, the officers gave him an overview of operations, Nutter said. Obama shook hands, answered questions, posed for photos and played a little basketball during the visit.

Sultan Ahmad Baheen, spokesman for Afghanistan's Foreign Ministry, confirmed the senator was in Afghanistan and that he would meet with President Hamid Karzai.

"I look forward to seeing what the situation on the ground is," Obama told a pair of reporters who accompanied him to his departure from Andrews Air Force Base on Thursday. "I want to, obviously, talk to the commanders and get a sense both in Afghanistan and in Baghdad of, you know, what the most, their biggest concerns are, and I want to thank our troops for the heroic work that they've been doing."

Obama had recently chided Karzai and his government, saying it had "not gotten out of the bunker" and helped to organize the country or its political and security institutions.

(AP Photo)
(Left: Sen. Barack Obama is photographed with Gul Agha Shirzai, the governor of Afghanistan's Nangarhar province, center rear, and U.S. military personel in Jalalabad, July 19, 2008.)

Underscoring the challenges in Afghanistan, authorities reported Saturday that a roadside bomb killed four policemen in the volatile south of the country where the Taliban-led insurgency is intensifying nearly seven years after a U.S.-led invasion ousted the militant movement from power.

The Taliban and al Qaeda-linked militants also have caused problems in Afghanistan's east, especially near the border with Pakistan. Nangarhar's Sherzai, considered a no-nonsense, bullish former warlord-turned-governor, briefed the delegation Saturday about the situation in his region, his chief of staff said.

"Barack Obama expressed support for Afghanistan and especially for Nangarhar province," Massoud Ahmad Azizi said. "He said he will support reconstruction, development and security all over the country, especially in Nangarhar. (Obama) thanked Sherzai for good leadership and good administration of the province."

Obama advocates ending the U.S. combat role in Iraq by withdrawing troops at the rate of one to two combat brigades a month. But he supports increasing the military commitment to Afghanistan, where the Taliban has been resurgent and Osama bin Laden is believed to be hiding.

"Because Barack Obama has proposed an increase in U.S. troops to Afghanistan - and because the conflict on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border has intensified - the senator's foreign trip begins with a focus on his aggressive approach to the war on terror, not on Iraq," said CBS News Foreign Affairs Analyst Pamela Falk.

"The Middle East leg of the trip will be more delicate and the European tour more popular," Falk said. "By arriving in Afghanistan first, Obama is making a statement about his priorities."

Also on his travel itinerary is a meeting with Nouri al-Maliki, the Iraqi leader. In an interview published Saturday in the German magazine Der Speigel, al-Maliki said that he approved of Obama's plan to withdraw U.S. troops over 16 months.

On the campaign trail, Obama has said one benefit of withdrawing U.S. troops is that it would pressure al-Maliki to shore up his government as well.

Nonetheless, he said he did not plan to reiterate those messages in person.

"I'm more interested in listening than doing a lot of talking, and I think it's very important to recognize that I'm going over there as a U.S. senator," he said. "We have one president at a time."

"This trip gives Obama an opportunity to gather some first-hand intelligence to support the proposals he has already laid out," said CBSNews.com senior political editor Vaughn Ververs. "More importantly, the images and coverage of the trip can give him the imprimatur of leadership critics say is lacking.

"It also carries risks in that any missteps or mistakes will be magnified by the intense coverage," Ververs said.

Quote

I'm more interested in listening than doing a lot of talking, and I think it's very important to recognize that I'm going over there as a U.S. senator. We have one president at a time.

Sen. Barack Obama
In a speech this week, Obama said the war in Iraq was a distraction, unlike the fighting in Afghanistan.

"This is a war that we have to win," he said. "I will send at least two additional combat brigades to Afghanistan, and use this commitment to seek greater contributions - with fewer restrictions from NATO allies.

"I will focus on training Afghan security forces and supporting an Afghan judiciary, with more resources and incentives for American officers who perform these missions."

By contrast, his opposition to the war in Iraq - and call for an end to the U.S. combat role - helped him overcome his rivals in the battle for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Lately, his efforts to explain how he will use what he learns from U.S. commanders to refine his proposals have brought charges from Republicans and complaints from Democratic liberals that he seems to be shifting his Iraq policy toward the political center. But Obama maintains his basic goal of ending the U.S. combat role soon remains unchanged and that he's always said the U.S. withdrawal must be done carefully.

Obama also arranged to visit Jordan, Israel, Germany, France and England, traveling aboard a jet chartered by his presidential campaign, before his return to the United States. The weeklong trip marks his only foreign excursion as a presidential candidate; McCain has visited Canada, Colombia and Mexico, in part to highlight Obama's opposition to trade deals with those allies.

Few citizens in impoverished Afghanistan were aware of Obama's unannounced visit, and few have been following the U.S. presidential race, being too busy eking out an existence amid soaring violence and with limited access to news media.

(AP Photo)
(Left: U.S. Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama, second from left, with Gul Agha Shirzai, left, the governor of Nangarhar province, and other unidentified officials during a meeting, in Jalalabad, Afghanistan, July 19, 2008.)

But some interviewed Saturday said they would welcome an Obama presidency if he could help their country end the fighting, corruption and poverty that have crippled it for so long.

"Obama is a good person," said Abdul Basir, 40, a former army officer. "During his campaign I heard he was saying that if I become president I will withdraw the U.S. troops from Iraq and bring them to Afghanistan and I will attack on the terror center on other side of border (in Pakistan). It is very important and I appreciated that."

Obama began his trip with as much secrecy as a presumed presidential nominee can muster.

The senator took an unmarked, corporate Gulfstream-III jet, much smaller than his normal campaign plane, from Chicago to Washington. He was joined by his Secret Service detail, spokeswoman Linda Douglass and two reporters.

Obama deplaned at Reagan National Airport in Washington, took one question apiece from the reporters, and then his motorcade departed for a hasty ride to Andrews Air Force Base about 10 miles away in Maryland.

Upon his arrival, Obama was greeted by a group of Air Force personnel at the bottom of stairs leading to the military Boeing 737 transporting his congressional delegation. Obama's traveling companions, Sens. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., and Jack Reed, R.I., were not visible to the reporters, but Douglass confirmed they were already on board the aircraft.

Both senators, each a veteran, have been mentioned as potential Obama vice presidential running mates, but Reed has said he's not interested in the job.

As Obama boarded the plane, luggage in hand, a pair of uniformed Air Force officers at the foot of the stairs saluted simultaneously, as they do each time President Bush boards Air Force One.

The only staff member to accompany Obama was a Senate foreign policy aide, Mark Lippert. He is a Navy reservist who returned in late spring from a tour of duty in Iraq.


©MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Candidate Profiles & RSS Feeds


Video and Galleries from Politics

Add a Comment See all 1514 Comments
by smirk5 July 19, 2008 4:13 AM PDT
Afghanistan. Cons? Remember Afghanistan? A guy named Bin Laden planned the 9-11 attacks from there. Remember him?
Reply to this comment
by July 19, 2008 4:44 AM PDT
The Obama Express is in full swing. His landslide election is creeping closer daily.
Reply to this comment
by abmitus July 19, 2008 4:57 AM PDT
DaysRnumbrd,

U R AN A$$HOLE! ESADB!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by smirk5 July 19, 2008 5:05 AM PDT
We''re in the 7th year of war in Afghanistan and 8% of all our troops killed in that country have died in the past 6 weeks. The Bushies dropped the ball and decided to make Iraq a new training ground for Al-Qaeda while also allowing them to rebuild in Afghanistan. We were told that we were fighting them in Iraq so we didn''t have to fight them here. But, really, we were training them in Iraq so they could attack us in Afghanistan instead. And, Chertie just told us that Al-Qaeda can get EU passports and attack us here anyway. Great job Bushies. By the way, whose side are you on in this war anyway?
Reply to this comment
by patriot12436 July 19, 2008 5:24 AM PDT
daysrnumbrd
i wouls settle for friendly fire.
Reply to this comment
by smirk5 July 19, 2008 5:34 AM PDT
Afghanistan bores Bush and Cheney. Not a bunch of light sweet crude there.
Reply to this comment
by ramos937 July 19, 2008 5:35 AM PDT
Rival John McCain has criticized Obama for his lack of time in the region, and the Republican National Committee had a running ticker tallying the more than 900 days since his last visit to Iraq.

As Obama boarded the plane, luggage in hand, a pair of uniformed Air Force officers at the foot of the stairs saluted simultaneously, as they do each time President Bush boards Air Force One
----------------------------------------------
First, I bet that McCain by now has fired the advisors who egged Obama to undertake these trips and taken a hammer to the clock.

While these two officers are probably in trouble, it is a stark reminder that even the military rank and file prefer Obama to McCain.

Reply to this comment
by barbaraf4 July 19, 2008 5:37 AM PDT
"How many people will be surprised if Obama suddenly dies in a horrible plane crash?! I won''t." Posed by DaysRnumbrd
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Me either; however, "they" will have to make it look like a terrorist attack. Maybe take out the Empire State Building this time.
Reply to this comment
by whiskyrocker July 19, 2008 5:38 AM PDT
This guy doesn''t have a clue what to do when it comes to matters of war.
Reply to this comment
by smirk5 July 19, 2008 5:48 AM PDT
whiskyrocker,

You''re so right. The evidence speaks for itself. Not!

I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a US occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda.

I am not opposed to all wars. I%u2019m opposed to dumb wars.
Barack Obama Oct. 2, 2002

"But the point is that, one, we will win this conflict. We will win it easily." [MSNBC, 1/22/03]
John McCain

"But I believe, Katie, that the Iraqi people will greet us as liberators." [NBC, 3/20/03]
John McCain

Reply to this comment
by gsggrigsby July 19, 2008 5:57 AM PDT
hey daysrnumbrd i reported you azz to CBS.COM and i told them you sound dangerous and should be reported to the CIA & FBI SO WHO`S DAY`S ARE NUMBERED NOW?
Reply to this comment
by platteman July 19, 2008 6:13 AM PDT
I am surprised that pope Obama did''t take Hanoi Jane with him. He has all these advisors, why not her???
Since he has been anoited by ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC because he is so great, it is evident that they are in the tank for him. You won''t hear one bad word about him from any of the new people. Such a shame. he is just like Milinie Vanillie.

I hope he surrenders while he is over there. Would do us all good. Maybe he should pull out now!!
Reply to this comment
by patriot12436 July 19, 2008 6:15 AM PDT
ramos937
I am retired military and all the military active members i know do not prefer obama.
Reply to this comment
by patriot12436 July 19, 2008 6:18 AM PDT
ggsrigsby
You sound like the kid in class that likes to snitch to the teacher so you can be the teachers pet. Unless you know something about how the intelligence community works, it is very hard to report anything. Those working in intelligence will never admit to where they work, especially CIA. They will only say they are employed by the state department. It is for security reasons.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 July 19, 2008 6:21 AM PDT
"daysrnumbrd i wouls settle for friendly fire." Posted by patriot12436

This cannot be the same Patriot who, from Thailand, advocated the return to the constitution and the rule of law, now hoping for an assassination of a US senator, because of political differences, can it?

If it is the same person, it surely doesn''t read like it...
Reply to this comment
by gunfighter51 July 19, 2008 6:21 AM PDT
The europeans are going to love this guy, a cut right out of their own mold.

Too bad for Barry, there''s no votes to be had, only discontent from the voters here for pandering to the EU.

He should also remember that half of these countries just voted out the wimp leftist''s in power.

Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 July 19, 2008 6:24 AM PDT
"While these two officers are probably in trouble, it is a stark reminder that even the military rank and file prefer Obama to McCain." Posted by ramos937

I doubt the soldiers are in any kind of trouble, it is standard protocol to salute a senator, as well as a president.

However your other point is well made, I would agree, my conversations with US servicemen have shown an overwhelming preference for Mr. Obama.
Reply to this comment
by nextgenman July 19, 2008 6:26 AM PDT
ramos937
I am retired military and all the military active members i know do not prefer obama.

Posted by patriot12436 at 06:15 AM : Jul 19, 2008
--------------

You must hang out down at the VFW with the 80-year-olds.....
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 July 19, 2008 6:29 AM PDT
"He should also remember that half of these countries just voted out the wimp leftist''''s in power." Posted by Gunfighter51

Considering that the US is now a rogue nation, invading sovereign states without cause, assassinating leaders, deposing governments, kidnapping and torturing civilians, it probably is a good idea for the Europeans who have chosen so to have those more willing to go to war at the ready, as they cannot possibly know that they won''t be the next victims.
Reply to this comment
by patriot12436 July 19, 2008 6:38 AM PDT
nextgenman
Actually i asked my daughters unit while they were in Iraq who they wanted, they said Hillary. Haven''t had a chance to talk to them since, my daughter was med evac''ed from Irag.
Reply to this comment
by patriot12436 July 19, 2008 6:39 AM PDT
brian
Yes it is me, but i lost faith in you when you said you believed farakhan had the right views.
Reply to this comment
by patriot12436 July 19, 2008 6:45 AM PDT
I really think if obama is elected this will start a civil war in our country. We may have one no matter who is elected. I hope i am wrong. But our constitution says we not only have the right but the duty if a govt is not giving the people the representation they want. We haven''t had leadership for 8 years now. The economy is so bad i am afraid we may have a civil war. I am financially secure so it doesn''t really effect me, but i hate to see our form of govt collapse.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 July 19, 2008 6:47 AM PDT
"Yes it is me, but i lost faith in you when you said you believed farakhan had the right views." Posted by patriot12436

Understood, as we have discussed before, we cannot agree on everything, but I would not dare presume that your displeasure at my views would justify the advocacy of assassination, and further erosion of the rule of law.

Are you saying that because you don''t agree with my take on Minister Farrakhan, that you have given up advocating the rule of law, as enshrined in the constitution?
Reply to this comment
by perceptions5 July 19, 2008 6:49 AM PDT
Obama, talk about fish-out-of-water.

This inexperienced guy is way over his head.

Just goes to show the power of America''s most corrupt institution, our mostly liberal MSM wolfpack press.

Propaganda does still work in 2008. Our liberal wolfpackp proved that.

Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 July 19, 2008 6:49 AM PDT
Posted by patriot12436

But if Mr. Obama is elected, in a transparent process, is it not then a representation of "what the people want"? Or are you limiting your definition of "the people" to include only those who are anti Mr. Obama, for whatever their reason?
Reply to this comment
by smirk5 July 19, 2008 6:50 AM PDT
Platteman,
Don''t blame it on the corporate media. Blame it on the rain.
Reply to this comment
by jb01201a July 19, 2008 6:52 AM PDT
The libs messiah has cometh...wow, how profound !
Reply to this comment
by gunfighter51 July 19, 2008 6:55 AM PDT
How did Farakhan get into this discussion.
Is the mothership hovering overhead?

If anyone should be in this discussion it''s Rev. Manning, and a bit of responsibility.
Reply to this comment
by homjett July 19, 2008 6:57 AM PDT
Did he take all of his 300 advisors with him, are the big "3" along to make sure he makes no "gaffes". I will give Sen Obama this, he can give good speeches, but he is weak in debates. The Dems use to say that Sen McCain cannot learn anything overseas through photo ops. The best thing to come out of this is proof that the MSM are bias towards Sen Obama. Course some of us had already figured that out. I wish him well on his trip. With all this going for him, can anyone explain the Gallup Tracking Poll???
Reply to this comment
by telltale57 July 19, 2008 6:58 AM PDT
Obama has it right. Pull out of Iraq and hunker down in Nam... er... Afghanistan.
Reply to this comment
by telltale57 July 19, 2008 6:59 AM PDT
Obama has it right. Pull out of Iraq and hunker down in Nam... er... Afghanistan.
Reply to this comment
by telltale57 July 19, 2008 7:01 AM PDT
Obama has it right. Pull out of Iraq and hunker down in Nam... er... Afghanistan.
Reply to this comment
by telltale57 July 19, 2008 7:02 AM PDT
Obama has it right. Pull out of Iraq and hunker down in Nam... er... Afghanistan.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 July 19, 2008 7:03 AM PDT
"If anyone should be in this discussion it''''s Rev. Manning, and a bit of responsibility." Posted by Gunfighter51

Even that has nothing to do with this subject. I asked the poster patriot12436 if his views had changed, as he was once a staunch supporter of the rule of law and the constitution, but in this thread expressed a wish for the assassination of a US senator. He made reference to my take on another issue, and I asked how disagreement with my views would change his regard for the constitution, that is all.
Reply to this comment
by telltale57 July 19, 2008 7:03 AM PDT
Obama has it right. Pull out of Iraq and hunker down in Nam... er... Afghanistan.
Reply to this comment
by joe1022joe July 19, 2008 7:06 AM PDT
Barak Hussein Obama in Afganistan:Babes in Toyland.
Reply to this comment
by smirk5 July 19, 2008 7:08 AM PDT
How stupid must one be to believe in the myth of the liberal media? You''d have to believe that corporations that own the various media outlets mostly want an anti-corporate agenda pushed to the public. And, you''d have to believe that the media is actively pushing that anti-corporate agenda currently, day after day. After all, liberals are antagonistic to corporate power. Anyone with any sense that hears someone utter their belief in the existence of a media with a clear liberal bias should immediately recognize that person as the complete fool they are.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 July 19, 2008 7:08 AM PDT
Actually Mr. Obama has it wrong, we should pull out of both places altogether, but I believe he is again doing what Rev. Jackson accused him of doing, trying unnecessarily to cater to the right wing, unnecessary because they will never accept him no matter how far right he leans.
Reply to this comment
by smirk5 July 19, 2008 7:16 AM PDT
This liberal media story presented to you by ExxonMobil. Because, everyone knows that ExxonMobil loves to support liberal hippy issues.
Reply to this comment
by emelder July 19, 2008 7:17 AM PDT
Go Obama! Yes, we can!
Reply to this comment
by patriot12436 July 19, 2008 7:44 AM PDT
Brian
I considered you to be intelligent as well as educated. But when you said you believed farakhans views were the right ones, a known black racist, then i decided ok, if we have to choose sides then i will back thwe whites all the way. I finally realized if with the education you have we cannot overcome the racial boundaries we never will. I gave up trying. This has nothing to do with my support of the constitution, which i answered right after my last reply to you.
Reply to this comment
by patriot12436 July 19, 2008 7:47 AM PDT
I have always supported the constitutio and supporting the laws of this country. However like many Americans we are tired of footing the bill for black America when they refuse to join as one and accept that they have been given more than equal opportunity. If you support farakhan then you are as much a racists as anyone who supports the KKK.
Reply to this comment
by jmurrieta1 July 19, 2008 7:47 AM PDT
It is good for Obama to meet the people he''ll be dealing with after he trounces McBush in the upcoming election.

McBush told us he knows how to win wars! Such as, McBush?
Reply to this comment
by patriot12436 July 19, 2008 7:48 AM PDT
GUNFIGHTER51
Farakhan came from an earlier discussion between brian and myself.
Reply to this comment
by perceptions5 July 19, 2008 7:50 AM PDT
Wow! Talk about a fish-out-of-water. Obama is clearly over his head with it comes to foreign policy experience.

And I can''t believe that a guy who wants to be Commander-in-Chief is just, for the first time, visiting Afghanistan. Almost unbelievable. (I know we''re suppose to BELIEVE) but it''s still unbelievable.

Well I don''t think it will matter much. Obama is sliding in the polls now. Both Gallup and Rasmussen (professional polling firms) have Obama up by only 1%. Obama should be up by 15 -20% which means he''s in big trouble come the night of November 4th 2008.

And when Obama visits Iraq he will visit an Iraq that will look a lot different than the Iraq he would have been going to if he had his way 1 1/2 years ago when HE OPPOSED the surge.

John McCain deserves a lot of credit for sticking his political neck on the line in pushing for the surge. Obama deserves none of the credit for the progress he will see when he visits Iraq........................McCain/Romney 2008 !!!
Reply to this comment
by armydog2 July 19, 2008 8:04 AM PDT
hey perception5 sounds like you are repeating mccain''s lame speech from the other day. If they had done what obama wanted in the first place we wouldn''t be in that s-h-i-t-h-ole and over 4000 of our servicemen and women would still be alive today.Gas prices would not be killing us, our economy would be much better off overall. give it up mccain will loose in november.
Reply to this comment
by rowdywicca July 19, 2008 8:08 AM PDT
I bet the little Islamofast hugger is happy now surrounded by his peers!
Reply to this comment
by nextgenman July 19, 2008 8:12 AM PDT
Afghanistan was where the real war against terrorism should have been fought. Now, because of the persistent failure in Iraq, we''re scrambling to try to shore up the bursting dam in Afghanistan.

As as we hurriedly shift troops out of Iraq, it will re-ignite in sectarian violence.

The reality of the situation in Iraq is that the Shia Militias are waiting for the US exit. Its now underway. When we''re gone, or sufficiently reduced, Mahdi will reassert himself and the Sunnis will respond, probably with help from Bush''s good "friends" the Saudis. This is inevitable because the politics in Iraq haven''t change.

No "surge" can fix that no matter how hard the McShrub supporters close their eyes and pray for it.

Bush simply failed.
Reply to this comment
by rowdywicca July 19, 2008 8:13 AM PDT
hey perception5 sounds like you are repeating mccain''''s lame speech from the other day. If they had done what obama wanted in the first place we wouldn''''t be in that s-h-i-t-h-ole and over 4000 of our servicemen and women would still be alive today.Gas prices would not be killing us, our economy would be much better off overall. give it up mccain will loose in november.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by armydog2 at 08:04 AM : Jul 19, 2008

Oh you think so do ya? What do you think would''ve happened if a democrat was president on 9/11?

What would he have done when Islamofast idiots drove planes into our buildings and killed thousands of Americans? Had a love in with them?
Reply to this comment
by patriot12436 July 19, 2008 8:14 AM PDT
nextgenman
I do agree with you about Iraq and Afghanastan.
Reply to this comment
See all 1514 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs