BAGHDAD, July 17, 2008

Iraq To Limit No-Bid Deals With Big Oil

Government Says Controversial Contracts With Major Western Companies Will Be For 1 Year

    • A refinery worker controls a valve on a pipeline at an oil refinery in Basra, 340 miles southeast of Baghdad, Iraq, in this photo taken March 2007. Photo

      A refinery worker controls a valve on a pipeline at an oil refinery in Basra, 340 miles southeast of Baghdad, Iraq, in this photo taken March 2007.  (AP Photo/Hadi Mizban)

    • Iraq's Oil Minister, Hussain al-Shahristani, gestures as he speaks at a press conference in Baghdad, Iraq, Monday, June 30, 2008. Photo

      Iraq's Oil Minister, Hussain al-Shahristani, gestures as he speaks at a press conference in Baghdad, Iraq, Monday, June 30, 2008.  (AP Photo/Khalid Mohammed)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Play CBS Video Video Iraqi Oil Opened To Investment

    Iraq's vast oil reserves have been opened to foreign investment for the fist time since 1972. But as Elizabeth Palmer reports, this will do little to stop the skyrocketing price of crude.

  • Video Not Much Relief From Saudis

    The White House has been leaning on Saudi Arabia to bring relief to the markets by pumping up oil production. Unfortunately, the Saudis didn't offer much help. Alexis Christoforous reports.

  • Video Saudis Up Oil Production

    Saudi Arabia has agreed to increase oil production by more than 200,000 barrels a day, but will it lower U.S. energy prices? Priya David reports.

  • Interactive Iraq: 5 Years At War

    Five years after the U.S.-led invasion, the war wears on.

  • Interactive Gas Prices

    State-by-state averages, tips to improve mileage and a look at what fuels prices at the pump.

(CBS/AP)  The Iraqi government is planning to limit no-bid contracts being negotiated with several major oil companies to one year to avoid overlap with longer-term deals expected to be signed next June, a senior Oil Ministry official said Thursday.

The no-bid contracts have sparked controversy because several major Western firms have been involved in the discussions. There are concerns that granting such contracts to Western oil companies could feed perceptions that U.S.-led forces toppled Saddam Hussein to grab the country's natural resources.

Iraqi officials have stressed that the contracts are only for technical advice and equipment and the companies will receive money in return, not a share of oil production. They say the deals are meant as a stopgap measure to boost oil production until the government completes a bidding process next June on the development of six major oil fields and two natural gas fields.

But some believe the no-bid deals could give the Western firms a bidding advantage in that process, which Oil Minister Hussain al-Shahristani said last month would include 35 foreign companies. The firms he named included seven from the U.S., three from Britain and others from countries like Russia and China.

Five of the oil fields up for longer-term development - Rumaila, Zubair, West Qurna 1, Maysan and Kirkuk - are also included in the no-bid contracts under negotiation, a senior oil official said Thursday. For this reason, the Iraqi government decided to limit those short-term deals to one year instead of two, he said.

"We want to avoid any overlap in this process," the official told The Associated Press, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to the media about this issue.

He said the government will soon ask the majors to submit one-year proposals.

Al-Shahristani was expected to announce the completed contracts at the end of last month. But he said the government was still negotiating the deals because the firms wanted to participate in oil field production rather than simply provide consultancy services for cash.

Neither al-Shahristani nor the senior oil official named the companies involved.

But Iraqi officials have said the government is negotiating short-term technical service contracts with Royal Dutch Shell PLC, BP PLC, Exxon Mobil Corp., Chevron and Total to boost oil production by 500,000 barrels per day.

The U.S. State Department has said it provided advisers to help draft these contracts, a subject that has generated controversy in Washington.

Four Democratic senators, including Senator Carl Levin, on Wednesday called on the State Department's inspector general to investigate whether agency employees encouraged oil deals between Iraq and Western companies.

The State Department insists it only provided technical advice and did not influence the process of granting contracts.

Iraq is currently producing about 2.5 million barrels of oil per day, its highest rate since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003. The government hopes to produce 4.5 million barrels per day by 2013.

Iraq sits on the world's third-largest oil reserves with more than 115 billion barrels, but its oil industry has been battered by years of war and U.N. sanctions.

