
WASHINGTON, July 18, 2008
Could D.C. Bribery Have Cost Troop Lives?
Exclusive: In Finding How IED Targeting Went Awry, Investigator Found Trail Of Gifts And Earmarks
-
Play CBS Video Video Lives Lost Over Earmarks? When Congress earmarked millions of dollars to dismantle IED networks in Iraq, the incompetence of the private contractor allegedly led to the deaths of many U.S. soldiers. Sharyl Attkisson reports.
-
Video Eye To Eye: IED Earmarks "Only On The Web": Sharyl Attkisson speaks with Maj. Eric Egland about allegations that Congressional earmarks meant to curb IED networks were mismanaged, leading to the loss of American lives.
-
-
This frame grab shows U.S. soldiers stationed in Iraq. CBS News looks at how Congressional earmarks may have put troops' lives in danger. (CBS)
-
Intelligence officer Maj. Eric Egland was in charge of finding out why roadside bomb casualties continued to soar in Iraq when Congress was pouring tens of millions of dollars into contract to keep troops safe. He exclusively shares what he found with CBS News. (CBS)
-
-
Interactive 110th Congress The balance of power shifts and new leadership takes control as the latest session convenes.
-
Interactive Battle For Iraq The government, the insurgency, key players, background and photos.
Congress poured in tens of millions of dollars to a company called MZM - but deaths and injuries continued to soar, CBS News investigative correspondent Sharyl Attkisson reports for Follow the Money.
It was the job of intelligence officer Maj. Eric Egland to find out why.
"It was my job to do a field evaluation of this program," Egland said.
In an exclusive interview, Egland told us he discovered stunning lapses on the part of MZM, which only hird a third of the employees they were paid for
"What you're hoping for is fewer IED injuries; more IEDs targeted and found?" Attkisson asked.
"Yeah, help the combat units go after the networks that are using IEDs against us," Egland said.
But what really was happening?
"The capability that was being funded was given an unqualified contractor, who failed at even the most basic level to provide the right people, the right resources and the right capability to help our troops deal with the No. 1 threat in Iraq," Egland said.
With American lives at stake, Egland couldn't imagine how a company like MZM got such a crucial contract. His next assignment took him to a place where he could find the answer: The Pentagon.
There, Egland did some digging and found MZM had gotten millions in Defense contracts - courtesy of Rep. Duke Cunningham, R-Calif., in the form of earmarks, grants of money without the normal public review.
As member of the House Intelligence Committee, Cunningham was able to keep the earmarks even more secret than most by making them "classified."
"It was not a merit-based process. It was based on sneaking a large contract to a company that had given millions of dollars in bribes and hundreds of thousands of dollars in political contributions to powerful members of Congress," Egland said.
That's right. To get the sweetheart deals, MZM owner Mitchell Wade had bribed Congressman Cunningham with the "Buoy Toy" yacht, vehicles, antiques, jewelry, cash and fancy property - details revealed when both were prosecuted in a wide-ranging corruption scandal.
The pieces came together when Cunningham and Wade were prosecuted in a wide-ranging bribery scandal. Egland is convinced that the classified earmarks didn't just waste your tax dollars - they cost American lives.
"People died because of this program being done the way it was?" Attkisson asked.
"I really believe so. Absolutely," Egland said. "I mean the troops wanted to target these networks. But without this critical capability, that was given to unqualified people, they weren't able to."
He says the real shame is it could happen again. Today, there's nothing to stop members of Congress from making secret, classified earmarks to favored companies.Read more from Sharyl Attkisson on this story at Couric & Co.
"Nothing that has changed would preclude this from happening again," he said.
Taxpayers bore the cost, but Egland says the price that soldiers paid was even higher.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- If we are going to change Washington we have to get rid of this notion of "its either the Republican's or its the Democrat's who rule Congress and the White House." This is no different than Communism as nothing changes except an internal political war of the so called(Republican)Democracy of the USA with the world their vicious victims because of bad policies built upon greed. Republicans did away with civics courses years ago and do you know what a civics course is and why its important???!!! So okay, we do away with Demo's and Repub's, but how is that going to change the election system and accountability system of our government? Its not. WE have to change election laws and laws of how the individual politician can negotiate and operate in congress along with the lobbyists. Seems jail time doesn't deter them, or, do they actually spend time in jail for breaking the rules or laws? WE Haven't seen or heard of a Politician or lobbyist spend time in the federal pen with regular inmates. Why? because its only a "white collar crime" and by all means it would be horrific if they didn't kill any military personnel, or citizens, or made an entire species extinct during their "donation contracts". "That would mean they actually did something bad and they just couldn't live with themselves now could they...? Sure they can and they do live with themselves, and they do kill citizens and military personnel because we are just an ant farm to them and **** they use RAID on us all the time!" Lets do away with this "White collar crime protection program" permanently. Finally, Why is our military outsourcing to private individuals for Intelligence operations who know nothing about the Military training, resources, techniques, and CIA operations...i.e. Blackwater(CEO fake Navy SEAL)and now this? Military operations MUST and ALWAYS MUST stay within the Military and not private companies !!!
Hell, if Haliberton (if I spelled it wrong so what u know who they are...They have CEO's who become V.P.'s of the USA to shoot their best friend in the face with a shotgun while they're on duty no less...) can squander Millions and Billions from the USA taxpayer and not get shut down or have 40% of its staff incarcerated while and after their main office is moved overseas then what good are we doing allowing money to be spent on private companies who care nothing...nothing...nothing about the safety, security, well being of our troops or our USA?! My mindset as viscious as it is... is very simple... Do what has worked for Thousands of years... Try these bastards for Treason, Execute them, put new people in place who will do everything in their power to do the right thing and well, things pretty much move forward from there. Wipe out the old corruption and hopefully a new one won't form. Yes, its...harsh, Maybe its a communist approach, but how is that different then what is going on now? Have any of us seen an independent make it into the white house or even on the ballot these last several elections? Hey, a new idea... we have inmates who want out of jail so bad, lets really mess up the war and give them the guns and send them all overseas....na...they'd have too much fun and well, the Pentagon might actually make use of it some day... no different then giving money to a corrupted killer such as Dick Cheney...oh did I miss-spell his name too??? - Reply to this comment
- This off topic. Can not find story on CBS. Family killed in San Francisco by illegal alien. San Francisco is a santuary city and knew this killer lived there. San Francisco does not enforce federal law along with other santuary cities. I think any state that has a santuary city should lose federal funding. Why are our laws not being enforced? A whole family killed. Think about it.
- Reply to this comment
- Does any one know that Duke Cunningham was already sentenced to 10 years in prison. Why are you reporting this as a new story? Shame on you Sharyl Atkisson and the CBS evening news for showing your lack of integrity and credibility. Isn''t our soldiers deaths difficult enough without dredging up stories from years ago?
- Reply to this comment
- Hopefully Kucinich adds THESE 2 as well as the ones that ENABLED them to GET AWAY WITH MURDER to that long and growing list of Congressional CHARGES he''s compiling and trying to get THE REST of CONGRESS to TAKE NOTICE and DO SOMETHING ABOUT.
Now if we only had a FEW MORE with similar sets of brass ones. - Reply to this comment
- To Firststate, and all :
Sorry bout that, kept getting msg telling me it didn''t go thru, try later...so I waited and kept trying.
Mea Culpa.
Mea Culpa.
Mea Fricken Culpa! - Reply to this comment
- Having served this country for 20 years I''ve voted on both sides of the aisle. Our Constitution is what has kept America a land of the highest ideals and principles. Yet Bush is too willing to chip away at that document. The framers of our Constitution were facing a far greater enemy than we are in our "war" on terrorism, yet they were willing to die for those principles. Anyone so fearful that he agrees to the slippery slope of eroding ANY of our rights is a coward. Period.
I don''t blame anyone in congress (much) for participating in what I see as graft in BOTH parties, they''ve got to work with the system as it is, in a super-competitive environment. Yes, soldiers die. So do civilians, if you want to look at what''s happening, and not being done, here at home. We have no one to blame but ourselves.
Until we get big money out of Washington politics, we, and our soldiers, will always get what we deserve. Nothing more, and always less.
The only way to do that is to get ALL private money out of federal elections.
ONLY vote for candidates who espouse mandatory public financing of all federal elections. If your party has no one who does, vote Independent and let your party know why. It doesn''t really matter which side is in power - as long as the corporations are running things nothing is really going to change, look at the past 30 years... - Reply to this comment
- MrkusDmetrus
Do you think that your argument is more effective if you repeat it ad nauseum? It sounds like the rove playbook in action. Say it enough times and it becomes true. - Reply to this comment
- Having served this country for 20 years I''ve voted on both sides of the aisle. Our Constitution is what has kept America a land of the highest ideals and principles. Yet Bush is too willing to chip away at that document. The framers of our Constitution were facing a far greater enemy than we are in our "war" on terrorism, yet they were willing to die for those principles. Anyone so fearful that he agrees to the slippery slope of eroding ANY of our rights is a coward. Period.
I don''t blame anyone in congress (much) for participating in what I see as graft in BOTH parties, they''ve got to work with the system as it is, in a super-competitive environment. Yes, soldiers die. So do civilians, if you want to look at what''s happening, and not being done, here at home. We have no one to blame but ourselves.
Until we get big money out of Washington politics, we, and our soldiers, will always get what we deserve. Nothing more, and always less.
The only way to do that is to get ALL private money out of federal elections.
ONLY vote for candidates who espouse mandatory public financing of all federal elections. If your party has no one who does, vote Independent and let your party know why. It doesn''t really matter which side is in power - as long as the corporations are running things nothing is really going to change, look at the past 30 years... - Reply to this comment
- Having served this country for 20 years I''ve voted on both sides of the aisle. Our Constitution is what has kept America a land of the highest ideals and principles. Yet Bush is too willing to chip away at that document. The framers of our Constitution were facing a far greater enemy than we are in our "war" on terrorism, yet they were willing to die for those principles. Anyone so fearful that he agrees to the slippery slope of eroding ANY of our rights is a coward. Period.
I don''t blame anyone in congress (much) for participating in what I see as graft in BOTH parties, they''ve got to work with the system as it is, in a super-competitive environment. Yes, soldiers die. So do civilians, if you want to look at what''s happening, and not being done, here at home. We have no one to blame but ourselves.
Until we get big money out of Washington politics, we, and our soldiers, will always get what we deserve. Nothing more, and always less.
The only way to do that is to get ALL private money out of federal elections.
ONLY vote for candidates who espouse mandatory public financing of all federal elections. If your party has no one who does, vote Independent and let your party know why. It doesn''t really matter which side is in power - as long as the corporations are running things nothing is really going to change, look at the past 30 years... - Reply to this comment
- Having served this country for 20 years I''ve voted on both sides of the aisle. Our Constitution is what has kept America a land of the highest ideals and principles. Yet Bush is too willing to chip away at that document. The framers of our Constitution were facing a far greater enemy than we are in our "war" on terrorism, yet they were willing to die for those principles. Anyone so fearful that he agrees to the slippery slope of eroding ANY of our rights is a coward. Period.
I don''t blame anyone in congress (much) for participating in what I see as graft in BOTH parties, they''ve got to work with the system as it is, in a super-competitive environment. Yes, soldiers die. So do civilians, if you want to look at what''s happening, and not being done, here at home. We have no one to blame but ourselves.
Until we get big money out of Washington politics, we, and our soldiers, will always get what we deserve. Nothing more, and always less.
The only way to do that is to get ALL private money out of federal elections.
ONLY vote for candidates who espouse mandatory public financing of all federal elections. If your party has no one who does, vote Independent and let your party know why. It doesn''t really matter which side is in power - as long as the corporations are running things nothing is really going to change, look at the past 30 years... - Reply to this comment
- Having served this country for 20 years I''ve voted on both sides of the aisle. Our Constitution is what has kept America a land of the highest ideals and principles. Yet Bush is too willing to chip away at that document. The framers of our Constitution were facing a far greater enemy than we are in our "war" on terrorism, yet they were willing to die for those principles. Anyone so fearful that he agrees to the slippery slope of eroding ANY of our rights is a coward. Period.
I don''t blame anyone in congress (much) for participating in what I see as graft in BOTH parties, they''ve got to work with the system as it is, in a super-competitive environment. Yes, soldiers die. So do civilians, if you want to look at what''s happening, and not being done, here at home. We have no one to blame but ourselves.
Until we get big money out of Washington politics, we, and our soldiers, will always get what we deserve. Nothing more, and always less.
The only way to do that is to get ALL private money out of federal elections.
ONLY vote for candidates who espouse mandatory public financing of all federal elections. If your party has no one who does, vote Independent and let your party know why. It doesn''t really matter which side is in power - as long as the corporations are running things nothing is really going to change, look at the past 30 years... - Reply to this comment
- Having served this country for 20 years I''ve voted on both sides of the aisle. Our Constitution is what has kept America a land of the highest ideals and principles. Yet Bush is too willing to chip away at that document. The framers of our Constitution were facing a far greater enemy than we are in our "war" on terrorism, yet they were willing to die for those principles. Anyone so fearful that he agrees to the slippery slope of eroding ANY of our rights is a coward. Period.
I don''t blame anyone in congress (much) for participating in what I see as graft in BOTH parties, they''ve got to work with the system as it is, in a super-competitive environment. Yes, soldiers die. So do civilians, if you want to look at what''s happening, and not being done, here at home. We have no one to blame but ourselves.
Until we get big money out of Washington politics, we, and our soldiers, will always get what we deserve. Nothing more, and always less.
The only way to do that is to get ALL private money out of federal elections.
ONLY vote for candidates who espouse mandatory public financing of all federal elections. If your party has no one who does, vote Independent and let your party know why. It doesn''t really matter which side is in power - as long as the corporations are running things nothing is really going to change, look at the past 30 years... - Reply to this comment
- On January 26, 1998 in a letter to the President the PNAC asked Clinton to invade Iraq and get rid of Saddam Hussein.
Clinton refused their request and they got even. George W. Bush took their agenda and got it done...........Mission Accomplished ! - Reply to this comment
- The Saudi''s and Big Oil are very happy with the Bush & Cheney energy policy which eliminated Iraqi world oil market manipulation. Saddam kept prices down by selling cheap thus preventing the Saudi''s & Big Oil from getting the prices up. Bush & Cheney opened Pandora''s box & now things will never be the same.
- Reply to this comment
- Having served this country for 20 years I''ve voted on both sides of the aisle. Our Constitution is what has kept America a land of the highest ideals and principles. Yet Bush is too willing to chip away at that document. The framers of our Constitution were facing a far greater enemy than we are in our "war" on terrorism, yet they were willing to die for those principles. Anyone so fearful that he agrees to the slippery slope of eroding ANY of our rights is a coward. Period.
I don''t blame anyone in congress (much) for participating in what I see as graft in BOTH parties, they''ve got to work with the system as it is, in a super-competitive environment. Yes, soldiers die. So do civilians, if you want to look at what''s happening, and not being done, here at home. We have no one to blame but ourselves.
Until we get big money out of Washington politics, we, and our soldiers, will always get what we deserve. Nothing more, and always less.
The only way to do that is to get ALL private money out of federal elections.
ONLY vote for candidates who espouse mandatory public financing of all federal elections. If your party has no one who does, vote Independent and let your party know why. It doesn''t really matter which side is in power - as long as the corporations are running things nothing is really going to change, look at the past 30 years... - Reply to this comment
- Having served this country for 20 years I''ve voted on both sides of the aisle. Our Constitution is what has kept America a land of the highest ideals and principles. Yet Bush is too willing to chip away at that document. The framers of our Constitution were facing a far greater enemy than we are in our "war" on terrorism, yet they were willing to die for those principles. Anyone so fearful that he agrees to the slippery slope of eroding ANY of our rights is a coward. Period.
I don''t blame anyone in congress (much) for participating in what I see as graft in BOTH parties, they''ve got to work with the system as it is, in a super-competitive environment. Yes, soldiers die. So do civilians, if you want to look at what''s happening, and not being done, here at home. We have no one to blame but ourselves.
Until we get big money out of Washington politics, we, and our soldiers, will always get what we deserve. Nothing more, and always less.
The only way to do that is to get ALL private money out of federal elections.
ONLY vote for candidates who espouse mandatory public financing of all federal elections. If your party has no one who does, vote Independent and let your party know why. It doesn''t really matter which side is in power - as long as the corporations are running things nothing is really going to change, look at the past 30 years... - Reply to this comment
- Having served this country for 20 years I''ve voted on both sides of the aisle. Our Constitution is what has kept America a land of the highest ideals and principles. Yet Bush is too willing to chip away at that document. The framers of our Constitution were facing a far greater enemy than we are in our "war" on terrorism, yet they were willing to die for those principles. Anyone so fearful that he agrees to the slippery slope of eroding ANY of our rights is a coward. Period.
I don''t blame anyone in congress (much) for participating in what I see as graft in BOTH parties, they''ve got to work with the system as it is, in a super-competitive environment. Yes, soldiers die. So do civilians, if you want to look at what''s happening, and not being done, here at home. We have no one to blame but ourselves.
Until we get big money out of Washington politics, we, and our soldiers, will always get what we deserve. Nothing more, and always less.
The only way to do that is to get ALL private money out of federal elections.
ONLY vote for candidates who espouse mandatory public financing of all federal elections. If your party has no one who does, vote Independent and let your party know why. It doesn''t really matter which side is in power - as long as the corporations are running things nothing is really going to change, look at the past 30 years... - Reply to this comment
- Having served this country for 20 years I''ve voted on both sides of the aisle. Our Constitution is what has kept America a land of the highest ideals and principles. Yet Bush is too willing to chip away at that document. The framers of our Constitution were facing a far greater enemy than we are in our "war" on terrorism, yet they were willing to die for those principles. Anyone so fearful that he agrees to the slippery slope of eroding ANY of our rights is a coward. Period.
I don''t blame anyone in congress (much) for participating in what I see as graft in BOTH parties, they''ve got to work with the system as it is, in a super-competitive environment. Yes, soldiers die. So do civilians, if you want to look at what''s happening, and not being done, here at home. We have no one to blame but ourselves.
Until we get big money out of Washington politics, we, and our soldiers, will always get what we deserve. Nothing more, and always less.
The only way to do that is to get ALL private money out of federal elections.
ONLY vote for candidates who espouse mandatory public financing of all federal elections. If your party has no one who does, vote Independent and let your party know why. It doesn''t really matter which side is in power - as long as the corporations are running things nothing is really going to change, look at the past 30 years... - Reply to this comment
- Having served this country for 20 years I''ve voted on both sides of the aisle. Our Constitution is what has kept America a land of the highest ideals and principles. Yet Bush is too willing to chip away at that document. The framers of our Constitution were facing a far greater enemy than we are in our "war" on terrorism, yet they were willing to die for those principles. Anyone so fearful that he agrees to the slippery slope of eroding ANY of our rights is a coward. Period.
I don''t blame anyone in congress (much) for participating in what I see as graft in BOTH parties, they''ve got to work with the system as it is, in a super-competitive environment. Yes, soldiers die. So do civilians, if you want to look at what''s happening, and not being done, here at home. We have no one to blame but ourselves.
Until we get big money out of Washington politics, we, and our soldiers, will always get what we deserve. Nothing more, and always less.
The only way to do that is to get ALL private money out of federal elections.
ONLY vote for candidates who espouse mandatory public financing of all federal elections. If your party has no one who does, vote Independent and let your party know why. It doesn''t really matter which side is in power - as long as the corporations are running things nothing is really going to change, look at the past 30 years... - Reply to this comment
- Having served this country for 20 years I''ve voted on both sides of the aisle. Our Constitution is what has kept America a land of the highest ideals and principles. Yet Bush is too willing to chip away at that document. The framers of our Constitution were facing a far greater enemy than we are in our "war" on terrorism, yet they were willing to die for those principles. Anyone so fearful that he agrees to the slippery slope of eroding ANY of our rights is a coward. Period.
I don''t blame anyone in congress (much) for participating in what I see as graft in BOTH parties, they''ve got to work with the system as it is, in a super-competitive environment. Yes, soldiers die. So do civilians, if you want to look at what''s happening, and not being done, here at home. We have no one to blame but ourselves.
Until we get big money out of Washington politics, we, and our soldiers, will always get what we deserve. Nothing more, and always less.
The only way to do that is to get ALL private money out of federal elections.
ONLY vote for candidates who espouse mandatory public financing of all federal elections. If your party has no one who does, vote Independent and let your party know why. It doesn''t really matter which side is in power - as long as the corporations are running things nothing is really going to change, look at the past 30 years... - Reply to this comment
Read more from Sharyl Attkisson on this story at Couric & Co.
The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.