As for the implications of Iraq's announcement to sign deals with major oil companies, "just announcing it is good news," said Leo Drollas, the senior oil analyst and forecaster at the Center for Global Energy Studies, who added that the move by Iraqi officials had been long-anticipated.

"The announcement would, on its own, without anything else, bring the prices down, the futures prices in particular, because it's a positive event. It will put more oil onto the market," Drollas told CBSNews.com last month, "and more oil is desperately needed."

Violence in Iraq is at its lowest level in four years, allowing a spike in production. But the process of awarding development contracts has been delayed by the inability to finalize a new law on how to divide the country's oil resources. Negotiations over the law have been stalled by political squabbles between the central government and the Kurds, who want more local control over their oil fields.

The Kurdish regional administration in northern Iraq has signed more than 20 oil deals with foreign firms to work in Kurdish-controlled fields since it drafted its own oil and gas law in August 2007.

The Shiite-led Iraqi central government says the deals are invalid with no national oil law in place.

A senior U.S. official in Baghdad said Thursday that Washington still hopes Iraqi lawmakers can pass a new oil law despite the current impasse over Kurdish objections. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to make public statements.



© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Video and Galleries from World

Add a Comment See all 48 Comments
by ubrew12 July 17, 2008 11:54 AM PDT
One month after 9-11, Ray Hunt [texas oil billionaire and Loyal Bushie] was appointed to the Presidents Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board [he also sits on the board of Halliburton]. Their advice? Get Iraqi oil, no matter how many American soldiers it kills.

Now Ray has a no-bid contract to exploit oil from Northern Iraq. He''s not even doing it through the Iraqi government, which Bush wants companies to do, he''s gone around them through the Kurds for higher profits and permanent exploitation rights. The gov''t will let him do it cuz he''s a Bush man.

Bush says the high cost of oil is a matter of ordinary Americans ''putting food on the table''. The truth? Its about texas billionaires being granted official access to advise him to invade Iraq and then reaping massive profits from his doing so, while other Americans try on their new arms and legs.
Reply to this comment
by emelder July 17, 2008 12:00 PM PDT
Good for Iraq ... they SHOULD limit the term of the no-bid contracts to just one year, but the Bush administration will block this move. No way will they allow Iraq sovereignty to apply to their bid-oil buddies. there won''t be any Iraq sovereignty until Barack gets us out.
Reply to this comment
by newsjunky5 July 17, 2008 12:02 PM PDT
"The State Department insists it only provided technical advice and did not influence the process of granting contracts"
---------------------------------

Technical advice such as, "if you don''t go along, a car bomb will go off near you."
Reply to this comment
by deacon20081 July 17, 2008 12:29 PM PDT
Why should they allow No-Bid Deals at all?
Insiders get No-Bid Deals and we see the results all too clearly.
In a Democracy we Bid Jobs to compete with other companies for the same projects. The specifications and plans are usually the same for every bidder and
the most experienced and best company wins. We take the High bid and the Low bid and throw them out.
The highest bidder is excluded for the obvious reason and the Low bidder is counting on "Extra charges" or is intending to provide a lesser quality product.

No-Bid is a Halliburton mainstay.

Reply to this comment
by hermitdave July 17, 2008 12:35 PM PDT
WELL GOLLY GOSH----Who would have thought Uncle Richard and the Neo Cons would have gone to war with Iraq to steal their oil? We all know it was because Saddam was sleeping with Osama. Uncle Richard told us and he never LIES. he he ha ha ho ho
Reply to this comment
by factsearcher July 17, 2008 12:46 PM PDT
I think the american govt is giving the arabs a message:
You''re trying to screw us up...we will look into our interests...we always do!
Reply to this comment
by brianp55 July 17, 2008 12:47 PM PDT
The Chinese companies will be moving in immediately after the 12 month period expires.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad July 17, 2008 12:57 PM PDT
BUSHIT!
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad July 17, 2008 12:57 PM PDT
BUSHIT!
Reply to this comment
by robroydonxlv July 17, 2008 12:59 PM PDT
1
Reply to this comment
by liberalme July 17, 2008 1:10 PM PDT
How can they do that to us??? Look at all we''ve done for them!!!!

This is not going, at all, the way Bush planned, he was "working hard" to get that oil!!
Reply to this comment
by condumbism July 17, 2008 1:28 PM PDT
Bush/McCain want US to believe that the USA can drill its way to cheaper gas prices. If you want cheaper gas, demand BIG US oil sells US drilled oil products within the USA at half the world market rate. Afterall, reason that oil per barell is $140 per on international markets is becaue of the Bush/McCain devalued dollar.
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey July 17, 2008 1:38 PM PDT
[If you want cheaper gas, demand BIG US oil sells US drilled oil products within the USA at half the world market rate. Afterall, reason that oil per barell is $140 per on international markets is becaue of the Bush/McCain devalued dollar.]
[Posted by ConDumbism at 01:28 PM : Jul 17, 2008]

would you agree to this if you were the ceo/president of these major oil cos? would you agree to this if you were their largest shareholder?

why would they sell at half the price ... when they could easily sell it at market price?
Reply to this comment
by condumbism July 17, 2008 1:43 PM PDT
bobnjersey

YOu have verified for all of US the failings of unfettered, deregulated capitalism, a trademark of the Republicon Party. This is also why the Republicons and their obstructionist radical ways will be swept out of Congress en-masse in November.
Reply to this comment
by pmaldona July 17, 2008 1:50 PM PDT
I''m so happy the Iraqi''s are growing a pair and standing up for themselves finally.....OBVIOUSLY THEY DO NOT WANT US THERE! And I''m sure they''re not stupid in that the REAL reason we went there was for their oil....If I were them, I wouldn''t even agree to talk to any US oil company until we''ve left their country.
Reply to this comment
by mbcsmith July 17, 2008 1:57 PM PDT

YOu have verified for all of US the failings of unfettered, deregulated capitalism, a trademark of the Republicon Party. This is also why the Republicons and their obstructionist radical ways will be swept out of Congress en-masse in November.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by ConDumbism at 01:43 PM : Jul 17, 2008



Beats the helll out of your socialism where hard work and innovation is rewarded by a slice of bread and a drink of water from a dirty glass
Reply to this comment
by liberalme July 17, 2008 1:58 PM PDT
I''d like to hear Bushs response to this---the who world has known for years what a fake blow hard Bush is---only about 24% of Americans are surprised to hear it!

Hello!!! Earth to low information voters------
Reply to this comment
by mbcsmith July 17, 2008 1:59 PM PDT
I''''d like to hear Bushs response to this---the who world has known for years what a fake blow hard Bush is---only about 24% of Americans are surprised to hear it!

Hello!!! Earth to low information voters------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by liberalme at 01:58 PM : Jul 17, 2008



Your HATRED blinds you. Vote HATE, vote LIB
Reply to this comment
by liberalme July 17, 2008 2:01 PM PDT
Beats the helll out of your socialism where hard work and innovation is rewarded by a slice of bread and a drink of water from a dirty glass


Posted by mbcsmith at 01:57 PM : Jul 17, 2008

Is that the same kind of "hard work" Bush used to describe being a president as?

It''s hard work lying to America and the world to invade an unarmed country, kill thousands just to get his hands on oil he will probably never see!

Bushs bloody hands.
Reply to this comment
by liberalme July 17, 2008 2:03 PM PDT
Your HATRED blinds you. Vote HATE, vote LIB

Posted by mbcsmith at

Actually I don''t "hate" anyone--I do however feel sorry for ignorant people--for they just "don''t know" I do however have a problem with "stupid" people who DO know but would prefer something else---this "ain''t" going your way huh buddy??
Reply to this comment
by condumbism July 17, 2008 2:07 PM PDT
mbcsmith

The most prosperous countries on earth today are all socialist. The happiest people on earth these days all live in socialist countries. The people with the longest life spans all live in socialist countries. The dumbest industrialized peoples on earth are Americans, especially the parasites that live in the Welfare Southern States
Reply to this comment
by vnveteran72 July 17, 2008 2:17 PM PDT
"The U.S. State Department has said it provided advisers to help draft these contracts, a subject that has generated controversy in Washington".

State Dept. Toady: "OK, just sign right here where it says you relinquish all rights to anything underground in your Country for a period of 1000 years, or till the Oil is gone, whichever comes first".

Malaki: "Bite Me, White Boy".....

Reply to this comment
by rowdywicca July 17, 2008 2:22 PM PDT
mbcsmith

The most prosperous countries on earth today are all socialist. The happiest people on earth these days all live in socialist countries. The people with the longest life spans all live in socialist countries. The dumbest industrialized peoples on earth are Americans, especially the parasites that live in the Welfare Southern States


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by ConDumbism at 02:07 PM : Jul 17, 2008

Your bigotry against southern states becomes you!

What socialist countries would those be? Would you please name them for me?
Reply to this comment
by rf35 July 17, 2008 2:32 PM PDT
I''m so glad I''m moving to England in October. If I extend my tour for an extra year, I could retire there. Surely there are jobs in British radio for a Yank. We have an Aussie on one of our local stations where I live.
Reply to this comment
by drinuk July 17, 2008 2:57 PM PDT
Socialism and Capitalism resemble the clock, they both start at the top, one goes left the other to the right AND both finish up meeting in the same place, at six o.clock. Those winding up the clock get wealthy but all the mechanism gets is a little cheap oil.
Reply to this comment
by drinuk July 17, 2008 3:00 PM PDT
rf35, So you''re looking forward to paying $10 a gallon for gas or do you ride a bicycle ? You must also enjoy living under a socialist government who have blown a fortune a bankrupted the nation.

Have a Nice Day !
Reply to this comment
by d33pthroat1 July 17, 2008 3:04 PM PDT
I''m so glad I''m moving to England in October.
-- Posted by rf35 at 02:32 PM : Jul 17, 2008

Yeah. As if England is any different than the US.
They copy everything the Americans do.

Canada is closer and probably a better choice.
Reply to this comment
by condumbism July 17, 2008 3:08 PM PDT
The American taxpayer is now paying for the unregulated banking industries near collapse under Republicon style failed capitalism. 8 months ago CDs payed 5% and a 30 year fixed mortgage was 5.6%. Today banks pay out 2.5% on CDs and charge 6.9% on a fixed 30 year mortgage. Vote for John McCain and the Republicon criminals for Congress for more of the same, or worse.

Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 July 17, 2008 3:18 PM PDT
Iraq To Limit No-Bid Deals With Big Oil




Amazing! This third world, backwards, three year old country, has the intelligence to LIMIT no-bid contracts, that our own government doesn''t.
Reply to this comment
by punchline3 July 17, 2008 3:27 PM PDT
"Iraq To Limit No-Bid Deals With Big Oil"

Well! That''s un-American!
Reply to this comment
by republic1776 July 17, 2008 5:37 PM PDT
diatreme,
Socialist IS Communism.
Example United Soviet Sccialist''s Republic (USSR)
It does not work.
It''s leads to Hugh Goverment, regimes, supression of human rights!
But... don''t worry, the liberals hatred of America, is still hard at work.
Reply to this comment
by meanbiker July 17, 2008 5:39 PM PDT
http://shock.military.com/Shock/videos.do?displayContent=171940&page=1
Reply to this comment
by republic1776 July 17, 2008 5:52 PM PDT
"Sweden have spent BILLIONS"
Sweden paid trillions in taxes, the Government raped them and gave a token billion back....
You know they pay over 50 percent in taxes?
Reply to this comment
by randynason July 17, 2008 6:17 PM PDT
Good for Iraq. It''s about time that these people stood up to our fascist, corporate dictates. Now, if only our own people had that same courage, we might start to really make some progress.
Reply to this comment
by randynason July 17, 2008 6:20 PM PDT
diatreme,
Socialist IS Communism.
Example United Soviet Sccialist''''s Republic (USSR)
It does not work.
It''''s leads to Hugh Goverment, regimes, supression of human rights!
But... don''''t worry, the liberals hatred of America, is still hard at work.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by republic1776

What are you- in high school and doing your homework online? You should have payed more attention in English class and less attention to being "really cool," in a dark and broody way.
Reply to this comment
by hunterdon6 July 17, 2008 6:32 PM PDT
Iraq,,,,,,,our 51st state.
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 July 17, 2008 7:14 PM PDT
republic1776 said: "You know [Swedes] pay over 50 percent in taxes?"

I KNEW there was a reason they are typically counted among the happiest people on the planet.
Reply to this comment
by gracchus1 July 17, 2008 7:16 PM PDT
Yet another article that presents the precise reason for our illegal invasion of Iraq: oil.
Reply to this comment
by firststate July 17, 2008 9:26 PM PDT
The Iraqis are starting to remind the US state department and the oil companies that they are a sovereign nation. Maybe W didn''t think they were listening when he kept saying that early in the occupation, but they were. Now they want to control their resources and even want a timetable for withdrawal of our troops, just like a real sovereign nation, go figure.
Reply to this comment
by terribletire July 18, 2008 12:17 AM PDT
"There are concerns that granting such contracts to Western oil companies could feed perceptions that U.S.-led forces toppled Saddam Hussein to grab the country''s natural resources." "perceptions"??? I think that that is fact is pretty well established at this point.
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 July 18, 2008 6:40 AM PDT
The Saudi''s and Big Oil are very happy with the Bush & Cheney energy policy which eliminated Iraqi world oil market manipulation. Saddam kept prices down by selling cheap thus preventing the Saudi''s & Big Oil from getting the prices up. Bush & Cheney opened Pandora''s box & now things will never be the same.
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 July 18, 2008 6:44 AM PDT
On January 26, 1998 in a letter to the President the PNAC asked Clinton to invade Iraq and get rid of Saddam Hussein. Clinton refused their request and they got even.

George W. Bush took their agenda and got it done...........Mission Accomplished !
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 July 18, 2008 6:48 AM PDT
The Times of India August 2007 reported : " Iran, Iraq signed an agreement to build pipelines for the transfer of Iraqi crude oil and oil products." Under the deal crude will be refined and sent back to Iraq.

Bush opposed this agreement and wanted the Iraqi Parliment to accept and sign a U.S. designed oil law that would result in huge profits for BIG OIL.

Iraqi oil workers and 63% of Iraqis polled are opposed to the Bush law and prefer a hands off Iraq oil policy.
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 July 18, 2008 9:21 AM PDT
The true intent for the Iraq invasion was to gain control of world oil markets for BIG OIL.

The Saudi''s, US oil interests and British petroleum were tired of Saddam flooding the market with cheaper priced oil and then charging US oil companies more for oil then Russia, France, Germany, China and Korea.

The administration is not interested in what you have to pay at the pump. The bottom line is profit for BIG OIL, which is the reason BIG OIL put up 150 million dollars for the election campaign of G.W. Bush.

Reply to this comment
by libsluv2spit July 18, 2008 7:06 PM PDT
Posted by samsel3 at 09:21 AM : Jul 18, 2008
+ report abuse

************

does this mean you are so upset about this that you stop buying gasoline?
Reply to this comment
by libsluv2spit July 18, 2008 7:08 PM PDT
Yet another article that presents the precise reason for our illegal invasion of Iraq: oil.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by gracchus1 at 07:16 PM : Jul 17, 2008
+ report abuse

the article failed to also state that everytime you pump gas..you condone it..

HAVE YOU CONSERVED YET?
Reply to this comment
by mh4cbs1 July 20, 2008 9:38 AM PDT
You got to give Bush and Cheney credit for trying!

They LIED us into Iraq and have done everything possible to set up permanent US military bases and to secure long term no bid contracts to begin the OIL THEFT.

But they didn''t plan on or expect an Iraqi democracy. They were forced into it by the continued resistance of the Iraqi freedom fighters. How else could they sell an unpopular war after the WMD Lies were exposed?

And now the Iraqis are not the puppet government that the NeoCons had hoped for.

Maliki wants US OUT of Iraq.
Iraqi people want US OUT of Iraq.
American peopoe want US OUT of Iraq.

Only the Corporate Rulers and the remaining brain dead Bush/McCain supporters want US to continue to occupy Iraq to secure the Oil Theft and enrich the Global Oil Corporations.
Reply to this comment
by mh4cbs1 July 20, 2008 9:42 AM PDT
the article failed to also state that everytime you pump gas..you condone it..

HAVE YOU CONSERVED YET?

Posted by libsluv2spit

***********************
The pathetic ''arguments'' of a brain dead Bush/McCain supporter. When their lies and mindless slogans fail, they restort to idiotic statements or personal smears - it happens all the time.
Reply to this comment
See all 48 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs